1887
Volume 40, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of foreign language policies in Asia and Australia with reference to policy contexts, motivations and processes. The analysis is specifically motivated by the recent publication of the White Paper that represents Australia’s renewed desire to engage with Asia by developing “Asia literacy” including the development of national proficiency in selected Asian languages. It is argued that, although foreign language policies in the two regions present interesting similarities in terms of policy contexts and goals, there is notable between Asia and Australia that potentially undermines Australian policy desire to with Asia. Furthermore, although languages, like other national resources, are planned to address social needs and aspirations, subjecting languages to economic imperative reflects not only misconceptions of languages but also misappropriation of their potential.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.1.02ham
2016-05-09
2019-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ager, D
    (2005) Image and prestige planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 6(1), 1–43. doi: 10.1080/14664200508668271
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200508668271 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali, L.H
    (2013)  Language policy and planning in Malaysia: Managing English-medium instruction at tertiary level . Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  3. Baldauf, R.B.J. , & Nguyen, H.T.M
    (2012) Language policy in Asia and the Pacific. In B. Spolsky (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of language policy (pp. 617–638). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511979026.036
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979026.036 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baldauf, R.B.Jr., Kaplan, R. , Kamwangamalu, N. , & Bryant, P
    (Eds) (2012) Language planning in primary schools in Asia. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bense, K
    (2014) “Languages aren’t important here”: German migrant teachers’ experiences in Australian language classes. Australian Educational Researcher, 41, 485–497. doi: 10.1007/s13384‑014‑0143‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0143-2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolton, K
    (2008) English in Asia, Asian Englishes, and the issue of proficiency. English Today, 24(2), 3–12. doi: 10.1017/S0266078408000333
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078408000333 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradford, A
    (2013) English-medium degree programs in Japanese universities: learning from the European experience. Asian Education and Development Studies, 2(3), 225–240 doi: 10.1108/AEDS‑06‑2012‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2012-0016 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brissenden, M
    (2013) Australia spied on Indonesian president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, leaked Edward Snowden documents reveal. 18November 2013 www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-18/australia-spied-on-indonesian-president-leaked-documents-reveal/5098860
  9. Bruthiaux, P
    (2002) Hold your courses: Language education, language choice, and economic development. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 275–296. doi: 10.2307/3588414
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588414 [Google Scholar]
  10. Canagarajah, S
    (2005) Reconstructing local knowledge, reconfiguring language studies. In S. Canagarajah (Ed.), Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chua, C.S.K. , & Baldauf, R.B. Jr
    (2011) Micro language planningIn E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 936–951). New York; London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Clyne, M. & Kipp, S
    (2006) Australia’s community languages. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 180, 7–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Commonwealth of Australia
    (2012) Australia in the Asian century white paper. Canberra: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2013) Australia in the Asian century: Implementation plan. Canberra: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cooper, R.L
    (1989) Language planning and social changeCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cross, R
    (2009) A sociocultural framework for language policy and planning. Language Problems & Language Planning, 33(1), 22–42. doi: 10.1075/lplp.33.1.02cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.33.1.02cro [Google Scholar]
  17. Dang, T.K.A. , Nguyen, H.T.M. , & Le, T.T.T
    (2013) The impacts of globalisation on EFL teacher education through English as a medium of instruction: an example from Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 52–72. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2013.780321
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.780321 [Google Scholar]
  18. Djité, P.G
    (2011) Language policy in Australia: What goes up must come down?In C. Norrby and J. Hajek (Eds.), Uniformity and diversity in language policy: Global perspectives (pp. 53–67). Bristol; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Firdaus, F
    (2013) Indonesian language education in Australia: Politics, policies and responses. Asian Studies Review, 37(1), 24–41. doi: 10.1080/10357823.2012.760527
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2012.760527 [Google Scholar]
  20. Floris, F.D
    (2014) Learning subject matter through English as the medium of instruction: Students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Asian Englishes, 16(1), 47–59. doi: 10.1080/13488678.2014.884879
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2014.884879 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gill, S.K. , & Kirkpatrick, A
    (2013) English in Asian and European Higher Education. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.1916–1920). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gupta, S.P
    (2002) India Vision 2020. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Halse, C
    (2013) Asia literacy and schooling. Curriculum Perspectives, 33(3), 71–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hamid, M.O
    (2010) Globalisation, English for everyone and English teacher capacity: Language policy discourses and realities in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(4), 289–310. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2011.532621
