Volume 43, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



It tends to be assumed that tonal languages do not make use of intonational tones and accent location for the purpose of conveying information structural aspects of the utterance. This study of read-aloud stories in colloquial Burmese shows that this tonal language does resort to this sort of intonational means for information-structuring reasons. The prosody of Burmese exhibits identifiable intonational patterns, which function on the level of accentual phrases. An accentual phrase constitutes the basic prosodic unit, and it is there that we find the real interaction of information structure, intonation and tone. Accentual phrases are organised around a single accent, the location of which depends on information structural factors. Sentences can consist of a single accentual phrase or a few phrases, while the exact partition into such phrases is also motivated by information- and discourse-structuring considerations.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Armstrong, Lilias E. & Pe Maung Tin
    1925A Burmese phonetic reader: With English translations. London: University of London Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
    2017Praat (version 6.0.28). Amsterdam: Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam. www.praat.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradley, David
    1982 Register in Burmese. In D. Bradley (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics No.8: Tonation, 117–132. Canberra: Australia National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunelle, Marc , Kiều Phương Hạ & Martine Grice
    2012 Intonation in Northern Vietnamese. The Linguistic Review29(1): 3–36. doi:  10.1515/tlr‑2012‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2012-0002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Burgdorf, Dan Cameron
    2020 Reduction in Burmese compounds. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society13(1): 129–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Yiya & Carlos Gussenhoven
    2008 Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese. Journal of Phonetics36(4): 724–746. 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
    2010 Information Patterning Theory and the corpus-based description of spoken language: The compositionality issue in topic-comment pattern. In Massimo Moneglia & Alessandro Panunzi (eds.), Bootstrapping information from corpora in a cross-linguistic perspective, 13–46. Florence: Firenze University Print.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Downing, Laura J.
    2008 Focus and prominence in Chichewa, Chitumbuka and Durban Zulu. ZAS papers in linguistics49: 47–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Downing, Laura J. & Annie Rialland
    (eds.) 2017Intonation in African tone languages. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:  10.1515/9783110503524
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110503524 [Google Scholar]
  10. Elvira-García, Wendy
    2017Create pictures with tiers v.4.4. Praat Script. stel.ub.edu/labfon/en/praat-scripts
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Féry, Caroline
    2010 Indian languages as intonational ‘phrase languages.’ In Imtiaz Hasnain & Shreesh Chaudhury (eds.), Problematizing language studies: Cultural, theoretical and applied perspectives – essays in honor of Rama Kant Agnihotri, 288–312. Delhi: Aakar Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fox, Anthony , Kang-Kwong Luke & Owen Nancarrow
    2008 Aspects of intonation in Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics36(2): 333–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Green, Antony D.
    2005 Word, foot and syllable structure in Burmese. In Justin Watkins (ed.), Studies in Burmese Linguistics, 1–26. [Pacific Linguistics 570]. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gruber, James F.
    2011 An articulatory, acoustic, and auditory study of Burmese tone. Washington: Georgetown University PhD thesis.
  15. Ha, Kiều Phương
    2012Prosody in Vietnamese: Intonational form and function of short utterances in conversation. [Pacific Linguistics A-PL 002]. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian national University.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hyman, Larry M. & Kemmonye C. Monaka
    2011 Tonal and non-tonal intonation in Shekgalagari. In Frota Sónia , Elordieta Gorka & Prieto Pilar (eds.), Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension, 267–289. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑0137‑3_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0137-3_12 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jacobs, Joachim
    1999 Informational autonomy. In Peter Bosch & Rob van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives, 56–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jenks, Peter
    2007 Burmese tone?Unpublished ms. Harvard University. www.linguistics.berkeley.edu/~jenks/Research_files/Burmese%20Tone.pdf
  19. Kanerva, Jonni
    1990Focus and phrasing in Chichewa phonology. New York: Garland.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kratovchil, Paul
    1998 Intonation in Beijing Chinese. In Daniel Hirst & Albert Di Cristo (eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages, 417–431. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kügler, Frank & Susanne Genzel
    2012 On the prosodic expression of pragmatic prominence: The case of pitch register lowering in Akan. Language and Speech55(3): 331–359. doi:  10.1177/0023830911422182
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830911422182 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  23. Matić, Dejan & Daniel Wedgwood
    2013 The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis. Journal of Linguistics49(1): 127–163. doi:  10.1017/S0022226712000345
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000345 [Google Scholar]
