1887
Volume 44, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, we present a framework for the analysis of effects of language policies on the competition between languages. At the core of this framework is a language competition model that takes into account four pivotal factors for the evolution of the linguistic composition of a society: intergenerational language transmission, formal language education, adult language learning and migration. In contrast to the majority of models available in the literature, our model operates with parameters that can be estimated from empirical socio-linguistic data. It allows the reconstruction of past and simulate future dynamics. Language policies can be modeled as changes in model parameters. Therefore, projections derived from the model can be utilized to compare the effects of different policy options. We use Basque and Spanish within the Basque Autonomous Community in Spain to illustrate the application of the model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00055.tem
2020-07-01
2020-08-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrams, D. M., & Strogatz, S. H.
    (2003) Linguistics: Modelling the dynamics of language death. Nature, 424(6951), 900–900.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Basque Government
    Basque Government (2008) Fourth Sociolinguistic Survey 2006 (Tech. Rep.). Vitoria-Gasteiz.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Basque Government
    Basque Government (2013) Fitth Sociolinguistic Survey 2011 (Tech. Rep.). Vitoria-Gasteiz.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cassels Johnson, D.
    (2013) Language Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V.
    (2009) Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of modern physics, 81(2), 591.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Eustat
    Eustat (2014) Panorámica Demográfica 2014 (Tech. Rep.). Donostia-San Sebastian: Instituto Vasco de Estadística.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fernando, C., Valijärvi, R.-L., & Goldstein, R. A.
    (2010) A model of the mechanisms of language extinction and revitalization strategies to save endangered languages. Human biology, 82(1), 47–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gardner, N.
    (2002) Language policy for Basque in education. Submission to the Education and Lifelong Learning Committee of the National Assembly of Wales.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gazzola, M.
    (2014) The Evaluation of Language Regimes: Theory and application to multilingual patent organisations (Vol.3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gobierno Vasco
    Gobierno Vasco (2003) Bases para una mayor eficacia y mejora de la calidad de la euskaldunización y alfabetización de adultos (Tech. Rep.). Vitoria-Gasteiz.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gobierno Vasco
    Gobierno Vasco (2008) Transmisión intergeneracional del euskera en la CAV. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gobierno Vasco, Gobierno de Navarra, & Euskararen erakunde publikoa-Office public de la langue basque
    Gobierno Vasco, Gobierno de Navarra, & Euskararen erakunde publikoa-Office public de la langue basque (2016) Vi encuesta sociolingüística: Comunidad autónoma de euskadi (Tech. Rep.). Donostia-San Sebastián.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gong, T., Shuai, L., & Zhang, M.
    (2014) Modelling language evolution: Examples and predictions. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(2), 280–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Grin, F.
    (1999) Economics. InJ. A. Fishman (Ed.), Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity (pp.9–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2003) Language planning and economics. Current issues in language planning, 4(1), 1–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Houle, R., & Corbeil, J.-P.
    (2017) Language Projections for Canada, 2011 to 2036 (Tech. Rep.). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ISEI-IVEI
    ISEI-IVEI (2005) Level B2 in Basque at the end of obligatory education (Tech. Rep.). Bilbao.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. John, A.
    (2016) Dynamic Models of Language Evolution: The Economic Perspective. InV. Ginsburgh & S. Weber (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook Economics and Language (pp.61–100). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Minett, J. W., & Wang, W. S.
    (2008) Modelling endangered languages: The effects of bilingualism and social structure. Lingua, 118(1), 19–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Morrill, R. L.
    (2016) On the measure of geographic segregation. Geography research forum, 11, 25–36. Retrieved2016-02-22, fromraphael.geography.ad.bgu.ac.il/ojs/index.php/GRF/article/view/91
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sabourin, P., & Bélanger, A.
    (2015) Microsimulation of Language Dynamics in a Multilingual Region with High Immigration. International Journal of Microsimulation, 8(1), 67–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Templin, T., Seidel, A., Wickström, B.-A., & Feichtinger, G.
    (2016) Optimal language policy for the preservation of a minority language. Mathematical Social Sciences (81), 8–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wickström, B.-A.
    (2005) Can Bilingualism be Dynamically Stable?: A Simple Model of Language Choice. Rationality and Society, 17, 81–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zalbide, M., & Cenoz, J.
    (2008) Bilingual education in the Basque Autonomous Community: Achievements and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 21(1), 5–20.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00055.tem
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00055.tem
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): language competition models , language policy evaluation and minority language
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error