1887
Volume 44, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article analyzes the realis converbs and irrealis converbs in Hwari () Tibetan, an Amdo Tibetan dialect spoken in Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County, Wuwei City, Gansu Province, China. One peculiarity of Hwari Tibetan morphosyntax is the existence of a large set of converbal suffixes. A survey of previous descriptions reveals a lack of consensus in the analysis of these converbs. They have been included in the framework of Written Tibetan too often, which has led to confusion regarding their typological status. A primary objective of our paper is to rectify this approach by describing the language on its own terms by comparing the morphosyntactic behavior of eight selected suffixes with regard to relevant criteria, such as realis and irrealis. This empirical research feeds back into the theoretical discussion, as it shows that the Hwari Tibetan converbs can be described using conventional typological concepts if construed appropriately. Our second objective is to explain the semantic and pragmatic properties of these converbs, particularly and . The conclusion is that the two converb types are located along a continuum from realis/irrealis to positive/negative, thus constituting an instantiation of syntax-semantics isomorphism. The clause chaining in Hwari Tibetan is representative. By describing the converbs in Hwari Tibetan from the perspective of realis and irrealis, and by focusing on the syntactic properties and pragmatic features of -Ce in realis converbs and -Ca in irrealis converbs, it is revealed that the irrealis converbs and function in a unique way in Hwari Tibetan.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.20006.son
2021-05-11
2021-07-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2015The art of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartee, Ellen Lynn
    2007 A grammar of Dongwang Tibetan. Santa Barbara: University of California dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bickel, Balthasar
    1998 Review article: Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology2(3): 381–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Comrie, Bernard
    1985Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165815
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165815 [Google Scholar]
  5. De Haan, Ferdinand
    2012 Irrealis: fact or fiction?Language Sciences34: 107–130. 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.016 [Google Scholar]
  6. DeLancey, Scott
    1991 The origins of verb serialization in modern Tibetan. Studies in Language15: 1–23. 10.1075/sl.15.1.02del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.15.1.02del [Google Scholar]
  7. Denwood, Philip
    1999Tibetan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/loall.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2010Basic linguistic theory 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dpa’ ris sangs rgyas. དཔའ་རིས་སངས་རྒྱས། 2003Brda sprod gsal byed ngag SGron. བརྡ་སྤྲོད་གསལ་བྱེད་ངག་སྒྲོན། [The lamp of Tibetan grammar] Xining: Qinghai Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ebihara, Shiho 海老原志穂
    2019 アムド・チベット語文法 (A grammar of Amdo Tibetan). Tokyo: ひつじ書房.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gesangjumian
    Gesangjumian 1987Shiyong zangwen wenfa [Practical Tibetan grammar]. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationalities Press.
  12. Haller, Felix
    2009 Switch-reference in Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area32(2): 45–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Haspelmath, Martin
    1995 The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110884463‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884463-003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Jendraschek, Gerd & Shin Yongmin
    2018 Korean converbs between coordination and subordination. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Linguistics56(5): 1099–1139. 10.1515/ling‑2018‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0018 [Google Scholar]
  15. Koshal, Sanyukta
    1979Ladakhi grammar. India: Shri Jainendra Press. Library of Congress.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nedjalkov, Igor’ V.
    1995 Converbs in Evenki. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 441–463. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110884463‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884463-014 [Google Scholar]
  17. Palmer, Frank R.
    2001Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
  18. Payne, Thomas E.
    2011Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sapir, Edward
    1930 Southern Paiute, a Shoshonean language. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Science65: 1–3. 10.2307/20026309
    https://doi.org/10.2307/20026309 [Google Scholar]
  20. Shao, Mingyuan
    2018Hexi zoulang binwei zangyu dongnahua yanjiu [Study on the endangered Dongna Tibetan in Hexi corridor]. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University Press.
  21. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    1993 Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. The bulletin of the institute of history and philology Taipei63(4): 945–1001.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, Zhijing
    1994Zangyu lasa kouyu yufa [A Grammar of Lhasa Tibetan]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
  23. Weisser, Philipp
    2015 Derived Coordination. Leipzig: Leipzig University PhD dissertation. 10.1515/9783110443578
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110443578 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ylikoski, Jussi
    2003 Defining non-finites: action nominals, converbs and infinitives. SKY Journal of Linguistics16: 185–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zemp, Marius
    2018A grammar of Purik Tibetan. Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004366312
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004366312 [Google Scholar]
  26. Zheng, Wuxi
    2019 Longxi qiangyu de renchen fanchou [The Person category in Longxi Qiang]. Language Science18: 62–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou, Jiwen & Xie Houfang
    2003Zangyu Lasahua Yufa [A grammar of Lhasa Tibetan]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
  28. Zhoumaocao
    Zhoumaocao 2003Maqu zangyu yanjiu [Study of Maqu Tibetan]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.20006.son
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.20006.son
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): clause-chaining; converb; finite; Hwari Tibetan; irrealis; switch reference
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error