1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
  4. Volume 42, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 42, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article presents information regarding newly recognised non-Tibetic Tibeto-Burman languages spoken in three counties, Dzogang, Markham, and Drag-yab, of Chamdo Municipality and the adjacent Dzayul County in the Tibet Autonomous Region. First, we introduce four languages – Lamo, Larong sMar, Drag-yab sMar, and gSerkhu – identifying the location of each language on the Chinese administrative map as well as the numbers of speakers of the languages. Second, we provide a brief historical background on these languages, which suggests a relationship between them and Qiangic groups. Third, we display lexical evidence that shows not only their non-Tibetic features but also their closeness to Qiangic languages. Finally, the article focuses on Lamo, an endangered language spoken in Dzogang County, and provides a linguistic analysis of an annotated Lamo historical narrative in the Appendix.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.18004.nyi
2019-06-14
2023-10-01

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ltba.18004.nyi
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beyer, Stephan V.
    1992 The classical Tibetan language. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bkra shis bzang po
    Bkra shis bzang po 2012 May all good things gather here: Life, religion, and marriage in a Minyag Tibetan village. Asian Highlands Perspectives14: 1–369.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Blo bzang Shes rab
    Blo bzang Shes rab 2006 Chab mdo’i yig tshang rin chen spungs pa, deb phreng dang po. Dharamsala: ’Phags yul Chab mdo lo rgyus rtsom sgrig khang.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Byang chub rGyal mtshan
    Byang chub rGyal mtshan 1986 rLangs kyi po ti bse ru rgyas pa. lHa sa: Bod ljongs mi dmangs dpe skrun khang.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chirkova, Katia
    2008 On the position of Baima within Tibetan: A look from basic vocabulary. In Alexander Lubotsky , Jos Schaeken , & Jeroen Wiedenhof (eds.) Evidence and counter-evidence: Festschrift for F. Kortland, Volume 2: General linguistics, 69–91. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 2012 The Qiangic subgroup from an areal perspective: A case study of languages of Muli. Language and Linguistics13.1: 133–170.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dawa Drolma & Hiroyuki Suzuki
    2016 Preliminary report of the linguistic area of Darmdo Minyag with a geolinguistic description of ‘sun’. Studies in Asian Geolinguistics I –SUN–, 72–78. https://publication.aa-ken.jp/sag1_sun_2016.pdf (30 January 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Désiré-Marchand, Joëlle
    1996 Alexandra David-Néel vie et voyages: Itinéraires géographiques et spiritieuses. Paris: Arthaud.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Fei, Xiaotong 费孝通
    1980 Guanyu woguo minzu de shibie wenti关于我国民族的识别问题 [Issues on the recognition of our country’s ethnic groups]. Zhongguo Shehui Kexue1: 94–107.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gates, Jesse P.
    2014 Situ in situ: Towards a dialectology of Jiāróng (rGyalrong). Munich: Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gong, Qunhu 龚群虎
    2007 Zhabayu yanjiu扎巴语研究 [Study on nDrapa]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. rGyal mo ’Brug pa
    rGyal mo ’Brug pa 2004 Bod kyi lo rgyus gleng ba’i gtam. Pe cin: Mi rigs dpe skrun khang.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hill, Nathan W. & Lauren Gawne
    2017 The contribution of Tibetan languages to the study of evidentiality. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems in Tibetan languages, 1–38. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110473742‑001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang, Bufan 黄布凡
    2009 Chuanxi Zangqu de yuyan guanxi川西藏区的语言关系 [Relationship among the languages in the Tibetosphere of West Sichuan]. Chuanxi Zangqu de yuyan, 1–17. Beijing: Zhongguo Zangxue Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, Chenglong 黄成龙
