Standardization and vitality

References

1. Absillis, K., & Jaspers, J.
   (2016) Reconsidering purism: The case of Flanders. InG. Rutten & K. Horner (Editors), Metalinguistic perspectives on Germanic languages: European case studies from past to present (Pages105–130). Peter Lang. 10.3726/b11384
   https://doi.org/10.3726/b11384 [Google Scholar]
2. Ammon, U.
   (1997) National-variety purism in the national centers of the German language. InM. Pütz (Editor), Language choices:. Conditions, constraints, and consequences (Pages161–178). Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.1.12amm
   https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.1.12amm [Google Scholar]
3. Awal, A.
   (2022) Linguistic purism in Bengali language in Bangladesh: Myth and reality. SELL (Scope of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature) Journal, 7(1), 57–79. 10.31597/sl.v7i1.720
   https://doi.org/10.31597/sl.v7i1.720 [Google Scholar]
4. Baioud, G., & Khuanuud, C.
   (2022) Linguistic purism as resistance to colonization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(3), 315–334. 10.1111/josl.12548
   https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12548 [Google Scholar]
5. Bauman, R., & Briggs, Ch. L.
   (2003) Voices of modernity: Language ideologies and the politics of inequality. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486647
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486647 [Google Scholar]
6. Baxandall, M.
   (1971) Giotto and the orators: Humanist observers of painting in Italy and the discovery of pictorial composition, 1350–1450. Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Beckett, G. H., & Postiglione, G. A.
   (Editors) (2012) China’s assimilationist language policy: The impact on indigenous/minority literacy and social harmony. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203804070
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203804070 [Google Scholar]
8. Berlin, I.
   (1976) Vico and Herder: Two studies in the history of ideas. Viking Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bilaniuk, L.
   (2017/2018) Purism and pluralism: Language use trends in popular culture in Ukraine since independence. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 35(1–4), 293–309.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Boeynaems, A., Burgers, Ch., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J.
    (2017) The effects of metaphorical framing on political persuasion: A Systematic literature review. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(2), 118–134. 10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623 [Google Scholar]
11. Bradley, D.
    (2009) Language policy for China’s minorities. Written Language and Literacy, 12(2), 170–87. 10.1075/wll.12.2.03bra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.12.2.03bra [Google Scholar]
12. Brunstad, E.
    (2003) Standard language and linguistic purism. Sociolinguistica, 17(1), 52–70. 10.1515/9783110245226.52
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245226.52 [Google Scholar]
13. Bulag, U. E.
    (2003) Mongolian ethnicity and linguistic anxiety in China. American Anthropologist, 105(4), 753–763. 10.1525/aa.2003.105.4.753
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2003.105.4.753 [Google Scholar]
14. Burke, P.
    (2004) Languages and communities in early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511617362
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617362 [Google Scholar]
15. Cabras, G.
    (2017) Language ideologies in a Uyghur comedy sketch: The comedy sketch Chüshenmidim “I don’t understand” and the importance of Sap Uyghur. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2017(248), 111–97. 10.1515/ijsl‑2017‑0032
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2017-0032 [Google Scholar]
16. Cameron, D.
    (2013) The one, the many, and the other: Representing multi- and mono-lingualism in post-9/11 verbal hygiene. Critical Multilingualism Studies, 1(2). Multilingual, 2.0? (PartII), 59–77.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Comrie, B.
    (1994) Review of: Thomas, George (1992). Linguistic purism. (Studies in language and linguistics.) London & New York: Longman. Pp.xii, 250. Language, 70(4), 844–846. 10.2307/416339
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416339 [Google Scholar]
18. Cubelli, R., Paolieri, D., Lotto, L., & Job, R.
    (2011) The effect of grammatical gender on object categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 449–460. 10.1037/a0021965
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021965 [Google Scholar]
19. Dahl, Ø.
    (1995) When the future comes from behind: Malagasy and other time concepts and some consequences for communication [Language, Culture, and World View]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 19(2), 197–209. 10.1016/0147‑1767(95)00004‑U
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(95)00004-U [Google Scholar]
