1887
Volume 47, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Angami has three-way laryngeal contrasts in stops, i.e., voiced, voiceless unaspirated, and voiceless aspirated. Apart from that, Angami also has four phonetically level tones. Due to the level nature of the lexical tones in Angami, consonantal perturbations could be investigated clearly. The results of the study showed that the extent of consonantal perturbation depended on the tonal categories. Voiceless consonantal perturbations were weaker as tone categories got higher. Conversely, voiced stop consonantal perturbations were weaker as tone categories got lower. This study also found a systematic relationship between tone height and VOT duration. High tones induced shorter VOT, while low tones induced longer VOT.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.00016.ter
2024-05-17
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abramson, Arthur S. & Douglas H. Whalen
    2017 Voice Onset Time (VOT) at 50: Theoretical and practical issues in measuring voicing distinctions. Journal of Phonetics631. 75–86. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    2014 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823 (2014). 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blankenship, Barbara, Peter Ladefoged, Peri Bhaskararao & Nichumeno Chase
    1993 Phonetic structures of Khonoma Angami. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area16(2). 69–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
    2018 Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.37.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burling, Robbins
    1960 Angami Naga phonemics and word list. Indian Linguistics211. 51–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2003 The Tibeto-Burman languages of Northeastern India. InGraham Thurgood & Randy J. Lapolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 169–192. London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chao, Kuan-Yi & Li-mei Chen
    2008 A cross-linguistic study of voice onset time in stop consonant productions. International Journal of Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language Processing13(2). 215–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chase, Nichumeno
    1992 A descriptive analysis of the Khwunomia dialect of Angami. Poona: University of PoonaPhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Yiya
    2011 How does phonology guide phonetics in segment–f0 interaction?Journal of Phonetics39(4). 612–625. 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cho, Taehong & Peter Ladefoged
    1999 Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics27(2). 207–229. 10.1006/jpho.1999.0094
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0094 [Google Scholar]
  11. Flege, James Emil & Wieke Eefting
    1986 Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica43(4). 155–171. 10.1159/000261768
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000261768 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fox, John & Sanford Weisberg
    2019 An R Companion to Applied Regression, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Geissler, Christopher
    2019 Tonal and laryngeal contrasts in Diaspora Tibetan. InSasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia2019, 2421–2424. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
  14. Giridhar, Puttushetra Puttuswamy
    1980Angami grammar. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Humbert, Jean-Marie, John J. Ohala & William G. Ewan
    1979 Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language55(1). 37–58. 10.2307/412518
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412518 [Google Scholar]
  16. Humbert, Jean-Marie
    1978 Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. InVictoria A. Fromkin (ed.), Tone – A linguistic survey, 77–111. Academic Press. 10.1016/C2013‑0‑10689‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10689-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hussain, Qandeel
    2018 A typological study of Voice Onset Time (VOT) in Indo-Iranian languages. Journal of Phonetics711. 284–305. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.011 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kirby, James P.
