1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language Problems and Language Planning
  4. Volume 47, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 47, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Many small languages are in danger of extinction. How to stop and reverse this process is an important topic in the sociolinguistic literature. In addition to the revitalization of languages, there are also some examples of vitalizing (bringing to use) “new” languages, for example the introduction of (modern Hebrew) in Palestine/Israel. Generally speaking, for a language to be used, no matter which language, the users must find it attractive and useful. At least two factors are important here: the value attributed to the language by its users as a means of communication and as a carrier of culture and identity. It is assumed that these factors can be influenced by language-policy measures.

The impact of various measures on the vitality of the language is an empirical matter. However, one can draw some general conclusions regarding which measures are sensible in order to vitalize or revitalize which languages when the financial resources of the policy-maker are limited. In this introductory text to the theme issue, we apply the methodology of cost-effectiveness analysis to discuss the connection between the types of the policy measures employed and characteristics of the language communities addressed, such as size, social status, and residential patterns. The cost-effectiveness ratio of street signs in a minority language might, for instance, be higher for a community spread over a whole country than for a community of the same size concentrated in one geographically limited jurisdiction. On the other hand, a decision to publish the texts of laws and decrees of a country in a minority language will have approximately the same effect for both types of minorities. The articles in this special issue of LPLP address and evaluate different types of policy measures for different linguistic minorities and illustrate important aspects of the main questions in this paper.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00102.wic
2024-01-08
2024-12-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00102.wic
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blanke, D.
    (1985) Internationale Plansprachen: Eine Einführung. Akademie-Verlag. 10.1515/9783112577141
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112577141 [Google Scholar]
  2. Boadway, R., & Shah, A.
    (2009) Fiscal federalism: Principles and practices of multiorder governance. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511626883
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626883 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cenoz, J.
    (2008) Achievements and challenges in bilingual and multilingual education in the Basque Country. AILA Review, 211, 13–30. 10.1075/aila.21.03cen
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.21.03cen [Google Scholar]
  4. Eberhard, D. M., Simmons, G. F., & Fennig, Ch. D.
    (Editors) (2022) Ethnologue: Languages of the world (25th edition). SIL International. www.ethnologue.com
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Fishman, J. A.
    (1991) Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Multilingual Matters Ltd. 10.21832/9781800418097
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800418097 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gazzola, M., Hahm, S., & Wickström, B.-A.
    (2018) Sind Fremdsprachenkenntnisse mit dem Einkommen und der Beschäftigung verbunden? Empirische Evidenz aus Deutschland und aus der Welt. InC. R. Brosch & S. Fiedler (Editors), Jahrbuch der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik 2018 (Pages55–78). Leipziger Universitätsverlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Ginsburgh, V. A., & Prieto-Rodriguez, J.
    (2011) Returns to foreign languages of native workers in the EU. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(3), 599–618. 10.1177/001979391106400309
     https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391106400309 [Google Scholar]
  8. Grin, F.
    (1992) Towards a threshold theory of minority language survival. Kyklos, 45(1), 69–97. 10.1111/j.1467‑6435.1992.tb02108.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1992.tb02108.x [Google Scholar]
  9. (1993) The relevance of thresholds in language shift and reverse language shift: A theoretical examination. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 141, 375–392. 10.1080/01434632.1993.9994543
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1993.9994543 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2016) Challenges of minority languages. InV. A. Ginsburgh & S. Weber (Editors), The Palgrave handbook of economics and language (Pages616–658). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑32505‑1_22
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-32505-1_22 [Google Scholar]
  11. Grin, F., & Vaillancourt, F.
    (2002) Minority self-governance in economic perspective. InK. Gál (Editor), Minority governance in Europe (Pages73–86). LGI Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Harshav, B.
    (1993) Language in time of revolution. University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hinton, L., Huss, L., & Roche, G.
    (Editors) (2018) The Routledge handbook of language revitalization. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315561271
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561271 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hüning, M., Vogl, U., & Moliner, O.
    (Editors) (2012) Standard languages and multilingualism in European history. John Benjamins. 10.1075/mdm.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/mdm.1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, A. H., Brown, D. S., & Dunn, M. H.
    (2015) Minority language recognition and trust: Evidence from twenty-five democracies. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 111, 137–162.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Liwiński, J.
    (2019) The wage premium from foreign language skills. Empirica, 46(4), 691–711. 10.1007/s10663‑019‑09459‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-019-09459-0 [Google Scholar]
  17. Marten, H. F.
    (2016) Sprach(en)politik: Eine Einführung. Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Reshef, Y.
    (2013) Revival of Hebrew: Grammatical structure and lexicon. InG. Khan (Editor), Encyclopedia of Hebrew language and linguistics (Pages397–405, Volume31). Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Templin, T., Seidl, A., Wickström, B.-A., & Feichtinger, G.
    (2016) Optimal language policy for the preservation of a minority language. Mathematical Social Sciences, 811, 8–21. 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2016.03.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2016.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  20. Templin, T., & Wickström, B.-A.
    (2024) Language competition models. InM. Gazzola, F. Grin, L. Cardinal, & K. Heugh (Editors), The Routledge handbook of language policy and planning (Pages66–86). Routledge. /10.4324/9780429448843‑5
     https://doi.org//10.4324/9780429448843-5 [Google Scholar]
  21. UNESCO
    UNESCO (2011) UNESCO’s language vitality and endangerment methodological guideline: Review of application and feedback since 2003. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Wexler, P.
    (1990) The schizoid nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic language in search of a Semitic past. Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Wickström, B.-A.
    (2005) Can bilingualism be dynamically stable? A simple model of language choice. Rationality and Society, 27(1), 81–115. 10.1177/1043463105051776
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463105051776 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2012) Language as a renewable resource: Import, dissipation, and absorption of innovations. International Journal of Computational Linguistics, 3(1), 32–52. 10.2139/ssrn.2144150
     https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2144150 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2020) On the political economy of minority rights. Three ways to manipulate a minority: Goals, rules, and border poles. European Journal of Political Economy, 641, 101894 (16pages). 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101894
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101894 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2021) Dynamics, costs and the survival of minorities: Optimal language policies for increasing the vitality of minority languages. Minorités linguistiques et société / Linguistic Minorities and Society, 271, 221–239. 10.7202/1084706ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/1084706ar [Google Scholar]
  27. (2023b) Optimal and politically opportune language policies for the vitality of minority languages. Rationality and society, 35(4), 448–479. 10.1177/10434631231186067
     https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631231186067 [Google Scholar]
  28. Wickström, B.-A., & Gazzola, M.
    (2024) The economics of language policy and planning. InM. Gazzola, F. Grin, L. Cardinal, & K. Heugh (Editors), The Routledge handbook of language policy and planning (Pages158–171). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429448843‑12
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429448843-12 [Google Scholar]
  29. Wickström, B.-A., Templin, T., & Gazzola, M.
    (2018) An economics approach to language policy and linguistic justice. InM. Gazzola, T. Templin, & B.-A. Wickström (Editors), Language policy and linguistic justice: Economic, philosophical and sociolinguistic approaches (Pages364). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑75263‑1_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75263-1_1 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00102.wic
Loading
Language (re)vitalization
Language Problems and Language Planning 47, 113 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00102.wic
/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00102.wic
/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.00102.wic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Introduction
Keyword(s): (re)vitalizaton; communication; cost structure; cost-effectiveness analysis; culture; identity; minority language; planning; policy measures; sociolinguistic characteristics of minority; status; vitality

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error