Review of Ahabwe (2020): Globalisation and the mother tongue in Uganda: An examination of public perceptions to native languages in education today

References

1. Baldauf Jr, R. B.
   (2006) Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. Current issues in language planning, 7(2–3), 147–170. 10.2167/cilp092.0
   https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp092.0 [Google Scholar]
2. Bourdieu, Pierre
   (1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. J.
   (2015) Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy, 141, 221–243. 10.1007/s10993‑014‑9333‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9333-z [Google Scholar]
4. Lawton, R.
   (2016) A critical integrated approach to language policy as discursive action: Strengths, challenges, and opportunities, pp. 105–127. InE. Barakos & J. W. Unger (Eds.), Discursive approaches to Language Policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
   [Google Scholar]
5. McMahon, A.
   (1994) Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166591
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166591 [Google Scholar]
6. Ruiz, Richard
   (1984) Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8 (2). 15–34. 10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464 [Google Scholar]
7. The Republic of Uganda
   The Republic of Uganda (1992) Government White Paper on the Education Policy Review Commission Report: “Education for National Integration and Development.”Kampala: The Republic of Uganda.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Zuckermann, G. A.
   (2003) Language Contact and Globalisation: The camouflaged influence of English on the world’s languages--with special attention to Israeli (sic) and Mandarin. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 16(2), 287–307. 10.1080/09557570302045
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570302045 [Google Scholar]