    2013 Zangmianyu cunzailei dongci de gainian jiegou藏缅语存在类动词的概念结构 [Conceptual structure of existential verbs in Tibeto-Burman]. Minzu Yuwen2: 31–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ikeda, Takumi
    2007 200 example sentences in the Mu-nya language (Tanggu dialect). ZINBUN40: 71–140. doi:  10.14989/71095
     https://doi.org/10.14989/71095 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jacques, Guillaume
    2008 Deux noms tangoutes dans une légende tibétaine. Revue d’études tibétaines13: 4–10. himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ret/pdf/ret_13_01.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2011 A note on the etymology of the Tangut name Ngwemi. Journal of the American Oriental Society130.2: 259–260. www.jstor.org/stable/23044518 (31 May, 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 2014 Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004264854
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004264854 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2017 The morphology of numerals and classifiers in Japhug. In Picus Sizhi Ding & Jamin Pelkey (eds.), Sociohistorical linguistics in Southeast Asia, 135–148. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004350519_009
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350519_009 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang, Di 江荻
    2005 Yiduyu yanjiu义都语研究 [Study on Idu]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiang, Di 江荻 , Daqin Li 李大勤 , and Hongkai Sun 孙宏开
    2013 Darangyu yanjiu达让语研究 [Study on Darang]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kalsang, Jay Garfield , Margaret Speas & Jill de Villiers
    2013 Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan: Evidence for a general theory of the semantics of evidential. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory31.2: 517–561. [doi:  10.1007/s11049‑013‑9193‑9]
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9193-9 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kitamura, Hajime
    1977 Tibetan (Lhasa dialect). Fuchu: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kun dga’ rDo rje
    Kun dga’ rDo rje 1961 Deb ther dmar po. Gangtok: Namgyal Institute of Tibetology. Scanned version by Buddhist Digital Resource Center, W16476. https://www.tbrc.org (9 February 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lai, Yunfan
    2017 Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. Université Paris III dissertation.
  27. Lewis, Paul , Gary F. Simons , & Charles D. Fennig
    (eds) 2015 Ethnologue: Languages of the world, Eighteenth edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Daqin 李大勤
    2002 Gemanyu yanjiu格曼语研究 [Study on Geman]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, Daqin 李大勤 and Di Jiang 江荻
    2001 Zhahua gaikuang扎话概况 [A brief introduction to Zha speech]. Minzu Yuwen6: 61–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, Xingxing 李星星
    2008 Ji Nujiang bian de yige yuyan gudao–Dongba记怒江边的一个语言孤岛——东坝 [Regarding a language island along the Nujiang River–Dongba]. InLi Xingxing lun Zang-Yi Zoulang. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, Zhiying 李志英
    2015 Kangqu “Baili Tusi” kao康区“白利土司”考 [A textual study of the Beri Tusi]. Zangxue Xuekan13: 107–122.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lin, You-Jing
    2003 Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale32.2: 245–286. 10.3406/clao.2003.1633
     https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.2003.1633 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin, Xiangrong 林向荣
    1993 Jiarongyu Yanjiu嘉戎语研究 [Study on rGyalrong]. Chengdu: Sichuan Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lu, Shaozun 陆绍尊
    1985 Zhabayu gaikuang扎巴语概况 [Outline of Zhaba]. Minzu Yuwen2:67–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 2002 Menbayu Fangyan Yanjiu门巴语方言研究 [Study on Monpa dialects]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Martin, Dan
    2010 Zhangzhung dictionary. Revue d’études tibétaines18: 33–253. himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ret/pdf/ret_18_02.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Matisoff, James A.
