Is minority language use a right or a privilege?

References

1. Andresen, J. T., & Carter, Ph. M.
   (2016) Languages In the world: How history, culture, and politics shape language. Wiley-Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arp, B.
   (2008) International norms and standards for the protection of national minorities: Bilateral and multilateral texts with commentary. Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004165830.i‑512
   https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004165830.i-512 [Google Scholar]
3. Consiliul Național pentru Combaterea Discriminării
   Consiliul Național pentru Combaterea Discriminării (2020) Declarații cu caracter discriminatoriu la adresa etnicilor maghiari. (443/2020-05-20). https://www.cncd.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Hotarare-443-2020-4.pdf
4. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe
   Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe (1992) European charter for regional or minority languages / Charte européenne des langues régionales ou minoritaires. https://rm.coe.int/1680695175
   [Google Scholar]
5. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe
   Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe (1995) Framework convention for the protection of national minorities / Convention-cadre pour la protection des minorités nationales. https://rm.coe.int/168007cdac
   [Google Scholar]
6. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe
   Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe (2023) Reservations and declarations for Treaty No. 148 – European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (ETS No. 148). https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=declarations-by-treaty&numSte=148&codeNature=10&codePays=ROM
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
   Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2008) Décision: Requête no. 59894/00, Recevabilité Alain Baylac-Ferrer et Nathalie Suarez c. France. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-88951%22]%7D
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
   Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2015) Arrêt: Requête no. 32093/10, Affaire Cumhuriyetçi Eğitim ve Kültür Merkezi Vakfı c. Turkey, Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-148275%22]%7D
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
   Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2016) Arrêt: Requête no. 40183/07, Affaire Chapin et Charpentier c. France. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-163436%22]%7D
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
    Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2020) Arrêt: Requête no. 41701/16, Affaire Y.T. c. Bulgarie. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-203898%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
11. ČSR – president republiky
    ČSR – president republiky (1945) Dekret č. 12/1945 Sb.: Dekret presidenta republiky o konfiskaci a urychleném rozdělení zemědělského majetku Němců, Maďarů, jakož i zrádců a nepřátel českého a slovenského národa. ČSR. https://www.beck-online.cz/bo/chapterview-document.seam?documentId=onrf6mjzgq2v6mjsfuza
    [Google Scholar]
12. Curia: Court of Justice of the European Union
    Curia: Court of Justice of the European Union (2022) Case T-158/21, Citizens’ Committee of the European Citizens’ initiative “Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe”. Reports of Cases, ECLI:EU:T:2022:696. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=ecli:ECLI:EU:T:2022:696
    [Google Scholar]
13. Curia: Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union
    Curia: Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union (2017) Rechtssache T-646/13: Bürgerausschuss für die Bürgerinitiative Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe. Sammlung der Rechtsprechung, ECLI:EU:T:2017:59. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/PDF/?uri=ecli:ECLI:EU:T:2017:59
    [Google Scholar]
14. Curtea de Apel Bucureşti
    Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (2021) Anulare act administrativ hot, CNCD nr. 443/20.05.2020: Hotarâre 100/2021-01-29. (2738/2/2020). https://portal.just.ro/2/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=200000000383951&id_inst=2
15. Der Internationale Karlspreis zu Aachen
    Der Internationale Karlspreis zu Aachen (2020/2021) Begründung des Direktoriums der Gesellschaft für die Verleihung des Internationalen Karlspreises zu Aachenan den Präsidenten von Rumänien, Klaus Johannis. Stiftung Internationaler Karlspreis zu Aachen. https://www.karlspreis.de/en/news/charlemagne-prize-2020-21
    [Google Scholar]
16. European Commission
    European Commission (2002) Joint press statement ont [sic] the Benes [sic] Decree. European Commision. Retrieved2023-05-03fromhttps://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/en/ip_02_588/IP_02_588_EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
17. European Commission
    European Commission (2021a) E-001388/2021: Answer given by Mr Reynderson behalf of the European Commission. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-001388-ASW_EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
18. European Commission
    European Commission (2021b) On the European citizens’ initiative “Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe”. Communication from the Commision, C1(2021) 171. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/api/files/C(2021)171_0/de00000000036104?rendition=false
    [Google Scholar]
19. European Commission
    European Commission (2021c) E-002655/2021 & E-002657/2021… Answer given by Mr Reynderson behalf of the European Commission. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-002655-ASW_EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
20. European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission)
    European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) (2010) Opinion on the act on the state language of the Slovak Republic. Venice Commission / Commission de Venice. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2010)035-e
    [Google Scholar]
21. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (1950) Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms (European convention on human rights). Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
22. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2006) Decision: Application no. 43983/02, Orange Slovensko, a.s. against Slovakia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22fulltext%22:[%22%5C%2243983/02%5C%22%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-77904%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
23. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2008a) Judgement: Application no. 43546/02, Case of E.B. v. France. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-84571%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
24. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2008b) Judgement: Application no.59894/00, Case of Bulgakov v. Ukraine. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-82241%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
25. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2009) Decision: Application no.16970/05, Miroslav Mazurek against Slovakia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22fulltext%22:[%22%5C%2216970/05%5C%22%22],%22languageisocode%22:[%22ENG%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22JUDGMENTS%22,%22DECISIONS%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-91782%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
26. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2011) Judgement: Application no.17763/07, Bubláková v. Slovakia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22fulltext%22:[%2217763/07%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22JUDGMENTS%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-103367%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
27. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2015) Judgement: Applications nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11, Case of Oliari and Others v. Italy. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-156265%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
28. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2017) Judgement: Applications nos. 79885/12, 52471/13, and 52596/13, Case of A.P., Garçon and Nicot v. France. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-172913%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
29. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2018) Judgement: Applications no. 55216/08, Case of S.V. v. Italy. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-187111%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
30. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2020) Judgement: Application no. 75041/17, Case of Bositis v. Slovakia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22fulltext%22:[%2275041/17%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-202463%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
31. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2021a) The ECHR in 50 questions. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/50questions_eng.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
32. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2021b) Decision: Application no. 25175/15, Július Pereszlényi- service TV-video against Slovakia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22fulltext%22:[%2225175/15%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-210772%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
33. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2022) Annual report 2021 of the European Court of Human Rights (English edition). Councel of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Annual_report_2021_ENG.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
34. European Court of Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights (2023) Judgement: Applications nos. 40792/10, 30538/14, and 43439/14, Case of Fedotova and Others v. Russia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-222750%22]%7D
    [Google Scholar]
35. European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
    European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2002) Thlimmenos v. Greece, no. 34369/97. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2000-IV, 263–299. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Reports_Recueil_2000-IV.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
36. European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
    European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2004) Andrášik and others v. Slovakia, nos. 57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2002-IX, 357–372. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Reports_Recueil_2002-IX.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
37. European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
    European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2006) Mentzen v. Latvia, no. 71074/01. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2004-XII, 301–335. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Reports_Recueil_2004-XII.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
38. European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
    European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2013) Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2010-IV, 409–446. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Reports_Recueil_2010-IV.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
39. European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
    European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2014) Lautsi and others v. Italy, no. 30814/06. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2011-III, 61–117. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Reports_Recueil_2011-III.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
40. European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
    European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2015) Vallianatos and Others v. Greece, nos. 29381/09 & 32684/09. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2013-VI, 125–162. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Reports_Recueil_2013-VI.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
41. European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme
    European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (2017) Hämäläinen v. Finland, no. 37359/09. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2014-IV, 369–414. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Reports_Recueil_2014-IV.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
42. European Parliament
    European Parliament (2020) European Citizens’ initiative – Minority SafePack: European Parliament resolution of 17 December 2020 on the European citizens’ initiative “Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe”, 2020/2846(RSP). Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0370. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0370_EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
43. Federal Union of European Nationalities (FUEN)
    Federal Union of European Nationalities (FUEN) (2021) Minority SafePack: The European Commission turned its back on national minorities. FUEN. https://fuen.org/en/article/Minority-SafePack-The-European-Commission-turned-its-back-on-national-minorities
    [Google Scholar]
