1887
image of Problematising ASEAN language policy
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In a world where linguistic and cultural diversity is increasingly celebrated, opting for English as the sole working language, as stipulated in the ASEAN Charter, on pragmatic grounds, has made ASEAN an interesting case study from the language policy and planning (LPP) perspective. ASEAN’s LPP can be understood as the manifestation of the principles of the ‘ASEAN Way’, i.e., quiet diplomacy, non-interference, and flexible consensus. Drawing on an analysis of the three overarching principles of the ASEAN Way and with reference to the ASEAN Charter, this paper problematises the ASEAN Way of LPP, arguing that a monolingual and essentialist approach to LPP might be both insufficient and inappropriate, and calls for an ecology-of-languages paradigm for ASEAN LPP. It invites readers to reimagine language policy that is more inclusive, democratic and socially equitable – one that reflects the sociolinguistic diversity of Southeast Asia and the Association.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.21044.lee
2022-03-28
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acharya, A.
    (1997) Ideas, identity, and institution-building: From the ‘ASEAN way’ to the ‘Asia-Pacific way’?The Pacific Review, 10(3), 319–346. 10.1080/09512749708719226
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749708719226 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ammon, U.
    (2012) Language policy in the European Union (EU). InB. Spolsky (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of language policy (pp.570–591). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511979026.034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979026.034 [Google Scholar]
  3. ASEAN Secretariat
    ASEAN Secretariat (2005, December12). Terms of reference of the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) on the ASEAN Charter. https://asean.org/?static_post=terms-of-reference-of-the-eminent-persons-group-epg-on-the-asean-charter
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ASEAN Secretariat
    ASEAN Secretariat (2009) The ASEAN Charter. ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta. www.asean.org/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Askandar, K., Berkovitch, J. & Oishi, M.
    (2002) The ASEAN way of conflict management: Old patterns and new trends, Asian Journal of Political Science, 10(2), 21–42, 10.1080/02185370208434209
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02185370208434209 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baetens Beardsmore, H.
    (2009) Language promotion by European supra-national institutions. InGarcia, O.Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective, Chichester, UK (pp.197–217). Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2015) Supra-national interventions promoting bilingual Education. InMehisto, P. & Genesee, F. (eds.), Building Bilingual Education Systems: Forces, Mechanisms and Counterweights. Cambridge, UK (pp.23–41). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bland, B.
    (2021, October22). ASEAN muddles through on Myanmar. Lowy Institute, Sydney: The Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/asean-muddles-through-myanmar
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2021) Language education policy. Retrieved12 January 2022fromhttps://www.coe.int/en/web/language-policy/language-policies
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Crystal, D.
    (1997) English as a global language. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chesterman, S.
    (2008) Does ASEAN exist? The Association of Southeast Asian Nations as an international legal person. The Singapore Year Book of International Law, 12, 199–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Curley, M. G., & Thomas, N.
    (2007) Advancing East Asian regionalism: an introduction. InMelissa, G. C. & Nicholas, T. (eds.), Advancing East Asian Regionalism. London, UK (pp.1–25). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dibb, P.
    (2016) What is ASEAN’s strategic value?Retrieved1 January 2022fromhttps://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/03/01/what-is-aseans-strategic-value/
  14. Djiwandono, J. S.
    (1995, June26). Confidence-building measures and preventive diplomacy: A Southeast Asian perspective. The evolving security situation in the Asia-Pacific region: Indonesian and Canadian perspectives [Symposium]. Jakarta, Indonesia.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gazzola, M.
    (2016) Multilingual communication for whom? Language policy and fairness in the European Union. European Union Politics, 17(4), 546–569. 10.1177/1465116516657672
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116516657672 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gogolin, I.
    (2002) Linguistic and cultural diversity in Europe: A challenge for educational research and practice. ECER Keynote. European Educational Research Journal, 1(1), 123–138. 10.2304/eerj.2002.1.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2002.1.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goh, G.
    (2003) The ‘ASEAN Way’: Non-intervention and ASEAN’s role in conflict management. Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs, 3(1), 113–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goh, E.
    (2016) Southeast Asian strategies against great powers. Still hedging after all these years?The ASEAN Special Forum. The ASAN Institute for Policy Studies. https://theasanforum.org/southeast-asian-strategies-toward-the-great-powers-still-hedging-after-all-these-years/
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Grin, F.
    (2019) The role of LPLP in a changing landscape. Language Problems and Language Planning, 43(1), 1–7. 10.1075/lplp.00029.edi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00029.edi [Google Scholar]
  20. Hamid, M. O.
    (2016) The politics of language in education in a global polity. InK. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp.259–274). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118468005.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468005.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hamid, M. O., & Kirkpatrick, A.
    (2016) Foreign language policies in Asia and Australia in the Asian Century. Language Problems & Language Planning, 40(1), 26–46. 10.1075/lplp.40.1.02ham
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.40.1.02ham [Google Scholar]
  22. Hardini, T. I., & Grangé, P.
    (2017) 27 countries, 23 languages, and communication challenges in the European Union: A comparison with ASEAN Economic Community. TAWARIKH: International Journal for Historical Studies, 8(2), 163–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kawashima, T.
    (2021) English use by heads of state at the United Nations General Assembly: Biennial survey of 1540 speeches between 2004 and 2018. English Today, 37(2), 92–114. 10.1017/S0266078419000464
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078419000464 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kirkpatrick, A.
    (2010) English as a Lingua Franca in ASEAN: A Multilingual Model. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 10.5790/hongkong/9789888028795.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888028795.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2017) Language education policy among the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), European Journal of Language Policy, 9(1), 7–25. 10.3828/ejlp.2017.2
    https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2017.2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kirkpatrick, A., & Liddicoat, A. J.