    1995 Sino-Tibetan numerals and the play of prefixes. Bulletin of National Museum of Ethnology20.1: 105–252.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 1997 Sino-Tibetan numeral systems: Prefixes, protoforms and problems. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University. doi: 10.15144/PL‑B114
     https://doi.org/10.15144/PL-B114 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2015a On the demise of the Proto-Tibeto-Burman mid vowels. Bulletin of National Museum of Ethnology39.3: 375–395. doi: 10.15021/00003807
     https://doi.org/10.15021/00003807 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2015b Sino-Tibetan etymological dictionary and thesaurus (STEDT). Berkeley: Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project. stedt.berkeley.edu/dissemination/STEDT.pdf (14 September, 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Nagano, Yasuhiko & Marielle Prins
    (eds.) 2013 rGyalrongic Languages Database. htq.minpaku.ac.jp/databases/rGyalrong/ (18 September, 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Nagano, Yasuhiko & ‎ Samten Gyeltsen Karmay
    (eds.) 2008 A lexicon of Zhangzhung and Bonpo terms. Compiled by Pasar Tsultrim Tenzin , Changru Tritsuk Namdak Nyima , and Gatsa Lodroe Rabsal . Suita: National Museum of Ethnology. hdl.handle.net/10502/00008536 (25 February, 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Nam mkha’i Nor bu
    Nam mkha’i Nor bu 1982 Bod rigs gzhon nu rnams la gros su ’debs pa gzi yi phreng ba. Dharamsala: Bod kyi dpe mdzod khang.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Nam mkha’i Nor bu
    Nam mkha’i Nor bu 2015 Zhang bod lo rgyus ti se’i ’od. Pe cin: Krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. de Nebesky-Wojkowitz, René
    1956 Oracles and demons of Tibet: The cult and iconography of the Tibetan protective deities. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Nishida, Tatsuo 西田龍雄 & Hongkai Sun 孫宏開
    1990 Baima Yiyu no kenkyuu: Sinhakken gengo Baima-go no koozoo to keitoo白馬譯語の研究：新発見言語白馬語の構造と系統 [Study on Baima Yiyu: Structure and genetic relationship of the newly-discovered language Baima]. Kyoto: Shokado.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Oisel, Guillaume
    2017 Re-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions. Himalayan Linguistics16.2: 90–128. doi:  10.5070/H916229119
     https://doi.org/10.5070/H916229119 [Google Scholar]
  48. Padma ’Byung gnas
    Padma ’Byung gnas. n.d.bKa’ thang sde lnga. sDe dge: sDe dge par khang. Scanned version by Buddhist Digital Resource Center, W29247. https://www.tbrc.org (24 February, 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  49. dPal ’byor bZang po
    dPal ’byor bZang po 1985 rGya bod yig tshang chen mo. Khreng tu’u: Si khron Min rigs dPe skrun khang. Scanned version by Buddhist Digital Resource Center, W20848. https://www.tbrc.org (9 February 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Phukhang, J. K. & Peter Schwieger
    1982 Erzählgut aus A-mdo und Brag-g.yab. Sankt Augustin: VGH Wissenschaftverlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Qu, Aitang 瞿霭堂 , dKon-chog rGya-mtsho, bCo-lnga and sKal-bzang Ye-shes
    1989 Weizang fangyan de xin tuyu: Ji zuijin faxian de Basonghua卫藏方言的新土语：记最近发现的巴松话 [New vernacular of dBus-gTsang dialect: Report on the newly-discovered Basum speech]. Minzu Yuwen3: 39–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Roche, Gerald
    2014 The vitality of Tibet’s minority languages in the twenty-first century: Preliminary remarks. Multiethnica35: 24–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 2017 Introduction: the transformation of Tibet’s language ecology in the twenty-first century. International Journal of the Sociology of Language245: 1–35. doi:  10.1515/ijsl‑2017‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2017-0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Roche, Gerald & Hiroyuki Suzuki
    2017 Mapping the linguistic minorities of the Eastern Tibetosphere. Studies in Asian Geolinguistics VI –Means to Count Nouns–, 28–42. https://publication.aa-ken.jp/sag6_count_2017.pdf (24 February, 2018)
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 2018 Tibet’s minority languages: Diversity and endangerment. Modern Asian Studies52.4: 1227–1278. doi:  10.1017/S0026749X1600072X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X1600072X [Google Scholar]
  56. Sa skya bSod nams rGyal mtshan
    Sa skya bSod nams rGyal mtshan 1985 rGyal rabs gsal ba’i me long. Rewalsar: Zigar Drukpa Kargyud Institute. Scanned version by Buddhist Digital Resource Center, W1AC11. https://www.tbrc.org (24 February, 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Schaeffer, Kurtis R. , Matthew T. Kapstein , & Gray Tuttle
    (eds.) 2013 Sources of Tibetan tradition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Schwieger, Peter
    1989 Tibetisches Erzählgut aus Brag-g.yab: Texte mit Übersetzungen, grammatischem Abriss und Glossar. Sankt Augustin: VGH Wissenschaftverlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 1999 Toward a biography of Don-yod rdo-rje, King of Be-ri. In Helmut Eimer , Michael Hahn , Maria Schetelich , & Peter Wyzlic (eds), Studia Tibetica et Mongolica (Festschrift Manfred Taube), 247–260. Swisttal-Odendorf: Indica et Tibetica Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 2002 History as oral tradition: The construction of collective identity in Brag g.yab (Khams). In Lawrence Epstein (ed.), Khams pa histories: Visions of people, place and authority, 127–154. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Shirai, Satoko
    2006 Dapa-go ni okeru siten hyoozi sisutemu no kenyuu [Study on the point-of-view system in nDrapa]. Doctoral dissertation, Kyoto University.