44. Fiala-Butora, J.
    (2018) Implementation of the framework convention for the protection of national minorities and the European Language Charter: Unified standard or divergence?Hungarian Journal of Minority Studies, 21, 7–21. https://epa.oszk.hu/03700/03754/#
    [Google Scholar]
45. Fiala-Butora, J.
    (2022a) Linguistic discrimination and linguistic equality: Three models of coexistence (research report Number 2022/10). MTA Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont. Budapest. https://jog.tk.hu/en/mtalwp/linguistic-discrimination-and-linguistic-equality-three-models-of-coexistence
    [Google Scholar]
46. Fiala-Butora, J.
    (2022b) Linguistic discrimination as a social, legal and human rights phenomenon. Jazykovedný časopis / Journal of Linguistics, 73(3), 285–302. 10.2478/jazcas‑2023‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2023-0010 [Google Scholar]
47. Ford, H. (with Crowther, S.
    ) (1922) My life and work. Garden City Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
48. High Commissioner on National Minorities
    High Commissioner on National Minorities (2009a) OSCE minorities commissioner discusses amendments to Slovakia’s language law. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Retrieved2023-03-03fromhttps://www.osce.org/hcnm/51194
    [Google Scholar]
49. High Commissioner on National Minorities
    High Commissioner on National Minorities (2009b) Statement by OSCE Minorities Commissioner on Slovakia’s State Language Act. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Retrieved2023-03-03fromhttps://www.osce.org/hcnm/51272
    [Google Scholar]
50. High Commissioner on National Minorities
    High Commissioner on National Minorities (2009c) Non-paper: Amendment to the Act on the State Language of the Slovak Republic. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Retrieved2023-04-17fromhttps://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/f/4/39022.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
51. Holzer, L.
    (2022) Legal gender recognition in times of change at the European Court of Human Rights. ERA Forum, 231, 165–182. 10.1007/s12027‑022‑00710‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00710-z [Google Scholar]
52. Hungarian Human Rights Foundation
    Hungarian Human Rights Foundation (2010) Opinion on the implementing principles to the Slovak State Language Law prepared by the EC’s Legal Service. https://perma.cc/C5Pj-9G2G
    [Google Scholar]
53. Hunt, L. A.
    (1996) The French Revolution and human rights: A brief documentary history. Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție a României
    Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție a României (2022) Anulare act administrativ, 2022-11-17. (2738/2/2020). https://www.scj.ro/1094/Detalii-dosar?customQuery[0].Key=id&customQuery[0].Value=200000000383951
55. JustNews
    JustNews (2022) De ce a câștigat Gheorghe Funar procesul cu CNCD și udemeristul Tanczos Barna. Retrieved2022-03-04fromhttps://justnews.ro/de-ce-a-castigat-fostul-primar-al-clujului-gheorghe-funar-procesul-cu-cncd-si-udemeristul-tanczos-barna-dupa-ce-a-spus-ca-maghiara-e-limba-cailor/
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kis, J.
    (1997) Túl a nemzetállamon. InAz állam semlegessége (Pages129–185). Atlantisz Könyvkiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Kochenov, D.
    (2008) A summary of contradictions: An outline of the EU’s main internal and external approaches to ethnic minority protection. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 31(1), 1–51. https://lira.bc.edu/work/ns/22e190a6-6f3a-4d2d-92c6-5eabb578595c/reader/a4d97bd6-03b2-4a26-b30b-10b68aaa990e
    [Google Scholar]
58. Kochenov, D.
    (2019) Citizenship. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11351.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11351.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
59. Lantschner, E., Constantin, S., & Marko, J.
    (Editors) (2012) Practice of minority protection in Central Europe. Nomos.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Meijknecht, A. K.
