Volume 45, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper describes the interrogative system of Liangshan Yi, a Loloish language spoken in Southwest China, by investigating its two major dialects: Nuosu and Niesu. Ten interrogative categories are addressed, including ‘who’, ‘which’, ‘what’, ‘how many/much’, ‘what kind’, ‘how’, ‘where’, ‘when’, ‘for what’ and ‘why’. The following syntactic categories are revealed for the basic functions of the interrogatives: person ‘who’, thing ‘what’, place ‘where’ and time ‘when’ are all nouns, selection ‘which’ is an adjective, quantity ‘how many/much’ is a numeral, manner ‘how’ is a verb, kind ‘what kind’ is a verb phrase, purpose ‘for what’ is a verb phrase, and cause ‘why’ is a verb. Both purpose and cause interrogatives are based on the meaning ‘to do what’. All interrogatives have the same syntactic categories in Niesu and Nuosu. Both Niesu and Nuosu distinguish purpose from cause by using word/phrase distinction and positional differences in sentences. The grammaticalization of the verb phrase ‘to do what’ into the cause interrogative is facilitated by three structural conditions of Liangshan Yi. Moreover, the (proto-)-word and the -word are the basis for most of the interrogatives in Liangshan Yi. However, the derivation between and is no longer visible in Nuosu, while this connection is still clear in Niesu. Three crossover functions are described: asking for ‘why’ with ‘how’, asking for ‘why’ with ‘what’, and asking for ‘how’ with ‘where’; the word classes of the interrogatives may also change due to the functional changes. Finally, the non-interrogative functions of the interrogatives are discussed, including indefinites, intensification of a state, and exclamation.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2011 Multi-verb constructions: Setting the scene. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Pieter C. Muyske (eds.), Multi-verb constructions: A view from the Americas, 1–26. Leiden & Boston: Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004194526.i‑313.8
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004194526.i-313.8 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ameka, Felix K.
    1991 Ewe: its grammatical constructions and illocutionary devices. Canberra: ANU PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andvik, Erik
    2010A grammar of Tshangla. Leiden & Boston: Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004178274.i‑490
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004178274.i-490 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2017 Tshangla. InGraham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 418–435. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bradley, David
    1979Proto-Loloish. London: Curzon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1995 Grammaticalisation of extent in Mran-Ni. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area18(1). 1–28. 10.1075/ltba.39.1.001ed
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.1.001ed [Google Scholar]
  7. 1997 Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. InDavid Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, papers in South East Asian linguistics, 1–72. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2001 Language policy for the Yi. InHarrell Stevan (ed.), Perspectives on the Yi of Southwest China, 195–214. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/california/9780520219885.003.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520219885.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Kang, & Wu Da
    1998Yiyu yufa [Grammar of Nuosu: Based on Shynra dialect]. Beijing: Central Minzu University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Shilin, Bian Shiming, & Li Xiuqing
    1985Yiyu jianzhi [A concise survey of Nuosu]. Beijing: Minzu Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chirkova, Katia
    2015Eggplant child (Lizu). Retrieved from   10.24397/pangloss‑0001254 (Accessed20 January 2022).
    https://doi.org/10.24397/pangloss-0001254 [Google Scholar]
  12. Croft, William
    2002Typology and universals (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511840579
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840579 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cysouw, Michael & Olav Hackstein
    2011The (in)stability of interrogatives. The case of Indo-European. Paper presented at20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25–30 July 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cysouw, Michael
    2005 The typology of content interrogatives. Paper presented at the6th Meeting of Association for Linguistic Typology. Padang, Indonesia, 24 July 2005.
