Suansu language from northeastern India

References

1. Arokianathan, S.
   1987 Tangkhul Naga grammar. Vol.161 (CIIL Grammar series). Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Benedict, Paul K.
   1972 Sino-Tibetan: a conspectus. London: Cambrige University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753541
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753541 [Google Scholar]
3. Comrie, Bernard., Martin. Haspelmath & Balthasar Bickel
   2008 The Leipzig glossing rules: conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Coupe, Alexander R.
   2003 A phonetic and phonological description of Ao: a Tibeto-Burman language of Nagaland, north-east India. Vol.5431. Canberra: Australian National University.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Coupe, Alexander R.
   2007 A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. xxiii+526. 10.1515/9783110198522
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198522 [Google Scholar]
6. Coupe, Alexander R.
   2014 Strategies for analyzing tone languages. Language Documentation & Conservation81. 462–489.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Coupe, Alexander R.
   2020 Northern Sangtam phonetics, phonology and word list. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area43(1). 147–189. 10.1075/ltba.19014.cou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.19014.cou [Google Scholar]
8. DeLancey, Scott
   2015 The origins of postverbal negation in Kuki-Chin. North East Indian Linguistics71. 203–212.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Devi, Thokchom Lakhipriya
   2011 The Tangkhul grammar of Shangshak village. Canchipur: Manipur UniversityPhD dissertation.
10. Grierson, George A.
    2006 Tangkhul. InLanguages of North-Eastern India, 499–507. Gyan Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Haokip, Pauthang
    2011 The languages of Manipur: a case study of the Kuki-Chin languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area34(1).85–118.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ivani, Jessica K.
    2019a A first overview on Suansu, a Tibeto-Burman language from Northeastern India. Paper presented at the29th Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (SEALS 29), Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Japan, 27–29 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ivani, Jessica K.
    2019b Suansu 250 concepts wordlist. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.3383006
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3383006 [Google Scholar]
14. Ivani, Jessica K.
    2022a Comparative constructions in Suansu and the languages of Northeastern India. Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads2(1). 65–93.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ivani, Jessica K.
    2022b Suansu language from northeastern India: a field report. Supplementary materials. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.7069299
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7069299 [Google Scholar]
16. Jenny, Mathias & San San Hnin Tun
    2016 Burmese: a comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Leisan, Apinao Reisangmi
    2017 Grammar and texts of Hunphun variety of Tangkhul Naga language. Pune: University of PunePhD dissertation.
18. Marrison, Geoffrey E.
    1967 The classification of the Naga languages of north-east India. London: School of Oriental & African Studies, PhD dissertation.
19. Matisoff, James A.
    1989 The bulging monosyllable, or the mora the merrier: echo-vowel adverbialization in Lahu. InJeremy H.C.S. Davidson (eds.), Southeast Asian Linguistics: Essays in honour of Eugénie J.A. Henderson, 163–197. London: School of Oriental & African Studies, University of London.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Matisoff, James A.
    2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Vol.1351. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mortensen, David
    2003 Comparative Tangkhul. Berkeley: University of California, unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mortensen, David R.
    2012 The emergence of obstruents after high vowels. Diachronica29(4). 434–470. 10.1075/dia.29.4.02mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.29.4.02mor [Google Scholar]
23. Mortensen, David & Jennifer Keogh
    2011 Sorbung, an undocumented language of Manipur: Its phonology and place in Tibeto-Burman. JSEALS41. 64–114.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mortensen, David R. & James A. Miller
    2013 A reconstruction of Proto-Tangkhulic rhymes. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area36(1). 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mortensen, David R., Jordan Picone, Xinjian Li & Kathleen Siminyu
    2021 Tusom2021: A phonetically transcribed speech dataset from an endangered language for universal phone recognition experiments. CoRRabs/2104.00824. 10.21437/Interspeech.2021‑1435
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2021-1435 [Google Scholar]
26. Mortensen, David & Jordan Picone
    2021 East Tusom: A phonetic and phonological sketch of a largely undocumented Tangkhulic language. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area44(2). 168–196. 10.1075/ltba.21009.mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.21009.mor [Google Scholar]
27. Nikolaev, Dmitry
    2019 Burmese sound inventory (EA). InSteven Moran & Daniel McCloy (eds.), PHOIBLE 2.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Peterson, David A.
    2019 Bangladesh Khumi. The Mainland Southeast Asia Linguistic Area3141. 12. 10.1515/9783110401981‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110401981-002 [Google Scholar]
29. Pettigrew, William
    1918 Tangkhul [Naga] grammar and dictionary. Shillong: Assam Secretariat Printing Office. 490.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Post, Mark W.
    2015 Tones in Northeast Indian languages, with a focus on Tani: A field-worker’s guide. InMark W. Post, Stephen Morey & Scott Delancey (eds.), Language and culture in Northeast India and beyond: In honour of Robbins Burling, 182–210. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Post, Mark W. & Robbins Burling
    2017 The Tibeto-Burman languages of northeast India. InGraham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 213–242. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ramaswami, N.
    2019 East-Central Tangkhul Naga sound inventory (RA). InSteven Moran & Daniel McCloy (eds.), PHOIBLE 2.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List
    2019 Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America1161. 10317–10322. 10.1073/pnas.1817972116
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817972116 [Google Scholar]
34. Shafer, Robert
    1955 Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages. Word11(1). 94–111. 10.1080/00437956.1955.11659552
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1955.11659552 [Google Scholar]
35. Takhellambam, Bijaya Devi
    2014 Descriptive grammar of Kabrang Tangkhul. Canchipur: Manipur UniversityPhD dissertation.
36. Temsunungsang, T.
    2009 Aspects of the prosodic phonology of Ao: an inter-dialectal study. Hyderabad: The English & Foreign Languages UniversityPhD dissertation.
37. Teo, Amos Benjamin
    2009 Sumi tone: a phonological and phonetic description of a Tibeto-Burman language of Nagaland. Melbourne: University of MelbourneMA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tohring, S. R.
    2010 Violence and identity in North-East India: Naga-Kuki conflict. Delhi: Mittal Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Watkins, Justin W.
    2001 Burmese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association31(2). 291–295. 10.1017/S0025100301002122
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100301002122 [Google Scholar]