1887
Volume 46, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

A particular lexical construction for “sun” composed of morphemes for “eye” and either “day” or “sky” has been widely reported for Austronesian languages. Urban (2010) made the case for this phenomenon as an areal feature originating in Austronesian, with attestation in Austroasiatic and Tai-Kadai varieties, but absent in Sino-Tibetan. A follow-up (Blust 2011) argued for the possibility of independent genesis across the languages, while reiterating the absence of the feature in Sino-Tibetan. This paper presents a large scale survey of Tibeto-Burman language varieties. Data from this region show widespread occurrence of the phenomenon in distinct constructions, arguing against contact as the inciting factor. Instead, this paper argues for multiple innovation events, with only small scale regional spread through contact. Data are analysed from approximately 250 doculects from a wide range of sources, including newly elicited data for Bodo-Garo, Maringic and Northern Naga varieties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.22011.van
2023-11-09
2025-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baxter, William & Laurent Sagart
    2014Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Benedict, Paul K.
    1972Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753541
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753541 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blench, Roger & Sokhep Kri
    2017A dictionary of Kman [=Miju], a language of Arunachal Pradesh. Ms. rogerblench.info/Language/NEI/Isolates/Kman/Ling/KmanlingOP.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blench, Roger & Mite Lingi
    2018A grammar of Idu, a language of Arunachal Pradesh. Ms. rogerblench.info/Language/NEI/Mishmi/Idu/Idulang/Idulangres.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blust, Robert
    2011 ‘Eye of the day’: A response to Urban (2010). Oceanic Linguistics50(2).524–535. 10.1353/ol.2011.0023
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2011.0023 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Nathan
    1837 Comparison of Indo-Chinese languages. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal6(2).1023–1038.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruhn, Daniel Wayne
    2014 A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Central Naga. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Burling, Robbins & L. Amon Phom
    1998 Phom phonology and word list. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area21(2).13–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Caughley, Ross C.
    2000Dictionary of Chepang: a Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal [Pacific Linguistics 502]. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1930 ə sIstəm əv “toun-lɛtəz”. Maître Phonétique301.24–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chirkova, Ekaterina
    2009 Shixing, a Sino-Tibetan language of South-West China: A grammatical sketch with two appended texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area32(1).1–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Coblin, W. South
    1986A Sinologist’s handlist of Sino-Tibetan lexical comparisons. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. van Dam, Kellen Parker
    2019 Mapping the frontier: Correlating representations of Tangsa-Nocte villages in early British Survey maps with modern GIS data. Anthropology Today: An International Peer Reviewed NEIRA Journal51.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. . Forthcoming. Patkaian (Northern Naga). InKristine Hildebrandt eds. The Oxford guide to the Tibeto-Burman languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. . In press. Semantic splits in Northern Naga: Lexical disambiguation through partial sound changes in polysemes. Journal of the 2nd International Conference of Tibeto-Burman Linguistics Association of North East India (ICTiBLANEI-2).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Das Gupta, Kamalesh
    1983An outline on Tagin language. Shillong: Directorate of Research, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ding, Picus Sizhi
    1998Fundamentals of Prinmi (Pumi): A Tibeto-Burman language of Northwestern Yunnan, China. Canberra: Australian National University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. van Driem, George
    2015 Tibeto-Burman. InWilliam S-Y. Wang & Chaofen Sun (eds.), Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 135–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Edmondson, Jerold. A. & Lama Ziwo
    1999 Laghuu or Xá Phó, a new language of the Yi group. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area22(1).1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath
    (eds.) 2022Glottolog 4.6. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hansson, Inga-Lill
    1989 A comparison of Akha, Hani, Khatu, and Pijo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area12(1).6–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hartmann, Helga
    1988 Notes on the Southern Chin languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area11(2).98–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. He, Jiren & Jiang Zhuyi
    1985Naxi language sketch. Beijing: Nationalities Press (in Chinese).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Htun Aung Kyaw
    Htun Aung Kyaw 2007 A Study on the Hpun Dialect. Rangoon: Rangoon University PhD thesis (in Burmese).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Huziwara, Keisuke
    2008 A descriptive study of the Cak language. Kyoto: Kyoto University PhD thesis (in Japanese).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2016 Systematic reconsideration of the Taman language. Kyoto University Linguistic Research351.1–34 (in Japanese).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ivani, Jessica Katiuscia
    2019 Suansu 250 concepts wordlist. Zenodo. CitetononCRdoi:10.5281/zenodo.3383006
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3383006 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakhi, Libu
    2018 A descriptive grammar of Namuyi Khatho spoken by Namuyi Tibetans. Bundoora: La Trobe University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, Yongsui & Wang Ersong
    1986Hani language sketch. Beijing: Nationalities Press (in Chinese).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Luce, Gordon Hannington
    1985Phases of pre-pagan Burma: Languages and history. 21vols.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lustig, Anton
    2010A grammar and dictionary of Zaiwa. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004190160
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004190160 [Google Scholar]
  32. Manson, Ken
    2010 Kayan-English/English-Kayan dictionary. (unpublished ms. contributed to STEDT).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Marrison, Geoffrey Edward
    1967 The classification of the Naga languages in North-East India. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, PhD thesis, 21volumes.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Matisoff, James A.
