1887
Volume 48, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article proposes an application of the capability approach (CA) within linguistic justice, adopting a capability-based approach. The aim is to break down the concept into language-based capabilities associated with public goods, which can be evaluated through qualitative or quantitative methods, aligning with policy cycle models. The objective is to deconstruct the abstract notion of linguistic justice into manageable components, namely language-based capabilities, making it amenable to scrutiny through policy analysis. Language-based capabilities are capabilities linked to public goods and services that inherently require a language for conversion into functioning. The state plays a crucial role as a conversion enabler through fair and effective language policies. This breakdown into language-based capabilities facilitates the identification of individual strategies, making the evaluation of language policies easier. Such an approach enables an examination of the policymaking process, including its efficacy, shortcomings, and opportunities for improvement. The ultimate goal is to translate a highly normative approach into an operational definition, further breaking it down into measurable indicators, thereby advancing the field.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.23049.gia
2024-06-27
2025-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adamson, L.
    (2021) ‘Language of instruction: a question of disconnected capabilities’, Comparative Education, 57(2), pp. 187–205. 10.1080/03050068.2020.1812236
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1812236 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alcalde, J.
    (2018) ‘Linguistic justice: An interdisciplinary overview of the literature’, inLanguage Policy and Linguistic Justice: Economic, Philosophical and Sociolinguistic Approaches. Springer International Publishing, pp. 65–149. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑75263‑1_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75263-1_2 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alkire, S.
    (2005) ‘Why the Capability Approach?’, Journal of Human Development, 6(1), pp. 115–135. 10.1080/146498805200034275
    https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034275 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alkire, S., Comim, F. and Qizilbash, M.
    (2008) The capability approach: Concepts, measures and applications.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anand, P., Hunter, G. and Smith, R.
    (2005) ‘Capabilities and well-being: evidence based on the Sen–Nussbaum approach to welfare’, Social Indicators Research, 171, pp. 9–55. 10.1007/s11205‑005‑6518‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6518-z [Google Scholar]
  6. Anand, P., Krishnakumar, J. and Tran, N. B.
    (2011) ‘Measuring welfare: Latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity’, Journal of Public Economics, 95(3–4), pp. 205–215. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  7. Anand, S. and Sen, A.
    (1994) ‘Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement.’
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Banai, A.
    (2013) ‘Language Recognition and the Fair Terms of Inclusion: Minority Languages in the European Union’, inLiberal Multiculturalism and the Fair Terms of Integration. Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 194–211. 10.1057/9781137320407_12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137320407_12 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barakos, E.
    (2020) ‘Linguistic and social justice: Towards a debate of intersections and disjuncture’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24(2), pp. 265–277. 10.1111/josl.12379
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12379 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bauböck, R.
    (2015) ‘The political value of languages’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 10.1080/13698230.2015.1023635
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2015.1023635 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bauer, A. M., Chen, C. N. and Alegría, M.
    (2010) ‘English language proficiency and mental health service use among Latino and Asian Americans with mental disorders’, Medical care, 48(12), p.1097. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f80749
    https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f80749 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bernhardt, D.
    (2021) ‘Woman gets creative through TikTok, using new ways to share an old language | CBC News’, CBC [Preprint]. Manitoba. Available at: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/tiktok-social-media-cree-language-lessons-winnipeg-1.5970978
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Biggeri, M. and Libanora, R.
    (2011) ‘From Valuing to Evaluating: Tools and Procedures to Operationalize the Capability Approach’, Children and the Capability Approach, pp. 79–106. 10.1057/9780230308374_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230308374_4 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bizot, O.
    (2021) ‘Creators on TikTok elevating Māori culture and language – The Observers’, France14-The Observer [Preprint]. Available at: https://observers.france24.com/en/tv-shows/the-observers/20211109-sonny-ngatai-uses-tiktok-to-teach-people-the-language-of-new-zealand-s-indigenous-māori-people
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonotti, M., Carlsson, N. and Rowe, C. W.
