1887
Volume 46, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article presents a frequently used versatile classifier in the endangered Ngwi language Zauzou. After investigating seven morphosyntactic contexts in which may occur, this classifier exhibits considerable syntactic and semantic overlaps with ordinary classifiers and the inanimate plural quantifier in this language. is used as the only classifier for unclassified nouns (i.e., some abstract and count nouns) and an alternative classifier for nearly all kinds of ordinary sortal or mensural classifiers for inanimates, especially when the canonical classifier is not known to the speaker. It shares a wide range of distributions with ordinary numeral classifiers and the plural quantifier and parallels these two classes of determiners in marking various referential values in different noun phrases. However, is semantically special in that it may classify nouns of various semantic classes, including abstract and mass nouns, and is underspecified in number. It is compatible with singular, plural and mass interpretations. The final quantity in the reference must be determined in the context. Moreover, is a lexical item involved in marking partitives, the function that is not found in ordinary classifiers and the plural quantifier. This study is a systematic description of an under-studied type of versatile classifier, highlighting the internal complexity of a classifier system in Tibeto-Burman languages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.22003.li
2023-05-12
2024-07-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    1998 Palikur and the typology of classifiers. Anthropological Linguistics40(3). 429–480.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2000Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allan, Keith
    1977 Classifiers. Language53(2). 2853–2911. 10.1353/lan.1977.0043
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0043 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bai, Ge
    2015 Definite markers in the expression of kind-reference: in the framework of linguistic inventory typology. Journal of Foreign Languages41. 21–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker, Laura
    2019 Articles in the world’s languages. Erlangen/Nuremberg: University of Erlangen-Nuremberg PhD dissertation.
  6. Bisang, Walter
    1993 Classifiers, quantifiers and class nouns in Hmong. Studies in Language17(1). 1–51. 10.1075/sl.17.1.02bis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17.1.02bis [Google Scholar]
  7. 1999 Classifiers in East and South East Asian languages: counting and beyond. InJadranka Gvozdanović (ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide, 113–185. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110811193.113
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811193.113 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bradley, David
    1997 Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. InDavid Bradley (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics 14: Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, 1–72. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Haihong
    2022Yunnan Lanping Rouruo Yu [The language of Zauzou in Yunnan Lanping]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Ping
    2009 Aspects of referentiality. Journal of Pragmatics411. 1657–1674. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Denny, Peter J.
    1976 What are noun classifiers good for?Proceedings from the Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 12. 122–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diessel, Holger
    1999aDemonstratives: form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.42 [Google Scholar]
  13. 1999b The morphosyntax of demonstratives in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistic Typology31. 1–49. 10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dryer, Matthew S.
    2013a Coding of nominal plurality. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. wals.info (accessed1 Nov 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2013b Order of relative clause and noun. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. wals.info (accessed1 Nov 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gerner, Matthias
    2003 Demonstratives, articles and topic markers in the Yi group. Journal of Pragmatics351. 947–998. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00131‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00131-5 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2006 Noun classifiers in Kam and Chinese Kam-Tai languages: their morphosyntax, semantics and history. Journal of Chinese Linguistics43(2). 237–305.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Givón, Talmy
    1978 Definiteness and referentiality. InJospeh Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, 291–330. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1972 Numeral classifiers and substantival number: problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Language Universals91. 1–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Guo, Rui & Lee, Jieun
    2021 The functional extensions of numeral classifiers. Studies of the Chinese Language61. 691–712.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Haspelmath, Martin
    2013 Occurrence of nominal plurality. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. wals.info (accessed3 Feb 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Her, One-Soon
    2012 Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua122(14). 1668–1691. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hopper, J. Paul & Thompson, Sandra A.
    1984 The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language60(4). 703–752. 10.1353/lan.1984.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1984.0020 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jacques, Guillaume
    2021A grammar of Japhug. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Keenan, Edward L.
    1985 Relative clauses. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 2, complex constructions, 141–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kibrik, Andrej
    2011Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, Xuping
    2013Numeral classifiers in Chinese: The syntax-semantic interface. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110289336
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110289336 [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Yu
    2017 Documentation of Zauzou, an endangered language in China. Endangered Languages Archive. Handle: hdl.handle.net/2196/00-0000-0000-0010-8822-7. Accessed onJul 25, 2022.
  29. 2020 A grammar of Zauzou. University of New York at BuffaloPhD dissertation.
  30. 2021 The interaction of age, L2 type and multilingualism in the Zauzou community. International Journal of Bilingualism25(4). 1040–1058. 10.1177/13670069211023138
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211023138 [Google Scholar]
  31. . forthcoming. Sortal classifiers and noun categorization in Zauzou. Language and Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lyons, John
    1977Semantics. vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Matisoff, James A.
    1972 Lahu Nominalization, relativization, and genitivization. InJohn P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 2, 237–257. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Milsark, Gary L.
    1979Existential sentences in English. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mithun, Marianne
    1987 The grammatical nature and discourse power of demonstratives. Berkeley Linguistics Society131. 184–194. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1824
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1824 [Google Scholar]
  36. Miyagishi, Tetsuya
    2022A grammar of Zauzou. Hiroshima:Yasuda Women’s University.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sankoff, David, Shana Poplack & Swathi Vanniarajan
    1990 The case of the nonce loan in Tamil. Language Variation and Change21. 71–101. 10.1017/S0954394500000272
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000272 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sun Hongkai, Huang Chenglong & Zhou Maocao
    2002Rouruoyu yanjiu [A grammar of Zauzou]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vittrant, Alice & Marc, Tang
    2020 Classifiers in Southeast Asian languages. InPaul Sidwell & Mathias Jenny (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia: a comprehensive guide, 733–772. hal-03047627.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. White, Nathan L.
    2019 Classifiers in Hmong. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Elena I. Mihas (eds.), Gender and classifiers, 222–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198842019.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842019.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  41. Wu, Jiun-Shiung & Her, One-Soon
    2021 Taxonomy of numeral classifiers: a formal semantic proposal. InLee Chungmin, Kim Young-Wha & Yi Byeong-uk (eds.), Numeral classifiers and classifier languages, 40–71. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315166308‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166308-3 [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, Niina N.
    2013Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110304992
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110304992 [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, Sihong
    2013 A reference grammar of Ersu: a Tibeto-Burman language of China. Townsville: James Cook University PhD dissertation.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.22003.li
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.22003.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): classifier; definiteness; mass noun; Ngwi; number; plural quantifier
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error