    2018 Onset pitch perturbations and the cross-linguistic implementation of voicing: Evidence from tonal and non-tonal languages. Journal of Phonetics711. 326–354. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kirby, James & Gwendolyn Hyslop
    2019 Acoustics analysis of onset voicing in Dzongkha obstruents. InSasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia2019, 3607–3611. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
  20. Kuolie, Duovituo
    2006Structural description of Tenyidie: a Tibeto-Burman language of Nagaland. Kohima: Ura Academy Publication Division.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen
    2017 LmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software82 (13). 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lai, Yuwen, Christopher Huff, Joan Sereno & Allard Jongman
    2009 The raising effect of aspirated prevocalic consonants on F0 in Taiwanese. InProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on East Asian Linguistics, vol. 2. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lalhminghlui, Wendy, and Priyankoo Sarmah
    2020 Interaction of tone and voicing in Mizo. INTERSPEECH, 1903–1907. 10.21437/Interspeech.2020‑2695
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2020-2695 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lalhminghlui, Wendy, Viyazonuo Terhiija, and Priyankoo Sarmah
    2019 Vowel-tone interaction in two Tibeto-Burman languages. INTERSPEECH, 3970–3974. 10.21437/Interspeech.2019‑2808
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2019-2808 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, Seunghun J., Shigeto Kawahara, Celéste Guillemot & Tomoko Monou
    2019 The acoustic correlates of the four-way laryngeal contrast in Drenjongke stops. InSasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, 1445–1449. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lenth, Russell
    2019 emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means, package version1(4). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
  27. Liezietsu, Mezhüvilie, Keduosievi Kesiezie & Shürhozelie Liezietsu
    2019MKS Dieda, 2nd edn.Kohima: Ura Academy. N.V. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lisker, Leigh & Arthur S. Abramson
    1964 A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word20(3). 384–422. 10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lisker, Leigh & Arthur S. Abramson
    1970 The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. InBohuslav Hála, Milan Romportl & Přmysl Janota (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Prague 7–13 September 1967, 563–567.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Maddieson, Ian
    1978 Tone effects on consonants. Journal of Phonetics6(4). 327–343. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)31165‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31165-9 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mahapatra, Bijay Prasad, Grant D. McConnell, P. Padmanabha & V. Verma
    1989 Book 2: Non-Constitutional Languages. InHeinz Kloss & Grant D. McConnell (eds.), The written languages of the world: A survey of the degree and modes of use, 611–1359. Office of the Registrar General, India and the International Centre of Research on Bilingualism, Laval University, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Marrison, Geoffrey Edward
    1967 The classification of the Naga languages of north-east India. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Meyase, Savio M.
    2021 Polarity in a four-level tone language: tone features in Tenyidie. Phonology38(1). 123–146. 10.1017/S0952675721000063
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675721000063 [Google Scholar]
  34. Moran, Steven & Daniel McCloy
    2019 cldf-datasets/phoible: PHOIBLE 2.0 as CLDF dataset (v2.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.2593234
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2593234 [Google Scholar]
  35. Murty, K. Sri Rama & Bayya Yegnanarayana
    2008 Epoch extraction from speech signals. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing16(8). 1602–1613. 10.1109/TASL.2008.2004526
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2008.2004526 [Google Scholar]
  36. Narayan, Chandan & Mary Bowden
    2013 Pitch affects voice onset time (VOT): A cross-linguistic study. InProceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013, vol.19(1). 060095. Acoustical Society of America. 10.1121/1.4800681
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4800681 [Google Scholar]
  37. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner of India
    Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner of India 2011 Statement-1: Abstract of Speakers’ Strength of Languages and Mother Tongues.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2022R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ravindran, N.
    1974Angami phonetic reader. CILL phonetic reader series 10. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rose, Phil
    1987 Considerations in the normalisation of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication6(4). 343–352. 10.1016/0167‑6393(87)90009‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(87)90009-4 [Google Scholar]
  41. Shrem, Yosi, Matthew Goldrick & Joseph Keshet
    2019 Dr. VOT: Measuring positive and negative voice onset time in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13255. https://github.com/MLSpeech/Dr.VOT
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Suokhrie, Kelhouvinuo
    2015 Internal variation in Angami: A case study of Kohima village. Delhi: University of DelhiM. Phil. thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Teo, A. B.
    2014A phonological and phonetic description of Sumi, a Tibeto-Burman language of Nagaland. Asia-Pacific Linguistics Open Access Monographs, A-PL 011/SEAMLES 007/Canberra, ACT: Asia-Pacific Linguistics, hdl.handle.net/1885/12015.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Tse, Holman
    2005 The phonetics of VOT and tone interaction in Cantonese. Chicago: University of Chicago PhD dissertation.
  45. Tzudir, Moakala, Priyankoo Sarmah & S.R. Mahadeva Prasanna
    2021 Analysis and modeling of dialect information in Ao, a low resource language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America149(5). 2976–2987. 10.1121/10.0004822
    https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0004822 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wickham, Hadley
    2016 ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
  47. Zakaria, Muhammad
    2020 The segmental phonetics and phonology of Hyow, A Tibeto-Burman language of Bangladesh. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area43(2). 309–346. 10.1075/ltba.19006.zak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.19006.zak [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.00016.ter
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.00016.ter
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Angami; Tibeto-Burman; tones; VOT
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error