Volume 45, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



We investigate the relative intensity of use of English and French at home for allophone immigrants in the Montreal metropolitan area. We find that the linguistic distances between immigrants’ mother tongues and English and French have an important impact on the relative intensities of use at home of the two Canadian official languages. However, immigrants whose mother tongues are closer to French than to English are relatively less likely to use an official language at home. We further investigate the role of spousal and other characteristics on the integration of immigrants. The results suggest that the home environment is an important factor contributing to the linguistic integration. Individuals exposed to an official language at home with their spouse have significantly higher rates of linguistic integration. Also, English is more attractive than French in the sense that immigrants with an Anglophone partner will have higher integration rates to English than those with a Francophone partner integrating to French.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bourhis, Richard Y.
    2019 “Evaluating the impact of Bill 101 on the English-speaking communities of Quebec.” Language Problems and Language Planning, 43(2): 198–229. 10.1075/lplp.00042.bou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00042.bou [Google Scholar]
  2. Castonguay, Charles
    2019 “Quebec’s new language dynamic.” Language Problems and Language Planning, 43(2): 113–134. 10.1075/lplp.00038.cas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00038.cas [Google Scholar]
  3. Chiswick, Barry R., and Paul W. Miller
    1994 “Language Choice Among Immigrants in a Multi-Lingual Destination.” Journal of Population Economics, 7 (2): 119–131. 10.1007/BF00173615
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173615 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2001 “A Model of Destination-Language Acquisition: Application to Male Immigrants in Canada.” Demography, 38 (3): 391–409. 10.1353/dem.2001.0025
    https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0025 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2015 “International Migration and the Economics of Language.” InBarry R. Chiswick and Paul W. Miller. Handbook of The Economics of International Migration, Volume1A, The Immigrants, Elsevier, Oxford, chapter 5, 211–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Grenier, Gilles and François Vaillancourt
    1983 “An Economic Perspective on Learning a Second Language.” Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 4 (6): 471–483. 10.1080/01434632.1983.9994130
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1983.9994130 [Google Scholar]
  7. Grenier, Gilles
    1984 “Shifts to English as Usual Language by Americans of Spanish Mother Tongue.” Social Science Quarterly, 65(2):537–550.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2019 “Quebec’s language policy and economic globalization.” Language Problems and Language Planning, 43(2): 179–197. 10.1075/lplp.00041.gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00041.gre [Google Scholar]
  9. Holman, Eric W., Cecil H. Brown, Søren Wichmann, André Müller, Viveka Velupillai, Harald Hammarström, Sebastian Sauppe, Hagen Jung, Dik Bakker, Pamela Brown, Oleg Belyaev, Matthias Urban, Robert Mailhammer, Johann-Mattis List and Dmitry Egorov
    2011 “Automated dating of the world’s language families based on lexical similarity.” Current Anthropology52 (6): 841–875. 10.1086/662127
    https://doi.org/10.1086/662127 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim, Chigon, and Pyong Gap Min
    2010 “Marital Patterns and Use of Mother Tongue at Home Among Native-Born Asian Americans.” Social forces, 89(1): 233–256. 10.1353/sof.2010.0097
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0097 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lazear, Edward P.
    2007 “Mexican Assimilation in the United States.” Mexican immigration to the United States. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226066684.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226066684.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee, Rennie
    2018 “Spousal Characteristics and Language Use at Home: Immigrants and Their Descendants in Canada.” Sociological Perspectives, 61(6): 874–893. 10.1177/0731121417753371
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417753371 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ortega, Javier, and Gregory Verdugo
    2015 “Assimilation in Multilingual Cities.” Journal of Population Economics, 28(3): 785–815. 10.1007/s00148‑015‑0549‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-015-0549-9 [Google Scholar]
  14. Paillé, Michel
    2019 “Succès et faiblesses de l’intégration des immigrants par la scolarisation obligatoire en français au Québec.” Language Problems and Language Planning, 43(2): 135–158. 10.1075/lplp.00039.pai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00039.pai [Google Scholar]
  15. Termote, Marc
    2019 “L’utilisation du français dans la sphère publique : travail, commerce et affichage.” Language Problems and Language Planning, 43(2): 159–178. 10.1075/lplp.00040.ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00040.ter [Google Scholar]
  16. Vaillancourt, François
    2019 “Assessing Bill 101 after 40 years: An introduction.” Language Problems and Language Planning, 43(2): 103–112. 10.1075/lplp.00037.vai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00037.vai [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Tubergen, Frank and Menno Wierenga
    2011 “The Language Acquisition of Male Immigrants in a Multilingual Destination: Turks and Moroccans in Belgium.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(7): 1039–1057. 10.1080/1369183X.2011.572476
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2011.572476 [Google Scholar]
  18. Veltman, Calvin
    1983 “Language Shift in the United States.” Amsterdam: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110824001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110824001 [Google Scholar]
  19. 1988 “Modelling the Language Shift Process of Hispanic Immigrants.” International migration review, 22(4): 545–562. 10.1177/019791838802200401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019791838802200401 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Canada; home language; immigrants; linguistic distance; linguistic integration; Montreal
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error