    (2022) ‘Introduction: Linguistic justice, migration and the nation-state’, Nations and Nationalism, 28(2), pp. 379–386. 10.1111/nana.12793
    https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12793 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bonotti, M. and Lazzari, C. De
    (2023) ‘Linguistic justice for non-resident citizens: Protecting language interests away from home’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 10.1177/13691481231172433
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481231172433 [Google Scholar]
  17. Brando, N. and Morales-Gálvez, S.
    (2021) ‘Capabilities and Linguistic Justice’, Political Studies, pp. 1–9. 10.1177/00323217211033846
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211033846 [Google Scholar]
  18. Briggs, C. L.
    (2017) ‘Towards Communicative Justice in Health’, Medical Anthropology: Cross Cultural Studies in Health and Illness, 36(4), pp. 287–304. 10.1080/01459740.2017.1299721
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2017.1299721 [Google Scholar]
  19. Burchardt, T. and Vizard, P.
    (2011) ‘’Operationalizing’the capability approach as a basis for equality and human rights monitoring in twenty-first-century Britain’, Journal of Human Development, 12(1), pp. 91–119. 10.1080/19452829.2011.541790
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.541790 [Google Scholar]
  20. Carey, B.
    (2019a) ‘The preference satisfaction model of linguistic advantage’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 22(2), pp. 134–154. 10.1080/13698230.2016.1270905
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2016.1270905 [Google Scholar]
  21. Carey, B. and Shorten, A.
    (2018) ‘How should we identify and measure linguistic disadvantage?’, inhe MIME Vademecum Mobility and Inclusion in Multilingual Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Civico, M.
    (2022) Emergency language policy: Principles and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. 10.1163/22116117‑02001002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117-02001002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Comim, F.
    (2001) ‘Operationalizing Sen’s Capability Approach’, inJustice and Poverty: Examining Sen’s Capability Approach Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Crnić-Grotić, V.
    (2018) ‘The Right to Display Place Names in Regional or Minority Languages within the Council of Europe Legal Framework’, Language Policy and Conflict Prevention, pp. 182–196. 10.1163/9789004357754_012
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004357754_012 [Google Scholar]
  25. Duggan, N. and Holmström, I.
    (2022) ‘“They have no language”: Exploring language ideologies in adult education for deaf migrants’, Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 16(2), pp. 147–165. 10.47862/apples.111809
    https://doi.org/10.47862/apples.111809 [Google Scholar]
  26. Edwards, J.
    (2020) ‘Language Economics and Language Rights’, Bridging Linguistics and Economics, pp. 224–244. 10.1017/9781108783101.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108783101.010 [Google Scholar]
  27. Etxebarria, A.
    (2022) ‘An Educational Project Based on the YouTuber Phenomenon for the Development of a Minority Language’, Sustainability, 14(10). 10.3390/su14106242
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106242 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gazzola, M.
    (2023) ‘Epistemological and Theoretical Foundations in Language Policy and Planning: Introduction’, Epistemological and Theoretical Foundations in Language Policy and Planning, pp. 1–14. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑22315‑0_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22315-0_1 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gazzola, M.
    (2023) ‘Language policy as public policy’, inEpistemological and Theoretical Foundations in Language Policy and Planning. Springer, pp. 41–71. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑22315‑0_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22315-0_3 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gazzola, M. and Grin, F.
    (2018) ‘Comparative language policy and evaluation’, inTranslation and Public Policy. Routledge, pp. 83–116. 10.4324/9781315521770‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315521770-5 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gazzola, M., Grin, F. and Vaillancourt, F.
    (2020) ‘Evaluating Language Policy and Planning’, Bridging Linguistics and Economics, pp. 109–139. 10.1017/9781108783101.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108783101.005 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gazzola, M. and Iannàccaro, G.
    (2023) ‘INDICATORS IN LANGUAGE POLICY AND PLANNING’, inM. Gazzola (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Language Policy and Planning. Taylor and Francis, pp. 331–347. 10.4324/9780429448843‑27
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429448843-27 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gazzola, M., & Marinaro, N.
    (2022) Sprachenpolitik und Integration in Ausländerbehörden und Krankenhäusern: Der Fall Berlin und Leipzig. Jahrbuch der Gesellschaft für Interlinguistik, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gazzola, M., Templin, T. and Wickström, B.-A.
    (2018) Language policy and linguistic justice: Economic, philosophical and sociolinguistic approaches. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑75263‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75263-1 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gazzola, M., Wickström, B.-A. and Fettes, M.
    (2023a) ‘Towards an Index of Linguistic Justice’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics [Preprint], (Aop). 10.1177/1470594X231158657
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X231158657 [Google Scholar]
  36. Grin, F.
    (2003) Language Planning and Economics, Current Issues in Language Planning. 10.1080/14664200308668048
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200308668048 [Google Scholar]
  37. Grin, F. and Fürst, G.
    (2022) ‘Measuring Linguistic Diversity: A Multi-level Metric’, Social Indicators Research, 1641, pp. 1–21. 10.1007/s11205‑022‑02934‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02934-5 [Google Scholar]
  38. Gustafsson, K.
    (2022) ‘The right to an interpreter – A guarantee of legal certainty and equal access to public services in Sweden?’, Just. Journal of Language Rights & Minorities, Revista de Drets Lingüístics i Minories, 1(1–2), pp. 165–192. 10.7203/Just.1.24781
    https://doi.org/10.7203/Just.1.24781 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hayes, B. C. and Mcallister, I.
