Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2214-9953
  • E-ISSN: 2214-9961
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Most linguistic landscape research to date has focused on how people read and write language in the material world. Much less attention has been paid to the way linguistic landscapes sometimes read and write their inhabitants through technologies like CCTV cameras, intruder alarms, and other aspects of the built environment designed to make people ‘visible’ – what I call surveillant landscapes. This article puts forth a framework for analyzing the surveillant nature of linguistic landscapes based on tools from mediated discourse analysis. It sees surveillant landscapes in terms of the way they communicate practices of surveillance to the people who inhabit them (‘discourses in place’), the kinds of social relationships and social identities that they make possible (‘interaction orders’), and the ways architectures of surveillance come to be internalized by citizens, while at the same time aspects of their behaviors and identities come to be sedimented into their environments (‘historical bodies’). I argue that studies of linguistic landscapes should take more account of the agenitive nature of linguistic landscapes and their increasing ability to recognize and to entextualize what takes place within them, and the consequences of this both on situated social interactions and on broader political and economic realities.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Althusser, L.
    (2008) On ideology. London: Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Albrechtslund, A. , & Dubbeld, L.
    (2002) The plays and arts of surveillance: Studying surveillance as entertainment. Surveillance & Society, 3(2/3). RetrievedJanuary 12, 2017fromojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3502
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Amin, A. , & Thrift, N.
    (2002) Cities: Reimagining the urban. Oxford: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2016) Seeing like a city. Cambridge, UK ; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrejevic, M.
    (2003) Monitored mobility in the era of mass customization. Space and Culture, 6(2), 132–150. doi: 10.1177/1206331203251256
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331203251256 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2005) The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance & Society, 2(4), 479–497.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumann, Z.
    (1993) Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ben-Rafael, E. , Shohamy, E. , Amara, M. H. , & Trumper-Hecht, N.
    (2006) Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 7–30. doi: 10.1080/14790710608668383
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668383 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blommaert, J.
    (2013) Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol : Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Castells, M.
    (2000) The rise of the network society. Oxford ; Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Clarke, R.
    (2014) Persona missing, feared drowned: the digital persona concept, two decades later, Information Technology & People, 27 (2), 182 – 207. doi: 10.1108/ITP‑04‑2013‑0073
    https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2013-0073 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cole, M.
    (2002) Signage and surveillance: Interrogating the textual context of CCTV in the UK. Surveillance & Society, 2(2/3). RetrievedJanuary 12, 2017fromojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3387
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Coleman, R.
    (2005) Surveillance in the city: Primary definition and urban spatial order. Crime, Media, Culture, 1(2), 131–148. doi: 10.1177/1741659005054018
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659005054018 [Google Scholar]
  14. Coleman, R. & Sim, J.
    (2000) “You’ll never walk alone”: CCTV surveillance, order and neo-liberal rule in Liverpool city centre, British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 623–639. doi: 10.1080/00071310020015299
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015299 [Google Scholar]
  15. de Certeau, M.
    (1984) The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dalton, C. M. , & Thatcher, J.
    (2015) Inflated granularity: Spatial ‘Big Data’ and geodemographics. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 1–15. doi: 10.1177/2053951715601144
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715601144 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dovey, K.
    (2010) Becoming places. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Epstein, D.
    (1997) Abject terror: a story of fear, sex and architecture. In N. Ellin (ed.) The architecture of fear (pp.133–142). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Foucault, M.
    (1970) The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1995) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goffman, E.
    (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1963) Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1964), The neglected situation, American Anthropologist, 66: 133–6. doi: 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090 [Google Scholar]
  24. (1983) The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17. doi: 10.2307/2095141
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141 [Google Scholar]
  25. Graham, S. D. N.
    (2005) Software-sorted geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 29 (5), 562–580. doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph568oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph568oa [Google Scholar]
  26. Haggerty, K. D. , & Ericson, R. V.
    (2000) The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–622. doi: 10.1080/00071310020015280
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2006) The new politics of surveillance and visibility. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Halliday, M. A. K. & Mattheison, C.
    (2014) An Introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jones, R. H.
    (2005) Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse. In S. Norris & R. H. Jones (Eds.) Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp.144–154). Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones, R.
    (2009) Inter-activity: How new media can help us understand old media. In C. Rowe and E. Wyss (eds.) New media and linguistic change (pp.11–29). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jones, R. H. & Li, N. C. H.
    (2016) Evidentiary video and “professional vision” in the Hong Kong umbrella movement. Journal of Language and Politics, 15 (5). pp.569–591. doi: 10.1075/jlp.15.5.04jon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.04jon [Google Scholar]
  32. Katz, J. E.
    (2006) Magic in the air: Mobile communication and the transformation of social life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kerfoot, C. , & Hyltenstam, K.
    (2017) Entangled discourses: South-North orders of visibility. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kitchin, R. , & Dodge, M.
    (2011) Code/Space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kitis, D. E. , & Milani, T. M.
    (2015) The performativity of the body: Turbulent spaces in Greece. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3), 268–290. doi: 10.1075/ll.1.3.04kit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.3.04kit [Google Scholar]
  36. Lefebvre, H.
    (1991) The production of space . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  37. Locke, J. L.
    (2010) Eavesdropping: An intimate history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Manovich, L.
    (2006) The poetics of augmented space. Visual Communication, 5(2), 219–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Markus, T. A.
    (1994) Buildings and power: Freedom and control in the origin of modern building types, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Markus, T. A. , & Cameron, D.
    (2002) The words between the spaces: Buildings and language. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203360361
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360361 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mirzoeff, N.
    (2011) The right to look. Critical Inquiry, 37 (3): 473–496. doi: 10.1086/659354
    https://doi.org/10.1086/659354 [Google Scholar]
  42. Monahan, T.
    (2006) Preface. In T. Monahan (Ed.) Surveillance and security: Technological politics and power in everyday life (pp.ix–xi). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Newman, O.
    (1972) Defensible space:. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Norris, S.
    (2004) Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Otter, C.
    (2008) The Victorian eye: A political history of light and vision in Britain, 1800–1910. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226640785.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226640785.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Phillips, D. & Curry, M.
    (2003) Privacy and the phenetic urge: Geodemographics and the changing spatiality of local practice. In D. Lyon (Ed.) Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp.137–152). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sennett, Richard
    (1998) The corrosion of character: the personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Scollon, R.
    (2001) Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203420065
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420065 [Google Scholar]
  49. Scollon, R. , & Scollon, S. W.
    (2003) Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2004) Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Scott, J.
    (1999) Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Shohamy, E. , & Gorter, D.
    (Eds.) (2008) Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wall, T. , & Linnemann, T.
    (2014) Staring down the state: Police power, visual economies, and the ‘war on cameras’. Crime, Media, Culture, 10 (2), 133–149. doi: 10.1177/1741659014531424
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659014531424 [Google Scholar]
  54. Yoshimi, S. , & Hayles, N. K.
    (2009) RFID: Human agency and meaning in information-intensive environments. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(2–3), 47–72.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error