    (2004) Minority protection: Standards and reality: implementation of Council of Europe standards in Slovakia, Romania and Bulgaria. T.M.C. Asser Press. 10.1007/978‑90‑6704‑703‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-703-6 [Google Scholar]
61. Michel, Ch.
    (2021) Speech by President Charles Michel at the award ceremony of the International Charlemagne Prize to Klaus Iohannis. European Council. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2021/10/02/speech-by-president-charles-michel-at-the-award-ceremony-of-the-international-charlemagne-prize-to-klaus-iohannis/
    [Google Scholar]
62. Mickonytė, A.
    (2017) The right to a name versus national identity in the context of eu law: The case of Lithuania. Review of Central and East European Law, 42(4), 325–363. 10.1163/15730352‑04204003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04204003 [Google Scholar]
63. Mikalayeva, L., Schwellnus, G., & Balázs, L.
    (2012) The revocation of minority protection rules in new EU member states: Language and education policy in Slovakia and Latvia. L’Europe en Formation, 364(2), 379–400. 10.3917/eufor.364.0379
    https://doi.org/10.3917/eufor.364.0379 [Google Scholar]
64. Nagy, Cs. I.
    (2017) Do European Union member states have to respect human rights? application of the European Union’s “Federal Bill of Rights” to member states. Indiana Internationall & Comparative Law Review, 27(1), 1–13. https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/iiclr/pdf/vol27p1.pdf. 10.18060/7909.0044
    https://doi.org/10.18060/7909.0044 [Google Scholar]
65. Nagy, N.
    (2018) Language rights as a sine qua non of democracy: A comparative overview of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. Central and Eastern European Legal Studies, 2018(2), 247–269. https://eplopublications.eu/publication/digital-edition/language-rights-sine-qua-non-democracy-comparative-overview
    [Google Scholar]
66. Nagy, N.
    (2019) A hatalom nyelve – a nyelv hatalma: Nyelvi jog és nyelvpolitika Európa történetében. Dialóg Campus Kiadó.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Nagy, N.
    (2020) Nesze semmi, fogd meg jól: A nemzeti kisebbségek nyelvi jogainak védelme az Emberi Jogok Európai Bizottságának és Bíróságának joggyakorlatában. Pro Minoritate, 2020(3-ősz), 3–19. hdl.handle.net/20.500.12944/18734
    [Google Scholar]
68. Pap, A. L.
    (2022) Genealogy in law as a technology for categorizing, contesting and deconstructing monoracialism. Genealogy, 7(1), 1–18. 10.3390/genealogy7010001
    https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy7010001 [Google Scholar]
69. Scharffs, B. G.
    (2019) Kokkinakis and the narratives of proper and improper proselytizing. InJ. Temperman, T. J. Gunn, & M. D. Evans (Editors), The European Court of Human Rights and the freedom of religion or belief: The 25 Years since Kokkinakis (Pages153–177). Brill. 10.1163/9789004346901_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004346901_009 [Google Scholar]
70. Slovenská národná rada
    Slovenská národná rada (1945) Nariadenie 104/1945 Sb. SNR: O konfiškovaní a urýchlenom rozdelení pôdohospodárskeho majetku Nemcov, Maďarov, ako aj zradcov a nepriateľov slovenského národa. SNR. https://www.aspi.sk/products/lawText/1/11815/1/2/nariadenie-c-104-1945-zb-snr-o-konfiskovani-a-urychlenom-rozdeleni-podohospodarskeho-majetku-nemcov-madarov-ako-aj-zradcov-a-nepriatelov-slovenskeho-naroda
    [Google Scholar]
71. Slovenská republika/Szlovák Köztársaság
    Slovenská republika/Szlovák Köztársaság (1995) Zákon o štátnom jazyku Slovenskej republiky, z 15. novembra 1995, 270/1995 Z. z. / Törvény a Szlovák Köztársaság államnyelvéről, kelt: 1995. november 15. Tt. 270/1995. Slovenská republika/Szlovák Köztársaság. Bratislava/Pozsony.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Slovenská republika/Szlovák Köztársaság
    Slovenská republika/Szlovák Köztársaság (2022) Zákon o používaní jazykov národnostných menšín z 10. júla 1999, 184/1999 Z.z. Zmena: 318/2009 Z.z.; Zmena: 204/2011 Z.z. Zmena: 287/2012 Z.z.; Zmena: 417/2021 Z.z./Törvény a nemzeti kisebbségi nyelvek használatáról 1999. július 10., Tt. 184/1999. Módosítva: a Tt. 318/2009. sz. törvényével; Módosítva: a Tt. 204/2011. sz. törvényével; Módosítva: a Tt. 287/2012. sz. törvényével;Módosítva: a Tt. 417/2021. sz. törvényével. Slovenská republika/Szlovák Köztársaság. Bratislava/Pozsony. https://torvenytar.sk/zakon-66
    [Google Scholar]