20. Danesi, M.
    (2021) Linguistic relativity today: Language, mind, society, and the foundations of linguistic anthropology. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003001669
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001669 [Google Scholar]
21. Eberhard, D. M., Simmons, G. F., & Fennig, Ch. D.
    (Editors) (2022) Ethnologue: Languages of the world (25th edition). SIL International. www.ethnologue.com
    [Google Scholar]
22. Elpers, N., Jensen, G., & Holmes, K. J.
    (2022) Does grammatical gender affect object concepts? Registered replication of Phillips and Boroditsky (2003). Journal of Memory and Language, 1271, 104357. 10.1016/j.jml.2022.104357
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104357 [Google Scholar]
23. Estival, D., & Pennycook, A.
    (2011) L’Académie française and Anglophone language ideologies. Language Policy, 10(4), 325–341. 10.1007/s10993‑011‑9215‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9215-6 [Google Scholar]
24. Everett, D. L.
    (2005) Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46(4), 621–646. 10.1086/431525
    https://doi.org/10.1086/431525 [Google Scholar]
25. Fanon, F.
    (2008) Black skin, white masks (R. Philcox, Translator). Grove Press. (Originally published as: Peau noire, masques blancs. Paris: Éditions de Seuil 1952.)
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fichte, J. G.
    (1922) Addresses to the German nation (R. F. Jones & G. H. Thurnbull, Translator). The open court publishing company. (Originally published as: Reden an die deutsche Nation. Berlin: Realschulbuchhandlung 1808.)
    [Google Scholar]
27. Garin, E.
    (Editor) (1952) Prosatori latini del quattrocento. Riccardo Riccardi.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hansen, K., Wypych, M., Bańko, M., & Bilewicz, M.
    (2018) Psychological determinants of linguistic purism: National identification, conservatism, and attitudes to loanwords. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(3), 365–375. 10.1177/0261927X17737810
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17737810 [Google Scholar]
29. Harrison, K.
    (2021) Attitudes towards linguistic variation in the Ukrainian community in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 0(0), 1–13. 10.1080/13670050.2021.1931019
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1931019 [Google Scholar]
30. Hawke, A.
    (2018) Coping with an expanding vocabulary: The lexicographical contribution to Welsh. International Journal of Lexicography, 31(2), 229–248. 10.1093/ijl/ecy004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecy004 [Google Scholar]
31. Herder, J. G.
    (1891) Herders sämmtliche Werke (B. Suphan, Editor; Volume51). Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Herder, J. G.
    (1966) Outlines of a philosophy of the history of man (Th. O. Churchill, Translator). Bergman Publishers. (Originally published as: Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch 1784.)
    [Google Scholar]
33. Humayoun, M., Hammarström, H., & Ranta, A.
    (2022) Urdu morphology, orthography and lexicon extraction. arXiv. CitetononCRdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2204.03071
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2204.03071 [Google Scholar]
34. von Humboldt, W.
    (1999) “On language”: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species (M. Losonsky, Editor; P. Heath, Translator; 2nd edition). Cambridge University Press. (Originally published as: Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluſs auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften 1836.)
    [Google Scholar]
35. Jackson, J. C., Watts, J., Henry, T. R., List, J.-M., Forkel, R., Mucha, P. J., Greenhill, S. J., Gray, R. D., & Lindquist, K. A.
    (2019) Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science, 366(6472), 1517–1522. 10.1126/science.aaw8160
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw8160 [Google Scholar]
36. Juliard, P.
    (1970) Philosophies of language in eighteenth-century France. Mouton. 10.1515/9783111352114
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111352114 [Google Scholar]
37. Kahneman, D.
    (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kirkness, A.
    (1984) Das Phänomen des Purismus in der Geschichte des Deutschen. InW. Besch, O. Reichmann, & S. Sonderegger (Editors), Sprachgeschichte. Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung (HSK) (Pages290–299, Volume2.11). Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kraef, O.