    (2007) ‘Integrated Education, Intergroup Relations, and Political Identities in Northern Ireland’, Social Problems, 541, pp. 1533–8533. 10.1525/sp.2007.54.4.454
    https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.4.454 [Google Scholar]
  40. Herraez Ortega, J. M., Abril Martí, M. I. and Martin, A.
    (2009) ‘Community interpreting in Spain: A comparative study of interpreters’ self perception of role in different settings’, inS. Beatriz Hale, U. Ozolins, and L. Stern (eds) The Critical Link 5: Quality in interpreting a shared responsibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 149–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Howlett, M. and Giest, S.
    (2015) ‘Policy Cycle’, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, pp. 288–292. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.75031‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.75031-8 [Google Scholar]
  42. Iannàccaro, G.
    (2019) ‘Verso un’individuazione del “disagio linguistico”’, inAtti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese. 10.13130/1972‑9901/11720
    https://doi.org/10.13130/1972-9901/11720 [Google Scholar]
  43. Iannàccaro, G. and Dell’Aquila, V.
    (2016) ‘On Linguistic Abilities, Multilingualism, and Linguistic Justice’, Acta Un. Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, 91, pp. 49–54. 10.1515/auseur‑2016‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2016-0007 [Google Scholar]
  44. Iskra, K. A.
    (2022) ‘Fact Sheets on the European Union: Language policy’, European Parliament [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/142/language-policy
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Jacobsen, B.
    (2004) ‘Pragmatic Meaning in Court Interpreting: An Empirical Study of Additions in Consecutively-Interpreted Question-Answer Dialogues’, International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(1), pp. 165–169. 10.1558/ijsll.v11i1.165
    https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v11i1.165 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kanaki, A.
    (2021) ‘Multilingualism and Social Inclusion in Scotland: Language Options and Ligatures of the “1+2 Language Approach”’, Social Inclusion, 9(1), pp. 14–23. 10.17645/si.v9i1.3488
    https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i1.3488 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kloss, H.
    (1977) ‘Ten types of language planning’, inLanguage Planning and the Building of a National Language, Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kymlicka, W. and Patten, A.
    (2003) Language Rights and Political Theory. Oxford Uni. Oxford. 10.1093/oso/9780199262908.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199262908.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. LeBlanc, M.
    (2010) ‘Le français, langue minoritaire, en milieu de travail : des représentations linguistiques à l’insécurité linguistique’, Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales, 6(1), pp. 17–63. 10.7202/1000482ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1000482ar [Google Scholar]
  50. Lewis, H.
    (2017) ‘Realising linguistic justice: resources versus capabilities’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(7), pp. 595–606. 10.1080/01434632.2016.1192178
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2016.1192178 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lippi-Green, R.
    (2012) English with an accent : language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203348802
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203348802 [Google Scholar]
  52. Mackenzie, L.
    (2022) ‘Theorising English as a Linguistic Capability: A Look at the Experiences of Economically Disadvantaged Higher Education Students in Colombia’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 23(3), pp. 477–500. 10.1080/19452829.2021.2014426
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2021.2014426 [Google Scholar]
  53. Morales-Gálvez, S.
    (2017) ‘Living together as equals: Linguistic justice and sharing the public sphere in multilingual settings’, Ethnicities, 17(5), pp. 646–666. 10.1177/1468796816667143
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796816667143 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2022) ‘Is speaking one’s own language(s) a right?’, Nations and Nationalism, 28(2), pp. 387–401. 10.1111/nana.12795
    https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12795 [Google Scholar]
  55. Morales-Gálvez, S. and Cetrà, D.
    (2021) ‘The controversy over the linguistic model of the catalan education system: Arguments, their normative bases and prospects for rapprochement’, Revista de Llengua i Dret, (75), pp. 46–63. 10.2436/RLD.I75.2021.3584
    https://doi.org/10.2436/RLD.I75.2021.3584 [Google Scholar]
  56. Morales-Gálvez, S. and Riera-Gil, E.
    (2019) ‘Què Són Polítiques Lingüístiques Justes ? Els Paradigmes Actuals de la Justícia Lingüística’, Revista d’Estudis Autonòmics i Federals – Journal of Self-Government, 301, pp. 25–56. 10.2436/20.8080.01.38
    https://doi.org/10.2436/20.8080.01.38 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mowbray, J.
