1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Landscape
  4. Volume 10, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

In the wake of the ‘climate apocalypse’ global discourse, the environmental agenda of the European Green Deal and the overarching objective for the European Union are to deliver a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. European cities are under pressure to reinvent urban environments and develop resilience to environmental risks. This paper looks at semiotic material appearing in Essen, a city in Germany awarded the European Green Capital title. Grounded in the multimodal social semiotic approach and ecolinguistics, the paper investigates strategically emplaced ‘green’ semiotic material which shape environmental values and privilege. The paper illustrates the political economy of city clean-ups which every so often result in questionable environmental choices and fail to alleviate social inequalities. The analysis ultimately shows how semiotic forms of sustainability are evidently implicated in the creation of urban eco-arenas accentuating the socioeconomic stratification and privileges of valorized places.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.23016.kos
2023-10-27
2024-10-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ll.23016.kos
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ll.23016.kos.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ll.23016.kos&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adger, W. N.
    (2006) Vulnerability, Global Environmental Change, 161, 268–281. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, R. J.
    (2017) Investigating Texts about Environmental Degradation: Using Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistic Techniques. InFill, A. & Penz, H. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, (pp.196–210). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315687391‑14
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687391-14 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen, O., Gossling, S., Simonsen, M., Walnuma, H. J., Peeters, P. & Neiberger, C.
    (2010) CO2 emissions from the transport of China’s exported goods. Energy Policy, 381. 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.030
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.030 [Google Scholar]
  4. Angelo, H.
    (2019) The greening imaginary: urbanized nature in Germany’s Ruhr region, Theory and Society, 481: 645–669. 10.1007/s11186‑019‑09361‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09361-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. & Brand, A. L.
    (2018) From landscapes of utopia to the margins of the green urban life, City, 22:3, 417–436. 10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126 [Google Scholar]
  6. Appleyard, D.
    (1979) Urban Trees, Urban Forests: What do they mean?InProceedings of the National Urban Forestry Conference, November 13–16, 1978. Washington: College of Environmental Science and Forestry.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Atanasova, D.
    (2019) Moving society to a sustainable future: The framing of sustainability in a constructive media outlet. Environmental Communication, 13:5, 700–711. 10.1080/17524032.2019.1583262
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1583262 [Google Scholar]
  8. Banda, F. & Jimaima, H.
    (2015) The semiotic ecology of linguistic landscapes in rural Zambia, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19:5, 643–670. 10.1111/josl.12157
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12157 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bednarek, M., Ross, A. S., Boichak, O., Doran, Y. J., Carr, G., Altmann, E. G. & Alexander, T. J.
    (2022) Winning the discursive struggle? The impact of a significant environmental crisis event on dominant climate discourses on Twitter, Discourse, Context & Media, 451. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100564
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100564 [Google Scholar]
  10. Benedict, M. & McMahon, E.
    (2002) Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. Renewable Rsources Journal, 201, 12–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P. & Zelli, F.
    (eds) (2010) Global climate governance beyond 2012: Architecture, agency, and adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139107150
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107150 [Google Scholar]
  12. Born, D.
    (2019) Bearing Witness? Polar Bears as Icons for Climate Change Communication in National Geographic, Environmental Communication, 13:5, 649–663. 10.1080/17524032.2018.1435557
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1435557 [Google Scholar]
  13. Boyce, J. K.
    (2002) The Political Economy of the Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781843766971
     https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843766971 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bulkeley, H. & Stripple, J.
    (2020) Climate Smart City: New Cultural Political Economies in the Making in Malmö, Sweden, New Political Economy.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Checker, M.
    (2011) Wiped Out by the ‘Greenwave’: Environmental Gentrification and the Paradoxical Politics of Urban Sustainability, City and Society, 23:2, 210–229. 10.1111/j.1548‑744X.2011.01063.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2011.01063.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Churkina, G., Grote, R., Butler, T. M. & Lawrence, M.
    (2015) Natural selection? Picking the right trees for urban greening, Environmental Science & Policy, 471, 12–17. 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  17. Crompton, J. L.
    (2001) The Impact of Parks on Property Values: A Review of the Empirical Evidence, Journal of Leisure Research, 33:1, 1–31. 10.1080/00222216.2001.11949928
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2001.11949928 [Google Scholar]
  18. Curtis, D.
    (2020) Using the Visual and Performing Arts to Encourage Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Despard, E.
    (2012) Cultivating Security: Plants in the Urban Landscape, Space and Culture, 15:2,151–163. 10.1177/1206331211430019
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331211430019 [Google Scholar]
  20. Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z. & Shirayama, Y.