    (2013) Building Yi (m)other tongue: virtual platforms, language maintenance and cultural awareness in a Chinese minority context. InE. Kasten & T. de Graaf (Editors), Sustaining indigenous knowledge: Learning tools and community initiatives for preserving endangered languages and local cultural heritage (Pages219–248). Verlag der Kulturstiftung Sibirien.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Langer, N., & Nesse, A.
    (2012) Linguistic purism. InJ. M. Hernández-Campoy & J. C. Conde-Silvestre (Editors), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics (Pages607–625). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118257227.ch33
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227.ch33 [Google Scholar]
42. Lhagyal, D.
    (2021) “Linguistic authority” in state-society interaction: Cultural politics of Tibetan education in China. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42(3), 353–367. 10.1080/01596306.2019.1648239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1648239 [Google Scholar]
43. Lichfield, J.
    (2002) Our Man in Paris: The mystery of the Académie française. The Independent, (2002-09-30).
    [Google Scholar]
44. Ma, R.
    (2017) Reconstructing “nation” (minzu) discourses in China. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 11, 8. 10.1186/s41257‑017‑0003‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-017-0003-x [Google Scholar]
45. MacNamara, J.
    (1971) The Irish language and nationalism. The Crane Bag, 1(2), 40–44. www.jstor.org/stable/30059442
    [Google Scholar]
46. Martyn, D.
    (1997) Borrowed fatherland: Nationalism and language purism in Fichte’s Addresses to the German nation. The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, 72(4), 303–315. 10.1080/00168899709597352
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00168899709597352 [Google Scholar]
47. Memmi, A.
    (2021) The colonizer and the ccolonized (H. Greenfeld, Translator). Profile Books. (Originally published as: Portrait du colonisé precede du portrait du colonisateur. Corrêa: Editions Buchet/Chastel 1957.)
    [Google Scholar]
48. Musolff, A.
    (2014) Metaphorical parasites and “parasitic” metaphors: Semantic exchanges between political and scientific vocabularies. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(2), 218–233. 10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus [Google Scholar]
49. Nauta, L.
    (2006) Linguistic relativity and the humanist imitation of classical Latin. InL. Nauta (Editor), Language and cultural change: Aspects of the study and use of language in the later Middle Ages and the Renaissance (Pages173–186). Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Ngũgĩ, wa Th.
    (1986) Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Currey.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Orwell, G.
    (1946) Politics and the English Language. Horizon, 13(76), 252–264.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Ottati, V., Renstrom, R., & Price, E.
    (2014) The metaphotic framing model: Political communication and public opinion. InJ. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Editors), The power of metaphor: Examining Its influence on social life (Pages179–202). American Psychological Association. 10.1037/14278‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1037/14278-009 [Google Scholar]
53. Patten, A.
    (2006) The humanist roots of linguistic nationalism. History of Political Thought, 27(2), 221–262. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/hpt/2006/00000027/00000002/art00003
    [Google Scholar]
54. Phillips, W., & Boroditsky, L.
    (2003) Can quirks of grammar affect the way you think? Grammatical gender and object concepts. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 251. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31t455gf
    [Google Scholar]
55. Prys, D., Andrews, T., & Prys, G.
    (2020) Term formation in Welsh: Problems and solutions. InI. Brač & A. Ostroški Anić (Editors), Svijet od riječi. Terminološki i leksikografski ogledi (Pages159–184). Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Rehm, G., Marheinecke, K., Hegele, S., Piperidis, S., Bontcheva, K., Hajič, J., Choukri, K., Vasiljevs, A., Backfried, G., Prinz, Ch., Gómez-Pérez, J. M., Meertens, L., Lukowicz, P., van Genabith, J., Lösch, A., Slusallek, Ph., Irgens, M., Gatellier, P., Köhler, J., Le Bars, L., Anastasiou, D., Auksoriūtė, A., Bel, N., Branco, A., Budin, G., Daelemans, W., De Smedt, K., Garabík, R., Gavriilidou, M., Gromann, D., Koeva, S., Krek, S., Krstev, C., Lindén, K., Magnini, B., Odijk, J., Ogrodniczuk, M., Rögnvaldsson, E., Rosner, M., Pedersen, B., Skadiņa, I., Tadić, M., Tufis, D., Váradi, T., Vider, K., Way, A., & Yvon, F.
