Volume 42, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Previous work has examined the potential of Esperanto as a pedagogical tool in classroom foreign language learning in England, where limited language input of sometimes as little as one hour per week is the norm. The work reviewed here focuses on child learners aged 6 to 12 and was carried out between 2006 and 2016. Two Esperanto-based language awareness programmes have provided primarily descriptive insights, suggesting that learning Esperanto may result in greater metalinguistic awareness and more positive attitudes to other languages and cultures. However, the language awareness programmes were implemented without matched comparison groups and therefore could not reveal whether the learning of Esperanto would lead to different results than the learning of other languages. Classroom-based research that included matched comparison groups has sought to address this issue. Specifically, three studies investigated the questions of whether learning Esperanto as opposed to learning other languages would help enhance children’s metalinguistic awareness and thus contribute in turn to more successful learning in a limited-input classroom context. On the one hand, results indicate that for novice child learners, Esperanto was easier to learn than French, and that learning Esperanto may have a levelling effect that compensates for individual differences between children. On the other hand, the findings also show that these apparent advantages of Esperanto did not translate into measurably greater benefits for the development of metalinguistic awareness, or greater subsequent success in learning another foreign language. Moreover, learning Esperanto could not compensate for low language learning aptitude. In view of these sobering results, a number of proposals are made on how to take forward the research agenda. These proposals include further research into the potential benefits of using form-focused instruction (based on any language) with children as well as the effects of learning Esperanto in novice adult learners.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, J. R.
    (2005) Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, C.
    (2006) Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (4th ed.). Clevedon: Mutilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barton, A., Bragg, J., & Serratrice, L.
    (2009) ‘Discovering language’ in primary school: An evaluation of a language awareness programme. Language Learning Journal, 37(2), 145–164.10.1080/09571730902928029
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730902928029 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bialystok, E.
    (2001) Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605963
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605963 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bialystok, E., Peets, K., & Moreno, S.
    (2014) Producing bilinguals through immersion education: Development of metalinguistic awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 177–191.10.1017/S0142716412000288
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000288 [Google Scholar]
  6. Birdsong, D.
    (1989) Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978‑3‑642‑74124‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74124-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bishop, A. J.
    (1997) EKPAROLI project report 1994–1997. web.archive.org/web/20040301110024/www.education.monash.edu.au/projects/esperanto/Ekrep97.htm (15 July 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bouffard, L., & Sarkar, M.
    (2008) Training 8-year-old immersion students in metalinguistic analysis: An innovation in form-focused pedagogy. Language Awareness, 17(1), 3–24.10.2167/la424.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/la424.0 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M.
    (2002) Modern language aptitude test – Elementary: MLAT-E. Rockville, MD: Second Language Testing Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Corsetti, R., & LaTorre, M.
    (1995) Quale lingua prima. Language Problems and Language Planning, 19, 26–46.10.1075/lplp.19.1.02cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.19.1.02cor [Google Scholar]
  11. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2009) The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, N. C.
    (1994) Consciousness in second language learning: Psychological perspectives on the role of conscious processes in vocabulary acquisition. AILA Review, 11, 37–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R.
    (2004) The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227–275.10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00255.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00255.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Erlam, R.
    (2005) Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 147–171.10.1191/1362168805lr161oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr161oa [Google Scholar]
  15. Fantini, A., & Reagan, T.
    (1992) Esperanto and education: Toward a research agenda. dok.esperantic.org/f-r1.htm8 July 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fisher, A.
    (1921) Modern languages by way of Esperanto. Modern Languages, 5(6), 179–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Formaggio, E.
    (1990) Lerneja eksperimento pri lernfacileco kaj transfero en la fremdlingvoinstruado. Internacia Pedagogia Revuo, 20, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gombert, J. E.
    (1992) Metalinguistic development. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Halloran, J. H.
    (1952) A four year experiment in Esperanto as an introduction to French. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 22(3), 200–204.10.1111/j.2044‑8279.1952.tb02826.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1952.tb02826.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Hanan, R.
    (2015) The effectiveness of explicit grammar instruction for the young foreign language learner: A classroom-based experimental study. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harley, B.
    (1998) The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. InC. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.156–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hulstijn, J. H.
    (2005) Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129–140.10.1017/S0272263105050084
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050084 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones, N., Barnes, A., & Hunt, M.
    (2005) Thinking through languages: A multi-lingual approach to primary school languages. Language Learning Journal, 32(1), 63–67.10.1080/09571730585200201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730585200201 [Google Scholar]
  24. Karmiloff, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A.
    (2002) Pathways to language: From fetus to adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lichtman, K.
    (2013) Developmental comparisons of implicit and explicit language learning. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 93–108.10.1080/10489223.2013.766740
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2013.766740 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2016) Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners?Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 707–730.10.1017/S0305000915000598
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000598 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lodge, O.
