1887
Volume 47, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The concept of standard language has become highly controversial after the rise of the postmodernist paradigm. This article traces the roots of the concept in the studies of a group of European linguists who inquired into the spread of “common languages” and related it to the processes of modernization and the role of social elites and urban centers during the 1920s. It then reviews the central role it played in the studies on nationalism and nation-building after 1945 and discusses how the focus on structural, macro-historical processes as determinants of the emergence of standard languages came to be abandoned in classical and postmodernist approaches to language standardization. Finally, it suggests that Antonio Gramsci’s insights on the “language question” in Italy should be read on the background of the early research on common languages and suggests that a reconsideration of macro-historical approaches could contribute to the understanding of the spread of Global English.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.22037.col
2023-10-03
2025-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, B.
    (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ascoli, G. I.
    (1873) Proemio. In: Archivio glottologico italiano, Vol.I1, pp.v – liv.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Auer, P.
    (1998) Dialect Levelling and the Standard Varieties in Europe, In: Folia Linguisticavol.32, no.1–2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.1–9. 10.1515/flin.1998.32.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1998.32.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonfante, G.
    (1947) The Neolinguistic Position (A Reply to Hall’s Criticism of Neolinguistics). In: Language, Vol.23, no.4, pp.344–375. 10.2307/410296
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410296 [Google Scholar]
  5. Caramani, D.
    (2011) Stein Rokkan: The Macro-Sociological Fresco of State, Nation and Democracy in Europe. In: Bull, M. (eds.), Masters of Political Science. Vol. 2. London: Routledge/ECPR.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlucci, A.
    (2013) Gramsci and Languages: Unification, Diversity, Hegemony. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004256392
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004256392 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chambers, J. K. & Trudgill
    (1980) Dialectology. Cambridge University Press (2nd Edition).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deutsch, K. W.
    (1942) International Affairs: The Trend of European Nationalism – the Language Aspect. In: American Political Science Review, Vol.36, no.3, pp.533–541. 10.2307/1949632
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1949632 [Google Scholar]
  9. (1953) Nationalism and Social Communication. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1961) Social Mobilization and Political Development. In: American Political Science Review, Vol.55, no.3, pp.493–514. 10.2307/1952679
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1952679 [Google Scholar]
  11. Esman, M. J.
    (ed. 1977) Ethnic Conflict in Western Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501734281
    https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501734281 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferguson, C. A.
    (1964) Directions in Sociolinguistics: Report on an Interdisciplinary Seminar. In: International Journal of the Sociology of Language, Vol.2020, no.263, pp37–44. 10.1515/ijsl‑2020‑2080
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2080 [Google Scholar]
  13. Flora, P.
    (1999) State Formation, Nation-Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198280323.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198280323.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Friedmann, J.
    (1986) The World City Hypothesis. John Friedmann. Development and Change. InInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol.17, no.1, pp.69–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gazzola, M.
    (2014) The Evaluation of Language Regimes: Theory and Application to Multilingual Patent Organisations. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/mdm.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/mdm.3 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gellner, E.
    (1983) Nations and Nationalism, Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gramsci, A.
    (1964) La lingua unica e l’Esperanto. In: Ferrata, G. & Gallo, N. (eds.) (2000) pagine di Gramsci, Vol. I. Nel tempo della lotta (1914–1926), Milano: Il Saggiatore, pp.271–275.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1975) Quaderni del carcere. 41vols.Ed. byV. Garritana, Torino: Einaudi.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haugen, E.
    (1966) Dialect, Language, Nation. In: American Anthropologist, Vol.681, pp.922–935. 10.1525/aa.1966.68.4.02a00040
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1966.68.4.02a00040 [Google Scholar]
  20. (1973) The Curse of Babel. In: Daedalus, Vol.102, no.3 (Language as a Human Problem), pp.47–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ives, P.
    (2010) Cosmopolitanism and Global English: Language Politics in GlobalisationIn: Political Studies, Vol581, pp.516–535. 10.1111/j.1467‑9248.2009.00781.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00781.x [Google Scholar]
  22. (2015) Global English and the Limits of Liberalism: Confronting Global Capitalism and Challenges to the Nation State. In: Ricento, T. (ed.), Language Policy & Political Economy: English in a Global Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.48–71. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199363391.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199363391.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jacquemet, M.
    (2005) Transidiomatic Practices: Language and Power in the Age of Globalization. In: Language & Communication, Vol.25, no.3, pp.257–277. 10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jernudd, B. H. & Nekvapil, J.