  62. Sims, Nathaniel
    2016 Towards a more comprehensive understanding of Qiang dialectology. Language and Linguistics17.3: 351–381. doi:  10.1177/1606822X15586685
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X15586685 [Google Scholar]
  63. Srong btsan sGam po
    Srong btsan sGam po 2013 Ma Ni bka’ ’bum. lHa sa: Bod ljongs mi dmang dpe skrun khang.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. STEDT database (beta)
    STEDT database (beta). Sino-Tibetan Etymologycal Dictionary and Thesaurus. stedt.berkeley.edu/~stedt-cgi/rootcanal.pl
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Sun, Hongkai 孙宏开
    1983 Liujiang liuyu de minzu yuyan ji xishu fenlei: jianshu Jialingjiang shangyou, Yaluzangbujiang liuyu de minzu yuyan六江流域的民族语言及其系属分类–兼述嘉陵江上游、雅鲁藏布江流域的民族语言 [Languages along six rivers and their classification–With some mentions regarding the ethnic languages along the upper Jialing River and Yarlung Tsangpo]. Minzu Xuebao3: 99–273.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Sun, Hongkai
    1999 On the Tibeto-Burman languages of the Eastern Himalayan area in China. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area22.2: 61–72. doi: 10.15144/LTBA‑22.2.61
     https://doi.org/10.15144/LTBA-22.2.61 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sun, Hongkai 孙宏开
    2003 Baimayu shi Zangyu de yige fangyan huo tuhua ma?白马语是藏语的一个方言或土话吗？ [Is Baima a dialect or a vernacular of Tibetan?] Yuyan Kexue1: 65–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 2013 Bajiang liuyu de Zangmianyu八江流域的藏缅语 [Tibeto-Burman languages along eight rivers]. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehuikexue Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 2016 Zangmianyuzu Qiangyuzhi yanjiu藏缅语族羌语支研究 [Study of the Qiangic branch in Tibeto-Burman]. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehuikexue Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Sun, Hongkai 孙宏开 , Zengyi Hu 胡增益 , & Xing Huang 黄行
    eds. 2007 Zhongguo de yuyan中国的语言 [China’s languages]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2000a Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics1.1: 161–190.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 2000b Stem alternations in Puxi verb inflection: Toward validating the rGyalrongic subgroup in Qiangic. Language and Linguistics1.2: 211–232.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 2004 Verb-stem variations in Showu rGyalrong. In Ying-chin Lin , Fang-min Hsu , Chun-chih Lee , Jackson T.-S. Sun , Hsiu-fang Yang & Dah-an Ho (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan Languages: Papers in Honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on His Seventieth Birthday, 269–296. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Suzuki, Hiroyuki
    2010 Nyagrong-Minyag (Xinlong Muya) go Jialaxi [rGyarwagshis] hoogen gaikyooニャロン・ムニャ（新龍木雅）語甲拉西[rGyarwagshis]方言概況 [Outline of Nyagrong Minyag rGyarwagshis dialect]. Researches in Asian Languages8: 27–55. id.nii.ac.jp/1085/00000537/
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 2012 Ergative marking in Nyagrong-Minyag (Xinlong, Sichuan). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman areaVol.35.1: 35–48. doi: 10.15144/LTBA‑35.1.35
     https://doi.org/10.15144/LTBA-35.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  76. 2016a Typological description of existential verbs and expressions in the Tibetic languages spoken in the eastern Tibetosphere. Paper presented at4th Workshop on Sino-Tibetan Languages of Southwest China, Seattle, 8–10 September 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2016b In defense of prepalatal non-fricative sounds and symbols: towards the Tibetan dialectology. Researches in Asian Languages10: 99–125. id.nii.ac.jp/1085/00002195/
