1887
Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to use string edit distance to describe the synchronic relationship between the Tibetan speech varieties located on the Northeastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau. String edit distance provides a statistical way to compare a large number of linguistic features, in essence producing a statistical bundle of isoglosses. In this way, it can be used as a tool in dialect mapping and synchronic clustering. In this paper, the aggregate distance matrix produced by string edit distance reveals that the great degree of phonetic continuity on the grasslands of the northeastern edge of the plateau is matched by an equal degree of phonetic discontinuity in the mountains forming the eastern border of the plateau. While the dialects located on the grasslands can be grouped together into one cluster, the dialects in the mountains can be grouped together into six clusters.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.17004.pow
2018-04-05
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chamberlain, Brad
    2015 Linguistic watersheds: A model for understanding variation among the Tibetic languages. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society8: 71–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Colen, Rinke , Charlotte Gooskens , Peter Kleiweg , Therese Leinonen & John Nerbonne
    . Gabmap. A web application for dialectology. Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition, University of Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Google Inc
    Google Inc 2012 Google Earth Pro (Version 7.1.7.2606) [CP]. www.google.com/intl.zh-CN/earth/index.html (3 January 2017).
  4. Heeringa, Wilbert
    2004 Measuring Dialect Pronunciation Differences Using Levenshtein Distance. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
  5. Hua, Kan
    2002Zangyu Anduo Fangyan Cihui (The vocabulary of Amdo Tibetan). Lanzhou: Gansu Minzu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jiang, Di
    2002Zangyu yuyinshi yanjiu (A study on Tibetan historical phonology). Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jin Peng
    (ed.) 1983Zangyu jianzhi (Outline of Tibetan). Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kessler, Brett
    1995 Computational dialectology in Irish Gaeilic. InProceedings of the Seventh Conference on European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 60–66. doi: 10.3115/976973.976983
    https://doi.org/10.3115/976973.976983 [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewis, Paul M. , Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig
    2016Ethnologue: Languages of Asia, 19th edn.Dallas TX: SIL International. www.ethnologue.com
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin, You-Jing
    2002 Phonological profile of Thewo Tibetan. Paper presented atthe 8th Himalayan Languages Symposium, University of Berne, 18–22 September 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nagano, Yasuhiko
    1980Amdo Sherpa Dialect: Material for Tibetan dialectology. Tokyo: Research Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nerbonne, John , Rinke Colen , Charlotte Gooskens , Peter Kleiweg & Therese Leinonen
    2011 Gabmap. A web application for dialectology. DialectologiaSpecial IssueII: 65–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nerbonne, John & Peter Kleiweg
    2007 Toward a dialectological yardstick. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics14(2): 148–167. doi: 10.1080/09296170701379260
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09296170701379260 [Google Scholar]
  14. Renzeng, Wangmu (Rig-’dzin dBang-mo)
    2013Diebu Zangyu Yanjiu (Research on Diebu Tibetan). Beijing: Zhongyang Minzu Daxue Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Stanford, James N.
    2012 One size fits all? Dialectometry in a small clan-based indigenous society. Language Variation and Change24(2): 247–278. doi: 10.1017/S0954394512000087
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000087 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2003a Phonological profile of Zhongu: A new Tibetan dialect of Northern Sichuan. Language and Linguistics4(4): 769–836.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2003b Qiuji zangyu de yuyin tezheng (Phonological characteristics of Chosrje Tibetan). Minzu Yuwen6: 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Suzuki, Hiroyuki
    2008 Nouveau regard sur les dialectes tibétains à l’est d’Aba: Phonétique et classification du dialecte de Sharkhog [Songpan-Jiuzhaigou]. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area31(1): 85–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2009 Tibetan dialects spoken in Shar khog and Khod po khog. EAST and WEST59(1–4): 273–283.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2014 Issues in the lexical complexity in Eastern Tibetic languages: From a cat’s eye. Papers from the Second International Conference on Asian Geolinguistics, 116–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2015 Gannan-syuu Zhuoni Diebu Zhouqu 3 ken no tibetto-kei syogengo to sono kaibunrui siron (Tibetic languages in three counties Cone, Thewo, and mBrugchu in Gannan Prefecture and an essay on their subclassification). Nidaba44: 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tournadre, Nicolas
    2014 The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, 105–129. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang, Cathryn
    2010 Lalo Regional Varieties: Hylogeny, Dialectometry, and Socio-linguistics. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.
  24. Yang, Cathryn & Andy Castro
    2008 Representing tone in Levenshtein distance. International Journal of Humanities and Computing2(1–2): 205–219. doi: 10.3366/E1753854809000391
    https://doi.org/10.3366/E1753854809000391 [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, Jichuan
    1996 A sketch of Tibetan dialectology in China: Classifications of Tibetan dialects. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale25(1): 115–133. doi: 10.3406/clao.1996.1496
    https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.1996.1496 [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhoumaocao (’Brug-mo-mtsho)
    Zhoumaocao (’Brug-mo-mtsho) 2003Maqu Zangyu Yanjiu (Research on Maqu Tibetan). Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhouta (’Brug-thar)
    Zhouta (’Brug-thar) 1996Gansu Zangzu Buluo de Shehui yu Lishi Yanjiu (Historical and sociological research on Gansu’s Tibetan tribes). Lanzhou: Gansu Minzu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.17004.pow
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.17004.pow
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): clustering , speech varieties , String edit distance and Tibetic languages
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error