  15. Diessel, Holger
    2008 Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics193. 465–490. 10.1515/COGL.2008.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ding, Hongdi
    2018 A cross-dialectal analysis of Nuosu adjectival comparative construction. Linguistics of Tibeto-Burma Area41(1). 45–74. 10.1075/ltba.16023.din
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.16023.din [Google Scholar]
  17. Ding, Hongdi & Lama, Ziwo
    2021 Aspect marking in Niesu, a dialect of Nuosu in Sichuan, China. Himalayan Linguistics20(1). 1–27. 10.5070/H920144787
    https://doi.org/10.5070/H920144787 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ding, Hongdi & Dong, Sicong
    . In press. Interrogatives of reason in Tibeto-Burman languages of Sichuan. Language and Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ding, Sizhi
    2014A grammar of Prinmi: Based on the central dialect of northwest Yunnan, China. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004279773
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004279773 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    2012aBasic linguistic theory (vol.1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2012bBasic linguistic theory (vol.3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Duanmu, San
    1998 Woodhood in Chinese. InJerome Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation morphology, phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese, 135–196. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110809084.135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809084.135 [Google Scholar]
  23. Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
    2002A grammar of Hdi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110885798
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885798 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gerner, Matthias
    2013Grammar of Nuosu (MGL 64)Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110308679
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308679 [Google Scholar]
  25. Givón, Talmy
    1985 Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. InJohn Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 187–219. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.6.10giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.10giv [Google Scholar]
  26. Green, Rebecca
    1995 A grammar of Gurr-goni (North Central Arnhem Land). Canberra: ANU PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Greenberg, H. Joseph
    1966Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hagège, Claude
    2008 Towards a typology of interrogative verbs. Linguistic Typology12. 1–44. 10.1515/LITY.2008.031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2008.031 [Google Scholar]
  29. Haiman, John
    1980 The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language56(3). 515–540. 10.2307/414448
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414448 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hajek, John
    2006 On doubly articulated labial-velar stops and nasals in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area29(2). 127–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hunnemeyer
    (eds.) 1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Heine, Bernd
    1993Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hengeveld, Kees, Jan Rijkhoff & Anna Siewierska
    2004 Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics40(3).527–570. 10.1017/S0022226704002762
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226704002762 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hölzl, Andreas
    2015 A typology of negation in Tungusic. Studies in Language39(1). 117–157. 10.1075/sl.39.1.05hoe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.1.05hoe [Google Scholar]
  35. 2018A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspective. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hosokawa, Komei
    1991 The Yawuru language of West Kimberley: A meaning-based description. Canberra: ANU PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jacques, Guillaume
    2021A grammar of Japhug. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jakobson, Roman
    1971 Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. InRoman Jakobson (eds.), Selected writings, vol. 2: Word and language, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110873269.130
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110873269.130 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    2019World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316479704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lama, Ziwo
    2012 Subgrouping of Nisoic (Yi) languages: A study from the perspectives of shared innovation and phylogenetic estimation. Arlington: the University of Texas at Arlington PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. LaPolla, Randy J.
    2008 Nominalization in Rawang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area31(2). 45–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lü, Shuxiang
    1980Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [Eight hundred words in modern Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Luo, Tianhua
    2016Interrogative strategies: An areal typology of the languages of China. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.5 [Google Scholar]
  44. Luraghi, Silvia
    2003On the meaning of prepositions and cases: A study of the expression of semantic roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.67
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.67 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mahai, Jibu
    2015 Yiyu beibu fangyan Suondi tuyu yuyin he cihui yanjiu [Phonetic and vocabulary research on Suodi Dialect of North Yi language]. Guangzhou, China: Jinan University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Matisoff, A. James
    2006 Much Adu 阿都 about something: Extrusional labiovelars in a Northern Yi patios. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area29(1). 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Matisoff, James A.
    2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. Accessed via STEDT database stedt.berkeley.edu/search/
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip
    2011Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Michaud, Alexis
    2012 Yongning Na changpian yuliao de jilu zhengli yu yanjiu gongzuo [the transcription and research of folk stories in Yongning Na]. Lijiang Minzu Yanjiu [Lijiang Ethnic Studies] 5. 36–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2018 Na (Mosuo)-English-Chinese dictionary. Retrieved fromhttps://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01204638v3/document (Accessed22 September 2020)
  51. Muysken, Pieter & Norval Smith
    1990 Question words in pidgin and creole languages. Linguistics28. 883–903. 10.1515/ling.1990.28.4.883
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1990.28.4.883 [Google Scholar]
  52. Noonan, Michael & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
    2017 Chantyal. InGraham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 494–515. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Pan, Zhengyun
    2001 Yiyu aduhua chunruan’e fufuyin shengmu bijiao yanjiu [A comparative study of labiovelar cluster initials in the Adu patois of the Yi language]. Minzu Yuwen [Minority Languages of China] 2. 17–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Payne, Thomas Edward
    1997Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805066
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805066 [Google Scholar]
  55. Qumu, Tiexi
    2010Yiyu yinuohua yanjiu [A study of Yynuo speech]. Beijing: Minzu Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Thompson, Sandra A., Robert Longacre & Shin Ja J. Hwang
    2007 Adverbial clauses. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, (2nd edition), 237–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.005 [Google Scholar]
  57. Tsai, Wei-tien
    2007 Chongwen Weishenme Wen Zenmeyang, Zenmeyang Wen Weishenme [Revisiting asking why with how and how with why]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] (3). 195–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
    2008 The status of purpose, reason and intended endpoint in the typology of complex sentences, and its implications for layered models of clause structure. Linguistics46. 757–788. 10.1515/LING.2008.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.025 [Google Scholar]
  59. Yin, Weibin
    2016Namuzi Yufa Biaozhu Wenben [Texts of Namuyi]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Yip, Virginia & Stephen Matthews
    2007The bilingual child: early development and language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620744
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620744 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): interrogatives; Liangshan Yi; Niesu; Nuosu; Tibeto-Burman
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error