1887
Volume 42, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Motility (sometimes referred to as ‘mobility capital’ or ‘mobility potential’) is a still understudied and underutilised concept in both migration and sociolinguistic literature. Perhaps even more than actual mobility, it can shed an important light on the possible connection between language and migration. In this theoretical article, it will be argued that motility can both be a potential catalyst for language shift, but can in other instances also contribute to language maintenance. Inspired by Fishman’s Graded Intergenerational Disruption Scale (GIDS) and Simon and Lewis’ Expanded Graded Intergenerational Scale (EGIDS), it is assumed that the most important factor in processes of language shift is the attitude of parents, in particular their willingness to transmit their heritage language to their children. This willingness is connected with the perception of the value of the heritage language, which might be, in addition to other factors, influenced by the mobility capital the heritage language might give future generations. The interplay between migrant networks in different countries and the country of origin is key in understanding the parents’ decision-making process. Furthermore, the three main features of motility (access, competence and appropriation) fit quite logically in the already existing EGIDS scale. This article thus argues that motility is a valuable and necessary concept for sociolinguistic research and migration scholars alike.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00002.hou
2018-04-24
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arends‐Tóth, J., & Van De Vijver, F.
    (2003) Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish – Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(2), 249–266.10.1002/ejsp.143
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.143 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourdieu, P.
    (1977) L’économie des echanges linguistiques. Langue Française. 34, 17–34.10.3406/lfr.1977.4815
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1977.4815 [Google Scholar]
  3. (1986) The forms of capital. InJ. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, (pp.241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Castles, S., & Miller, M.
    (2009) The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Çelik, Ç.
    (2015) ‘Having a German passport will not make me German’: Reactive ethnicity and oppositional identity among disadvantaged male Turkish second-generation youth in Germany. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(9), 1646–1662.10.1080/01419870.2015.1018298
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1018298 [Google Scholar]
  6. De Swaan, A.
    (2001) Worlds of the world: The global language system. Malden: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Vroome, T., Verkuyten, M., & Martinovic, B.
    (2014) Host national identification of immigrants in the Netherlands. International Migration Review, 48(1), 76–102.10.1111/imre.12063
    https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12063 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fishman, J.
    (1991) Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gobbo, F.
    (2015) Transnational communication in a ‘glocalized’ world: In search of balanced multilingualism. InI. Koutny (Ed.), Language Communication Information (Special issue on Interlinguistic and Esperanto Studies), 196–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Holmes, J., Roberts, M., & Verivaki, M.
    (1993) Language maintenance and shift in three New Zealand speech communities. Applied linguistics, 14(1), 1–24.10.1093/applin/14.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Houtkamp, C.
    (2014) Integrating language in theories on long-distance movement: Migration vs mobility and the concept of motility. A’dam Multiling, 1(1), 16–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M., & Joye, D.
    (2004) Motility: Mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), 745–756.10.1111/j.0309‑1317.2004.00549.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis, P. & Simon, G.
    (2010) Assessing endangerment: Expanding Fishman’s GIDS. Romanian Review of Linguistics, 55(2), 103–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Massey, D., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouanouci, A., Pellegrimo, A., & Taylor, E.
    (2008) Worlds in motion: Understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Milroy, L.
    (1980) Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2002) Introduction: Mobility, contact and language change – Working with contemporary speech communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 3–15.10.1111/1467‑9481.00174
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00174 [Google Scholar]
  17. Putnam, R.
    (2007)  E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.10.1111/j.1467‑9477.2007.00176.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Sonntag, S. & Cardinal, L.
    (Eds.) (2015) State traditions and language regimes. Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Stahl, C.
    (1993) Explaining international migration. InC. Stahl, R. Ball, C. Inglis, & P. Gutman. (Eds.), Global Population Movements and their Implications for Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stoessel, S.
    (2002) Investigating the role of social networks in language maintenance and shift. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 153, 93–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Turkenburg, M.
    (2001) Onderwijs in allochtone levende talen: Een verkenning in zeven gemeenten. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR)
    Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR) (1989) Allochtonenbeleid. SDU; ’s-Gravenhage
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Website Volkskrant
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00002.hou
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00002.hou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error