1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language Problems and Language Planning
  4. Volume 40, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 40, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0272-2690
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9889
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The , one of the oldest language academies in the world, represents a prototypical institutional body that supports strong monolingual ideology. This article sets out to understand its relevance and the normative stance it represents in a multicultural world. It analyzes the symbolic position that this institution still holds in and beyond France in light of the challenges associated with preserving a traditional monocentric language ideology in an era of globalization. In the last two decades, this ideology has been challenged by claims that French can survive as an international language only if it is open to legitimate influences from other cultures.

© 2016 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.3.01ami
2016-09-09
2024-10-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.3.01ami
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adamson, R
    (2007) The defense of French: A language in crisis?Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ager, D.E
    (1990) Sociolinguistics and contemporary French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620768
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620768 [Google Scholar]
  3. (1996) Language policy in Britain and France: The processes of policy. London: Cassell.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alèn Garabato, C
    (2008) Actes de résistance sociolinguistique. Les défis d’une production périodique militante en langue d’oc. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Amit, A
    (2013) Continuité et changements dans les contacts linguistiques à travers l’histoire de la langue française. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. (2014) Regional language policies in France during World War II. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137300164
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137300164 [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson, B
    (1983) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Armstrong, N
    (2001) Social and stylistic variation in spoken French: A comparative approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.8 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baggioni, D
    (1997) Langues et nations en Europe. Paris: Payot.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bavoux, Cl. , Lambert-Félix P. , & Wharton, S
    (Eds.) (2008) Normes endogènes et plurilinguisme : Aires francophones, aires créoles. Lyon: ENS Editions.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Blackwood, R
    (2013) French, language policy and new media. Sociolinguistica27(1), 37–53. doi: 10.1515/soci.2013.27.1.37
     https://doi.org/10.1515/soci.2013.27.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  12. Boulanger, J.-Cl
    (2001) La francophonie: une norme, des normes, un dictionnaire, des dictionnaires. InVariations et dynamisme du français, une approche polynomique de l’espace francophone (pp.29–50). Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bourdieu, P
    (1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Boutet, J. , & Maingueneau, D
    (2005) Sociolinguistique et analyse de discours: Façons de dire, façons de faire. Langage et société, 114, 15–47. doi: 10.3917/ls.114.0015
     https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.114.0015 [Google Scholar]
  15. Calvet, L.–J
    (2002) Le marché aux langues, les effets linguistiques de la mondialisation. Paris: Plon.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Catach, N
    (1991) L’orthographe en débat: Dossiers pour un changement. Paris: Editions Nathan.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cenoz, J. , Gorter, D. , & Heugh, K
    (2011) Linguistic diversity. In S. Knotter , R. de Lobel , L. Tripouri & V. Stenius (eds.), Diversity research and policy. A multidisciplinary exploration (pp.83–98). Amsterdam: Pallas Publications – Amsterdam University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chumbow, B.S. , & Simo Bodba, A
    (2000) French in the West Africa: A sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 141, 39–60. doi: 10.1515/ijsl.2000.141.39
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2000.141.39 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chaudenson, R
    (2006) Vers une autre idée et pour une autre politique de la langue française. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Chaudenson, R , Calvet, L.–J . et al.
    (1992) Multilinguisme et développement dans l’espace francophone. Paris: Didier–Érudition.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cooper, R.L
    (1989) Language planning and social change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. De Swaan, A
    (2002) Words of the world: The global language system. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Estival, D. , & Pennycook, A
    (2011) L’Académie française and anglophone language ideologies. Language Policy, 10(4), 325–341. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑011‑9215‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9215-6 [Google Scholar]
  24. Farandjis, S
    (2004) Repères dans l’histoire de la Francophonie. Hermès, 40, 49–52. doi: 10.4267/2042/9498
     https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/9498 [Google Scholar]
  25. Francard, M
    (Ed.) (2000) Le français de référence: Constructions et appropriations d’un concept. Louvain–la–Neuve: Peeters ( Cahiers de l’Institut de linguistique de Louvain, 26, 1-4).
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (Ed.) (2001) Le français de référence: Constructions et appropriations d’un concept. Louvain–la–Neuve: Peeters ( Cahiers de l’Institut de linguistique de Louvain, 27, 1-2).
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gadet, F
    (2003) La variation sociale en français. Paris: Ophrys.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Greenberg, J.H
    (1971) Language, culture and communication. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Gueunier, N
    (1985) La crise du français en France. In J. Maurais (ed.), La crise des langues (pp.3–38). Québec: Conseil de la Langue Française.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hagège, Cl
    (2008) Combat pour le français. Au nom de la diversité des langues et des cultures. Paris: O. Jacob.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Krauss, M
    (1992) The world’s languages in crisis. Language, 68, 6–10. doi: 10.1353/lan.1992.0075
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0075 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lafage, S
    (1993) French in Africa. In C. Sanders (ed.), French today: Language in its social context (pp.215–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620980.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620980.013 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lafont, R
    (1997) Quarante ans de sociolinguistique à la périphérie. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lombard, A
    (2003) Politique culturelle internationale, le modèle français face à la mondialisation. Paris: Babel.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lüdi, G
    (1992) French as a pluricentric language. In M.G. Clyne (ed.), Pluricentric languages: Different norms in different nations (pp.149–178). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Milroy, J
    (2001) Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530–555. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00163
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163 [Google Scholar]
  37. Moreau, M–L
    (2000) La pluralité des normes dans la francophonie. Proceedings from La coexistence des langues dans l’espace francophone, approche macro-sociolinguistique, deuxièmes Journées scientifiques du réseau de l’AUF, sociolinguistique et dynamique des langues (pp.137–151). Rabat: Aupelf–Uref.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Nerrière, J–P
    (2004) Parlez Globish. Paris: Eyrolles.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Oakes, L
    (2001) Language and national identity: Comparing France and Sweden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.13
     https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.13 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pöll, B
    (2005) Le français langue pluricentrique? Études sur la variation diatopique d’une langue standard. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Robillard, D. de , & Beniamino, M
    (1996) Le français dans l’espace francophone: Description linguistique et sociolinguistique de la francophonie, vol. 2. Paris: Honoré Champion.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Schiffman, H.F
    (2002) French language policy: Centrism, Orwellian dirigisme, or economic determinism?In L. Wei , J.-M. Dewaele , and A. Housen (eds.), Opportunities and challenges of bilingualism. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Spolsky, B
    (2004) Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. (2011) Language academies and other language management agencies. Language Policy, 10(4), 285–287. doi: 10.1007/s10993‑011‑9218‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9218-3 [Google Scholar]
  45. Truchot, Cl
    (2008) Europe: L’enjeu linguistique. Paris: La documentation française.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Valdman, A
    (2000) Comment gérer la variation dans l’enseignement du français langue étrangère aux Etats–Unis. The French Review, 73, 648–666.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Verreault, Cl
    (1999) L’enseignement du français en contexte québécois : De quelle langue est–il question?Terminogramme, 91-92, 21–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Weinstein, B
    (1989) Francophonie: Purism at the international level. In H.J. Bjorn and M.J. Shapiro (eds.), The politics of language purism (pp.53–79). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lplp.40.3.01ami
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Académie française; francophonie; globalization; international French; language academies; language policy

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error