1887
Volume 43, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a description and analysis of segmental phonetics and phonology of Hyow, a Tibeto-Burman language spoken by almost 4,000 people in the southeast of Bangladesh. Hyow demonstrates phonological features which are absent in other Chin languages of the Tibeto-Burman branch. Proto Kuki-Chin initial voiceless nasals are not only preserved in Mara and Central Chin languages (Van Bik 2009: 220), but also in Hyow. Unlike other Southern Chin languages, Hyow final liquids are sometimes preserved or developed into central approximants. In fact, final liquids are preserved in Bangladesh Hyow, and in two varieties of Laitu – Keyni and Myebon – and Laisaw in the Rakhine State of Myanmar. The salient and prevalent phonological process of re-syllabification in Hyow demonstrates that the glottal stop cannot be treated as a phonetic property of the coda-cluster sonorants, which is otherwise treated as glottalized in some Chin languages by scholars, e.g. Hakha Lai (Hyman & Van Bik 2002: 114). Hyow does not show a phonemic contrast between long and short vowels which is very often found in Chin languages. Though Mainland Southeast Asian Languages are profoundly known for having sesquisyllables or reduced syllables, in Hyow, vowels of initial syllables of disyllabic words carrying grammatical morphemes are harmonized with vowels of root-initial syllables, which confirms the absence of such type of reduced syllables in Hyow. The phonological description and analysis in this paper are furthermore supported by phonetic data and illustrations. Discussions of variant phonetic realizations of certain segments have also been included.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.19006.zak
2021-01-04
2021-05-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bernot, Denise & Lucien Bernot
    1958Les Khyang des Collines de Chittagong (Pakistan oriental): materiaux pour l’etude linguistique des Chin. [L’Homme, Cahiers d’Ethnologie, de Geographie et de Linguistique, Nouvelle Serie, 3]. Paris: Librairie Plon.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burling, Robbins
    1992Patterns of language. San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chao, Yuen-Ren
    1930 ə sistim əv toun-letəz [A system of tone-letters]. Le Mâitre Phonétique45: 24–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cho, Taehong & Peter Ladefoged
    1999 Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2): 207–229. 10.1006/jpho.1999.0094
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0094 [Google Scholar]
  5. Coupe, Alec
    2003A phonetic and phonological description of Ao: A Tibeto Burman language of Nagaland, north-east India. [Pacific Linguistics 543]. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Duanmu, San
    1994 Syllabic weight and syllabic duration: a correlation between phonology and phonetics. Phonology11(1): 1–24. 10.1017/S0952675700001822
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700001822 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferguson, Charles
    1963 Assumptions about nasals: a sample study in phonological universals. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 53–60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. So-Hartmann, Helga
    2009A descriptive grammar of Daai Chin. Berkeley: Sino Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hyman, Larry & Kenneth Van Bik
    2002 Tone and Stem2-Formation in Hakha Lai. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area25(1): 113–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ladefoged, Peter
    1971Phonetics. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2001A course in phonetics (4th Ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2003 Validity of voice identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society America114(4): 2403. 10.1121/1.4778312
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4778312 [Google Scholar]
  13. LaPolla, Randy
    2003 Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 22–42. London, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lass, Roger
    1984Phonology: An introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Laver, John
    1994Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166621
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166621 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lisker, Leigh & Arthur Abramson
    1964 A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word20(3): 384–422. 10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830 [Google Scholar]
  17. Luján, Eugenio
    2014 Phonological change. In Georgios Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek language and linguistics, Volume3, 83–87. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lotven, Samson , Kelly Berkson , James C. Wamsley , Jillian Danaher , Kenneth Van Bik & Stuart Davis
    2020 The syllable in Kuki Chin. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 6(1): 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Maddieson, Ian
    1984Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753459 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2005 Glottalized consonants. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 34–37. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Matisoff, James
    2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Meunier, Christine & Robert Espesser
    2011 Vowel reduction in conversational speech in French: The role of lexical factors. Journal of Phonetics39(3): 271–278. 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.11.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.11.008 [Google Scholar]
  23. Okell, John
    1969A reference grammar of colloquial Burmese. London: Oxford U.P.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Peterson, David
    2000 On the status of the southern Chin Subgroup. Paper presented at the33rd ICSTLL, Bangkok, 2–6 October.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Bik, Kenneth
    2009Proto-Kuki-Chin: A reconstructed ancestor of the Kuki Chin languages. University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Weirich, Melaine & Adrian Simpson
    2014 Differences in acoustic vowel space and the perception of speech tempo. Journal of Phonetics43: 1–10. 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Zakaria, Muhammad
    2018 A grammar of Hyow. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University Doctoral dissertation.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.19006.zak
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.19006.zak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chin; coda cluster; glottalized sonorants; Hyow; phonological processes; Tibeto-Burman
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error