    (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science, 359:6373, 270–272. 10.1126/science.aap8826
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dor-Ziderman, Y., Lutz, A. & Goldstein, A.
    (2019) Prediction-based neural mechanisms for shielding the self from existential threat, NeuroImage, 2021. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116080
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116080 [Google Scholar]
  22. Eckerd, A.
    (2010) Cleaning Up Without Clearing Out? A Spatial Assessment of Environmental Gentrification, Urban Affairs Review, 47:1, 31–59. 10.1177/1078087410379720
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087410379720 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ergen, T.
    (2022) Deindustrialization as fact and fiction. Max Planck Society. Available at: https://www.mpg.de/18631468/deindustrialization-as-fact-and-fiction
     [Google Scholar]
  24. European Commission
    European Commission (2019) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal. COM/2019/640
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fahy, D.
    (2020) Energy Humanities: Insights for Environmental Communication. Environmental Communication, 1–5. 10.1080/17524032.2020.1758377
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1758377 [Google Scholar]
  26. FAO
    FAO (2022) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2022–2031. Paris: OECD PublishingAvailable at: 10.1787/f1b0b29c‑en
     https://doi.org/10.1787/f1b0b29c-en [Google Scholar]
  27. Fill, A. & Mühlhäusler, P.
    (eds) (2001) The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment. London, New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Fill, A. & Penz, H.
    (2018) Ecolinguistics in the 21st century. InFill, A. & Penz, H. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, (pp.437–443). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fine, J. C. & Love-Nichols, J.
    (2021) Language and climate justice: A research agenda, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 25:3, 453–473. 10.1111/josl.12469
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12469 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gale, F. P.
    (2018) The Political Economy of Sustainability. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781785368011
     https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785368011 [Google Scholar]
  31. Garcia, C. J. & Proffitt, J. M.
    (2021) Elite Company: Sourcing. Trends in 2014–2017 Prestige Press Climate Change Editorials, Environmental Communication, 15:4, 482–494. 10.1080/17524032.2020.1866635
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1866635 [Google Scholar]
  32. Grote, R., Samson, R., Alonso, R., Amorim, J. H., Cariñanos, P., Churkina, G. & Calfapietra, C.
    (2016) Functional traits of urban trees: air pollution mitigation potential, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14:10, 543–550. 10.1002/fee.1426
     https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1426 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hahn, U. & Berkers, P.
    (2020) Visualizing climate change: an exploratory study of the effectiveness of artistic information visualizations, World Art, 11:1, 95–119. 10.1080/21500894.2020.1769718
     https://doi.org/10.1080/21500894.2020.1769718 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hanhörster, H. & Terpoorten, T.
    (2011) Kleinräumige segregation. InReicher, C., Kunzmann, K. R., Polívka, J., Roost, F., Utku, Y. & Wegener, M. (eds) Schichten einer Region. Kartenstücke zur räumlichen Struktur des Ruhrgebiets, (pp.112–113). Berlin: Jovis.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Heynen, N., Perkins, H. A. & Roy, P.
    (2006) The Political Ecology of Uneven Urban Green Space: The Impact of Political Economy on Race and Ethnicity in Producing Environmental Inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Affairs Review, 42:1, 3–25. 10.1177/1078087406290729
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087406290729 [Google Scholar]
  36. Horsbøl, A.
    (2019) Green conflicts in environmental discourse. A topos based integrative analysis of critical voices. Critical Discourse Studies, 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Howlett, M. & Raglon, R.
    (1992) Constructing the environmental spectacle: Green advertisements and the Greening of the corporate image, Environmental History Review, 16:4, 53–68. 10.2307/3984949
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3984949 [Google Scholar]
  38. Huber, B., Lepenies, R., Quesada Baena, L. & Allgaier, J.
    (2022) Beyond Individualized Responsibility Attributions? How Eco Influencers Communicate Sustainability on TikTok, Environmental Communication, 1–10. 10.1080/17524032.2022.2131868
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2131868 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jones, O. – Cloke, P.
    (2002) Tree Cultures: The Place of Trees and Trees in Their Place. New York: Berg Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kampa, M. – Castanas, E.
    (2008) Human health effects of air pollution, Environmental Pollution, 151: 2, 362–367. 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kidd, C. V.
    (1992) The evolution of sustainability, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 5:1, 1–26. 10.1007/BF01965413
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01965413 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kosatica, M.
    (2022) The Burden of Traumascapes: Discourses of remembering in Bosnia-Herzegovina and beyond. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350134829
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350134829 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kosatica (née Bilkic), M.
