Volume 46, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Language policy, which is directly concerned with organizational operation, functions, and objectives, has become an increasingly important issue in international organizations (IOs). However, research on IOs’ language policies, especially exploration based on large-scale data, is rather limited. Using data from the , this study explores how IOs select their languages. It is found that: (1) Federations of IOs and IGOs are more likely to choose languages other than English, whereas universal membership organizations and NGOs are much more likely to use English; (2) IOs headquartered in Western countries adopt more diverse languages than those in Asia, and those headquartered in developed countries are more prone to choose local language(s) than those in developing countries; (3) IOs with a longer history tend more towards multilingualism; (4) IOs dealing with religion, law, society, transportation, and communication are more inclined to be multilingual; and (5) IOs with individual members generally choose fewer languages than those with IO members. These findings reveal that IOs’ language management is shaped not only by internal and external organizational features, but also by the interactions between these features and language values.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ager, D. E.
    (1996) Language policy in Britain and France: The processes of policy. London and New York: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akiko, O.
    (1999) A study on international communication in regional organizations: The use of English as the “official” language of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). Asian Englishes, 2(1), 91–107. 10.1080/13488678.1999.10801020
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.1999.10801020 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ammon, U.
    (2006a) The dominance of languages and language communities in the European Union (EU) and the consequences. InM. Pütz, J. A. Fishman, & J. Neff-van Aertselaer. (Eds.), Along the Routes to Power: Explorations of Empowerment through Language (pp.217–238). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110923247.217
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110923247.217 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2006b) Language conflicts in the European Union. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 319–338. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2006.00121.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00121.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Angouri, J.
    (2013) The multilingual reality of the multinational workplace: Language policy and language use. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(6), 564–581. 10.1080/01434632.2013.807273
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.807273 [Google Scholar]
  6. Arzoz, X.
    (2008) Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/wlp.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barkin, J. S.
    (2006) International Organization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.   10.1057/9781403983237
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983237 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourdieu, P.
    (1991) Language and Symbolic Power (trans.G. Raymond, & M. Adamson). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bruthiaux, P.
    (2003) Contexts and trends for English as a global language. InH. Tonkin, & T. Reagan. (Eds), Language in the Twenty-First Century (pp.9–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/wlp.1.02bru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.1.02bru [Google Scholar]
  10. Chapman, T. L.
    (2009) Audience Beliefs and International Organization Legitimacy. International Organization, 63(4), 733–764. 10.1017/S0020818309990154
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309990154 [Google Scholar]
  11. Christiansen, P. V.
    (2006) Language policy in the European Union: European/English/Elite/Equal/ Esperanto Union?Language Problems and Language Planning, 30(1), 21–44. 10.1075/lplp.30.1.03chr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.30.1.03chr [Google Scholar]
  12. Crystal, D.
    (1997) English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. De Swaan, A.
    (2001) Words of the World: The Global Language System. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. De Varennes, F.
    (2012) Language policy at the supranational level. InB. Spolsky. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy (pp.3–16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511979026.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979026.011 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dhir, K. S., & Goke-Pariola, A.
    (2002) The case for language policies in multinational corporations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(4), 241–251. 10.1108/13563280210449822
    https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280210449822 [Google Scholar]
  16. Edwards, J.
    (2003) Language and the future: Choices and constraints. InH. Tonkin, & T. Reagan. (Eds), Language in the Twenty-First Century (pp.35–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/wlp.1.04edw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.1.04edw [Google Scholar]
  17. Franzese, M., & Iuliano, A.
    (2019) Correlation analysis. InS. Ranganathan, M. Gribskov, K. Nakai, & C. Schönbach. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (pp.706–721). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑809633‑8.20358‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20358-0 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gazzola, M.
    (2006) Managing multilingualism in the European Union: Language policy evaluation for the European Parliament. Language Policy, 5(4), 393–417. 10.1007/s10993‑006‑9032‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-006-9032-5 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gazzola, M., & Grin, F.
    (2007) Assessing efficiency and fairness in multilingual communication: Towards a general analytical framework. Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée Review, 20, 87–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Grin, F.
    (2003) Language planning and economics. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4:1, 1–66. 10.1080/14664200308668048
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200308668048 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2004) Coûts et justice linguistique dans l’élargissement de l’Union européenne. Panoramiques, 69(4), 97–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2008) Principles of Policy Evaluation and their Application to Multilingualism in the European Union. InX. Arzoz. (Ed.), Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union (pp.73–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/wlp.2.06gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.2.06gri [Google Scholar]
  23. (2019) The role of LPLP in a changing landscape. Language Problems and Language Planning, 4(1), 1–7. 10.1075/lplp.00029.edi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00029.edi [Google Scholar]
  24. Hamel, R.
    (2013) Language Policy and Ideology in Latin America. InR. Bayley, R. Cameron, & C. Lucas. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics (1st edition) (pp.609–628). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harmon, D., & Loh, J.
    (2010) The index of linguistic diversity: A new quantitative measure of trends in the status of the world’s languages. Language Documentation & Conservation, 4, 97–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Henderson, J. K.