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 2018a Kamutibettogo Mangkang-Jiangzhong [sMarling] hoogen no hoogen tokutyooカムチベット語芒康・江仲 [sMarling]方言の方言特徴 [Dialectal characteristics of the sMarling dialect of Khams Tibetan]. Nidaba47: 41–49. ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/00045563
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 2018b Litangxian ji qi zhoubian Zangzu yuyan xianzhuang diaocha yu fenxi理塘县及其周边藏族语言现状调查与分析 [Current situation of Tibetans’ languages in Lithang County and its surroundings: Investigation and analysis]. Minzu Xuekan2: 35–44+106–109.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Suzuki, Hiroyuki & Sonam Wangmo
    2015 Quelques remarques linguistiques sur le tibétain de Lhagang, ‘l’endroit préféré par le Bodhisattva’. Revue d’Études Tibétaines32: 153–175. himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ret/pdf/ret_32_05.pdf (11 February, 2018)
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 2016 Lhagang Choyu: A first look at its sociolinguistic status. Studies in Asian Geolinguistics II –Rice–, 60–69. https://publication.aa-ken.jp/sag2_rice_2016.pdf (9 February, 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 2017 Lhagang Choyu wordlist with the Thamkhas dialect of Minyag Rabgang Khams (Lhagang, Dartsendo). Asian and African Languages and Linguistics (AALL)12: 133–160. hdl.handle.net/10108/91144 (15 June, 2018)
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 2018 Kamutibettogo Tagong [Lhagang] hoogen no zyutubu ni hyoozi sareru syookoseiカムチベット語塔公 [Lhagang]方言の述部に標示される証拠性 [Evidential system of Lhagang Tibetan]. Journal of Kijutsuken10: 13–42. id.nii.ac.jp/1422/00002000/ (15 June, 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Tashi Tsering
    ed. 1980 ’Dzam gling chen po’i rgyas bshad kun gsal me long: The rare 1830 redaction of the monumental Tibetan work on the geography of the world by Fourth Btsan-po No-mon-han Sprul-sku ’Jam-dpal-chos-kyi-bstan-’dzin-’phrin-las. Edited from a cursive manuscript from Mongolia. Delhi: Jayyad Press. Retrieved fromBuddhist Digital Resource Center (Work-22137, Volume–3546). https://www.tbrc.org/ (9 February, 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Thub bstan Phun tshogs
    Thub bstan Phun tshogs 1996 Bod kyi rgyus spyi don padma tA ga’i lde mig. Khreng tu’u: Si khron Min rigs dPe skrun khang. Scanned version by Buddhist Digital Resource Center, W21968. https://www.tbrc.org/ (9 February 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Thub bstan Phun tshogs and Don grub Tshe ring
    Thub bstan Phun tshogs and Don grub Tshe ring 2016 Mi nyag gi lo rgyus spyi don gangs ri’i rang mdang. Chengdu: Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Thugs mchog rDo rje
    Thugs mchog rDo rje 1991 Bod mi bu gdong drug gi rus mdzod me tog skyed tshal. InmGo log rus mdzod. Zi ling: mTsho sngon Mi rigs dPe skrun khang. Scanned version by Buddhist Digital Resource Center, W27305. https://www.tbrc.org/ (9 February 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Thurgood, Graham
    2017 Sino-Tibetan: Genetic and areal subgrouping. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, (2nd edn), 3–39. Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Tournadre, Nicolas
    2005 L’aire linguistique tibétaine et ses divers dialectes. Lalies25:7–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 2014 The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 105–129. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy J. LaPolla
    2014 Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area37.2: 240–263. doi:  10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou [Google Scholar]
  92. Tournadre, Nicolas & Hiroyuki Suzuki
    . Forthcoming. The Tibetic languages: An introduction to the family of languages derived from Old Tibetan (with the collaboration of Xavier Becker and Alain Brucelles for the cartography).
