1887
Volume 45, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Languages with sortal classifiers () are distributed across the world, with a large concentration in East and South (east) Asia. Across the world’s classifier languages, few are attested which order classifiers before numerals in counted noun phrases (). The Sino-Tibetan language family includes languages without sortal classifiers, languages with the more typical order, as well as languages with order. The latter group of languages are concentrated in Northeast India and neighboring regions. The Sino-Tibetan languages with order do not fit under one genealogical node. The present hypothesis is that the classifiers arose through repetition of the counted noun, following which the order spread via contact. The order appears to have arisen at least as early as the time of Proto-Bodo-Garo. However, we do not yet find cognate classifiers at a time depth beyond Proto-Bodo-Garo. A remaining mystery is why such a cross-linguistically rare morpheme order spread so easily within the Northeast India linguistic area.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.21013.eva
2022-06-02
2024-03-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2000Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Basumatary, Guddu P.
    2015 Numeral classifiers in Bodo. Nepalese Linguistics30. 19–24. himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/nepling/pdf/Nep_Ling_30.pdf#page=23
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benedict, Paul K.
    1972Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753541
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753541 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berkson, Kelly
    . ms. Field report on classifiers in Lutuv. Bloomington: Indiana Working Papers in South Asian Languages and Cultures.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boro, Krishna
    2017 A grammar of Hakhun Tangsa. Eugene: University of Oregon, Doctoral dissertation.
  6. Bradley, David
    1997 Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. InBradley, David (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, Papers in South East Asian linguistics14, 1–71. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2002 The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. InChristopher Beckwith (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages, 73–112. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2012 Tibeto-Burman languages of China. InRint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese languages and linguistics. Leiden: Brill.   10.1163/2210‑7363_ecll_COM_00000419
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7363_ecll_COM_00000419 [Google Scholar]
  9. van Breugel, Seino
    2014A grammar of Atong. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004258938
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004258938 [Google Scholar]
  10. Burling, Robbins
    1961A Garo grammar25. Postgraduate and Research Institute, Deccan College: Pune.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1983 The Sal Languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area7(2). 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheung, C. C. H.
    2007 On the noun phrase structure of Jingpo. Bloomington: Working papers in linguistics3. 32–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chor, W. T.
    2011A sketch grammar of Chang. Final year project report, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cornyn, William Stewart & D. Haigh Roop
    1968Beginning Burmese. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dai, Qingxia & Xijian Xu
    1992Jingpoyu yufa [A Jingpo grammar]. Beijing: Minzu University of China.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dai, Qingxia
    2012Jingpoyu cankao yufa [A Jingpo reference grammar]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Debbarma, Biman
    2015 Word order in Kokborok. Mysore. Language in India15(5). 51–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. DeLancey, Scott
    2015 Morphological evidence for a Central branch of Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan). Cahiers de Linguistique–Asie Orientale44(2). 122–149. 10.1163/19606028‑00442p02
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-00442p02 [Google Scholar]
  19. . In press. Classifying Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan) languages. InPaul Sidwell & Mattias Jenny eds. The languages and linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia, 207–224. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110558142‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110558142-012 [Google Scholar]
  20. Evans, Jonathan P. & Dhrubajit Langthasa
    . ms. Dimasa language: Structure and texts.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gil, David
    2013 Numeral classifiers. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online atwals.info/chapter/55, Accessed on2021-03-18.)
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Greenberg, Joseph
    1990On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 1990 [1972] Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the Genesis type. Working Papers inLanguage Universals, reprinted inGreenberg 1990: 16–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Her, O. S., M. Tang & B. T. Li
    2019 Word order of numeral classifiers and numeral bases: Harmonization by multiplication. STUF-Language Typology and Universals72(3). 421–452. 10.1515/stuf‑2019‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2019-0017 [Google Scholar]
  25. Joseph, Umbavu V.
    2007Rabha. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kansakar, Tej Ratna
    2005 A historical development of the numeral classifier system in Newar. InY. Yadav (ed.), Contemporal issues in Nepalese linguistics, 101–116. Kirtipur: Tribhuvan University.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kiryu, K.
    2009On the rise of the classifier system in Newar. Osaka: Senri ethnological studies75. 51–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Konnerth, Linda
    2014 A grammar of Karbi. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.
  29. Kurabe, Keita
    2016 A grammar of Jinghpaw, from Northern Burma. Kyoto: Kyoto University, Ph.D. dissertation.
  30. Li, Daqin
    2002Gemanyu Yanjiu [Geman language research]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Longmailai, Monali
    2014 The morphosyntax of Dimasa. Shillong, India: Department of Linguistics, North-Eastern Hill University, Ph.D. thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Matisoff, James A.
    2013 Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area36(2). 1–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Morey, Stephen
    2010Turung: A variety of Singpho language spoken in Assam. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mulder, Miijke
    2020 A descriptive grammar of Muklom Tangsa. LaTrobe: LaTrobe University Doctoral dissertation.
  35. Needham, Jack Francis
    1886Outline grammar of the Shaiyāng Miri language. Shillong: Assam Secretariat Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Peterson, David
    2017 On Kuki-Chin subgrouping. InPicus Sizhi Ding & Jamin Pelkey (eds.), Sociohistorical linguistics in Southeast Asia: New horizons for Tibeto-Burman studies in honor of David Bradley, 189–209. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Post, Mark W.
    2007 A grammar of Galo. Bundoora: La Trobe University PhD dissertation.
  38. Post, Mark W. & Jackson T-S. Sun
    2017 Tani languages. InGraham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edition), 322–337. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Prasad, Bal Ram
    1991Mising grammar17. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sangdong, D.
    2012 A grammar of the Kadu (Asak) language. Melbourne: La Trobe University Doctoral dissertation.
  41. Thurgood, Graham
    2003 A subgrouping of the Sino-Tibetan languages: The interaction between language contact, change, and inheritance. InGraham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 1–21. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. VanBik, Kenneth
    2009Proto-Kuki-Chin: A reconstructed ancestor of the Kuki-Chin languages. Berkeley, CA: STEDT Monograph8.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Weidert, Alfonso K.
    1984 The classifier construction of Newari and its Southeast Asian background. Kailash11(3–4). 185–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Wood, Daniel C.
    2008 An initial reconstruction of Proto-Boro-Garo. Eugene: University of Oregon Master’s thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wood, Daniel
    2011 An initial reconstruction of the Proto-Boro-Garo Noun Phrase. InGwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds.), North East Indian linguistics3, 46–60. New Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/UPO9788175968875.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9788175968875.006 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.21013.eva
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.21013.eva
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): classifier; historical; morphosyntax; typology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error