1887
Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

On 18 February 2012 Latvian citizens participated in a referendum on making Russian a second official (“state”) language. The proposal was rejected by three-quarters of voters. There is a complex background to language policy in Latvia, where since regaining independence in 1991 the country has promoted Latvian as the only state language, though Russian and other languages are widely used at a societal level. The language law and associated citizenship law in Latvia (as in Estonia) have received considerable commentary, with recent significant writings disagreeing strongly regarding their interpretation. These laws have also very often been criticized by both European institutions and by Russia, yet are tenaciously clung to as a basis of Latvian sovereignty. Proficiency in Latvian among previous non-speakers of this language has improved markedly since regained independence, and generally there has been little interpersonal or community confict over language. The move for a referendum, promoted by Russian groups of a highly political character, and with a particular discourse about Latvia and language, brings a new phase to an ongoing language policy issue. Subsequent events both in Latvia (in the form of a constitutional amendment) and in Ukraine (in the form of both language law and armed conflict) show language policy being increasingly influenced by wider political forces.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.2.01dru
2016-07-22
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agarin, T
    2010A Cat‘s Lick. Democratisation and Minority Communites in the Post-Soviet Baltic. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Agustsson, A
    (2011) Framed peoples: The discourse of minority elites and the language question in Ukraine. Slovo, 23(2), 80–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alksnis, V
    (1991) Suffering from self-determination. Foreign Policy, 84, 61–71. doi: 10.2307/1148782
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1148782 [Google Scholar]
  4. Balodis, R
    (2014) Konstitūcijas sastāvdaļa – preambula: tās loma un nozīme mūsdienu konstitucionālismā/ [The Preamble to the Constitution: its role and importance in modern constitutionalism.] In University of Latvia Proceedings of 72nd Scientific Conference (pp.295–311). Riga: University of Latvia,.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baltic Institute of Social Sciences
    2008Language. Report March-April 2008. Retrieved fromwww.biss.soc.lv/?lang=en&category=resurss&id=2006-2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bildt, C
    (1994) The Baltic litmus test. Foreign Affairs, 73(5), 72–85. doi: 10.2307/20046832
    https://doi.org/10.2307/20046832 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bratt Paulston, C. , Szidonia Haragos, V.L. & Martelle, W
    (2007) Some thoughts on extrinsic linguistic minorities. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(5), 385–399. doi: 10.2167/jmmd389.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd389.0 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bruthiaux, P
    (2009) Language rights in historical and contemporary perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30(1), 73–85. doi: 10.1080/01434630802510139
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630802510139 [Google Scholar]
  9. Budryte, D
    (2005) Taming Nationalism? Political Community Building in the Post-Soviet Baltic States. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Deets, S
    (2002) Reconsidering East European minority policy: liberal theory and European norms. East European Politics and Societies, 16(1), 30–54. doi: 10.1177/0888325402016001003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325402016001003 [Google Scholar]
  11. de Varennes, F
    (1995/6) The protection of linguistic minorities in Europe and human rights: possible solutions to ethnic conflicts?Columbia Journal of European Law, 2(1), 107–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Druviete, I
    (1997) Linguistic Human rights in the Baltic States. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 127, 161–185. doi: 10.1515/ijsl.1997.127.161
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1997.127.161 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2010) Latvian language as the state language: As a symbol, as a form of communication, or the foundation for statehood?In A. Cimdina & D. Hanovs (Eds), Latvia and Latvians. A People and a State in Ideas, Images and Symbols (pp.145–182). Riga: Zinātne.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dunbar, R
    (2001) Minority language rights in international law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 50, 90–120. doi: 10.1093/iclq/50.1.90
    https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/50.1.90 [Google Scholar]
  15. Grigas, A
    (2012) Legacies, Coercion and Soft Power: Russian Influence in the Baltic States. Retrieved fromwww.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/185321 (4 November, 2012).