  24. Matisoff, James A.
    1994 Tone, intonation, and sound symbolism in Lahu: Loading the syllable canon. In John Ohala , Leanne Hinton & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Sound symbolism, 115–129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McDonough, Joyce
    2003 The prosody of interrogative and focus constructions in Navajo. In Andrew Carnie , Heidi Harley & and MaryAnn Willie (eds.), Formal approaches to functional phenomena. In honour of Eloise Jelinek, 191–206. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.62.15mcd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.62.15mcd [Google Scholar]
  26. Michaud, Alexis & Jacqueline Vaissière
    2015 Tone and intonation: Introductory notes and practical recommendations. KALIPHO – Kieler Arbeiten Zur Linguistik Und Phonetik (Theoretical and empirical foundations of experimental phonetics) 3: 43–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Michaud, Alexis & Tuan Vu-Ngoc
    2004 Glottalized and nonglottalized tones under emphasis: Open quotient curves remain stable, F0 curve is modified. In Bernard Bel & Isabelle Marlien (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, 745–748. Nara, Japan: ISCA.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ouyang, Iris Chuoying & Elsi Kaiser
    2015 Prosody and information structure in a tone language: An investigation of Mandarin Chinese. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience30(1–2): 57–72. doi:  10.1080/01690965.2013.805795
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.805795 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ozerov, Pavel
    2015 Information structure without topic and focus: Differential object marking in Burmese. Studies in Language39(2): 386–423. doi:  10.1075/sl.39.2.04oze
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.2.04oze [Google Scholar]
  30. 2018 Tracing the sources of information structure: Towards the study of interactional management of information. Journal of Pragmatics138: 77–97. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.017 [Google Scholar]
  31. Patin, Cédric
    2017 Tone and intonation in Shingazidja. In Laura J. Downing & Annie Rialland (eds.), Intonation in African tone languages, vol.24, 285–320. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110503524‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110503524-009 [Google Scholar]
  32. Peng, Shu-Hui
    1997 Production and perception of Taiwanese tones in different tonal and prosodic contexts. Journal of Phonetics25(3): 371–400. doi:  10.1006/jpho.1997.0047
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0047 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sax, Daniel J.
    2012 Not quite ‘out of the blue’? Towards a dynamic, Relevance-theoretic approach to thetic sentences in English. In Agnieszka Piskorska (ed.), Relevance studies in Poland, vol.4, 24–53. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schwiertz, Gabriele
    2009 Intonation and prosodic structure in Beaver (Athabaskan) – Explorations on the language of the Danezaa. Cologne: University of Cologne PhD Thesis.
  35. Selkirk, Elizabeth
    2008 Contrastive focus, givenness and the unmarked status of ‘Discourse-New.’ Acta Linguistica Hungarica55:1–16. doi:  10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3‑4.8
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.8 [Google Scholar]
  36. Simpson, Andrew & Justin Watkins
    2006 Constituent focus in Burmese: A phonetic and perceptual study. In Justin Watkins (ed.), Studies in Burmese linguistics, 27–66. [Pacific Linguistics 570.] Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Thompson, Sandra A.
    2019 Understanding ‘clause’ as an emergent ‘unit’ in everyday conversation. Studies in Language43(2): 254–280. doi:  10.1075/sl.16032.tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16032.tho [Google Scholar]
  38. Watkins, Justin
    2003 Tone and intonation in Burmese. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1289–1292. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Xu, Yi
    1999 Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. Journal of Phonetics27: 55–105. doi:  10.1006/jpho.1999.0086
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0086 [Google Scholar]
  40. Xu, Yi , Szu-Wei Chen & Bei Wang
    2012 Prosodic focus with and without post-focus compression: A typological divide within the same language family?The Linguistic Review29: 131–47. doi:  10.1515/tlr‑2012‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2012-0006 [Google Scholar]
  41. Zerbian, Sabine
    2004 Phonological phrases in Xhosa (Southern Bantu). ZAS Papers in Linguistics37: 71–99.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): accent; Burmese; focus; information structure; prosody; topic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error