    (2005) Language diversity in international management teams. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35(1), 66–82. 10.1080/00208825.2005.11043722
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2005.11043722 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hogan-Brun, G.
    (2013) Language planning as a complex practice. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(3–4), 359–362. 10.1080/14664208.2013.848648
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.848648 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hornberger, N. H.
    (1994) Language policy and planning in South America. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 14, 220–239. 10.1017/S0267190500002907
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002907 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2003) Multilingual language policies and the continua of biliteracy: An ecological approach. InN. H. Hornberger. (Ed.), Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596568‑018
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596568-018 [Google Scholar]
  30. Laverack, P. J.
    (2015) The rise of Asia and the status of the French language in International Law. Chinese Journal of International Law, 14(3), 567–583. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmv025
    https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmv025 [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, W., & Liu, H.
    (2013) Language problems and language planning: A corpus-based historical investigation. Language Problems and Language Planning, 37(2), 151–177. 10.1075/lplp.37.2.03lil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.37.2.03lil [Google Scholar]
  32. Liddicoat, A. J.
    (2009) Language planning and international collaboration: A current issue in language planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10(2), 163–165. 10.1080/14664200902878895
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200902878895 [Google Scholar]
  33. Loos, E.
    (2000) Language choice, linguistic capital and symbolic domination in the European Union. Language Problems and Language Planning, 24(1), 37–53. 10.1075/lplp.24.1.04loo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.24.1.04loo [Google Scholar]
  34. McEntee-Atalianis, L. J.
    (2006) Geostrategies of Interlingualism: Language Policy and Practice in the International Maritime Organisation, London, UK. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2–3), 341–358.   10.2167/cilp102.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp102.0 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mooko, T.
    (2009) Language policy and practice in the multilingual Southern African Development Community. Current Issues in Languages Planning, 10(2), 166–180. 10.1080/14664200802399141
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200802399141 [Google Scholar]
  36. Neeley, T. B.
    (2013) Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organization Science, 24(2), 476–497. 10.1287/orsc.1120.0739
    https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0739 [Google Scholar]
  37. Neustupný, J. V.
    (1997): Gengokanri to komyuniti gengo no shomondai [Language management and the problems of community languages]. InK. K. Kokuritsu. (Ed.), Tagengo, tabunka komyuniti no tameno gengokanri [Language Management for Multicultural Communities] (pp.21–37). Tokyo: Bonjinsha.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Neustupný, J. V. & Nekvapil, J.
    (2003) Language Management in the Czech Republic. New York, NY, USA: Taylor & Francis. 10.1080/14664200308668057
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200308668057 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pearce, M.
    (2007) The Routledge Dictionary of English Language Studies. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pearl, S.
    (1996) Changes in the patterns of language use in the United Nations. InK. E. Müller. (Ed.), Language Status in the Post-Cold-War Era (pp.29–42). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Phillipson, R.
    (2018) English, the lingua nullius of global hegemony. InP. A. Kraus, & F. Grin. (Eds), The Politics of Multilingualism: Europeanisation, Globalisation and Linguistic Governance (pp.275–304). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins. 10.1075/wlp.6.12phi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.6.12phi [Google Scholar]
  42. Piller, I., Zhang, J., & Li, J.
    (2020) Linguistic diversity in a time of crisis: Language challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Multilingua, 39(5), 503–515. 10.1515/multi‑2020‑0136
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0136 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pool, J.
    (1991) The Official Language Problem. American Political Science Review, 85, 495–514. 10.2307/1963171
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1963171 [Google Scholar]
  44. Quell, C.
    (1997) Language choice in multilingual institutions: A case study at the European Commission with particular reference to the role of English, French and German as working languages. Multilingua, 16(1), 57–76. 10.1515/mult.1997.16.1.57
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1997.16.1.57 [Google Scholar]
  45. Spolsky, B.
    (2004) Language Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2009) Language Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511626470
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626470 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2018) Language policy in Portuguese colonies and successor states. Current Issues in Language Planning, 19:1, 62–97. 10.1080/14664208.2017.1316564
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2017.1316564 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tonkin, H.
    (2017) Language and the United Nations: A preliminary review. [Online]. Available: www.esperantoun.org/images/languages-un-tonkin-draft-dec2011.pdf
  49. Wang, Y., & Liu, H.
    (2017) From planned language to language planning: Esperantists’ activities in China in 1911–1958. Language Problems and Language Planning, 41(3), 265–286. 10.1075/lplp.00006.wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00006.wan [Google Scholar]
  50. Wilkinson, B.
    (2009) Language, Power and Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Review of International Political Economy, 16(4), 597–619. 10.1080/09692290802587734
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802587734 [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, H., Wu, Y., & Xie, Z.
    (2020) Diversity or division: Language choices on international organizations’ official website. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(2), 139–154. 10.1109/TPC.2020.2982258
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2020.2982258 [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang, H., & Xie, Z.
    (2018) The choices of official languages of international organizations. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 52(2), 213–224.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J.
    (2002) Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy. The Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431. 10.2307/4134387
    https://doi.org/10.2307/4134387 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error