    (2020) The European language technology landscape in 2020: Language-centric and human-centric AI for cross-cultural communication in multilingual Europe. European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.407
    [Google Scholar]
57. Ritter, V.
    (2004) The language of Hariaudh’s “Priyapravās”: Notes toward an archaeology of modern standard Hindi. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 124(3), 417–438. 10.2307/4132274
    https://doi.org/10.2307/4132274 [Google Scholar]
58. Roche, G.
    (2018) Draft Report on Tibet’s Linguistic Minorities (research report). SocArXiv, University of Maryland. College Park. 10.31235/osf.io/sjnbk
    https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/sjnbk [Google Scholar]
59. Roche, G.
    (2019) Articulating language oppression: colonialism, coloniality and the erasure of Tibet’s minority languages. Patterns of Prejudice, 53(5), 487–514. 10.1080/0031322X.2019.1662074
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2019.1662074 [Google Scholar]
60. Roche, G.
    (2021a) Lexical necropolitics: The raciolinguistics of language oppression on the Tibetan margins of Chineseness. Language & Communication, 761, 111–120. 10.1016/j.langcom.2020.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.10.002 [Google Scholar]
61. Roche, G.
    (2021b) Tibetan language rights and civil society in the People’s Republic of China: Challenges of and for rights. Asian Studies Review, 45(1), 67–82. 10.1080/10357823.2020.1758033
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1758033 [Google Scholar]
62. Roche, G., & Suzuki, H.
    (2018) Tibet’s minority languages: Diversity and endangerment. Modern Asian Studies, 52(4), 1227–1278. 10.1017/S0026749X1600072X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X1600072X [Google Scholar]
63. Samuel, S., Cole, G., & Eacott, M. J.
    (2019) Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 261, 1767–1786. 10.3758/s13423‑019‑01652‑3
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01652-3 [Google Scholar]
64. Simon, A. F., & Jerit, J.
    (2007) Toward a theory relating political discourse, media, and public opinion. Journal of Communication, 57(2), 254–271. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2007.00342.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00342.x [Google Scholar]
65. Sun Hongkai, Hu Zengyi, & Huang Xing [孫宏開, 胡增益, & 黃行]
    (Editors) (2007) 中國的語言 (The languages of China). Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Thomas, G.
    (1991) Linguistic purism. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Trask, R. L.
    (1999) Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Tsung, L.
    (2012) Language and power: Tuanjie hua, an Yi-Han mixed language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2012(215), 63–77. 10.1515/ijsl‑2012‑0029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2012-0029 [Google Scholar]
69. Uszkoreit, H., & Rehm, G.
    (2012) At least 21 European languages in danger of digital extinction. META-NET. www.meta-net.eu/whitepapers/press-release
    [Google Scholar]
70. Valla (Valllensis), L. [della Valle, L.
    ] (1471) Elegantiarum linguae latinae libri sex.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Wickström, B.-A.
    (2012) Language as a renewable resource: Import, dissipation, and absorption of innovations. International Journal of Computational Linguistics, 3(1), 32–52. 10.2139/ssrn.2144150
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2144150 [Google Scholar]
72. Witt, R.
    (2021) In the footsteps of the ancients: The origins of humanism from Lovato to Bruni. Brill. 10.1163/9789004476059
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004476059 [Google Scholar]
73. Wu, H.
    (2003) Bonan. InJ. Janhunen (Editor), The Mongolic languages (Pages325–345). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Xu, Y., Duong, K., Malt, B. C., Jiang, S., & Srinivasan, M.
    (2020) Conceptual relations predict colexification across languages. Cognition, 2011, 104280. 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104280
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104280 [Google Scholar]
75. Xú, S.
    (2013) Language endangerment. InY. Li & W. Li (Editors), The language situation in China (Pages261–270, Volume11, 2006–2007). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614512530.261
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512530.261 [Google Scholar]