1887
Volume 40, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

L. L. Zamenhof saw the creation of his proposed international language, Esperanto, as a process of construction, rather like the building of a city. This new city of words would replace the walls of language difference that had previously separated the nations. His poems imagined a new “foundation” replacing the Tower of Babel and destroying the walls of Jericho. Unlike most other projectors of international languages, Zamenhof saw the creation of a community of Esperanto speakers, who could claim ownership of the language, as crucially important. The language began as text, but soon, as a result of its growing community of users, became a spoken language. The language owed its popularity to the emergence of an urban European middle class, eager to travel and learn about the world — at a time when the modern city was also emerging, its sense of identity defined above all by shared text and a common narrative. A common narrative and a shared text were also generated among the speakers of Esperanto, who were imbued with faith in technological progress and a corresponding belief in the achievement of common values. They developed common symbols and common modes of organization reflecting those that they found around them, notably the holding of annual international congresses in European cities, and other city-based activities. Zamenhof’s own beliefs were driven above all by his experience as a Central European Jew and by his exposure to early manifestations of the Zionist movement, which led him to dream of a kind of post-Zionist universalism embracing all creeds and races. Sadly, this was not to be: he could not put an end to anti-Semitism, nor bring about the kind of ecumenism of which he dreamed. That vision was lost in the rise of nationalism in World War I and beyond.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.1.06ton
2016-05-09
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Appiah, K
    (2006) Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Archibugi, D
    (2007) The language of democracy: Vernacular or Esperanto? A comparison of the multiculturalist and cosmopolitan perspectives. In C. Rumford (Ed.), Cosmopolitanism and Europe (pp. 142–157). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Auld, W
    (Ed.) (1984) Esperanta antologio 1887-1981. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barth, G
    (1980) City people: The rise of modern city culture in nineteenth-century America. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck, U
    (2006) The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Berger, P. , & Luckmann, T
    (1966) The social construction of reality. Harmondsworth and Baltimore: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Birnbaum, P
    (2003) The anti-semitic moment: A tour of France in 1898. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blahuš, M
    (2012) Cifereca prilaboro de la Zamenhofaj adresaroj. In D. Blanke (Ed.), Pioniroj de la Internacia Lingvo (pp.55–60). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blanke, D
    (2009) Causes of the relative success of Esperanto. Language Problems and Language Planning, 33(3), 251–266. doi: 10.1075/lplp.33.3.04bla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.33.3.04bla [Google Scholar]
  10. Boulton, M
    (1960) Zamenhof, creator of Esperanto. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Boyer, M.C
    (1994) The city of collective memory: Its historical imagery and architectural entertainments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eco, U
    (1995) The search for the perfect language, trans. J. Fentress . Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fritzsche, P
    (1996) Reading Berlin 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Garvía, R
    (2013) Religion and artificial languages at the turn of the 20th century: Ostwald and Zamenhof. Language Problems and Language Planning, 37(1), 47–70. doi: 10.1075/lplp.37.1.04gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.37.1.04gar [Google Scholar]
  15. (2015) Esperanto and its rivals: The struggle for an international language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi: 10.9783/9780812291278
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812291278 [Google Scholar]
  16. Geppert, A (2010) Fleeting cities. Imperial expositions in fin-de-siècle Europe. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gobbo, F
    (2009) Fondamenti di interlinguistics ed esperantologia: Pianificazione linguistica e lingue pianificate. Milano: Cortina.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gordin, M
    (2015) Scientific Babel: How science was done before and after global English. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226000329.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226000329.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gubbins, P
    (1999) Majstra muzikado: Berlino en romanoj de Varankin kaj Schwartz. In V. Benczik (Ed.), Lingva arto: Jubilea libro omaĝe al William Auld kaj Marjorie Boulton (pp.61–69). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2006) Kaj en ondoj dronas ankaŭ verda stelo: W. T. Stead kaj ni. British Esperantist, Spring, 26–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harper, T.N
    (2002) Empire, diaspora, and the languages of globalism 1850-1914. In A.G. Hopkins (Ed.), Globalization in world history (pp.141–166). New York and London: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, Young Soo
    (1999) Esperanto and global identity. In J. Boli and G.M. Thomas (Eds.), Constructing world culture (pp. 127–148). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kiselman, C
    (2010) Hilelismo, homaranismo kaj neŭtrale-homa religio. In D. Blanke and U. Lins (Eds.), La arto labori kune (pp.401–414). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (Ed.) (2009) Religiaj kaj filozofiaj ideoj de Zamenhof: Kultura kaj socia fono. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Korĵenkov, A
    (2011) Homarano: La vivo, verkoj kaj ideoj de d-ro L. L. Zamenhof (2nd ed.). Kaliningrad: Sezonoj / Kaunas: Litova Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Korzhenkov, A
