1887
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

For many, garbage day functions as a mundane performance of civic and even national selfhood; yet garbage days are also practices with complex spatial and semiotic entanglements. To demonstrate this, I present a visual essay which draws on an ethnographically informed study of garbage day in five Swiss cities. At the intersection of semiotic landscape studies and dispositive analysis, these banal practices constitute biopolitical forms of governance and control. In this setting, waste reveals itself as a language-material formation; this interplay of words — both visible and invisible — and things is central to the distinct meanings and practices of wasting. Rather than approaching garbage bags as passive receptacles or neutral technologies, therefore, they are best understood as performative regimes by which waste is displaced, public space is ordered, and particular subjectivities are produced.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.24020.pel
2024-10-03
2026-07-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agamben, Giorgio
    (2009) ‘What is an apparatus?’: And other essays (David Kishik & Stefan Pedatella, Trans.). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    (2022) Scaling the pandemic dispositive: A multimodal analysis of mask-requirement signs during 2020. Linguistic Landscape, 8(2–3), 131–148. 10.1075/ll.21038.and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21038.and [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander, Catherine, & O’Hare, Patrick
    (2020) Waste and its disguises: Technologies of (un)knowing. Ethnos, 88(3), 419–443. 10.1080/00141844.2020.1796734
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2020.1796734 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barad, Karen
    (2003) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831. 10.1086/345321
    https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bührmann, Andrea D., & Schneider, Werner
    (2008) Mehr als nur diskursive Praxis? Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und methodische Aspekte der Dispositivanalyse. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 33(1 (123)), 108–141. www.jstor.org/stable/20762260
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Björkvall, Anders & Archer, Arlene
    (2021) Semiotics of destruction: Traces on the environment. Visual Communication, 21(2), 218–236. 10.1177/1470357220957375
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357220957375 [Google Scholar]
  7. Calvino, Italo
    (1974) Invisible cities (William Weaver, Trans.). New York: Harvest.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cavanaugh, Jillian R.
    (2017) How the sausage gets made: Food safety and the mediality of talk, documents, and food practices. InJillian R. Cavanaugh & Shalini Shankar (Eds.), Language and materiality: Ethnographic and theoretical explorations (pp.105–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316848418.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848418.006 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2022) Trash talk: Language as waste practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(3), 404–410. 10.1111/josl.12558
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12558 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cavanaugh, Jillian R., & Shankar, Shalini
    (2017) Language and materiality: Ethnographic and theoretical explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316848418
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848418 [Google Scholar]
  11. Foucault, Michel
    (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. (Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, & Kate Soper, Trans., Colin Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Deumert, Ana
    (2022) The sound of absent-presence: Towards formulating a sociolinguistics of the spectre. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(2), 135–153. 10.1075/aral.21039.deu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21039.deu [Google Scholar]
  13. Gille, Zsuzsa
    (2007) From the cult of waste to the trash heap of history: The politics of waste in socialist and postsocialist Hungary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gregson, Nicky, Metcalfe, Alan, & Crewe, Louise
    (2007) Identity, mobility, and the throwaway society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(4), 682–700. 10.1068/d418t
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d418t [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamann, Julian, Maesse, Jens, Scholz, Ronny, Angermuller, Johannes
    (2019) The academic dispositif: Towards a context-centred discourse analysis. InScholz, Ronny (Eds.) Quantifying approaches to discourse for social scientists. Postdisciplinary studies in discourse (pp.51–87). London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑97370‑8_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97370-8_3 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hawkins, Gay
    (2003) Down the drain: Shit and the politics of disturbance. InGay Hawkins & Stephen Muecke (Eds.), Culture and waste: The creation and destruction of value (pp.39–52). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2006) The ethics of waste: How we relate to rubbish. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2007) Waste in Sydney: Unwelcome returns. Publications of the Modern Language Association, 122(1), 348–351. 10.1632/pmla.2007.122.1.348
    https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2007.122.1.348 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hetherington, Kevin
    (2004) Secondhandedness: Consumption, disposal, and absent presence. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 157–173. 10.1068/d315t
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d315t [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones, Rodney H.
    (2017) Surveillant landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 3(2), 149–186. 10.1075/ll.3.2.03jon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.3.2.03jon [Google Scholar]
  21. Karlander, David
    (2019) A semiotics of nonexistence? Erasure and erased writing under anti-graffiti regimes. Linguistic Landscape, 5(2), 198–216. 10.1075/ll.18023.kar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18023.kar [Google Scholar]
  22. Laporte, Dominique
    (2000) History of shit (Radolphe el-Khoury, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Latour, Bruno
    (2005) Reassembling the social: An introduction to the Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Liboiron, Max, & Lepawski, Josh
    (2022) Discard studies: Wasting, Systems, and Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/12442.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12442.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Moore, Sarah A.
    (2012) Garbage matters: Concepts in new geographies of waste. Progress in Human Geography, 36(6), 780–799. 10.1177/0309132512437077
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512437077 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pellanda, Alessandro
    (2021) Recycling privilege: The social semiotics of waste and class in Switzerland. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Bern.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Peltonen, Matti
    (2004) From discourse to ‘dispositif’: Michel Foucault’s two histories. Historical Reflections/ Réflexions Historiques, 30(2), 205–219. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41299305
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Reno, Joshua Ozias
    (2014) Toward a new theory of waste: From ‘Matter out of Place’ to signs of life. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(6), 3–27. 10.1177/0263276413500999
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413500999 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2022) Does waste make language?Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(3), 418–425. 10.1111/josl.12556
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12556 [Google Scholar]
  30. Scollon, Ron, & Scollon, Suzie Wong
    (2003) Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  31. Strasser, Susan
    (1999) Waste and want: A social history of trash. New York: Metropolitan Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Straw, William
    (2010) Spectacles of Waste. InAlexandra Boutros & William Straw (Eds.), Circulation and the City: Essays on urban culture (pp.193–213). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 10.1515/9780773581012‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773581012-009 [Google Scholar]
  33. Thurlow, Crispin
    (2022) Rubbish? Envisioning a sociolinguistics of waste. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(3), 386–403. 10.1111/josl.12559
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12559 [Google Scholar]
  34. Thurlow, Crispin, Pellanda, Alessandro, & Wohlgemuth, Laura
    (2022) The discursive chronotopes of waste: Temporal laminations and linguistic hauntings. Language in Society, 51(5), 819–837. 10.1017/S0047404522000616
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404522000616 [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    (2005) Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Woolgar, Steve, & Neyland, Daniel
    (2013) Mundane Governance: Ontology and accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584741.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584741.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Žižek, Slavoj
    (2009) The plague of fantasies. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.24020.pel
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.24020.pel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discard studies; dispositive; ethnography; semiotic landscape; waste
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error