Kinship in three Tamangic varieties

References

1. Benedict, Paul K.
   1942 Tibetan and Chinese kinship systems. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies6(3/4): 313–337.10.2307/2717980
   https://doi.org/10.2307/2717980 [Google Scholar]
2. Bohannon, Paul & John Middleton
   (eds.) 1968 Kinship and social organization. Garden City, NJ: Natural History Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bradley, David
   1989 Uncles and aunts: Burmese kinship and gender. In Jeremy H. C. S. Davidson (ed.), South-east Asian Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Eugénie J. A. Henderson, 147–161. University of London: SOAS.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chambers, J. K. & P. Trudgill
   1998 Dialectology (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805103
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805103 [Google Scholar]
5. Doherty, Victor S.
   1974 Gurung kinship. Kailash2(4): 273–301.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dousset, Laurent
   2011 Understanding human relations (kinship systems). In Nicholas Thieberger (ed.), Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork, 209–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dziebel, German V.
   2007 The genius of kinship: The phenomenon of human kinship and the global diversity of kinship. Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Georg, Stephan
   1996 Marphatan Thakali. Munich: Lincom Europa.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Glover, Warren W. , Jessie R. Glover & Dev Bahadur Gurung
   1977 Gurung-English-Nepali dictionary. Canberra: ANU Department of Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hammarström, Harald , Robert Forkel , Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank
    2016 Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. Available online atglottolog.org, Accessed on2016-11-08.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
    2013 Converb and aspect marking polysemy in Nar. In Elena Mihas , Bernard Perley , Gabriel Rei-Doval , & Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Responses to language endangerment: In honor of Mickey Noonan, 97–117. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.142.06hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.142.06hil [Google Scholar]
12. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
    2009 Loanwords in Manange, a Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmoor (eds.), Loanword typology, 447–470. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
    2007a Tone in Tibeto-Burman languages: Typological and sociolinguistic approaches. In Matti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), New trends in typology: Young typologists’ contributions to linguistic theory, 67–90. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
    2007b Manange [Nyeshangte]. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 283–300. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
    2005 A phonetic analysis of Manange segmental and suprasegmental properties. LTBA28(1): 1–36.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
    2004 A grammar and dictionary of the Manange [Nyeshangte] language. In Carol Genetti (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal: Manange [Nyeshangte] and Sherpa, 2–189. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hildebrandt, Kristine A. & Oliver Bond
    2011 Negation in Nar. In Peter K. Austin , Oliver Bond , David Nathan & Lutz Marten (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory3, 141–150. London: SOAS.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hildebrandt, Kristine A. & Oliver Bond
    2017 Manange. In Randy J. LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edition), 516–533. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hildebrandt, Kristine A. , Dubi Nanda Dhakal , Oliver Bond , Matthew Vallejo , & Andrea Fyffe
    2015 A sociolinguistic survey of the languages of Manang, Nepal: Co-existence and endangerment. Nepal Journal of Indigenous Nationalities14(6): 106–124.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hoshi, M.
    1986 An outline of the Prakaa grammar: A dialect of the Manang language. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Huang, Bufan & Dai, Qingxia
    eds. 1992 Zangmianyuzu yuyan cihui《藏緬語族語言詞匯 [A Tibeto-Burman lexicon]. Beijing: Central Institute of Minorities. Accessed via STEDT database stedt.berkeley.edu/search/ on2016-11-08.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jacques, Guillaume
    2012 The Tangut kinship system in Qiangic perspective. In Nathan W. Hill (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages IV, 211–258. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004233454_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004233454_010 [Google Scholar]
23. Levi-Strauss, Claude
    1969 The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lewis, M. Paul , Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig
    (eds.) 2016 Ethnologue: Languages of the world (19th edition). Dallas: SIL International. Online version: www.ethnologue.com. Accessed on2016-11-08.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Matisoff, James A.
    2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mazaudon, Martine
    1996 An outline of the historical phonology of the dialects of Nar-Phu (Nepal). LTBA19(1): 103–114.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Murdock, George Peter
    1968 Patterns of sibling terminology. Ethnology7(1): 1–24.10.2307/3772805
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3772805 [Google Scholar]
28. Nagano, Y.
    1984 A Manang glossary [Anthropological and Linguistic Studies of the Gandaki Area in Nepal 12]. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Language and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Noonan, Michael
    2003 Nar-Phu. In Randy LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 336–352. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Noonan, Michael
    2011 Aspects of the historical development of nominalizers in the Tamangic languages. In Ha Yap Foong , Karen Grunow-Harsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages [Typological Studies in Language 96], 195–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Noonan, Michael & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
    2017 Nar-Phu. In Randy LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edition), 534–556. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pohle, P.
    1990 Useful plants of Manang District: A contribution to the ethnobotany of the Nepal Himalaya. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Thurgood, Graham
    2017 Sino-Tibetan: Genetic and areal subgroups. In Randy LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 3–39. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Toffin, G.
    1986 Unités de parenté, systèmed’alliance et de presentations chez les Tamang de l’Ouest (Népal). Anthropos81: 21–45.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Turin, Mark
    2008 A grammar of the Thangmi language. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Turin, Mark
    2001 Call me uncle: An outsider’s experience of Nepali kinship. Contributions to Nepalese Studies28(2): 277–283.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Vinding, Michael
    1998 The Thakali: A Himalayan ethnography. London: Serindia Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Yadava, Yogendra P.
    2014 Language use in Nepal. Population Monograph of NepalVol.II, 51–72. Kathmandu: CBS.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Zeitlyn, David
    2005 Words and processes in Mambila kinship: The theoretical importance of the complexity of everyday life. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]