    (2012) ‘Linguistic Justice: International Law and Language Policy’, Oxford University Press, 9780199646, pp. 1–248. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646616.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646616.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. (2022) ‘Language rights and linguistic justice in international law: Lost in translation?’, Just. Journal of Language Rights & Minorities, Revista de Drets Lingüístics i Minories, 1(1–2), pp. 37–68. 10.7203/Just.1.25238
    https://doi.org/10.7203/Just.1.25238 [Google Scholar]
  59. ‘Netflix to subtitle or dub in Catalan 70 titles per year’ (2022) Catalan News [Preprint]. Barcelona. Available at: https://www.catalannews.com/culture/item/netflix-to-subtitle-or-dub-in-catalan-70-titles-per-year
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Nussbaum, M.
    (2003) ‘Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice’, Feminist Economics, pp. 33–59. 10.1080/1354570022000077926
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926 [Google Scholar]
  61. Nussbaum, Martha C.
    (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press,. JSTOR, 10.2307/j.ctt2jbt31
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2jbt31 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2011) Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England. 10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200 [Google Scholar]
  63. Nussbaum, M.
    (2011b) Creating capabilities. 10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200 [Google Scholar]
  64. Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A.
    (1993) The quality of life. Oxford Uni. Oxford. 10.1093/0198287976.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  65. Palermo, F. and Woelk, J.
    (2003) ‘No representation without recognition: The right to political participation of (National) minorities’, Journal of European Integration, 25(3), pp. 225–248. 10.1080/0703633032000133574
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0703633032000133574 [Google Scholar]
  66. Van Parijs, P.
    (2002) ‘Linguistic Justice’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 1(1), pp. 59–74. 10.1177/1470594X02001001003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X02001001003 [Google Scholar]
  67. (2015) ‘Linguistic Territoriality’, inLinguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford University Press, pp. 133–174. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199208876.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199208876.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  68. Patten, A.
    (2015) Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights, Equal Recognition. Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400850433
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850433 [Google Scholar]
  69. Peled, Y.
    (2018) ‘Language barriers and epistemic injustice in healthcare settings’. 10.1111/bioe.12435
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12435 [Google Scholar]
  70. (2019) ‘Toward an Adaptive Approach to Linguistic Justice : Three Paradoxes’, pp. 173–188. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑75263‑1_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75263-1_4 [Google Scholar]
  71. Peled, Y. and Bonotti, M.
    (2016) ‘Tongue-Tied: Rawls, Political Philosophy and Metalinguistic Awareness’, American Political Science Review, 110(4), pp. 798–811. 10.1017/S0003055416000393
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000393 [Google Scholar]
  72. (2019) ‘Sound reasoning: Why accent bias matters for democratic theory’, The Journal of Politics, 81(2), pp. 411–425. 10.1086/701725
    https://doi.org/10.1086/701725 [Google Scholar]
  73. Piller, I.
    (2018) ‘Linguistic diversity and social justice: An introduction to applied sociolinguistics’, in. 10.1558/sols.33777
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.33777 [Google Scholar]
  74. Piller, I. and Takahashi, K.
    (2011) ‘Linguistic diversity and social inclusion’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(4), pp. 371–381. 10.1080/13670050.2011.573062
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.573062 [Google Scholar]
  75. Piller, I., Zhang, J. and Li, J.
    (2020) ‘Linguistic diversity in a time of crisis: Language challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic’, Multilingua, 39(5), pp. 503–515. 10.1515/multi‑2020‑0136
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0136 [Google Scholar]
  76. Ramallo, F.
    (2014) ‘Language policy and conflict management: A view from Galicia Policy and conflict’, inLanguage Policy and the Promotion of Peace: African and European Case Studies, pp. 93–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Réaume, D. G.
    (2003) ‘Beyond personality: the Territorial and Personal Principles of Language Policy Reconsidered’, inW. Kymlicka and A. Patten (eds) Language Rights and Political Theory. Oxford Uni. Oxford, pp. 271–295.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. (2017) ‘Fairness and equal recognition’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(1), pp. 63–74. 10.1080/13698230.2016.1253163
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2016.1253163 [Google Scholar]
  79. Rice, A.
    (2021) ‘Using YouTube as the Primary Transcription and Translation Platform for Remote Corpus Work’, Language Documentation and Conservation. University of Hawaii Press, pp. 514–550. Available at: hdl.handle.net/10125/74667
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Robeyns, I.
