1887
Volume 45, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The Tangut language is of particular importance to the field of Sino­Tibetan Studies, notably because of its morphological conservatism, which is unexpectedly correlated with a simplification of its syllable structure, a consequence of a process Miyake (2012) called “compression”. Such conservatism is evident in the syllable qualities reconstructed, which sometimes reflect proto­ Tangut’s ancient derivational processes. Verbs also exhibit various flectional phenomena, mainly due to conversion of agreement rules and referential hierarchy rules (Silverstein 1976), in a manner reminiscent of the indexation system of languages of the rGyalrongic taxon within the Qiangic family. The present paper attempts to explain the absence of indexation in the Tangut verb, a key phenomenon in the history of verb agreement analysis. First, I recall the main rules of the Tangut verb’s agreement system, as shown by Kepping (1975) and Gong (2001). Second, cases of non­agreement are analyzed. Apart from the case of non­local contexts, we see that the absence of agreement occurs in non­finite forms resulting from a dependency pattern, such as clause chaining, topic/comment context, and semantically dependent modality.1

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.21008.bea
2022-06-02
2024-03-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahrens, Kathleen
    1990 Re-examining the evidence for verbal agreement in Tangut. Paper presented at the23rd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, University of Texas at Arlington, October 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2007 Semi-direct speech: Manambu and beyond. Language Sciences30(4). 383–422. 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arakawa, Shintarō 荒川慎太郎
    2018 西夏語の双数接尾辞についてSeik- ago no sosu setsubishi ni tsuite [On the ‘dual’ suffix of Tangut]. Inユーラシア諸言語の多様性と動態-20 号記念号-追悼庄垣内正弘先生 [Diversity and dynamics of Eurasian languages: The 20th commemorative volume dedicated to Prof. Dr. Masahiro Shōgaito]. Contribution to the studies of Eurasian languages series 20, 69–83. The Consortium for the Studies of Eurasian Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beaudouin, Mathieu
    . accepted. Tangut and Horpa languages: some shared morphosyntactic features. Language and Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dooley, Robert A.
    2010 Exploring clause chaining. SIL Electronic Working Papers 2010–001. https://www.sil.org/system/files/reapdata/13/04/21/130421360311569160306235201738876375986/silewp2010_001.pdf. Last checked: 10/02/2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gong, Hwang-cherng 龔煌城
    2001 〈西夏語動詞的人稱呼應與音韻轉換〉Xīxiàyǔ dòngcí de rénchēng hūyìng yǔ yīnyùn zhuǎnhuàn [Rhyme alternation and personal agreement in the Tangut verb]. Language and Linguistics2(1). 21–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2006 西夏語文研究論文集Xīxià yǔwén lùn- wénjí [Collected papers on the Tangut language]. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology of the Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Haspelmath, Martin
    2007 Coordination. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions, 1–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Haspelmath, Martin & Ekkehard König
    (eds.) 1995Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: Structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms–adverbial participles, gerunds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110884463
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884463 [Google Scholar]
  10. Honkasalo, Sami
    2019 A grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally anchored description. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Faculty of Arts Doctoral dissertation.
  11. Jacques, Guillaume
    2007 Textes tangoutes I. Nouveau recueil sur l’amour parental et la piété filiale. München: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2011 The structure of the Tangut verb. Journal of Chinese Linguistics39(2). 419–441.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2014Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004264854
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004264854 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2016 Tangut, Gyalrongic, Kiranti and the nature of person indexation in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan. Linguistics Vanguard2(1). 20150033. 10.1515/lingvan‑2015‑0033
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2015-0033 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2017 L’impératif en tangoute. Panchronica (Research Blog)https://panchr.hypotheses.org/2015. Last checked: 10/02/2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jacques, Guillaume & Anton Antonov
    2014 Semi-direct speech in rGyalrongic languages: Rtau vs Japhug. Paper presented at theSymposium on the Syntax of the World’s Languages VI, Pavia, September 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaltenböck, G., E. Keizer & A. Lohmann
    2016Outside the clause: form and function of extra-clausal constituents Studies in Language Companion Series, 178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.178
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kepping, Ksenija
    1975 Subject and object agreement in the Tangut verb. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area2(2). 219–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1985Тангутский язык: Морфология [The Tangut language: Morphology]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lai, Yunfan
    2017 Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. Paris: Université Sorbonne Paris Cité Doctoral dissertation.
  21. Lai, Yunfan, Jesse Gates, Xun Gong & Guillaume Jacques
    2020 Tangut as a West Gyalrongic language. Folia Linguistica Historica41(1). 171–203. 10.1515/flih‑2020‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2020-0006 [Google Scholar]
  22. LaPolla, Randy
    1992a ‘Anti-ergative’ marking in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area15(1). 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 1992b On the dating and nature of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies55(2). 298–315. 10.1017/S0041977X00004638
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00004638 [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, Fanwen 李範文
    2008 夏漢字典Xià Hàn zìdiǎn [A Tangut-Chinese dictionary]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Miyake, Marc
    2012 Complexity from compression: a sketch of pre-Tangut. InIrina Popova (ed.), Тангуты в Центральной Азии: сборник статей в честь 80-летия проф. Е.И.Кычанова [Tanguts in Central Asia: a collection of articles marking the 80th anniversary of Prof. E. I. Kychanov], 244–261. Moscow: Oriental Literature.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nevsky, Nikolai Alexandrovich
    1960 Posth. Тангутская филология [Tangut Philology], vol.1. USSR Academy of Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nishida, Tatsuo 西田龍雄
    1964–1966 西夏語の研究 ― 西夏語の再構成と西夏文字の解読Seikago no kenkyū – Seikago no saikōsei to seika moji no kaidoku [Tangut Studies – Decipherment of the Tangut script and reconstruction of the Tangut language]. Tokyo: Zauhō Kankōkai [2volumes].
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2004 西夏語文法新探Xīxiàyǔ wénfǎ xīntàn. InLin Ying chin 林英津 (ed.), 漢蔵語研究-龔煌城先生七秩壽慶論文集Hànzàngyǔ yánjiù – Gong Hwang-cherng xiānshēng qīzhì shòuqìng lùnwénjí [Sino-Tibetan Studies – collected paper for the anniversary of Prof. Gong Hwang-cherng], 353–381. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics of the Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Shi, Jinbo 史金波, Huang Zhenhua 黃振華 & Nie Hongyin 聶鴻音
    1993 類林研究Lèilín yánjiù [Study of Leilin]. Ningxia Renmin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Silverstein, Michael
    1976 Hierarchy of features and Ergativity. InRobert M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sofronov, Michail V.
    1968Грамматика тангутского языка [Grammar of the Tangut language]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Solonin, Kirill
    1995 𗰗𗍫𗂧 /Двенадцать царств [The Twelve Kingdoms]. Saint Petersburg: Petersburg Oriental Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tersis, Nicole
    2010 Clause dependency relations in East Greenlandic Inuit. InIsabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy, syntax and pragmatics. Studies in Language Companion Series 121, 581–601. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.121.18ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.18ter [Google Scholar]
  34. Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje
    2003Manuel de tibétain standard. Paris: L’Asiathèque.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. van Valin, Robert D.
    2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, Yongfu 張永富
    . Ms. 西夏语第一、二人称双数后缀与人称范畴再探讨Xīxiàyǔ dì yī, dì èr rénchēng shuāngshù hòuzhuì yǔ rénchēng fànchóu zài tàn- tǎo [New inquiries on the first/second person dual suffixes and the agreement in Tangut].
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.21008.bea
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.21008.bea
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): clause chaining; dependency; Tangut; verb agreement
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error