1887
Volume 44, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates the structure of phonological word and grammatical word in Brokpa, a Tibeto-Burman (Trans-Himalayan) language of Bhutan. Defining features of a phonological word include stress, tone, and segmental properties. A grammatical word is defined based on conventionalized coherence and meaning, fixed order of morphemes, and its behaviour in relation to derivational and inflectional marking. Grammatical and phonological words in Brokpa coincide in most instances. Typical mismatches include words involving non-cohering compounds and non-cohering reduplication. A formal distinction between phonological and grammatical word is the key to our understanding of the interactions between different parts of grammar in Brokpa, and help resolve potential ambiguities of the term “word” in this language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.19019.wan
2021-11-23
2021-11-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2002 Typological parameters for the study of clitics, with special reference to Tariana. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 42–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2007 Typological distinctions in word-formation. InTimothy Shopen, (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 3.1–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618437.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2015The art of grammar: a practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White
    2020 The essence of ‘word’. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White (eds.), Phonological word and grammatical word: a cross-linguistic typology, 1–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickel, Balthasar
    1998 Rhythm and feet in Belhare morphology. Rutgers Optimality Archive Working Paper. No.287.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2003 Prosodic tautomorphemicity in Sino-Tibetan. InDavid R. Bradley, Randy LaPolla, Boyd Michailovsky & Graham Thurgood (eds.), Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in Honour of James A. Matisoff, 89–99. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bickel, Balthasar & Fernando Zúñiga
    2017 The ‘Word’ in polysynthetic languages: Phonological and syntactic challenges. InMichael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.013.52
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199683208.013.52 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bickel, Balthasar, René Schiering & Kristine Hildebrandt
    2009 The distribution of phonological word domains: A probabilistic typology. (co-authors Balthasar Bickel & René Schiering). InBaris Kabak & Janet Grijzenhout (eds.), Phonological domains: Universals & deviations, 47–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219234.1.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219234.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bolinger, Dwight L.
    1963 The uniqueness of the word. Lingua12.113–136. 10.1016/0024‑3841(63)90022‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(63)90022-6 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bybee, Joan L.
    1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  12. Caplow, Nancy
    2016 Stress patterns and acoustic correlates of stress in Balti Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics15(2).1–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1977A grammar of Yidiɲ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139085045
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139085045 [Google Scholar]
  14. 1988A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2010Basic linguistic theory, vol. 2. Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2020 Words within words: Examples from Yidiñ, Jarawara, and Fijian. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White (eds.), Phonological word and grammatical word: a cross-linguistic typology, 25–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2002 Word: A typological framework. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. van Driem, George
    1991Guide to official Dzongkha romanization. Thimphu: Royal Government of Bhutan.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. van Driem, George & Karma Tshering
    2019The grammar of Dzongkha: Revised and expanded, with a guide to Roman Dzongkha and to phonological Dzongkha. (4th edition) Santa Barbara: Himalayan Linguistics, University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall, T. Alan & Ursula Kleinhenz
    (eds.) 1999Studies on the phonological word. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.174
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.174 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hall, T. Alan & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
    2008 Phonological and morphological domains in Kyirong. Linguistics46(2).215–248. 10.1515/LING.2008.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.010 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hall, T. Alan, Kristine A. Hildebrandt & Balthasar Bickel
    2008 Introduction: Theory and typology of the word. Linguistics46(2).183–192. 10.1515/LING.2008.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.008 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
    2004A grammar and glossary of the Manange. Tibeto-Burman Languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa, 241.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2007 Prosodic and grammatical domains in Limbu. Himalayan Linguistics8.1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2015 The prosodic word. InJohn R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word, 221–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hill, Nathan W.
    2010 An overview of old Tibetan synchronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society108(2).110–125. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2010.01234.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01234.x [Google Scholar]
  27. 2012 Tibetan palatalization and the gy vs g.y distinction. InNathan W. Hill (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languagesIV, 383–398. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004233454_014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004233454_014 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lyons, John
    1968Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165570
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570 [Google Scholar]
  29. Mazaudon, Martine
    1973Phonologie Tamang: Étude phonologique du dialecte Tamang de Risiangku (langue Tibéto-Birmane du Nepal). Paris: SELAF.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mazaudon, Martine & Boyd Michailovsky
    1988 Lost syllables and tone contour in Dzongkha. InDavid Bradley, Eugénie J. A. Henderson & Martine Mazaudon (eds.), Prosodic analysis and Asian linguistics: To Honour R. K. Sprigg, 115–136. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mithun, Marianne
    1984 The evolution of noun incorporation. Language60.847–894. 10.1353/lan.1984.0038
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1984.0038 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
    1986Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2007Prosodic phonology. With a new foreword. (Studies in Generative Grammar 28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110977790
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110977790 [Google Scholar]
  34. Peperkamp, Sharon
    1997Prosodic words. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sadock, Jerrold M.
    1991Autolexical syntax: a theory of parallel grammatical representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1995 A multi-hierarchy view of clitics. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society31(2).258–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schiering, René, Balthasar Bickel & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
    2010 The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. Journal of Linguistics46.657–709. 10.1017/S0022226710000216
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000216 [Google Scholar]
  38. Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
    1995 The prosodic structure of function words. InJill N. Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18), 439–469. Amherst: GLSA.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sprigg, R. K.
    1955 The tonal system of Tibetan (Lhasa Dialect) and the nominal phrase. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 133–153. 10.1017/S0041977X00106391
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00106391 [Google Scholar]
  40. 1966 Lepcha and Balti Tibetan: Tonal or non-tonal languages?Asia Major12.185–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Suzuki, Hiroyuki
    2015 New perspectives on the suprasegmentals in mBrugchu Tibetan: An introduction to the tonogenesis triggered by breathy voice. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics8.117–139. 10.1163/2405478X‑00801007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-00801007 [Google Scholar]
  42. Trubetzkoy, Nicolai S.
    1969Principles of phonology. Translated byC. A. M. Baltaxe. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wangdi, Pema
    2020 Segmental and suprasegmental features of Brokpa. Himalayan Linguistics19(1).393–422. 10.5070/H919148641
    https://doi.org/10.5070/H919148641 [Google Scholar]
  44. . Forthcoming. A grammar of Brokpa: A Trans-Himalayan language of Bhutan. Cairns: James Cook University PhD dissertation.
  45. Watters, Stephen A.
    2002 The sounds and tones of five Tibetan languages of the Himalayan region. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area25(1).1–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2018 A grammar of Dzongkha: phonology, words, and simple clauses. Houston: Rice UniversityPhD dissertation.
  47. Zhang, Sihong
    2014 A reference grammar of Ersu, a Tibeto-Burman language of China. Townsville: James Cook University PhD dissertation.
  48. Zwicky, Arnold M.
    1977On clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club 1973.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 1985 Clitics and particles. Language61(2).283–305. 10.2307/414146
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414146 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zwicky, A. M. & G. K. Pullum
    1985 Cliticisation vs. inflection: English n’t. Language59.502–513. 10.2307/413900
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413900 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.19019.wan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.19019.wan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error