1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Landscape
  4. Volume 3, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

As semiotic spaces, monuments convey messages through multiple information design modes, including language, materiality and emplacement. As research on semiotic landscape has pointed out (e.g., Shohamy and Waksman 2009 , Abousnnouga and Machin 2010 , Train 2016 ), these messages are often contested in nature and convey competing discourses inherent in the spaces they occupy. This paper explores those competing discourses manifested in a monument dedicated to the 1976 student protest and violent suppression of it by the Thai military and right-wing paramilitary groups. Working within a production of space framework ( Lefebvre 1991 ) and drawing on insights from the grammar of visual design ( Kress and van Leeuwen 2006 ) and nexus analysis ( Scollon and Scollon 2004 ), the paper attempts to show how these contested discourses are reflected in the monument’s historiography as conceived, in its physical appearance and emplacement, and as it is experienced today. The analysis is based on photographic data of the monument and its immediate physical context, published accounts of the events of October 6, and interviews with survivors, commemoration planners, and the monument’s designer.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ll.3.2.01hue
2017-10-06
2024-12-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ll.3.2.01hue
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abousnnouga, G. and Machin, D.
    (2010) War monuments and the changing discourses of nation and soldiery. In A. Jaworski and C. Thurlow (Eds), pp.219–239.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben-Rafael, E.
    (2016)  Introduction . Linguistic Landscape2 (3). 207–210. doi: 10.1075/ll.2.3.001int
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.3.001int [Google Scholar]
  3. Blomaert, J.
    (2013) Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscape: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Committee for the Construction of the Thammasat History of Democracy Monument
    Committee for the Construction of the Thammasat History of Democracy Monument (2000), eds.Six October 1996 Monument. Bangkok: Thammasat University
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferrara, F.
    (2015) The Political Development of Modern Thailand. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107449367
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449367 [Google Scholar]
  6. Garvin, R. T.
    (2016) Multiple ‘ways of telling’ in the LL: Marking the WWII Japanese American Internment Camp at Rohwer, Arkansas, USA. Paper presented at theEighth Linguistic Landscape Workshop at Liverpool University, April.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Guilat, Y. and Espinosa-Ramirez, A. B.
    (2016) The Historical Memory Law and its role in redesigning semiotic cityscapes in Spain: A case study from Granada. Linguistic Landscape2 (3), 247–274. doi: 10.1075/ll.2.3.03gui
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.3.03gui [Google Scholar]
  8. Handley, P. M.
    (2006) The King Never Smiles: A Biography of Thailand’s Bhumibol Adulyadej. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C.
    Eds. (2010) Semiotic Landscape: Language, Image, Space. London and New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Kongkirati, P.
    (2012) Thailand: The cultural politics of student resistance. In M. L. Weiss and E. Aspinall (Eds.). pp.234–241.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T.
    (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Second Edition. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Laothammatat, A.
    (2000) Building the October Heroes Monument: It’s Historical Importance [in Thai]. InCommittee for the Construction of the Thammasat History of Democracy Monument, eds.p.29.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Lefebvre, H.
    (1991) The Production of Space. English translation by D. Nicholson-Smith . Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Lim, E.
    (n.d.). Pridi Banomyong: father of Thai democracy. www.tour-bangkok-legacies.com/pridi-banomyong.html, retrievedFebruary 8, 2017.
  16. Lou, J. J.
    (2016) The Linguistic Landscape of Chinatown: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. Bristol, Buffalo and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Malinowski, D.
    (2015) Opening spaces of learning in the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape: An International Journal1 (1–2), 93–113.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Noobanjong, K.
    (2012) The Rajadamnoen Avenue: Contesting urban meanings and political memories. Journal of Architectural / Planning Research and Studies9 (2), 15–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Rojanaphruk, R.
    (2016, October5). The will to remember: Survivors recount 1976 Thammasat massacre 40 years later. Khao Sod English: An on-line English language news outlet, Retrieved fromwww.khaosodenglish.com/politics/2016/10/05/will-remember-survivors-recount-1976-massacre-40-years-later/, February8 2017:
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Satha-Anand, C.
    (2006) The silence of the bullet monument: Violence and “truth” management, Dunsun-nyor 1948, and Kru-Ze 2004. Critical Asian Studies38. (1), 11–37. doi: 10.1080/14672710600556411
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14672710600556411 [Google Scholar]
  21. Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W.
    (2004) Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (2003) Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203422724
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  23. Shohamy, E. , E. Ben-Rafael , & M. Barni
    (Eds.) 2010) Linguistic Landscape in the City. Bristol: Multingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Shohamy, E. and Gorter, D.
    eds. (2009) Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York and London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Shohamy, E. and Waksman, S.
    (2009) Linguistic landscape as an ecological arena: Modalities, meanings, negotiations, education. In E. Shohamy and D. Gorter , (Eds.). pp.313–331.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Tanabe, S. and C. F. Keyes
    Eds. (2002) Cultural Crisis and Social Memory: Modern Identity in Thailand and Laos. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Train, R. W.
    (2016) Connecting visual presents to archival pasts in multilingual California: Towards historical depth in Linguistic Landscape. Linguistic Landscape2 (3), 223–246. doi: 10.1075/ll.2.3.02tra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.3.02tra [Google Scholar]
  28. Trumper-Hecht, N.
    (2010) Linguistic landscape in mixed cities in Israel from the perspective of ‘walkers’: The case of Arabic. In E. Shohamy , E. Ben-Rafael & M. Barni (Eds). pp.235–251.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Van Leeuwen, T.
    (2005) Introduction to Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. (2006) Towards a semiotic of typography. Information Design Journal + Document Design14, 139–155. doi: 10.1075/idj.14.2.06lee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.06lee [Google Scholar]
  31. Weiss, M. L. and E. Aspinall
    Eds. (2012) Student Activism in Asia: Between Protest and Powerlessness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. doi: 10.5749/minnesota/9780816679683.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816679683.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Winichakul, T.
    (2002) Remembering / silencing the traumatic past: The ambivalent memories of the October 1976 massacre in Bangkok. In S. Tanabe and C. Keyes , Eds., pp.243–283.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2001) “We Do Not Forget the 6 October” The 1996 Commemoration of the October 1976 Massacre in Bangkok. Paper presented at theworkshop on “Imagining the Past, Remembering the Future,” sponsored by the Japan Foundation and the University of the Philippines, Cebu, March 8–10, 15pages.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Wong saga backfires on regime
    Wong saga backfires on regime (2016, October5). The Bangkok Post 2016, p.A1.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.3.2.01hue
Loading
Monument as semiotic landscape
Linguistic Landscape 3, 101 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.3.2.01hue
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.3.2.01hue
/content/journals/10.1075/ll.3.2.01hue
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): contested discourses; historiography; massacre; monuments; multimodality; October 6; student protest; Thailand; Thammasat University

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error