1887
Volume 43, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive phonetic and phonological description of Northern Sangtam, an essentially undescribed Tibeto-Burman language of central Nagaland belonging to the Aoic subgroup. It is a noteworthy language from a number of phonological perspectives, not least because its phoneme inventory contains two of the world’s rarest phonemes: a pre-stopped bilabial trill, and a doubly-articulated labial-coronal nasal. These unique segments are described in detail, and an attempt is made to determine how they might have developed their phonemic status. The tone system is also of interest, as it demonstrates evidence of debuccalization resulting in the development of a new high tone. Following a systematic description of the syllable and word structure, the tone system, and the segmental phonology, some observed age-related differences in the phoneme inventory are discussed. The paper is linked to an online repository containing the audio-visual data and transcribed word lists of approximately 900 items, based on the recorded utterances of eight speakers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.19014.cou
2020-08-28
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Benedict, Paul K.
    1972Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753541
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753541 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bielenberg, Brian & Zhalie Nienu
    2001 Chokri (Phek dialect): Phonetics, phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area24.(2). 85–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouchery, Pascal & Lemlila Sangtam
    2012 The Kinship terminology of the Sangtam Nagas. European Bulletin of Himalayan Research41. 9–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruhn, Daniel Wayne
    2014 A phonological construction of Proto-Central Naga. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  5. Burling, Robbins
    1999 On “Kamarupan”. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area22.(2). 169–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2003 The Tibeto-Burman languages of northeastern India. InThurgood, Graham and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 169–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark, Mary Mead
    [1893] 2002The Ao-Naga grammar. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chao, Y.
    1930 A system of “tone-letters”. Le Maître Phonetique30. 24–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coupe, Alexander R.
    2003A phonetic and phonological description of Ao: a Tibeto-Burman language of Nagaland, north-east India. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2007aA grammar of Mongsen Ao. Mouton Grammar Library 39. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198522
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198522 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2007b Converging patterns of clause linkage in Nagaland. InMatti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), New challenges in typology: Broadening the horizons and redefining the foundations. [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs189], 339–361. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (ed.) 2008 Special issue on nominalization in Tibeto-Burman, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman AreaVol.31.(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011 On core case marking patterns in two Tibeto-Burman languages of Nagaland. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area34.(2). 21–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2012 Overcounting numeral systems and their relevance to sub- grouping in the Tibeto-Burman languages of Nagaland. Language and Linguistics13.(1). 193–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2013 Phonological peculiarities of Sangtam: A preliminary investigation. Paper read at the19th Himalayan Languages Symposium, The Australian National University, Canberra6–7 September.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2014 Strategies for analyzing tone languages. Language Documentation & Conservation8: 462–489. hdl.handle.net/10125/2461
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2015 Pre-stopped bilabial trills in Sangtam. InThe Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow. ISBN978-0-85261-941-4. Paper no. 0734. 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2017 Mongsen Ao. InThurgood, Graham & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd Edn., 277–301. Oxford and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, & Charles D. Fennig
    (eds.) 2019Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Twenty-second edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online edition: www.ethnologue.com. Accessed13/06/2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Everett, Daniel L. & Barbara Kern
    1997Wari’. Routledge: London & New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Grierson, George Abraham
    (ed.) 1967 Reprint. Linguistic survey of India. Vol3, Part2. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Series first published 1903–1928.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Haudricourt, André-Georges
    1954 De l’origine des tons en vietnamien. Journal Asiatique242. 69–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hutton, John Henry
    1921The Angami Nagas, with some notes on neighbouring tribes. London: MacMillan and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1986 Reprint. Diaries of two tours in the unadministered area, east of the Naga Hills. Memoirs of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol.11, No.1. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal. Delhi: Mittal Publications. First published 1929.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Imchen
    Imchen 2014 Linguistic ecology of Sangtam. InWar, J. and S. K. Singh and S. A. Lyngdoh & B. Khyriem (eds.), Tibeto-Burman linguistics of North-East India, 54–75. Guwahati: EBH Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle
    1956Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kauffmann, H. E.
    1939 Kurze Ethnographie der nördlichen Sangtam-Naga (Lophomi), Assam. Anthropos34. 207–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kumar, Braj Bihari
    1973Hindi-Sangtam dictionary. Kohima: Nagaland Bhasha Parishad.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson
    1996The sounds of the world’s languages. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ladefoged, Peter & Daniel Everett
    1996 The status of phonetic rarities. Language72.(4). 794–800. 10.2307/416103
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416103 [Google Scholar]
  31. LaPolla, Randy J.
    1994 Parallel grammaticalizations in the Tibeto-Burman languages: evidence of Sapir’s ‘drift’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area17(1). 61–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. MacEachern, M. R., Kern, B., Ladefoged, P.
    1997 Wari’ phonetic structures. Journal of Amazonian Languages1(1). 3–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Maddieson, Ian
    2013 Consonant inventories. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atwals.info/chapter/1, Accessed on2019-09-13.)
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Marrison, Geoffrey Edward
    1967 The classification of the Naga languages of north-east India, Volume 1 (Text). Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
  35. Matisoff, James A.
    1973 Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. InLarry M. Hyman (ed.), Consonant types and tone, 71–95. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 1. Los Angeles: Linguistics Program of the University of Southern California.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1989 The bulging monosyllable, or the mora the merrier: Echo-vowel adverbialization in Lahu. InJ. Davidson (ed.), South-East Asian Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Eugenie J. A. Henderson, 163–97. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 1991 Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Present state and future prospects. Annual Review of Anthropology20: 469–504. 10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.002345
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.002345 [Google Scholar]
  38. 1999 In defense of Kamarupan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area22(2). 173–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mills, John P.
    1922The Lotha Nagas. London: MacMillan & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 1926The Ao Nagas. London: MacMillan & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. No author
    No author 2016Yusüp: Bilingual dictionary of Sangtam Naga. Dimapur, Nagaland: Sangtam Literature Board.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Reid, Robert
    1942History of the frontier areas bordering on Assam, from 1883–1942. Shillong: Assam Government Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sampson, Rodney
    2011Nasal vowel evolution in Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sapir, Edward
    1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Orlando FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Temsunungsang, T.
    2009 Aspects of the prosodic phonology of Ao: An inter-dialectal study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad.
  47. Teo, Amos
    2014A phonological and phonetic description of Sumi, a Tibeto-Burman language of Nagaland. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Weidert, Alfons
    1987Tibeto-Burman tonology: A comparative account. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.54
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.54 [Google Scholar]
  49. Witter, W. E.
    1888Outline grammar of the Lhōtā Nāgā language: With a vocabulary and illustrative sentences. Calcutta: Supt. of Govt. Print.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wolfenden, Stuart Norris
    1929Outlines of Tibeto-Burman linguistic morphology. London: Royal Asiatic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.19014.cou
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.19014.cou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error