What is a word in Brokpa?

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2002 Typological parameters for the study of clitics, with special reference to Tariana. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 42–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2007 Typological distinctions in word-formation. InTimothy Shopen, (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 3.1–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618437.001
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.001 [Google Scholar]
3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2015 The art of grammar: a practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White
   2020 The essence of ‘word’. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White (eds.), Phonological word and grammatical word: a cross-linguistic typology, 1–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
5. Bickel, Balthasar
   1998 Rhythm and feet in Belhare morphology. Rutgers Optimality Archive Working Paper. No.287.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bickel, Balthasar
   2003 Prosodic tautomorphemicity in Sino-Tibetan. InDavid R. Bradley, Randy LaPolla, Boyd Michailovsky & Graham Thurgood (eds.), Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in Honour of James A. Matisoff, 89–99. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bickel, Balthasar & Fernando Zúñiga
   2017 The ‘Word’ in polysynthetic languages: Phonological and syntactic challenges. InMichael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.013.52
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.013.52 [Google Scholar]
8. Bickel, Balthasar, René Schiering & Kristine Hildebrandt
   2009 The distribution of phonological word domains: A probabilistic typology. (co-authors Balthasar Bickel & René Schiering). InBaris Kabak & Janet Grijzenhout (eds.), Phonological domains: Universals & deviations, 47–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219234.1.47
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219234.1.47 [Google Scholar]
9. Bloomfield, Leonard
   1933 Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bolinger, Dwight L.
    1963 The uniqueness of the word. Lingua12.113–136. 10.1016/0024‑3841(63)90022‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(63)90022-6 [Google Scholar]
11. Bybee, Joan L.
    1985 Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
12. Caplow, Nancy
    2016 Stress patterns and acoustic correlates of stress in Balti Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics15(2).1–49.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1977 A grammar of Yidiɲ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139085045
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139085045 [Google Scholar]
14. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1988 A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2010 Basic linguistic theory, vol. 2. Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2020 Words within words: Examples from Yidiñ, Jarawara, and Fijian. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White (eds.), Phonological word and grammatical word: a cross-linguistic typology, 25–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
17. Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2002 Word: A typological framework. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. van Driem, George
    1991 Guide to official Dzongkha romanization. Thimphu: Royal Government of Bhutan.
    [Google Scholar]
19. van Driem, George & Karma Tshering
    2019 The grammar of Dzongkha: Revised and expanded, with a guide to Roman Dzongkha and to phonological Dzongkha. (4th edition) Santa Barbara: Himalayan Linguistics, University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hall, T. Alan & Ursula Kleinhenz
    (eds.) 1999 Studies on the phonological word. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.174
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.174 [Google Scholar]
21. Hall, T. Alan & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
    2008 Phonological and morphological domains in Kyirong. Linguistics46(2).215–248. 10.1515/LING.2008.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.010 [Google Scholar]
22. Hall, T. Alan, Kristine A. Hildebrandt & Balthasar Bickel
    2008 Introduction: Theory and typology of the word. Linguistics46(2).183–192. 10.1515/LING.2008.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.008 [Google Scholar]
23. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
    2004 A grammar and glossary of the Manange. Tibeto-Burman Languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa, 241.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
    2007 Prosodic and grammatical domains in Limbu. Himalayan Linguistics8.1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
    2015 The prosodic word. InJohn R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word, 221–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hill, Nathan W.
    2010 An overview of old Tibetan synchronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society108(2).110–125. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2010.01234.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01234.x [Google Scholar]
27. Hill, Nathan W.
    2012 Tibetan palatalization and the gy vs g.y distinction. InNathan W. Hill (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languagesIV, 383–398. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004233454_014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004233454_014 [Google Scholar]
28. Lyons, John
    1968 Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165570
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570 [Google Scholar]
29. Mazaudon, Martine
    1973 Phonologie Tamang: Étude phonologique du dialecte Tamang de Risiangku (langue Tibéto-Birmane du Nepal). Paris: SELAF.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mazaudon, Martine & Boyd Michailovsky
    1988 Lost syllables and tone contour in Dzongkha. InDavid Bradley, Eugénie J. A. Henderson & Martine Mazaudon (eds.), Prosodic analysis and Asian linguistics: To Honour R. K. Sprigg, 115–136. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mithun, Marianne
    1984 The evolution of noun incorporation. Language60.847–894. 10.1353/lan.1984.0038
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1984.0038 [Google Scholar]
32. Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
    1986 Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
    2007 Prosodic phonology. With a new foreword. (Studies in Generative Grammar 28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110977790
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110977790 [Google Scholar]
34. Peperkamp, Sharon
    1997 Prosodic words. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sadock, Jerrold M.
    1991 Autolexical syntax: a theory of parallel grammatical representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sadock, Jerrold M.
    1995 A multi-hierarchy view of clitics. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society31(2).258–279.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Schiering, René, Balthasar Bickel & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
    2010 The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. Journal of Linguistics46.657–709. 10.1017/S0022226710000216
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000216 [Google Scholar]
38. Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
    1995 The prosodic structure of function words. InJill N. Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18), 439–469. Amherst: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sprigg, R. K.
    1955 The tonal system of Tibetan (Lhasa Dialect) and the nominal phrase. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 133–153. 10.1017/S0041977X00106391
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00106391 [Google Scholar]
40. Sprigg, R. K.
    1966 Lepcha and Balti Tibetan: Tonal or non-tonal languages?Asia Major12.185–201.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Suzuki, Hiroyuki
    2015 New perspectives on the suprasegmentals in mBrugchu Tibetan: An introduction to the tonogenesis triggered by breathy voice. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics8.117–139. 10.1163/2405478X‑00801007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-00801007 [Google Scholar]
42. Trubetzkoy, Nicolai S.
    1969 Principles of phonology. Translated byC. A. M. Baltaxe. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wangdi, Pema
    2020 Segmental and suprasegmental features of Brokpa. Himalayan Linguistics19(1).393–422. 10.5070/H919148641
    https://doi.org/10.5070/H919148641 [Google Scholar]
44. Wangdi, Pema
    . Forthcoming. A grammar of Brokpa: A Trans-Himalayan language of Bhutan. Cairns: James Cook University PhD dissertation.
45. Watters, Stephen A.
    2002 The sounds and tones of five Tibetan languages of the Himalayan region. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area25(1).1–66.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Watters, Stephen A.
    2018 A grammar of Dzongkha: phonology, words, and simple clauses. Houston: Rice UniversityPhD dissertation.
47. Zhang, Sihong
    2014 A reference grammar of Ersu, a Tibeto-Burman language of China. Townsville: James Cook University PhD dissertation.
48. Zwicky, Arnold M.
    1977 On clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club 1973.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Zwicky, Arnold M.
    1985 Clitics and particles. Language61(2).283–305. 10.2307/414146
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414146 [Google Scholar]
50. Zwicky, A. M. & G. K. Pullum
    1985 Cliticisation vs. inflection: English n’t. Language59.502–513. 10.2307/413900
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413900 [Google Scholar]