    (2010) Zamenhof: The Life, Works and Ideas of the Author of Esperanto, trans. I. Richmond . New York: Mondial.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Künzli, A
    (2010) L. L. Zamenhof (1859-1917): Esperanto, Hillelismus (Homaranismus) und die “jüdische Frage” in Ost- und Westeuropa. Wiesbaden, Germany: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lins, U
    (2008) Esperanto as language and idea in China and Japan. Language Problems and Language Planning, 32(1), 47–60. doi: 10.1075/lplp.32.1.05lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.32.1.05lin [Google Scholar]
  29. Lo Bianco, J
    (2004) Invented languages and new worlds. English Today, 20(2), 8–18. doi: 10.1017/S0266078404002032
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078404002032 [Google Scholar]
  30. Maimon, N.Z
    (1978) La kaŝita vivo de Zamenhof. Tokyo: Japana Esperanto-Instituto.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mazower, M
    (2012) Governing the world: The history of an idea, 1815 to the present. New York: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Müller-Saini, G. , & Benton, G
    (2006) Esperanto and Chinese anarchism 1907-1920: The translation from diaspora to homeland. Language Problems and Language Planning, 30, 45–73. doi: 10.1075/lplp.30.1.05mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.30.1.05mul [Google Scholar]
  33. (2006) Esperanto and Chinese anarchism in the 1920s and 1930s. Language Problems and Language Planning, 30, 173–192. doi: 10.1075/lplp.30.2.06mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.30.2.06mul [Google Scholar]
  34. Nagai, K
    (2010) “The new bilingualism”: Cosmopolitanism in the era of Esperanto. In J. Wilson , C. Şandru and S. Lawson Welsh (Eds.), Rerouting the postcolonial: New directions for a new millennium (pp. 48–59). London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Okrent, A
    (2009) In the land of invented languages. New York: Spiegel & Grau.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Osterhammel, J. , & Petersson, N
    (2005) Globalization: A short history. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Privat, E
    (1931) The Life of Zamenhof, trans. R. Eliott . London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Rodríguez, K
    (2012) Small city on a big couch. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Romaniuk, Z. , & Wiśniewski, T
    (2009) Ĉio komenciĝis ĉe la Verda. Pri Ludoviko Zamenhof, lia familio kaj la komenco de Esperanto / Zaczęło się na Zielonej. O Ludowiku Zamenhofie, jego rodzinie i początkach esperanta. Łódź, Poland: Księż Młyn.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rossi, P
    (2000) Logic and the art of memory: The quest for a universal language, trans. S. Clucas . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schor, E
    (2009) Esperanto: A Jewish story. Pakn Treger: The Magazine of the National Yiddish Book Center, 60, 16–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2010) Zamenhof and the shadow people. Language Problems and Language Planning, 34(2), 183–192. doi: 10.1075/lplp.34.2.05sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.34.2.05sch [Google Scholar]
  43. (2015) Zamenhof and the liberal/communitarian debate. Language Problems and Language Planning, 39(3), forthcoming.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sikosek, Z
    (2005) Sed homoj kun homoj. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Simon, S
    (2012) Cities in translation: Intersections of language and memory. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Stillman, R
    (1995) The new philosophy and universal languages in seventeenth-century England: Bacon, Hobbes, and Wilkins. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press; London: Associated University Presses.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tanner, T
    (1971) City of words: American fiction 1950-1970. London: Jonathan Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tauli, V
    (1968) Introduction to a theory of language planning. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tonkin, H
    (2002a)  La Espero: Esperanto-poetoj pri Esperanto. In R. McCoy (Ed.), Internacia Kongresa Universitato, Fortalezo, Brazilo 3-10 aŭgusto 2002 (pp.46–67). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (2002b) The role of literary language in Esperanto. In K. Schubert (Ed.), Planned languages: From concept to reality (pp.11–35). Brussels: Hogeschool voor Wetenschap en Kunst.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2012) Movado aŭ kulturo? La ideologia bazo de la Esperanto-poezio. In R. McCoy (Ed.), Internacia Kongresa Universitato, Hanojo, Vjetnamio 28 julio-4 aŭgusto 2012 (pp.44–56). Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2014) Planning the Past in Language Planning. A’dam Multiling (Amsterdam Working Papers in Multilingualism), 1(1), 6–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2015) Language planning and planned languages: How can planned languages inform language planning?INDECS: Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 12, forthcoming.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Van Dijk, Z
    (2012) Historio de UEA. Partizánske, Slovakia: Espero.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Zamenhof, L.L
    (1907) Esperanto and Jewish ideals: Interview for the Jewish Chronicle with Dr. Zamenhof. Jewish Chronicle (6September), 16–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. (1929) Originala verkaro, ed. J. Dietterle . Leipzig: Ferdinand Hirt.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. (1961) Proverbaro esperanta. La Laguna: Régulo.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Żelazny, W
    (2012) Ludwik Zamenhof: Życie I dzieło, Recepcja I reminiscencje, Wybór pism I listów. Kraków: NOMOS.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.1.06ton
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anti-Semitism , Esperanto , language and cities , universalism and Zamenhof
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error