Transitivity markers in West Himalayish

References

1. Bailey, Thomas G.
   1909 A brief grammar of the Kanauri language. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft63, 661–687.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benedict, Paul K.
   1972 Sino-Tibetan: a conspectus (Princeton-Cambridge Studies in Chinese Linguistics 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753541
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753541 [Google Scholar]
3. Bradley, David
   1997 Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas (Papers in South East Asian linguistics, 14), 1–71. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beyer, Stephan V.
   1992 The classical Tibetan language. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Croft, William
   2000 Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach (Longman Linguistics Library). Harlow: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Croft, William
   2012 Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DeLancey, Scott
   2011 Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Foong, Ha Yap , Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96), 343–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.96.12del
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.12del [Google Scholar]
8. Dixon, Robert M. W.
   1979 Ergativity. Language55(1): 59–138.10.2307/412519
   https://doi.org/10.2307/412519 [Google Scholar]
9. Dixon, Robert M. W.
   2010 Basic linguistic theory, volume II: grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Francke, August H.
    1909 Tabellen der Pronomina und Verba in den drei Sprachen Lahoul’s: Bunan, Manchad und Tinan. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft63. 65–97.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Genetti, Carol
    2007 A grammar of Dolakha Newar (Mouton Grammar Library 40). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198812
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198812 [Google Scholar]
12. Givón, Talmy
    2001 Syntax: an introduction, 2vols., rev. edn.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Grierson, George A.
    (ed.) 1909 Tibeto-Burman family, part I: general introduction, specimens of the Tibetan dialects, the Himalayan dialects, and the North Assam group (Linguistic Survey of India 3). Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language56(2): 251–299.10.1353/lan.1980.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
15. Huber, Christian
    2011 Some notes on gender and number marking in Shumcho. In: Gerda Lechleitner & Christian Liebl (eds.), Jahrbuch des Phonogrammarchivs der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften2, 52–90. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Huber, Christian
    2014 Subject and object agreement in Shumcho. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 266), 221–274. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jacques, Guillaume
    2004 Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). Paris: University of Paris VII – Denis Diderot dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kemmer, Suzanne
    1993 The middle voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.23 [Google Scholar]
19. Kittilä, Seppo
    2010 Transitivity typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 346–367. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Krishan, Shree
    2001 A sketch of Chaudangsi grammar. In Yasuhiko Nagano & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), New research on Zhangzhung and related Himalayan languages (Bon Studies 3 = Senri Ethnological Reports 19), 401–448. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LaPolla, Randy J.
    2011 On transitivity in two Tibeto-Burman languages. Studies in Language35(3): 636–649.10.1075/sl.35.3.05lap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.3.05lap [Google Scholar]
22. Matisoff, James A.
    2016 The Sino-Tibetan etymological dictionary and thesaurus. Berkeley: The Regents of the University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Næss, Åshild
    2007 Prototypical transitivity (Typological Studies in Language 72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.72
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.72 [Google Scholar]
24. Næss, Åshild
    2009 How transitive are EAT and DRINK verbs?In John Newman (ed.), The linguistics of eating and drinking (Typological Studies in Language 84), 27–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.84.03nae
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.84.03nae [Google Scholar]
25. Nishi, Yoshio
    1991 Himarayashogo no bunpu to bunrui (II) [The distribution and classification of the Himalayan languages (II)], Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology16(1): 31–158.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pons, Marie-Caroline
    2017 Morphological evidence for “Raji-Raute” and its genetic position within Trans-Himalayan. Paper presented atthe Berner Zirkel für Sprachwissen-schaft, University of Bern, December 13.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Shafer, Robert
    1967 Introduction to Sino-Tibetan. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Sharma, Devidatta
    1989a Studies in Tibeto-Himalayan linguistics: a descriptive analysis of Paṭṭani (a dialect of Lahaul) (Panjab University Indological Series 28). Hoshiarpur: Vishveshvaranand Vishva Bandhu Institute of Sanskrit and Indological Studies, Panjab University.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sharma, Devidatta
    1989b Tribal languages of Himachal Pradesh, part I (Studies in Tibeto-Himalayan Languages 2). Delhi: Mittal.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sharma, Suhnu Ram
    2007 Byangsi grammar and vocabulary (People of India, National Series, 2). Pune: Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sharma, Suhnu Ram
    . forthcoming. A grammar of Manchad.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Takahashi, Yoshiharu
    2001 A descriptive study of Kinnauri (Pangi dialect): a preliminary report. In Yasuhiko Nagano & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), New research on Zhangzhung and related Himalayan languages (Bon Studies 3 = Senri Ethnological Reports 19), 97–119. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Thurgood, Graham
    2003 A subgrouping of the Sino-Tibetan languages: the interaction between language contact, change, and inheritances. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (Routledge Language Family Series), 3–21. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. van Driem, George
    1987 A grammar of Limbu (Mouton Grammar Library 4). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110846812
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846812 [Google Scholar]
35. van Driem, George
    2001 Languages of the Himalayas: an ethnolinguistic handbook of the greater Himalayan region: containing an introduction to the symbiotic theory of language, 2vols. (Handbuch der Orientalistik, Abt. 2, Indien, 10). Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
    1997 Syntax: structure, meaning, and function (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
37. Watters, David E.
    2002 A grammar of Kham (Cambridge Grammatical Descriptions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486883
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486883 [Google Scholar]
38. Widmer, Manuel & Marius Zemp
    2017 The epistemization of person marking in reported speech. Studies in Language41(1): 33–75.10.1075/sl.41.1.02wid
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.1.02wid [Google Scholar]
39. Widmer, Manuel
    2015 The transformation of verb agreement into epistemic marking: evidence from Tibeto-Burman. In Jürg Fleischer , Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 287), 53–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110399967‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110399967-004 [Google Scholar]
40. Widmer, Manuel
    2017a A grammar of Bunan (Mouton Grammar Library 71). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Widmer, Manuel
    2017b The evoution of egophoricity and evidentiality in the Himalayas: the case of Bunan. Journal of Historical Linguistics7(1): 245–274.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Willis, Christina M.
    2007 A descriptive grammar of Darma: an endangered Tibeto-Burman language. Austin: University of Texas dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Zoller, Claus P.
    1983 Die Sprache der Rang pas von Garhwal (Raṅ pɔ Bhāsa). Grammatik, Sprache, Wörterbuch (Neuindische Studien 8). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]