    1991The mother of all morphemes: Augmentatives and diminutives in areal and universal perspective. InMartha Ratliff & Eric Schiller (eds.), Papers from the First Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 293–349. Tempe: Arizona State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Michaud, Alexis
    2006 STEDT deposit (version 1, 2011) of original materials collected in the Yongning plain (Yongning Na) and in Muli’s Xiangjiao township (Laze). (unpublished ms. contributed to STEDT).
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Morey, Stephen D.
    2010Turung: A variety of Singpho language spoken in Assam. [Pacific Linguistics 614]. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mortensen, David R. & James A. Miller
    2013 A reconstruction of proto-tangkhulic rhymes. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area36(1).1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mossang, Wanglung Kelim
    2022 Personal correspondence, August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nishida, Tatsuo
    1988 Ao Naga. InTakashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono & Eiichi Chino (eds.), Dictionary of modern linguistics. vol.11, 133–137. Tōkyō: Sanseido (in Japanese).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Post, Mark
    2007 A grammar of Galo. Bundoora: LaTrobe University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2020 The Eastern Himalayan ethno-linguistic diversity hotspot: Where is it, why is it significant, why is it endangered, and what should “we” do about it?Aligarh Journal of Linguistics9(1–2).29–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2022R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rutgers, Roland
    1998Yamphu: Grammar, texts & lexicon. 21vols.Leiden: CNWS, Leiden University.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sæbø, Lilja Maria
    2020 A description of Uipo phonology. Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schorer, Nicholas
    2016The Dura language: Grammar and phylogeny. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004326408
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004326408 [Google Scholar]
  47. Shi, Vong Tsuh
    2009 Discorse studies of Makuri Naga narratives. Chiang Mai: Payap University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Singh, Laishram Bijenkumar
    2015 A descriptive grammar Of Khoibu. Silchar: Assam University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. So-Hartmann, Helga
    2009A descriptive grammar of Daai Chin. [STEDT Monograph Series v.7]. Berkeley: STEDT.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sun, Hongkai
    1991Tibeto-Burman phonology and glossary. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Press (in Chinese).
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sun, Jackson Tianshin
    1993a Tani synonym sets. (unpublished ms. contributed to STEDT).
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 1993b A Historical-comparative study of the Tani (Mirish) Branch in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Teo, Amos Benjamin
    2009 Sumi tone: A phonological and phonetic description of a Tibeto-Burman language of Nagaland. Melbourne: University of Melbourne MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Urban, Matthias
    2010 ‘Sun’ = ‘Eye of the Day’: A linguistic pattern of Southeast Asia and Oceania. Oceanic Linguistics49(2).568–579. 10.1353/ol.2010.a411426
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2010.a411426 [Google Scholar]
  55. VanBik, Kenneth
    2009Proto-Kuki-Chin: A reconstructed ancestor of the Kuki-Chin languages. [STEDT Monograph Series, v.8]. Berkeley: STEDT.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Yu, Dominic
    2012 Proto-Ersuic. Berkeley: University of California PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.22011.van
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.22011.van
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): contact; typology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error