1887
image of Language rights and groups of immigrant origin
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this article, I aim to analyse language rights in relation to groups of immigrant origin. Liberal democracies are reluctant to consider immigrant groups as subjects entitled to the same set of language and cultural rights enjoyed by national minorities. However, the trend towards increasing levels of immigration is configuring new cultural and language correlations within territorial boundaries that provoke responses that problematise a fixed conception of language rights. Drawing on theories of liberal multiculturalism, I examine the case of claims for language recognition in the Spanish autonomous cities of Ceuta and Melilla and its normative implications. In these territories, factors such as size, concentration, and the historical ties of Arabic- and Berber-speaking communities challenge conventional approaches to minority groups’ rights based on a national versus immigrant minority distinction. I argue that these approaches are not satisfactory for language claims in these two cities and that a contextual approach is better suited to conceptualising the recognition of language rights.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.19025.erd
2020-09-24
2020-10-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Application of the ECRML in Spain
    Application of the ECRML in Spain. Initial Monitoring Cycle (2005)https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/minlang/Report/EvaluationReports/SpainECRML1_en.pdf (accessed01/07/19).
  2. Application of the ECRML in Spain
    Application of the ECRML in Spain. Third Monitoring Cycle (2012) https://rm.coe.int/16806dba6b (accessed01/07/19).
  3. Application of the ECRML in Spain
    Application of the ECRML in Spain. Fourth Monitoring Cycle (2016) https://rm.coe.int/16806f0658 (accessed01/07/19).
  4. Application of the ECRML in Spain
    Application of the ECRML in Spain. Fifth Monitoring Cycle (2019) https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=0900001680993e63 (accessed19/02/20).
  5. Arteaga, F.
    (2014) España Mirando al Sur: del Mediterráneo al Sahel. Informe del Real Instituto Elcano18.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauböck, R.
    (1996) Cultural Minority Rights for Immigrants. International Migration Review, 30 (1): 203–250. doi:  10.2307/2547468
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2547468 [Google Scholar]
  7. Carens, J.
    (2000) Culture, Citizenship, and Community: A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0198297688.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297688.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Choudhry, S.
    (2002) National Minorities and Ethnic Immigrants: Liberalism’s Political Sociology. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10 (1): 54–78. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9760.00142
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00142 [Google Scholar]
  9. CICODE
    CICODE (2015) Construir Ciudadanía Intercultural. Granada: GEEPE.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2008) White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue: Living Together as Equals in Dignity. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Schutter, H.
    (2007) Language Policy and Political Philosophy. On the Emerging Linguistic Justice Debate. Language Problems & Language Planning, 31 (1): 1–23. doi:  10.1075/lplp.31.1.02des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.31.1.02des [Google Scholar]
  12. ECRML
    ECRML (1992) https://rm.coe.int/168007bf4b (accessed01/07/19).
  13. Erdocia, I.
    (2019) Medium of Instruction Ideologies: Accommodation of Multilingualism in the Bilingual Regime of Navarre. Current Issues in Language Planning, 19 (4): 1–25. doi:  10.1080/14664208.2018.1503457
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1503457 [Google Scholar]
  14. Explanatory Report to the ECRML
    Explanatory Report to the ECRML (1992) https://rm.coe.int/16800cb5e5 (accessed01/07/19).
  15. Fernández, A.
    (2015) Repensar las Fronteras Lingüísticas del Territorio Español: Melilla, entre Mosaico Sociológico y Paradigma Lingüístico. Estudios de Lingüística Universidad de Alicante, 29: 105–126. doi:  10.14198/ELUA2015.29.05
    https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2015.29.05 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2016) Nacionalismo y Representaciones Lingüísticas en Ceuta y en Melilla. Revista de Filología Románica, 33 (1): 23–46. doi:  10.5209/RFRM.55230
    https://doi.org/10.5209/RFRM.55230 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gans, C.
    (2001) Historical Rights: The Evaluation of Nationalist Claims to Sovereignty. Political Theory, 29 (1): 58–79. doi:  10.1177/0090591701029001004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591701029001004 [Google Scholar]
  18. González, C.
    (2008) Los Frenos al Pluralismo Cultural en Territorios de Soberanía Discutida: Los Casos de Ceuta y Melilla. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 140: 135–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. INE.
    INE. (1987) Estudio Estadístico de las Comunidades Musulmanas de Ceuta y Melilla. Madrid: INE.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kloss, H.
    (1971) Language Rights of Immigrant Groups. International Migration Review, 5 (2): 250–268. doi:  10.1177/019791837100500208
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019791837100500208 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kraus, P.
    (2008) A Union of Diversity: Language, Identity and Polity-Building in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511491993
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491993 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kukathas, C.
    (2004) Contextualism Reconsidered: Some Skeptical Reflections. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 7 (2): 215–225. 10.1023/B:ETTA.0000032808.92466.f5
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ETTA.0000032808.92466.f5 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kymlicka, W.
    (1995) Multicultural Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kymlicka, W., & A. Patten
    (Eds.) (2003a) Language Rights and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1017/S0267190503000163
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190503000163 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2003b) Language Rights and Political Theory. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23: 3–21. doi:  10.1017/S0267190503000163
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190503000163 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lægaard, S.
    (2015) Multiculturalism and Contextualism: How is Context Relevant for Political Theory?European Journal of Political Theory, 14 (3): 259–276. doi:  10.1177/1474885114562975
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885114562975 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2019) Contextualism in Normative Political Theory and the Problem of Critical Distance. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 22 (4): 953–970. doi:  10.1007/s10677‑019‑10026‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10026-6 [Google Scholar]
  28. Léger, R., & H. Levis
    (2017) Normative Political Theory’s Contribution to Language Policy Research. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38 (7): 577–583. doi:  10.1080/01434632.2016.1192177
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2016.1192177 [Google Scholar]
  29. Levy, J.
    (2007) Contextualism, Constitutionalism, and Modus Vivendi. InA. S. Laden & D. Owen (Eds.), Multiculturalism and Political Theory (pp.173–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. May, S.
