The use of ནས་ -nas to mark cross-clausal co-reference in Version I of the Old Tibetan Rāmāyaṇa reveals accusative alignment in Tibetan syntax, which in turn vindicates the notion of ‘subject’ applied to Tibetan.
1861 Über das Passivum: eine sprachvergleichende Abhandlung. Abhandlungen der Philologisch-Historischen Klasse der Königlich-Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften81, 431–546.
1994 An examination of ergativity and the so-called ‘middle-construction’ in the Tibetan Language. InHajime Kitamura (ed.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics, 985–991. Osaka: Organising Committee the 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
2000 Switch evidence in Old Tibetan: Between switch reference and evidentiality. Paper presented at the9th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Leiden University, June 24–30, 2000.
2002 The Tibetan connection: Switch evidence and direct-inverse marking from Old to Middle Tibetan. Paper presented at the8th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Bern University, September 19–22, 2002.