1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language Problems and Language Planning
  4. Volume 40, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article contributes to recent critical discussion of ‘agency’ in language policy and planning (LPP) research and practice. It argues that whilst scholars have widened their purview to consider the impact of individual actors on LPP in different contexts, the field has not developed or embraced theoretical and methodological frameworks which satisfactorily model or investigate the of actor impact on LPP. This article analyzes the current status of LPP at the United Nations (UN). Taking the ‘Actor-Stage Model’ (Zhao & Baldauf, 2012) as a theoretical point of departure, the article discusses and analyzes the most recent review of LPP within the UN. It becomes apparent that a network of agents is responsible for LPP development, influence and implementation within the organization. This ‘web of influence’ is schematized using a network model which accounts for the implicit and explicit responsibility of multiple actors / ‘experts’ within and outside of the organization. A sub-analysis of institutional LPP goals reveals the ‘polycentric’ and ‘relational’ nature of influence within and across multiple ‘nodes’. It is argued that the network model and the concept of ‘web of influence’ is crucial in de- and re-constructing particular LPP goals and serves as a useful heuristic for those investigating or working within similar sites of inter/transnational integration as well as LPP in other macro, meso or micro-contexts.

© 2016 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.2.05mce
2016-07-22
2024-12-10

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.2.05mce
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baldauf, Jr., R.B
    (1982) The language situation in American Somoa: Planners, plans and planning. Language Planning Newsletter, 8(1), 17–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. (2004) Issues of prestige and image in language-in-education planning in Australia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 5(4), 376–388. doi: 10.1080/14664200408668264
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200408668264 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2006) Rearticulating the case for micro-language planning in a language ecology context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2/3), 147–170. doi: 10.2167/cilp092.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp092.0 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2008) Rearticulating the case for micro-language planning in a language ecology context. In A.J. Liddicoat and R.B. Baldauf, Jr . (Eds.), Language planning and policy: Language in local contexts (pp.18–41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Benwell, B. , & Stokoe, E
    (2006) Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Canagarajah, S
    (Ed.) (2002) Celebrating local knowledge on language and education. (Special issue). Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(4). doi: 10.1207/S15327701JLIE0104_1
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0104_1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooper, R.L
    (1989) Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis, K.A
    (1999) The socio-political dynamics of indigenous language maintenance and loss: A framework for language policy and planning. In T. Huebner and K.A. Davis (Eds.), Socio-political perspectives on language policy and planning in the USA (pp.67–97). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.16.08dav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.16.08dav [Google Scholar]
  9. Freeman, R.D
    (2004) Building on community bilingualism. Philadelphia: Caslon.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Hornberger, N.H
    (2006) Frameworks and models in language policy and planning. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp 24–41). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Hornberger, N.H. , & Johnson, D.C
    (2007) Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 44(3), 509–532. doi: 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00083.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00083.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Fall, P.L. , & Zhang, Y
    (2011) Multilingualism in the United Nations system organisations: Status of implementation. JIU/REP/2011/4. Geneva: United Nations.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Haarman, H
    (1990) Language planning in the light of a general theory of language: A methodological framework. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 95, 109–129.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaplan, R.B. , & Baldauf, R.B., Jr
    (1997) Language planning: From practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Liddicoat, A
    (2009) Language planning and international collaboration: A current issue in language planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10(2), 163–165. doi: 10.1080/14664200902878895
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200902878895 [Google Scholar]
  16. McEntee-Atalianis L.J
    (2006) ‘Geostrategies of interlingualism’: Language policy and practice in the International Maritime Organisation, London. UK. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2/3), 341–358. doi: 10.2167/cilp102.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp102.0 [Google Scholar]
  17. McEntee-Atalianis, L.J
    (2008) Diplomatic negotiation in an international organisation: An exploration of expert status and power. The International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations, 8(3), 265–271. doi: 10.18848/1447‑9532/CGP/v08i03/39594
     https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9532/CGP/v08i03/39594 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2010) An investigation of argumentational discourse units in diplomatic negotiation. Sociolinguistic Studies, 4(3), 553–568.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. (2011) The role of metaphor in shaping the identity and agenda of the United Nations: The imagining of an international community and international threat. Discourse and Communication, 5(4), 393–412. doi: 10.1177/1750481311418099
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311418099 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2013) Stance and metaphor: Mapping changing representations of (organisational) identity. Discourse and Communication, 7(3), 319–340. doi: 10.1177/1750481313494498
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313494498 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2015) Language policy and planning in international organisations. Multilingualism and the United Nations: Diplomatic baggage or passport to success? U. Jessner-Schmid and C.J. Kramsch (Eds.), The multilingual challenge: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp.295–322). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. McEntee-Atalianis, L.J. , & Zappettini, F
    (2014) Networked identities: Changing representations of Europeanness. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(4), 397–415. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2014.934385
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2014.934385 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nekvapil, J. , & Nekula, M
    (2006) On language management in multinational companies in the Czech Republic. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2/3), 307–327. doi: 10.2167/cilp100.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp100.0 [Google Scholar]
  24. Payne, M
    (2006) Foreign language planning in England: The pupil perspective. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2/3),189–213. doi: 10.2167/cilp094.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp094.0 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pennycook, A
    (2002) Mother tongues, governmentality, and protectionism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 154, 11–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (2006) Postmodernism in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp.60–76). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Piron, C
    (1980) Problèmes de communication linguistique au Nations Unies et dans les organiations apparentées. Language Problems and Language Planning, 4(3), 224–236. doi: 10.1075/lplp.4.3.03pir
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.4.3.03pir [Google Scholar]
  28. Ricento, T
    (2000) Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4, 196–213. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00111
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00111 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2006) Language policy: Theory and practice – An Introduction. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp.3–9). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ricento, T. , & Hornberger, N.H
    (1996) Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 401–428. doi: 10.2307/3587691
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587691 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sassen, S
    (1996) Losing control?: Sovereignty in an age of globalisation. New York: Colombia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Siew Kheng Chua, C
    (2006) Singaporean educational planning: Moving from the macro to the micro. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2/3), 214–229. doi: 10.2167/cilp095.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp095.0 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sims, C
    (2006) Language planning in American Indian Pueblo communities: Contemporary challenges and issues. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2/3), 251–268. doi: 10.2167/cilp097.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp097.0 [Google Scholar]
  34. Spolsky, B
    (2009) Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511626470
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626470 [Google Scholar]
  35. Winter, J. and Pauwels, A
    (2006) ‘Trajectories of agency’ and discursive identities in education: A critical site in feminist language planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2/3), 171–188. doi: 10.2167/cilp093.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/cilp093.0 [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhao, S
    (2011) Actors in language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook in research in second language teaching and learning, vol. II (pp.905–923). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhao, S. , & Baldouf, R.B., Jr
    (2012) Individual agency in language planning: Chinese script reform as a case study. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1075/lplp.36.1.01zha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.36.1.01zha [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.2.05mce
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agency; language planning; language policy; network model; network theory; United Nations

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error