Volume 45, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The use of ནས་ - to mark cross-clausal co-reference in Version I of the Old Tibetan reveals accusative alignment in Tibetan syntax, which in turn vindicates the notion of ‘subject’ applied to Tibetan.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Andersen, P. K.
    1987 Zero-anaphora and related phenomena in Classical Tibetan. Studies in Language11(2).286–296. 10.1075/sl.11.2.02and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.11.2.02and [Google Scholar]
  2. Beer, Z.
    2019 Switch-reference in the Ye shes rgyas pa’i mdo. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. New Series29(2).249–256. 10.1017/S1356186318000731
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186318000731 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang, K. & B. Shefts
    1980 Ergativity in Spoken Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica51(1).15–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DeLancey, S.
    1982 Lhasa Tibetan: a case study in ergative typology. Journal of Linguistic Research2(1).21–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
  6. von der Gabelentz, H. C.
    1861 Über das Passivum: eine sprachvergleichende Abhandlung. Abhandlungen der Philologisch-Historischen Klasse der Königlich-Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften81, 431–546.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Giraudeau, P. P.
    1916Dictionarium Latino-Thibetanum ad usumalumnorum Missionis Thibeti. Hongkong: Typis Societatis Missionum ad Exteros.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Haller, F.
    2009 Switch-reference in Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area32(2).45–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hill, N. W.
    2010A lexicon of Tibetan verb stems as reported by the grammatical tradition. Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. de Jong, J. W.
    1989The story of Rāma in Tibet: text and translation of the Tun-huang manuscripts. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sato, M.
    1994 An examination of ergativity and the so-called ‘middle-construction’ in the Tibetan Language. InHajime Kitamura (ed.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics, 985–991. Osaka: Organising Committee the 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tournadre, N.
    1991 The rhetorical use of the Tibetan ergative. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area14(1).93–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1996L’ergativité en tibétain. Louvain: Péeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Vollmann, R.
    2008Descriptions of Tibetan ergativity: a historiographical account. Grazer vergleichende Arbeiten, Bd. 23. Graz: Leykam.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zadoks, A.
    2000 Switch evidence in Old Tibetan: Between switch reference and evidentiality. Paper presented at the9th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Leiden University, June 24–30, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2002 The Tibetan connection: Switch evidence and direct-inverse marking from Old to Middle Tibetan. Paper presented at the8th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Bern University, September 19–22, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): accusative; co-reference; Old Tibetan; switch reference; Tibetan
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error