1887
Volume 41, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article explores the shifting relations that took place from the last decades of the 19th to the first years of the 20th century between two of the most innovative language movements of the time: the spelling reform and the artificial language movements. The article focuses on the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and France. Although both movements shared a similar language ideology which run counter to the organicist perception of language and emphasized its democratic function, the article shows how the shifting political environment in which they operated affected their relation. The article identifies three stages. In a first stage, and convinced that the reform of the spelling and the promotion of an artificial, neutral language were not mutually exclusive projects, the spelling reformers were favorably inclined towards artificial language projects. In a second stage relations began to skew when some reformers advocated for the “natural Esperanto” solution, which implied the promotion of a small language to the status of the international lingua franca. In the last stage, when nationalist sentiments and international rivalries mounted, the spelling reformers broke ties with the artificial language movement and worked to improve as much as possible the international standing of their own languages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00007.gar
2018-02-19
2018-12-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercrombie, D.
    (1965) Isaac Pitman. InStudies in phonetics and linguistics (pp.92–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ammon, U.
    (2001) Entwicklungen des Deutschunterrichts in nicht-deutschsprachigen Ländern. In Gerhard Helbig , Lutz Götze , Gert Henrici , and Hans-Jürgen Krumm (Eds.). Deutsch als Fremdsprache: ein internationales Handbuch (pp.68–83). Berlin: de Gruyter,
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanke, D.
    (1985) Internationale Plansprachen. Eine Einfuhrung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blommaert, J.
    (Ed.) (1999) Language ideological debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110808049
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808049 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bramann, K-W.
    (1987) Der Weg zur heutigen Rechtschreibnorm. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cram, D. , & Maat, J.
    (2001) George Dalgarno on universal language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dauzat, A.
    (1912) La défense de la langue francaise. Paris: Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eble, A.
    (2008) Die Sionsharfe, eine katholische Zeitschrift fur christliche Poesie. Prälat Schleyer Jahrbuch 2008, 29–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Egger, A.
    (1870) Die Reformbestrebungen auf dem Gebiete der deutschen RechtschreibungWien: Holder.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, A.
    (1888) On the conditions of a universal language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 1888, 59–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Forster, P.
    (1982) The Esperanto movement. The Hague: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110824568
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110824568 [Google Scholar]
  12. Garvía, R.
    (2015) Esperanto and its rivals. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press. doi: 10.9783/9780812291278
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812291278 [Google Scholar]
  13. Glaeser, K.
    (1852) The Spelling Reform. Die Reform der englischen Orthographie auf Grund des von Pitman und Ellis erfundenen phonetishen-Alphabets. Leipzig: Coldits.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Haupenthal, R.
    (2008) Über die Startbedingungen zweier Plansprachen. Prälat Schleyer Jahrbuch 2008, 56–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Henderson, F. , & Poole, W.
    (2001) General introduction. InFrancis Lodwick On language, theology, and utopia (pp.1–53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Heselwood, B.
    (2013) Phonetic transcription in theory and practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748640737.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748640737.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hobsbawm, E.
    (1990) Nations and nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Iriye, A.
    (2002) Global community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, S.
    (2005) Spelling trouble? Language, ideology and the reform of German orthography. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kamusella, T.
    (2008) The politics of language and nationalism in modern central Europe. New York: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Keller, M.
    (1991) Ein Jahrhundert Reformen der französischen Orthographie. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kniele, R.
    (1989 [1889]) Das erste Jahrzehnt der Weltsprache Volapük, edited by Reinhard Haupenthal . Saarbrüken: Iltis.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Küppers, H-G.
    (1984) Orthographiereform und Öffentlichkeit. Düsseldorf: Swann.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Large, A.
    (1985) The artificial language movemen. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Macmahon, M. K. C.
    (1986) The International Phonetic Association: The first 100 years. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 16, 30–38. doi: 10.1017/S002510030000308X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002510030000308X [Google Scholar]
  26. Martin, A.
    (1889) Volapük und Stenographie. Rund um die Welt (November1 1889), 225–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MacMillan, M.
    (2103) The war that ended peace. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Michaelis, G.
    (1854) Die Vereinfachungen der deutschen Rechtschreibung vom Standpunkte der Stolzeschen Stenographie beleuchtet. Berlin: F. Duncker.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Nasaw, D.
    (2008) Andrew Carnegie. New York: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nerius, D.
    (2000) Die Rolle der II. Orthographischen Konferenz (1901) in der Geschichte der deutschen Rechtschreibung, Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie, 119, 30–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Portebois, Y.
    (2003) La réforme de l’orthographie, une affaire d’État. Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 25, 71–85. doi: 10.3406/hel.2003.2113
    https://doi.org/10.3406/hel.2003.2113 [Google Scholar]
  32. Salmon, V.
    (1988) The evolution of Dalgarno’s Ars signorum . In V. Salmon , The study of language in 17th century England. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sihols.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.17 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1996a) Effort and achievement in 17th century linguistic dcholarship. In V. Salmon , Language and society in early modern England (pp.3–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sihols.77
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.77 [Google Scholar]
  34. (1996b) William Bedell and the universal language movement in 17th century Ireland. In V. Salmon , Language and society in early modern England (pp.99–111). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sihols.77
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.77 [Google Scholar]
  35. (1996c) Thomas Harriot (1560–1621) and the English origins of Algokian linguistics. In V. Salmon , Language and society in early modern England (pp.143–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sihols.77
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.77 [Google Scholar]
  36. Sauer, W. , & lmut Glück, H.
    (1995) Norms and reforms: Fixing the form of the language. In P. Stevenson (Ed.), The German language and the real world (pp.69–95). London: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schaefer, M.
    (1981) Der Weg zur deutschen Einheitsorthographie vom Jahre 1870 bis zum Jahre 1901. Sprachwissenschaft, 6, 391–438.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shenton, H.
    (1933) Cosmopolitan conversation. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tauber, A.
    (1958) Spelling reform in the United States. Unpublished dissertation. Columbia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Veblen, T.
    (1994 [1899]) The theory of the leisure class. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Weber, E.
    (1976) Peasants into Frenchmen: The modernization of rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Woolard, K. , & Schieffelin, B.
    (1994) “Language ideology,” Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00007.gar
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error