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.532621 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2016) The politics of language in education in a global polity. In K. Mundy , A. Green , B. Lingard & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 259–274). London: Wiley Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118468005.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468005.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hamid, M.O. , & Baldauf, R.B.J
    (2014) Public-private domain distinction as an aspect of LPP frameworks: A case study of Bangladesh. Language Problems & Language Planning, 38(2), 192–210. doi: 10.1075/lplp.38.2.05ham
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.38.2.05ham [Google Scholar]
  27. Hamid, M.O. , & Jahan, I
    (2015) Language, identity and social divides: Medium of instruction debates in Bangladeshi print media. Comparative Education Review, 59 (1), 75–101. doi: 10.1086/679192
    https://doi.org/10.1086/679192 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hamid, M.O. , Jahan, I. , & Islam, M.M
    (2013) Medium of instruction policies and language practices, ideologies and institutional divides: voices of teachers and students in a private university in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 144–163. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2013.771417
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.771417 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hamid, M.O. , Nguyen, H.T.M. , & Baldauf, R.B.J
    (Eds.) (2014) Language planning for medium of instruction in AsiaLondon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hamid, M.O. , Sussex, R. , & Khan, A
    (2009) Private tutoring in English for secondary school students in Bangladesh. TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 281–308. doi: 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2009.tb00168.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00168.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Hashimoto, K
    (2009) Cultivating ‘Japanese Who Can Use English’: Problems and contradictions in government policy. Asian Studies Review, 33, 21–42. doi: 10.1080/10357820802716166
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10357820802716166 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2013) The Japanisation of English language education: Promotion of the national language within foreign language policyIn J.W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (2nd ed.) (pp. 174–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hatoss, A
    (2014) Displacement, language maintenance and identity: Sudanese refuges in Australia. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.34 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hercovitch, B
    (2012) English is the language of the Asian century. www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-13/herscovitch-english-asia/4257442.
  35. Hornberger, N.H. , & Johnson, D.C
    (2007) Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532. doi: 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00083.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00083.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Hu, G. , & McKay, S.L
    (2012) English language education in East-Asia: Some recent developments. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 33(4), 345–362. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2012.661434
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2012.661434 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hu, G. , Li, L. , & Lei, J
    (2014) English-medium instruction at a Chinese university: Rhetoric and reality. Language Policy, 13(1), 21–40. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑013‑9298‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9298-3 [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson, D. , & Ricento, T
    (2013) Conceptual and theoretical perspectives in language planning and policy: situating the ethnography of language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, 7–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kachru, B.B
    (1998) English as an Asian language. Links & Letters, 5, 89–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kaplan, R.B
    (2011) Macro language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 924–935). New York; London:Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kaplan, R.B. , & Baldauf, B.R
    (1997) Language planning: From practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kaplan, R.B. , Baldauf, R.B. Jr , & Kamwangamalu, N
    (2011) Why educational language plans sometimes fail. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 105–124. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2011.591716
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.591716 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kin, K.W
    (2013, 18April 2013) TOEFL or not TOEFL? For Abe, the answer is clear. The Straits Times. Retrieved fromblogs.straitstimes.com/2013/04/18/toefl-or-not-toefl-for-abe-the-answer-is-clear/
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kirkpatrick, A
    (2011) English as a lingua franca in ASEAN: A multilingual model. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2012) English as an Asian lingua franca: The ‘Lingua Franca Approach’ and implications for language education policyJournal of English as Lingua Franca, 1(1), 121–139.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2014) English as a medium of instruction in East and Southeast Asian universities. In N. Murray & A. Scarino (Eds.), Dynamic ecologies: A relational perspective on languages education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 15–29). Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Koh, A
    (2013) A cultural studies approach to Asia literacy: A curriculum imagination. Curriculum Perspectives, 33(3), 86–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kohler, M
    (2014) The teaching and learning of Indonesian in Australia: Issues and prospects. In N. Murray & A. Scarino (Eds.), Dynamic ecologies: A relational perspective on languages education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 169–181). New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Liddicoat, A.J
    (2014) Tensions in the linguistic space. In N. Murray & A. Scarino (Eds.), Dynamic ecologies: A relational perspective on languages education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 217–227). Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lo Bianco, J
    (1987) National policy on languages. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2004) Language planning as applied linguistics. In A. Davies and C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 738–762). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470757000.ch30