    (2004) School teaching and school reform. London: Elibron Classics. Original publication 1905.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Markarian, R.
    (1964) The educational value of Esperanto teaching in the schools. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Masson, H.
    (2006) Quel parti la language française peut-elle tirer de la défense et de l’illustration de l’espéranto?La Informilo, 133, 25–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Maxwell, D.
    1988 On the acquisition of Esperanto. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 51–61.10.1017/S0272263100006951
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100006951 [Google Scholar]
  31. Milton, J. & Alexiou, T.
    (2006) Language aptitude development in young learners. InC. Abello-Contesse, R. Chacón-Beltrán, M. D. López-Chiménez & M. del Mar Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Age in L2 acquisition and teaching (pp.177–192). Oxford: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Porter, A.
    (2014) An early start to French literacy: Learning the spoken and written word simultaneously in English primary schools. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rodríguez, S., Luis, H., & Roehr-Brackin, K.
    (2016) Language learning aptitude and working memory as predictors of instructed adult L2 learners’ explicit and implicit L2 knowledge. Paper presented atthe Cognitive Approaches to Language Pedagogy 2 conference, Basel, Switzerland, 10–11 June.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Roehr, K.
    (2012) The Springboard to Languages evaluation project: a summary report. InA. Tellier (Ed.), Esperanto as a starter language for child second-language learners in the primary school (pp.23–34). Stoke-on-Trent: Esperanto UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Roehr, K., & Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A.
    (2009) The status of metalinguistic knowledge in instructed adult L2 learning. Language Awareness, 18(2), 165–181.10.1080/09658410902855854
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410902855854 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schmidt, R. W.
    (2001) Attention. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003 [Google Scholar]
  37. Serrano, R.
    (2011) From metalinguistic instruction to metalinguistic knowledge, and from metalinguistic knowledge to performance in error correction and oral production tasks. Language Awareness, 20(1), 1–16.10.1080/09658416.2010.529911
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.529911 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N.
    (2009) Long-term crosslinguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning, 59(1), 203–243.10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00504.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00504.x [Google Scholar]
  39. (2011) Subcomponents of second-language aptitude and second-language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 253–273.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01176.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01176.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Svalberg, A. M. -L.
    (2007) Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40(4), 287–308.10.1017/S0261444807004491
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004491 [Google Scholar]
  41. Symoens, E.
    (1989) The socio-political, educational and cultural roots of Esperanto. Antwerpen: Internacia Ligo de Esperantistaj Instruistoj.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (1992) Al nova internacia lingvopolitiko: La propedeŭtika valoro de Esperanto (Vol.28–29EEsperanto-Dokumento). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tellier, A.
    (2013) Developing a measure of metalinguistic awareness for children aged 8–11. InK. Roehr and G. A. Gánem-Gutiérrez (Eds.), The metalinguistic dimension in instructed second language learning (pp.15–43). London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2015) Metalinguistic awareness and foreign language learning in primary school: A classroom study with children aged 8 to 9 years. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (Ed.) (2012) Esperanto as a starter language for child second-language learners in the primary school. Stoke-on-Trent: Esperanto UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K.
    (2013a) The development of language learning aptitude and metalinguistic awareness in primary-school children: A classroom study. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 62(1), 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2013b) Metalinguistic awareness in children with differing language learning experience. EuroSLA Yearbook, 13, 81–108.10.1075/eurosla.13.06tel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.13.06tel [Google Scholar]
  48. (2017) Raising children’s metalinguistic awareness to enhance classroom second language learning. InM. del P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp.22–48). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783098118‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098118-004 [Google Scholar]
  49. Thorndike, E. L., & Kennon, L.
    (1927) Progress in learning an auxiliary language: A report. New York, NY: Institute of Educational Research, Columbia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tinsley, T., & Board, K.
    (2016) Language trends 2015/16: The state of language learning in primary and secondary schools in England. British Council. Reading: Education Development Trust. 51. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/language_trends_survey_2016_0.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. White, J., & Ranta, L.
    (2002) Examining the interface between metalinguistic task performance and oral production in a second language. Language Awareness, 11(4), 259–290.10.1080/09658410208667060
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667060 [Google Scholar]
  52. White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P., & Ranta, L.
    (1991) Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 416–432.10.1093/applin/12.4.416
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.416 [Google Scholar]
  53. Williams, N.
    (1965a) A language teaching experiment. Canadian Modern Language Review, 22, 26–28. 10.3138/cmlr.22.1.26
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.22.1.26 [Google Scholar]
  54. (1965b) Report on the teaching of Esperanto from 1948 to 1964. Manchester: Denton Egerton Park County School.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error