  16. Hogan-Brun, G
    (2006) At the interface of language ideology and practice: The public discourse surrounding the 2004 education reform in Latvia. Language Policy, 5(2), 313–333. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑006‑9028‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-006-9028-1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hogan-Brun, G. , Ozolins, U. , Ramoniene, M. & Rannut, M
    (2007) Language politics and practices in the Baltic States. Current Issues in Language Planning, 8(4), 469–631. doi: 10.2167/cilp124.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp124.0 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jarinovska K
    (2013) Popular initiatives as means of altering the core of the Republic of Latvia. Juridica International Law Review, XX, 152–159. Retrieved fromwww.juridicainternational.eu/public/pdf/ji_2013_1_152.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jubulis, M
    (2001) Nationalism and democratic transition: The politics of citizenship and language in post-Soviet Latvia. Lanham: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Latvia. Latvian Language Agency [Latviešu valodas aģentūra
    ] (2011) Valodas situācija Latvijā 2004-2010 [The Language Situation in Latvia 2004-2010]. The Agency.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Latvia. State Language Commission
    (2008) Break-out of Latvian. A Sociolinguistic Study of Situation, Attitudes, Processes, and Tendencies. Riga: Zinātne.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Levits E
    (2013) Izvērstas Satversmes preambulas iespējamā teksta piedāvājums un komentārs. [Draft of possible text of a Constitutional Preamble and commentary] Jurista Vārds, 39(790), 8–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Loeber, D.A
    (1993) Language rights in independent Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, 1918–1940. In S. Vilfan (Ed.), Ethnic Groups and Language Rights (pp.221–249). Aldershot: Dartmouth.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Maurais, J
    (Ed.) (1998) Les Politiques Linguistiques des Pays baltes. Special number of Terminogramme. Quebec: Office de la langue française.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ozolins, U
    (1999) Between Russian and European hegemony: Current language policy in the Baltic States. Current Issues in Language and Society, 6(1), 6–47. doi: 10.1080/13520529909615534
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13520529909615534 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2003) The impact of European accession upon language policy in the Baltic States. Language Policy, 2(3), 217–238. doi: 10.1023/A:1027320716791
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027320716791 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pavlenko, A
    (2011) Language rights versus speakers’ rights: on the applicability of Western language rights approaches in Eastern European contexts. Language Policy, 10(1), 37–58. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑011‑9194‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9194-7 [Google Scholar]
  28. Pētersone, K
    (2012) Latvia: The Hot Month of February. Retrieved frombaltic-review.com/2012/02/latvia-the-hot-month-of-february/
  29. Pleps, J
    (2014) The fundamental values of the Latvian constitutional order: some thoughts about the intentions of the constitutional legislator. Retrieved from constitutional-change.com/the-fundamental-values-of-the-latvian-constitutional-order-some-thoughts-about-the-intentions-of-the-constitutional-legislator/
  30. Poriņa, V
    (2009) Valsts valoda daudzvalodīgajā sabiedrībā [The State Language in Multilingual Society]. Riga: Latvian Language Institute, University of Latvia. (English summary, pp.183–6).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Račevskis, K
    (2002) Towards a postcolonial perspective on the Baltic States. Journal of Baltic Studies, 33(1), 37–56. doi: 10.1080/01629770100000201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770100000201 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ramishvili, T
    (1998) Latvia and Estonia: Human rights violations in the center of Europe. International Affairs, 44(4), 116–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rannut, M
    (1994) Beyond linguistic policy: the Soviet Union versus Estonia. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas & R. Phillipson (Eds), Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination (pp.179–208). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Romanov, A
    (2000) The Russian diaspora in Latvia and Estonia: predicting language outcomes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21(1), 8–71. doi: 10.1080/01434630008666394
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630008666394 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schmid, C
    (2008) Ethnicity and language tensions in Latvia. Language Policy, 7(1), 3–19. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑007‑9068‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-007-9068-1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Wee, L
    (2007) Linguistic human rights and mobility. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(4), 325–338. doi: 10.2167/jmmd492.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd492.0 [Google Scholar]
  37. Zaagman, R
    (1999) Conflict Prevention in the Baltic States: The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Flensburg: ECMI [European Centre for Minority issues], Monograph #1.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.2.01dru
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Latvia , Latvian language , Latvian Language Referendum 2012 and Russian language
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error