    (2005) ‘Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement’, Social Indicators Research, 74(1), pp. 191–215. 10.1007/s11205‑005‑6524‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6524-1 [Google Scholar]
  81. Sayers, D.
    (2024) ‘Using language to help people, or using people to help language? A capabilities framework of language policy’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), pp. 3–29. 10.1111/ijal.12463
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12463 [Google Scholar]
  82. Schutter, H. De
    (2014) ‘Testing for linguistic injustice: territoriality and pluralism’, Nationalities Papers, 42(6), pp. 1034–1052. 10.1080/00905992.2014.954989
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2014.954989 [Google Scholar]
  83. De Schutter, H.
    (2017) ‘Two principles of equal language recognition’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(1), pp. 75–87. 10.1080/13698230.2016.1253166
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2016.1253166 [Google Scholar]
  84. (2020) ‘Intralinguistic justice’, inY. Peled and D. M. Weinstock (eds) Language Ethics. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 10.1515/9780228002925‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780228002925-007 [Google Scholar]
  85. (2022) ‘Linguistic justice for immigrants’, Nations and Nationalism, 28(2), pp. 418–434. 10.1111/nana.12800
    https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12800 [Google Scholar]
  86. Scrutton, A. P.
    (2017) ‘Epistemic Injustice and Mental Illness’, The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, pp. 347–355. 10.4324/9781315212043‑34
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043-34 [Google Scholar]
  87. Sen, A.
    (1985a) ‘Freedom and agency’, The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), pp. 203–221. 10.5840/jphil198582468
    https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil198582468 [Google Scholar]
  88. (1985b) ‘Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984’, The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), p.169. 10.2307/2026184
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184 [Google Scholar]
  89. (1987) The standard of living: lecture I, concepts and critiques. 10.1017/CBO9780511570742
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570742 [Google Scholar]
  90. (1990) ‘Development as capability expansion’, The community development reader, pp. 41–58. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑21136‑4_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21136-4_3 [Google Scholar]
  91. (1994) ‘Well-being, capability and public policy’, Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 55(7/9), pp. 333–347.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Shorten, A.
    (2017) ‘Four conceptions of linguistic disadvantage’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(7), pp. 607–621. 10.1080/01434632.2016.1192174
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2016.1192174 [Google Scholar]
  93. (2018) Justice in the Linguistic Environment: Narrow or Wide?. In: Gazzola, M., Templin, T., Wickström, BA. (eds) Language Policy and Linguistic Justice. Springer, Cham. pp. 153–176 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑75263‑1_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75263-1_3 [Google Scholar]
  94. Skutnabb-Kangas, T.
    (2006) ‘Language policy and linguistic human rights’, inT. Ricento (ed.) An introduction to language policy: Theory and Method. Blackwell Publishing, pp. 273–291.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Cummins, J.
    (1988) Minority education: From shame to struggle.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Phillipson, R.
    (2016) Language Rights (Critical Concepts in Language Studies). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Timmermans, N.
    (2005) Council of Europe Publishing Editions du Conseil de l’Europe The status of sign languages in Europe. Strasbourg. Available at: www.coe.int
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Ulasiuk, I. and Hadîrcă, L.
    (2018) ‘To Speak or Not to Speak: Minority Languages, the Public Administration and the Enforcement of Linguistic Requirements’, Language Policy and Conflict Prevention, pp. 40–51. 10.1163/9789004357754_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004357754_004 [Google Scholar]
  99. Vaughan, D.
    (2022) ‘WEBINAR: The capability approach, linguistics, and language policy: resolving language-based social divisions in Sri Lanka | Human Development and Capability Association’. HDCA Asia-Pacific Regional Network.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Vizard, P. and Burchardt, T.
    (2007) Developing a capability list: Final Recommendations of the Equalities Review Steering Group on Measurement. London. Available at: sticerd.lse.ac.uk/case
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Weimer, D. L. and Vining, A. R.
    (2019) Policy analysis : concepts and practice.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Woelk, J., Marko, J. and Palermo, F.
    (2007) Tolerance through law: self governance and group rights in South Tyrol. 10.1163/ej.9789004163027.i‑422
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004163027.i-422 [Google Scholar]
  103. Yousef, J. and Agbaria, A.
    (2010) Israeli Government Policy and Civil Society Initiatives to Improve Arab Education in Israel Education on Hold. Haifa.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.23049.gia
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.23049.gia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): capability approach; language policy; linguistic justice; normative approach
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error