    (2018) Emplacing Hate: Turbulent Graffscapes and Linguistic Violence in Post-War Bosnia-Herzegovina, Linguistic Landscape, 4:1,1–28. 10.1075/ll.17011.bil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.17011.bil [Google Scholar]
  44. Koubi, V.
    (2019) Climate Change and Conflict, Annual Review of Political Science, 22:1, 343–360. 10.1146/annurev‑polisci‑050317‑070830
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070830 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T.
    (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Lamb, G.
    (2021) Spectacular sea turtles: Circuits of a wildlife ecotourism discourse in Hawai‘i. Applied Linguistics Review, 12:1, 93–121. 10.1515/applirev‑2019‑0104
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0104 [Google Scholar]
  47. Latané, B., Liu, J. H., Nowak, A., Bonevento, M. & Zheng, L.
    (1995) Distance matters: Physical space and social impact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21:8, 795–805. 10.1177/0146167295218002
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295218002 [Google Scholar]
  48. Laurent, É. & Zwickl, K.
    (eds) (2022) The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of the Environment. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee, K.
    (2021) Urban Public Space as a Didactic Platform: Raising Awareness of Climate Change through Experiencing Arts, Sustainability, 13:5. 10.3390/su13052915
     https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052915 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lefebvre, H.
    [1961] (2002) Critique of Everyday Life, Volume21. London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Luccarelli, M. & Røe, P. G.
    (eds) (2016) Green Oslo: Visions, planning and discourse. London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Machin, D. & Liu, Y.
    (2023) How tick list sustainability distracts from actual sustainable action: the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Critical Discourse Studies, 10.1080/17405904.2023.2197606
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2197606 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mandal, J., Nanfang Yu, Y. Y., Raman1, A. P.
    (2020) Paints as a Scalable and Effective Radiative Cooling Technology for Buildings, Joule, 41: 1–7. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  54. Magnus, R. & Remm, T.
    (2018) Urban ecosemiotics of trees: Why the ecological alien species paradigm has not gained ground in cities?, Sign Systems Studies, 46:2/3, 319–342. 10.12697/SSS.2018.46.2‑3.06
     https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2018.46.2-3.06 [Google Scholar]
  55. Matheney, A., Pérez del Pulgar, C. & Shokry, G.
    (2022) A green capital for all? Austerity, inequalities and green space in Bristol. InAnguelovski, I. & Connolly, J. (eds) The Green City and Social Injustice: 21 Tales from North America and Europe, (pp.49–60). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Mendes, A.
    (2020) Verdant Vernaculars: Corsican Environmental Assemblages, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 30:2, 156–178. 10.1111/jola.12264
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12264 [Google Scholar]
  57. O’Brien, L., De Vreese, R., Kern, M., Sievänen, T., Stojanova, B. & Atmiş, E.
    (2017) Cultural ecosystem benefits of urban and peri-urban green infrastructure across different European countries, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 241, 236–248. 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  58. Otto, A., Göpfert, C. & Thieken, A. H.
    (2021) Are cities prepared for climate change? An analysis of adaptation readiness in 104 German cities. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 261: 35. 10.1007/s11027‑021‑09971‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09971-4 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pace, R., Churkina, G. & Rivera, M.
    (2016) How green is a “Green City”? A review of existing indicators and approaches. IASS Working Paper. Available at: 10.2312/iass.2016.035
     https://doi.org/10.2312/iass.2016.035 [Google Scholar]
  60. Pavlenko, A.
    (2012) Transgression as the norm: Russian in linguistic landscape of Kyiv, Ukraine. InGorter, D., Marten, H. & Van Mensel, L. (eds.) Minority Languages in the Linguistic Landscape, (pp.36–56). Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230360235_3
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360235_3 [Google Scholar]
  61. Pearsall, H. & Eller, J.K.
    (2020) Locating the green space paradox: A study of gentrification and public green space accessibility in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1951. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103708
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103708 [Google Scholar]
  62. Penz, H. & Fill, A.
    (2022) Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow, Journal of World Languages, 8:2, 232–253. 10.1515/jwl‑2022‑0008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0008 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schepelmann, P., Kemp, R., & Schneidewind, U.
    (2016) The Eco-restructuring of the Ruhr District as an Example of a Managed Transition. InBrauch, H., Oswald Spring, Ú., Grin, J., Scheffran, J. (eds) Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace, (pp.593–612). Cham: Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑43884‑9_28
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43884-9_28 [Google Scholar]
  64. Shohamy, E. & S. Waksman
    (2010) ‘Building the nation, writing the past: History and textuality at the Ha’apala memorial in Tel Aviv-Jaffa’. InJaworski, A. & Thurlow, C. (eds) Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, (pp.241–55). London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Söderström, O., Paasche, T. & Klauser, F.