    (2012) History of the Field: A Sketch. InB. Spolsky (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.16–36. 10.1017/CBO9780511979026.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979026.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jespersen, O.
    (1922) Language, its Nature, Development and Origin. London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (1946) Mankind, Nation and Individual from a Linguistic Point of View, London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2010) Selected Writings. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Juul, A. & Nielsen, H. F.
    (1989) Otto Jespersen: Facets of his Life and Work. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sihols.52
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.52 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaplan, R. B. & Baldauf, R. B.
    (1997) Language Planning from Practice to Theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781800418059
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800418059 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kloss, H.
    (1969) Research Possibilities on Group Bilingualism: A Report. Quebec: International Center for research on Bilingualism.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1993) Abstand Languages and Ausbau Languages. In: A Retrospective of the Journal Anthropological Linguistics: Selected Papers, 1959–1985. Indiana University, pp.158–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Labov, W.
    (1964) The Social Stratification of English in New York City. New York: Columbia University Dissertation Publishing.
  33. Linn, A. R.
    (2002) Quousque Tandem: Language-teaching Reform in 19th-century Scandinavia. In: The Henry Sweet Society Bulletin, Vol.381. pp.34–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2008) The Birth of Applied Linguistics: The Anglo-Scandinavian School as Discourse Community. In: Historiographia Linguistica, Vol.35 (n.3/4), pp.342–384. 10.1075/hl.35.3.04lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.35.3.04lin [Google Scholar]
  35. Lo Piparo, F.
    (2010) The Linguistic Roots of Gramsci’s Non-Marxism. In: Ives, P. & Lacorte, R. (eds.), Gramsci, Language and Translation. Plymouth: Lexington Books, pp.19–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A.
    (2007) Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Clevedon – Buffalo – Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Makoni, S.
    (2011) Sociolinguistics, Colonial and Postcolonial: An Integrationist Perspective. In: Language Sciences, Vol.331, pp.680–688. 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.04.020 [Google Scholar]
  38. Meillet, A.
    (1920) Aperçu d’une histoire de la langue grecque. Paris: Achette.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (1925) La méthode comparative en linguistique historique. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (1928) Les langues dans l’Europe nouvelle, Paris: Payot (2nd ed.).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (1967) The Comparative Method in Historical Linguistics (translated byGordon B. Ford), Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Milroy, J.
    (2001) Language Ideologies and the Consequences of Standardization. In: Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol.5, no.4, pp.530–555. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00163
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2007) The Ideology of the Standard Language. In: Llamas, C., Mullany, L. & Stockwell, P. (eds.) Routledge Companion in Sociolinguistics, London: Routledge, pp.133–139.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Muljačić, Ž.
    (1985) Come applicare il modello standardologico comparativo in diacronia? Sulla “focalizzazione” nella storia linguistica d’Italia. In: Agostiniani, L., Bellucci-Maffei, P. & Paoli, M. (eds.), Linguistica storica e cambiamento linguistico. Roma: Bulzoni, pp.397–410.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pennycook, A.
    (2006) Postmodernism in Language Policy. In: T. Ricento (ed.), An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.60–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2019) From Translanguaging to Translingual Activism. In: Marcedo, D. (ed.), Decolonizing Foreign Language Education: The Misteaching of English and Other Colonial Languages. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429453113‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429453113-7 [Google Scholar]
  47. Rokkan, S. & Urwin, D.
    (1983) Economy, Territory, Identity: The Politics of the European Peripheries. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rosiello, L.
    (2010) Linguistics and Marxism in the Thought of Antonio Gramsci. In: Ives, P. & Lacorte, R. (eds.), Gramsci, Language and Translation. Plymouth: Lexington Books, pp.29–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rubin, J. & Jernudd, B. H.
    (1971) Can Languages Be Planned? Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice for Developing Nations. University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sassen, S.
    (1991) The Global City. New York London Tokyo, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sklair, L.
    (2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class, Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Smith, A. D.
    (1998) Nationalism and Modernism. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sweet, H.
    (1900) The History of Language. London: Dent.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tollefson, J. W.
    (1991) Planning Language, Planning Inequality. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (2006) Critical Theory in Language Policy. In: T. Ricento (ed.): An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.42–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Tollefson, J. W. & Milans Pérez, M.
    (2018) Research and Practice in Language Policy and Planning. In: The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Weber, E.
    (1977) Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford; Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.22037.col
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error