Volume 43, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Ritual speech in many languages around the world shows grammar distinct from grammar used in daily speech. In Northern Prinmi ritual speech we found a significant use of two exhaustive constructions, one of which is not attested in daily speech; the other is only minimally attested. We argue that exhaustive constructions are strong expressions of the utmost degree which makes them particularly useful to the serious occasions in which ritual speech is used, such as when pronouncing blessings or invoking the gods. We also discuss two possible grammaticalization pathways, but find no conclusive evidence for either.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Allen, Nicholas J.
    1978 Sewala puja bintila puja: Notes on Thulung ritual language. Kailash6(4). 237–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1981 Differences between colloquial and ritual Seneca and how oral literature is literary. InAlice Schlichter, Wallace L. Chafe & Leanne Hinton (eds.), Reports from the survey of California and other Indian languages, Report #1, 131–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Daudey, Henriëtte
    2014a Volition and control in Wǎdū Pǔmǐ. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37(1). 75–103. 10.1075/ltba.37.1.03dau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.1.03dau [Google Scholar]
  4. 2014bA grammar of Wadu Pumi. La Trobe University: Unpublished PhD Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Daudey, Henriëtte & Gerong Pincuo
    2018Documentation of Northern Prinmi oral art, with a special focus on ritual speech. London: SOAS, Endangered Languages Archive. URL: https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI1083424
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ding, Picus Sizhi
    2014A grammar of Prinmi, based on the central dialect of northwest Yúnnán, China. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004279773
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004279773 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017 Language endangerment and loss of traditional knowledge: The case of Prinmi. InPicus Sizhi Ding & Jamin Pelkey (eds.), Sociohistorical linguistics in Southeast Asia: New horizons for Tibeto-Burman studies in honor of David Bradley, 53–73. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004350519_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350519_005 [Google Scholar]
  8. Foley, William A.
    1997Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gaenszle, Martin
    2002Ancestral voices: Oral ritual texts and their social contexts among the Mewahang Rai in East Nepal. Münster: Lit.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gaenszle, Martin, Balthasar Bickel, Goma Banjade, Elena Lieven, Netra Paudyal, Ichchha Rai, Manoj Rai, Novel Kishore Rai & Sabine Stoll
    2005 Worshiping the King God: A preliminary analysis of Chintang ritual language in the onvocation of Rajdeo. InYogendra P. Yadava (ed.), Contemporary issues in Nepalese linguistics, 33–47. Kathmandu: Linguistic Society of Nepal.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gaenszle, Martin, Balthasar Bickel, Narayan P. Sharma, Judith Pettigrew, Arjun Rai, Shree Kumar Rai, & Diana Schackow
    2011 Binomials and the noun-to-verb ratio in Puma Rai ritual speech. Anthropological Linguistics53(4). 365–382. 10.1353/anl.2011.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2011.0021 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gerong Pincuo & Henriëtte Daudey
    2013 Too much loving-kindness to repay: Funeral speeches of the Wenquan Pumi. Asian Highlands Perspectives28. 81–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hansson, Inga-Lill
    1991 The language of Akha ritual texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area7(1). 63–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2013 Grammatical aesthetics of ritual texts in Akha. InJeffrey P. Williams (ed.), The aesthetics of grammar: Sound and meaning in the languages of Mainland Southeast Asia, 280–288. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139030489.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030489.022 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jacques, Guillaume
    2016 Complementation in Japhug. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area39(2). 222–281. 10.1075/ltba.39.2.02jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.2.02jac [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee Wen-Yao 李文窈
    2014 Jiā de gǔ, rén de gēn: Zhōngguó Diān xīběi Yǒngníng Pǔmǐzúrén yánxù zài dìjǐng shang de rénqún gòuchéng 《家的骨,人的根:中國滇西北永寧普米族人延續在地景上的人群構成》 Bone of the house, root of the people: The sociality and landscape of the Pumi speaking people of Yong-ning in Southwestern China. Táiwān: National Táiwān University 國立臺灣大學 MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ozerov, Pavel & Henriëtte Daudey
    2017 Copy-verb constructions in Tibeto-Burman and beyond. Linguistic Typology21(1). 53–99. 10.1515/lingty‑2017‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2017-0002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Rai, Ichchha Purna, Balthasar Bickel, Elena Lieven, Goma Banjade, Martin Gaenszle, Manoj Rai, Netra Prasad Paudyal, Novel Kishore Rai, Sabine Stoll & Toya Nath Bhatta
    2009 Mundun: A case study of Chintang ritual language. InR. Mukherjee & M. N. Rajesh (eds.), Locality, history, memory: the making of the citizen in South Asia, 20–33. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Walker, Anthony R.
    1980 “Kh’awv k’ov ve”: A Lahu Nyi (Red Lahu) rite of spirit exorcism. Oriens Extremus27(2). 227–248.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error