     [Google Scholar]
  93. gTsug lag ’Phreng ba
    gTsug lag ’Phreng ba 1980 Chos ’byung mKhas pa’i dga’ ston. Delhi: Delhi Karmapae Choedey Gyalwae Sungrab Partun Khang. Scanned version by Buddhist Digital Resource Center, W28792. https://www.tbrc.org/ (9 February 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Tunzhi (Sonam Lhundrop)
    Tunzhi (Sonam Lhundrop) 2017 Language vitality and glottonyms in the Ethnic Corridor: The rTa’u language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language245: 147–168. doi:  10.1515/ijsl‑2017‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2017-0006 [Google Scholar]
  95. Tunzhi (Sonam Lhundrop) , Hiroyuki Suzuki , & Gerald Roche
    2019 Language contact and the politics of recognition amongst Tibetans in China: The and rTa’u-speaking ‘Horpa’ of Khams. In Selma Sonntag & Mark Turin (eds.), The politics of language contact in the Himalaya, in press. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. doi: 10.11647/OBP.0169
     https://doi.org/10. 11647/OBP.0169 [Google Scholar]
  96. Wang, Jianmin 王建民 & bTsan-lha Ngag-dbang Tshul-khrims
    1992 Anduohua Jiaronghua duibi fenxi安多话嘉戎话对比分析 [Contrastive analysis of Amdo and rGyalrong]. Chengdu: Sichuan Minzu Chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Warner, Cameron David
    2011 A miscarriage of History: Wencheng Gongzhu and Sino-Tibetan historiography. Inner Asia13.2: 239–264. pure.au.dk/portal/files/44398758/03_Warner_offprint.pdf (31 May 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
  98. van Way, John & Bkrashis Bzangpo
    2015 Nyagrong Minyag: Prestige and maintenance of a traditional language on the Tibetan periphery. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area38.2: 245–255. doi:  10.1075/ltba.38.2.06van
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.38.2.06van [Google Scholar]
  99. Wylie, Turrell Verl
    1962 The geography of Tibet according to the ’Dzam-gling-rgyas-bshad. Roma: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Xizang Changdu Diqu Difangzhi Bianzuan Weiyuanhui西藏昌都地区地方志编纂委员会 2005 Changdu Diquzhi昌都地区志 [Annals of Chamdo District]. Beijing: Fangzhi Chubanshe.
  101. Yamaguchi, Zuiho 山口瑞鳳
    1983 Toban Ookoku seiritusi kenkyuu吐蕃王国成立史研究 [Study on the history of the establishment of Tibet Kingdom]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Yelatai [Yul lha thar]
    Yelatai [Yul lha thar] 2017 Qian Tufan shiqi Duokang Zangqu Zangxi buluo前吐蕃时期多康藏区藏系部落 [Tibetan-related ethnic groups in mDo Khams in the pre-Tibet Empire era]. Qinghai Minzu Daxue Xuebao4:68–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. gZhong nu dpal
    gZhong nu dpal 1984 Deb ther sngon po. Khreng tu’u: Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Zhu, Xiaonong 朱晓农
    2010 Yuyinxue语音学 [Phonetics]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
  105. Zong, Xiaozhe 宗晓哲 , Jie Liu 刘洁 , & Daqin Li 李大勤
    2017 Songgu Zhahua de yuyin tedian松古扎话的语音特点 [Phonetic features of Songgu Zhahua]. Yuyan Yanjiu4: 113–119.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.18004.nyi
Loading
Newly recognised languages in Chamdo
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 42, 38 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.18004.nyi
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.18004.nyi
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.18004.nyi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chamdo; gSerkhu; historical migration; Lamo; lexical comparison; non-Tibetic (Tibeto-Burman) languages; sMar; Tibet Autonomous Region

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error