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch30 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2010a) Language policy and planning. In N.H. Hornberger and S.L. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp.143–174). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2010b) The struggle to retain diversity in language education. In A. Scarino and A.J. Liddicoat (Eds.), Languages in Australian education: Problems, prospects and future directions (pp. 97–108). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (2013) What’s needed for Asian languages?Curriculum Perspectives, 33(3), 74–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (2014) Asia and Anglosphere: Public symbolism and language policy in Australia. In N. Murray and A. Scarino (Eds.), Dynamic ecologies: A relational perspective on languages education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 59–73). Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Lo Bianco, J. , & Aliani, R
    (2013) Language planning and student experiences: Intention, rhetoric and implementationClevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Makoni, S. , & Pennycook, A
    (2007) Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Morita, L
    (2014) English, language shift and values shift in Japan and Singapore. Globalisation, Societies and Education, iFirst. doi: 10.1080/14767724.2014.967184
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.967184 [Google Scholar]
  59. Murray, N. & Scarino, A
    (2014) Introduction: A relational perspective on language learning. In M. Murray and A. Scarino (Eds.), Dynamic ecologies: A relational perspective on languages education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp.3–33). New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Nguyen, T.H. , Hamid, M.O. , & Moni, K
    (2016) English-medium instruction and self-governance in higher education: The journey of a Vietnamese university through the institutional autonomy regime. Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10734‑015‑9970‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9970-y [Google Scholar]
  61. Nunan, D
    (2003) The Impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific Region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589–613. doi: 10.2307/3588214
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588214 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pan, C
    (2013) Knowing Asia and re-imagining the Australian self. Curriculum Perspectives, 33(3), 77–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Pennycook, A
    (2000) English, politics, ideology: From colonial celebration to postcolonial performativity. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Ideology, politics and language policies: Focus on English (pp. 107–119). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.6.09pen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.6.09pen [Google Scholar]
  64. Piller, I. , & Cho, J
    (2013) Neoliberalism as language policy. Language in Society, 42, 23–44. doi: 10.1017/S0047404512000887
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404512000887 [Google Scholar]
  65. Rajput, J.S
    (2002) Vision 2020—Education. New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Ricento, T
    (2000) Historical and theoretical perspectives on language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196–213. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00111
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00111 [Google Scholar]
  67. Rizvi, F
    (2013) Asia literacy and beyond. Curriculum Perspectives, 33(3), 80–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Ruiz, R
    (1984) Orientations in language planningNABE Journal, 8, 15–34
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Salter, P
    (2015 ) A reconceptualisation of ‘knowing Asia’ in Australian education. Discourse, 36 (6). 781–794.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Scarino, A
    (2014) Recognising the diversity of learner achievements in learning Asian languages in school education settings. In N. Murray and A. Scarino (Eds.), Dynamic ecologies: A relational perspective on languages education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 137–150). New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Schriewer, J. , & Martinez, C
    (2004) Constructions of internationality in education. In G.Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 29–53). New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Sellar, S. , & Lingard, B
    (2013) Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field.. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2013.770943
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.770943 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sonntag, S
    (2003) The local politics of global English: Case studies in linguistic globalisation. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Spolsky, B
    (2009) Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511626470
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626470 [Google Scholar]
  75. Toh, G
    (2014) English for content instruction in a Japanese higher education setting: Examining challenges, contradictions and anomalies. Language and Education, 28(4), 299–318. doi: 10.1080/09500782.2013.857348
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2013.857348 [Google Scholar]
  76. Tollefson, J.W
    (2013) Language policy in a time of crisis and transformation. In J.W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (2nd ed.) (pp. 11–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Tsui, A.B.M. , & Tollefson, J.W
    (Eds.) (2007) Language policy, culture and identity in Asian contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Wright, S
    (2002) Language education and foreign relations in Vietnam. In J.W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language Policies in Education: Critical Issues (pp. 225–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. (2012) Language policy, the nation and nationalism. In B. Spolsky (Ed.)The Cambridge handbook of language policy (59–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511979026.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979026.006 [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhao, S
    (2011) Actors in language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.)Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Vol. 2. (pp.905–923.) New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.1.02ham
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error