    (2020) English and language policies in East and Southeast Asia. InK. Bolton, W. Botha, & A. Kirkpatrick (eds.), The handbook of Asian Englishes (pp.725–740). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118791882.ch32
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118791882.ch32 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kruse, J., & Ammon, U.
    (2018) The language planning and policy for the European Union and its failures. InC. S. K. Chua (Ed.), Unintended language planning in a globalising world: Multiple levels of players at work (pp.39–56). De Gruyter Open. 10.1515/9783110518269‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110518269-003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, H. Y., Hamid, M. O. & Hardy, I.
    (2021) Language and education policies in Southeast Asia: reorienting towards multilingualism-as-resource, International Journal of Multilingualism, 10.1080/14790718.2021.2002333
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.2002333 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2021b) Characterising language policy and planning in international organisations: ASEAN insights, Current Issues in Language Planning, 10.1080/14664208.2021.1965742
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.1965742 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lo Bianco, J.
    (2014) A celebration of language diversity, language policy, and politics in education. Review of Research in Education, 38(1), 312–331. 10.3102/0091732X13511050
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X13511050 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mahbubani, K.
    (2015) ASEAN as a living, breathing modern miracle. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 2, 136–149. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48573461
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mardiano, M.
    (2017) English in a post-Brexit European Union. World Englishes, 36(3), 313–327. 10.1111/weng.12264
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12264 [Google Scholar]
  33. McEntee-Atalianis, L. J., & Vessey, R.
    (2020) Mapping the language ideologies of organisational members: A corpus linguistic investigation of the United Nations’ general debates (1970–2016). Language Policy, 19, 549–573. 10.1007/s10993‑020‑09542‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-020-09542-4 [Google Scholar]
  34. Narine, S.
    (1999) ASEAN into the twenty-first century: Problems and prospects, The Pacific Review, 12(3), 357–380. 10.1080/09512749908719296
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749908719296 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2009) ASEAN in the twenty-first century: A sceptical review. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 369–386. 10.1080/09557570903104065
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903104065 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nortajuddin, A.
    (2020) The future of consumption in ASEAN. The ASEAN Post. November4 2020 Retrieved onlinefromhttps://theaseanpost.com/article/future-consumption-asean
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Okudaira, A.
    (1999) A study on international communication in regional organisations: The use of English as the ‘official’ language of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). Asian Englishes, 2(1), 91–107. 10.1080/13488678.1999.10801020
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.1999.10801020 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pennycook, A.
    (2004) Language policy and the ecological turn. Language Policy, 3(3), 213–239. 10.1007/s10993‑004‑3533‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-004-3533-x [Google Scholar]
  39. Phillipson, R., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T.
    (1996) English only worldwide, or language ecology. ROLIG Papir, 53, 38–54. 10.2307/3587692
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587692 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pierson, P.
    (2004) Politics in time. History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400841080
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400841080 [Google Scholar]
  41. Quayle, L.
    (2013) Southeast Asia and the English school of international relations: A region-theory dialogue. Palgrave studies in international relations series. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137026859
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026859 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruiz, R.
    (1984) Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8, 15–34. 10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464 [Google Scholar]
  43. Seah, D.
    (2009) The ASEAN Charter. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 58(1), 197–212. 10.1017/S0020589308000882
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589308000882 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sercombe, P., & Tupas, R.
    (2014) Language, education and nation-building: Assimilation and shift in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137455536
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455536 [Google Scholar]
  45. Simpson, J., & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2019) Language diversity in Indigenous Australia in the 21st century. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(1), 67–80. 10.1080/14664208.2018.1503389
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1503389 [Google Scholar]
  46. Singh, D.
    (2018) Southeast Asia’s uneasy position in America’s Indo-pacific strategy. ISEAS Perspectives 2018(76), 1–7. Yusok Ishak Institute. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/[email protected]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Suzuki, S.
    (2019) Why is ASEAN not intrusive? Non-interference meets state strength, Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 8(2), 157–176. 10.1080/24761028.2019.1681652
    https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2019.1681652 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tupas, R.
    (2018) (Un)framing language policy and reform in Southeast Asia. RELC Journal, 49(2), 149–163. 10.1177/0033688218772155
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218772155 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tupas, R., & Martin, I. P.
    (2017) Bilingual and mother tongue-based multilingual education in the Philippines. InO. Garcia, A. Lin, & S. May (Eds.), Bilingual and multilingual education (pp.247–258). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02258‑1_18
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1_18 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tsuda, Y.
    (2000) Envisioning a democratic linguistic order. TESL Reporter, 33(1), 32–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2014) The hegemony of English and strategies for linguistic pluralism: Proposing the ecology of language paradigm. InM. K. Asante, Y. Miike, & J. Yin (Eds.), The global intercultural communication reader (2nd ed.), (pp.445–456). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wunderlich, J. U.
    (2012) Comparing regional organisations in global multilateral institutions: ASEAN, the EU and the UN. Asia Europe Journal, 10(2–3), 127–143. 10.1007/s10308‑012‑0324‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-012-0324-4 [Google Scholar]
  53. Yukawa, T.
    (2018) The ASEAN Way as a symbol: An analysis of discourses on the ASEAN norms. The Pacific Review, 31(3), 298–314. 10.1080/09512748.2017.1371211
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1371211 [Google Scholar]
  54. UNESCO
    UNESCO (2018) MTB MLE resource kit. Including the excluded: Promoting multilingual education. UNESCO.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.21044.lee
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error