    (2014) Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City, 18:3, 307–320. 10.1080/13604813.2014.906716
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.906716 [Google Scholar]
  66. Staddon, C., Ward, S., De Vito, L., Zuniga-Teran, A., Gerlak, A. K., Schoeman, Y., Hart, A. & Booth, G.
    (2018) Contributions of green infrastructure to enhancing urban resilience, Environment Systenms & Decisions, 381, 330–338. 10.1007/s10669‑018‑9702‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9702-9 [Google Scholar]
  67. Stibbe, A.
    (2015) Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315718071
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718071 [Google Scholar]
  68. Stöckl, H. & Molnar, S.
    (2018) Eco-advertising: The linguistics and semiotics of green(washed) persuasion. InFill, A. & Penz, H. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics, (pp.261–276). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Stroud, C.
    (2016) Turbulent Linguistic Landscapes and the Semiotics of Citizenship. InBlackwood, R., Lanza, E. & Woldemariam, H. (eds), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes, (pp.3–18). London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Swyngedouw, E. & Kaika, M.
    (2008) The Environment of the City…or the Urbanization of Nature. InBridge, G. & Watson, S. (eds) A Companion to the City, (pp.567–580). Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Swyngedouw, E. & Heynen, N.
    (2003) Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale, Antipode, 351, 898–918. 10.1111/j.1467‑8330.2003.00364.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00364.x [Google Scholar]
  72. Themistocleous, C.
    (2020) Multilingual voices of unification in ‘No man’s land’: Evidence from the Linguistic Landscape of Nicosia’s UN controlled buffer zone. Linguistic Landscape, 6:2, 155–182. 10.1075/ll.19030.the
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.19030.the [Google Scholar]
  73. UNEP
    UNEP (2011) Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. A synthesis for policy makers. Available at: www.unep.org/greeneconomy
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Urry, J.
    (2015) Climate Change and Society. InMichie, J., Cooper, C. L. (eds) Why the Social Sciences Matter. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137269928_4
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137269928_4 [Google Scholar]
  75. van Marrewijk, C.
    (2019) Demography and Inequality in China. InS. Brakman, C. van Marrewijk, N. Salike, & P. Morgan (eds), China in the Local and Global Economy, Regions and Cities Series, (pp.243–283). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Van der Heijden, J.
    (2019) Studying urban climate governance: Where to begin, what to look for, and how to make a meaningful contribution to scholarship and practice. Earth System Governance, 11:100005. 10.1016/j.esg.2019.100005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100005 [Google Scholar]
  77. Viard-Crétat, A. & Buffet, C.
    (2017) Climate change, a new ‘buzzword’ for the ‘perpetual present’ of development aid?InAykut, S., Foyer, J. & Morena, E. (eds) Globalising the Climate: COP21 and the climatisation of global debates, (pp.135–152). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315560595‑8
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560595-8 [Google Scholar]
  78. Viippola, V., Whitlow, T., Zhao, W., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Mikola, J., Pouyat, R. & Setälä, H.
    (2018) The effects of trees on air pollutant levels in peri-urban near-road environments, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 301, 62–71. 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.014 [Google Scholar]
  79. Volvach, N.
    (2023) Manoeuvres of dissent in landscapes of annexation. Linguistic Landscape, 9:2, 113–132. 10.1075/ll.22012.vol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.22012.vol [Google Scholar]
  80. Xiao, M. & Myers, P.
    (2022) Pride and Prejudice and Country-of- Origin Ecological Images: The Influence of COO Ecological Image on Consumer Evaluation of Product Greenness and Green Claim Credibility. Environmental Communication, 16:4, 473–489. 10.1080/17524032.2022.2046121
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2046121 [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhou, W.
    (2021) Ecolinguistics: A half-century overview. Journal of World Languages, 7:3, 461–486. 10.1515/jwl‑2021‑0022
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0022 [Google Scholar]
  82. Zimmermann, K. & Lee, D.
    (2021) Environmental Justice and Green Infrastructure in the Ruhr. From Distributive to Institutional Conceptions of Justice, Front. Sustain. Cities, 31:670190. 10.3389/frsc.2021.670190
     https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.670190 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.23016.kos
Loading
Semiotic landscape in a green capital
Linguistic Landscape 10, 136 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.23016.kos
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.23016.kos
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.23016.kos
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): environmental inequalities; global warming discourse; green city; political economy; semiotic landscape; sustainability

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error