1887
Volume 45, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The Bodo-Garo group of languages consisting of Kāchārī or Bodo, Lālung (autonym Tiwa), Dīmā-sā, Gārō, Koch, Rābhā, Tipurā (autonym Kokborok), Chutiyā (autonym Deori) and Morān (Grierson 1903) are mainly spoken by about four million people in north-east India.1

BG exhibit systematic processes of formation of causative verbs through prefixation, suffixation and very rarely, infixation. Lexical causative verbs are also employed in these languages whereas periphrastic causatives are found in the form of verb stacking. This study aims at finding out the causative prefixes which co-occur with the root verbs to form their causative counterparts; categorizing the prefixes in terms of their occurrences with certain roots; and, analyzing the environments and linguistic conditioning of the occurrences of the prefixes. This study also discusses several syntactic and semantic features associated with causation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.21023.bra
2022-11-04
2023-01-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Balawan, M.
    1975Outlines of Lalung grammar. Shillong: Don Bosco Technical School.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baro, Daithun
    2017 Process of word formation in Bodo. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention6(11). 46–58. Retrieved fromwww.ijhssi.orgonApril 12, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Basumatary, Prafulla
    2017Verbal semantics in a Tibeto-Burman language: The Bodo verb. Oxford: Peter Lang. 10.3726/b11643
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b11643 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boro, Krishna
    2012 Serialized verbs in Boro. InGwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds.), North East Indian linguistics41, 83–103. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd./Foundation Books. 10.1017/UPO9789382264521.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9789382264521.007 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brahma, Aleendra
    2013Modern Bodo grammar. Guwahati: N.L. Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Comrie, Bernard
    1976 The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causative constructions (Syntax and semantics 6), 261–312. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1989Language universals and linguistic typology, 2nd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Daimai, Kailadbou & I. D. Raguibou
    2020 Causatives in Liangmai. Himalayan Linguistics19(2). 30–43. Retrieved from10.5070/H91151000onJanuary 15, 2021.
    https://doi.org/10.5070/H91151000 [Google Scholar]
  9. Debbarma, Binoy
    2001Concise Kokborok-English-Bengali dictionary. Agartala, Tripura: Caxton Printers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2000 A typology of causatives: form, syntax and meaning. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 30–83. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, & Charles D. Fennig
    (eds.) 2022Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 25th edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: www.ethnologue.com
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Evans, Jonathan P. & Dhrubajit Langthasa
    2022 Dimasa language: Structure and texts. Language and Linguistics. Published online. Retrieved fromhttps://www.academia.edu/55350183/Dimasa_language_structure_and_textsonApril 5, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Frawley, William
    1992Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Grierson, G. A.
    1903Linguistic Survey of India, Vol.III1, Part II. Kolkata: Superintendent of Government Printing.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1927Linguistic Survey of India, Vol.I1, Part I. Kolkata: Superintendent of Government Printing.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hale, Kenneth
    1997 The Misumalpan causative construction. InJoan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 199–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.13hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.13hal [Google Scholar]
  17. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacques, Guillaume
    2019 The labial causative in Trans-Himalayan. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society12(1). 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jose, U. V.
    2014Tiwa-English dictionary with English-Tiwa index. Shillong: Don Bosco Centre for Indigenous Cultures.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Joseph, U. V.
    2005 Causatives in Rabha. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area28 (2). 79–106. 10.1075/ltba
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba [Google Scholar]
  21. 2007Rabha. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2008 Causative prefixes in four Boro-Garo languages. InStephen Morey & Mark Post (eds.), North East Indian linguistics11. 153–167. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd./Foundation Books. 10.1017/UPO9788175968431.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9788175968431.011 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kroeger, P. R.
    2005Analyzing grammar: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801679
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801679 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lyons, John
    1977SemanticsVol.21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mithun, Marianne
    2000 Valency-changing derivation in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 30–83. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Payne, Thomas
    1997Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805066
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805066 [Google Scholar]
  27. Post, Mark W. & Robbins Burling
    2017 The Tibeto-Burman languages of Northeast India. InRandy J. LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages2nd edition, 213–242. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Shibatani, M.
    1976 The grammar of causative constructions. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causative constructions (Syntax and semantics 6), 1–39. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368842
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368842 [Google Scholar]
  29. Talmy, L.
    2007 Lexical typologies. InT. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 66–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618437.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.002 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.21023.bra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.21023.bra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bodo-Garo; causative prefixes; causative suffixes; causative verbs; valency
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error