73. Solé, J., Riba i Giner, D., Pedicini, P., Alfonsi, F., & Ždanoka, T.
    (2021) Question for written answer E-003262/2021 to the Commission. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-003262_EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
74. Spiliopoulou Åkermark, A.
    (2021) Justifications of minority protection in international law. Brill. (Originally published as: Justifications of minority protection in international law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International 1997.)
    [Google Scholar]
75. Tárnok, B.
    (2020) Slovakia still applying the Beneš Decrees: Principle of collective guilt in the European Union (research report). Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Budapest. https://eustrat.uni-nke.hu/document/eski-uni-nke-hu/0715TB.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
76. Tárnok, B.
    (2021) EP committee demanding action of the European Commission on the Beneš Decrees (research report). Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Budapest. https://eustrat.uni-nke.hu/hirek/2021/01/27/ep-committee-demanding-action-of-the-european-commission-on-the-benes-decrees
    [Google Scholar]
77. Ternes, E.
    (1992) The Breton language. InD. MacAulay (Editor), The Celtic languages (Pages371–452). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
78. The Economist
    The Economist (2009) Hovorte po slovensky! Slovakia criminalises the use of Hungarian, (2009-07-30). https://www.economist.com/europe/2009/07/30/hovorte-po-slovensky
79. United Nation Human Rights Committee
    United Nation Human Rights Committee (2000) J.G.A. Diergaardt (late Captain of the Rehoboth Baster Community) et al. v. Namibia. Communication, (760/1997). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/456000?ln=en#record-files-collapse-header
    [Google Scholar]
80. Varga, P.
    (2020) Az Emberi Jogok Európai Bíróságának ítélete a nemzeti kisebbségi iskolák diákjai érettségi többletterhének ügyében. Kisebbségi Szemle, 5(3), 59–70. https://bgazrt.hu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/5.Varga_.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
81. Vass, Á.
    (2016) If yes, why not? Minority language use and accommodation of minority language rights in Slovakia. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, 8(1), 43–56. 10.1515/auseur‑2015‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2015-0012 [Google Scholar]
82. Veress, E.
    (2021) Tízéves a Sapientia Erdélyi Magyar Tudományegyetem jogászképzése: mérleg és jövőkép. Magyar Jog, 68(9), 531–537. https://www.mokk.hu/regioldal/pdf/linkgyujto/Magyar_Jog/2021-09_Magyar_Jog.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
83. Vincze, L.
    (2021a) Question for written answer E-001388/2021 to the Commission. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-001388_EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
84. Vincze, L.
    (2021b) Question for written answer E-002655/2021 to the Commission. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-002655_EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
85. Vincze, L.
    (2021c) Question for written answer E-002657/2021 to the Commission. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-002657_EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
86. Wardyn, Ł., & Fiala, J.
    (2009) The 2009 amendment of the Slovakian State Language Law and its impact on minority rights. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 291, 153–174. https://pyil.inp.pan.pl/about-pyil/
    [Google Scholar]
87. Wickström, B.-A.
    (2020) On the political economy of minority rights. Three ways to manipulate a minority: Goals, rules, and border poles. European Journal of Political Economy, 641, 101894 (16pages). 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101894
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101894 [Google Scholar]
88. Wickström, B.-A.
    (2023a) Unstable orders and changing minority protection: The effects of urbanisation. InA.-M. Bíró & D. Newman (Editors), Minority rights and liberal democratic insecurities: The challenge of unstable orders (Pages76–95). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003239871‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003239871-6 [Google Scholar]
89. Wittgenstein, L. J. J.
    (1921) Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. Annalen der Naturphilosophie, 14(3/4), 185–262.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Wittgenstein, L. J. J.
    (1999) Tractatus logico-philosoficus (Ch. K. Ogden, Translator). Dover Publications. (Originally published as: Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co 1922.)
    [Google Scholar]