    (2017) National and Ethnic Minorities: Language Rights and Recognition. InS. Canagarajah (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Migration and Language (pp.149–167). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315754512‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754512-9 [Google Scholar]
  31. Melilla
    Melilla (2014) Pacto Social por la Interculturalidad. www.melilla.es/melillaportal/RecursosWeb/DOCUMENTOS/1/0_11857_1.pdf (accessed01/07/19).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Meyer, F.
    (2005) Die Städte der Vier Kulturen: Eine Geographie der Zugehörigkeit und Ausgrenzung am Beispiel von Ceuta und Melilla (Spanien/Nordafrika). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Modood, T., & S. Thompson
    (2018) Revisiting Contextualism in Political Theory: Putting Principles into Context. Res Publica, 24 (3): 339–357. doi:  10.1007/s11158‑017‑9358‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9358-1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Moscoso, F.
    (2013) El Árabe de Ceuta. Argumentos para su Cooficialidad. InP. Santillán, L. M. Pérez, & F. Moscoso (Eds.), Árabe Marroquí: De la Oralidad a la Enseñanza (pp.95–124). Cuenca: Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Oakes, L.
    (2017) Normative Language Policy and Minority Language Rights: Rethinking the Case of Regional Languages in France. Language Policy, 16 (4): 365–384. doi:  10.1007/s10993‑016‑9411‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-016-9411-5 [Google Scholar]
  36. Oakes, L. & Y. Peled
    (2018) Normative Language Policy: Ethics, Politics, Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Observatorio Andalusí
    Observatorio Andalusí (2016) Estudio Demográfico de la Población Musulmana. Exploración Estadística del Censo de Ciudadanos Musulmanes en España Referido a Fecha 31/12/2015. Madrid: UCIDE.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Osborn, A.
    (2002), August27). Arabic: A language for Belgium?The Guardian. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theguardian.com
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Parekh, B.
    (2006) Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑20425‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20425-6 [Google Scholar]
  40. Parvin, P.
    (2018) Democracy without Participation: A New Politics for a Disengaged Era. Res Publica, 24 (1): 31–52. doi:  10.1007/s11158‑017‑9382‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9382-1 [Google Scholar]
  41. Patten, A.
    (2003) Can the Immigrant/National Minority Dichotomy be Defended?InS. Macedo, & A. Buchanan (Eds.), Secession and Self-Determination (pp.174–189). New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2014) Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Peled, Y.
    (2014) Normative Language Policy: Interface and Interferences. Language Policy, 13 (4): 301–315. doi:  10.1007/s10993‑014‑9325‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9325-z [Google Scholar]
  44. Pidd, H.
    (2011), February28). Germany Hits Back after Turkish PM Tells Immigrants to Resist Assimilation. The Guardian. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theguardian.com
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Ramírez, S.
    (1987), February3). Estrecha Vigilancia Policial en Melilla para Prevenir Nuevos Brotes de Violencia. ABC. Retrieved fromhttps://www.abc.es
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ready, C.
    (2018) Maintaining the Status Quo. Diglossia and the Case of Arabic Language Policy in Ceuta. Language Problems and Language Planning, 42: 173–195. doi:  10.1075/lplp.00018.rea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00018.rea [Google Scholar]
  47. Ricento, T., Y. Peled, & P. Ives
    (Eds.) (2015) Language Policy and Political Theory: Building Bridges, Assessing Breaches. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑15084‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15084-0 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rontomé, C.
    (2012) Ceuta, Convivencia y Conflicto en una Sociedad Multiétnica. Ceuta: UNED.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rontomé, C., J. M. Cantón Gálvez, & I. Lázaro
    (2014) Los Usos Lingüísticos de la Poblacion de Ceuta. Ceuta: IEC.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rubio-Marín, R.
    (2003) Exploring the Boundaries of Language Rights: Insiders, Newcomers, and Natives. InS. Macedo, & A. Buchanan (Eds), Secession and Self-Determination (pp.136–174). New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sánchez, S.
    (2010) El Abandono Escolar Temprano en las Ciudades de Ceuta y Melilla. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Stojanović, N.
    (2017) Normative Political Theory, Democratic Politics and Minority Rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20 (1): 101–113. doi:  10.1080/13698230.2016.1253168
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2016.1253168 [Google Scholar]
  53. Third Periodical Report of Spain’s Compliance with the ECRML 2006–2009
    Third Periodical Report of Spain’s Compliance with the ECRML 2006–2009 (2010) www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/minlang/Report/PeriodicalReports/SpainPR3_en.pdf (accessed01/07/19).
  54. Van Parijs, P.
    (2011) Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199208876.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199208876.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wee, L.
    (2011) Language without Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737437.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737437.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  56. Weinstock, D.
    (1999) Le Probleme de la Boîte de Pandore. InM. Seymour (Ed.), Nationalité, Citoyenneté et Solidarité (pp.17–40). Montreal: Editions Liber.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Young, I. M.
    (1997) A Multicultural Continuum: A Critique of Will Kymlicka’s Ethnic-Nation Dichotomy. Constellations, 4 (1): 48–53. doi:  10.1111/1467‑8675.00035
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00035 [Google Scholar]
  58. Zapata-Barrero, R.
    (2016) Theorising Intercultural Citizenship. InN. Meer, T. Modood, & R. Zapata-Barrero (Eds), Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines (pp.53–76). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474407083.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474407083.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.19025.erd
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error