oa Emergence of the honorific register in Tibetic languages

References

1. Agha, Asif
   1993 Grammatical and indexical convention in honorific discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology3(2).131–163. 10.1525/jlin.1993.3.2.131
   https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1993.3.2.131 [Google Scholar]
2. Agha, Asif
   1994 Honorification. Annual Review of Anthropology231.277–302. 10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.001425
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.001425 [Google Scholar]
3. Agha, Asif
   2006 Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618284
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618284 [Google Scholar]
4. Andvik, Erik E.
   2010 A grammar of Tshangla. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004178274.i‑490
   https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004178274.i-490 [Google Scholar]
5. Beckwith, Christopher I.
   1992 Deictic class marking in Tibetan and Burmese. InMartha Ratliff & Eric Schiller (eds.), Papers from the first annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 1–14. Tempe: Arizona State University.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BDSN = Dbus-pa Blo-gsal
   BDSN = Dbus-pa Blo-gsal, Brda gsar rñiṅ gi rnam par dbye ba; apudMimaki 1992.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Betholia, Chandam
   2005 Politeness and power: An Analysis of Meiteilon suffixes. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area28(1).71–87.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Beyer, Stephan V.
   1993 The Classical Tibetan language. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bialek, Joanna
   2016 Side, stench, remnant, plot, oath, and craftiness – the semantic ‘capacity’ of the OT dku. Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines351.115–167.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bialek, Joanna
    2018a Compounds and compounding in Old Tibetan. A corpus based approach. 21vols. Marburg: Indica et Tibetica.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bialek, Joanna
    2018b Stretching the body, stretching the mind. The OT noun ring revisited. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft168(2).391–414. 10.13173/zeitdeutmorggese.168.2.0391
    https://doi.org/10.13173/zeitdeutmorggese.168.2.0391 [Google Scholar]
12. Bialek, Joanna
    2018c The Proto-Tibetan clusters sL- and sR- and the periodisation of Old Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics17(2).1–50. 10.5070/H917238831
    https://doi.org/10.5070/H917238831 [Google Scholar]
13. Bialek, Joanna
    2019 When Mithra came as rain on the Tibetan Plateau: A new interpretation of an Old Tibetan topos. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft169(1).141–53. 10.13173/zeitdeutmorggese.169.1.0141
    https://doi.org/10.13173/zeitdeutmorggese.169.1.0141 [Google Scholar]
14. Bialek, Joanna
    2020a Old Tibetan verb morphology and semantics: An attempt at a reconstruction. Himalayan Linguistics19(1).263–346. 10.5070/H919145017
    https://doi.org/10.5070/H919145017 [Google Scholar]
15. Bialek, Joanna
    2020b Towards a standardisation of Tibetan transliteration for textual studies. Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines561.28–46.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bialek, Joanna
    2021c Naming the empire: from Bod to Tibet. A philologico-historical study on the origin of the polity. Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines611.339–402.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bialek, Joanna
    2021d Social roots of grammar: Old Tibetan perspective on grammaticalization of kinterms. InDiana Lange, Jarmila Ptáčková, Marion Wettstein & Mareike Wulff (eds.), Crossing boundaries. Tibetan studies unlimited, 253–288. Prague: Academia Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bialek, Joanna
    2022a A textbook in Classical Tibetan. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Bialek, Joanna
    2022b ‘Tibetan’ – all inclusive? Rethinking the ‘Tibetan-ity’ of the ‘Tibetan Empire’. InGuntram Hazod, Christian Jahoda & Mathias Fermer (eds.), The social and the religious in the making of Tibetan societies: New perspectives on Imperial Tibet, 7–53. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bialek, Joanna
    2023a bcan pos who were not khri: Royal titulature and the succession to the throne in the Tibetan Empire. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies86(1). 10.1017/S0041977X23000150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X23000150 [Google Scholar]
21. Bialek, Joanna
    2023b Discourse structure and argument realisation in Old Literary Tibetan. From text composition to verb semantics. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics5(1).3–38. 10.1163/25898833‑20230036
    https://doi.org/10.1163/25898833-20230036 [Google Scholar]
22. Bialek, Joanna
    2024 (forthcoming). Old Tibetan Annals. A comprehensive text grammar based on the Old Tibetan Annals. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Bialek, Joanna
    . (In Preparation). Funerary rites in Tibetan Empire: A philological examination of PT 1042.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Böhtlingk, Otto & Rudolph Roth
    1990 [1875] Sanskrit-Wörterbuch herausgegeben von der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften: 1872–1875. St. Petersburg: Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Cairangsanzhou, Tsering Samdrup
    2022 Pragmatics in Old Tibetan: Investigations based on several Dunhuang texts. London: Department of East Asian Languages and Culture, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
26. CDTD = Bielmeier, Roland, Felix Haller, Katrin Häsler, Brigitte Huber & Marianne Volkart
    (eds.) 2013 (draft). Comparative dictionary of Tibetan dialects.
    [Google Scholar]
27. CDTD.V = Bielmeier, Roland, Katrin Häsler, Chungda Haller, Felix Haller, Veronika Hein, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Thomas Preiswerk, Ngawang Tsering, Manuel Widmer & Marius Zemp
    (eds) 2018 Comparative dictionary of Tibetan dialects (CDTD). Volume 2: Verbs. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Cieńkowski, Witold Paweł
    1972 Teoria etymologii ludowej. Warszawa: PWN.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Csoma, Sándor Kőrösi
    1834 A grammar of the Tibetan language, in English. Calcutta: The Baptist Mission Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. DeLancey, Scott
    1998 Semantic categorization in Tibetan honorific nouns. Anthropological Linguistics40(1).109–123.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Dotson, Brandon
    2009 The Old Tibetan Annals. An annotated translation of Tibet’s first history. With an annotated cartographical documentation by Guntram Hazod. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Dotson, Brandon
    2013 The Victory Banquet. The Old Tibetan Chronicle and the rise of Tibetan historical narrative. Habilitationsschrift, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Driem, George van
    2012 The Trans-Himalayan phylum and its implications for population prehistory. Communication on Contemporary Anthropology51.135–142.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Feurer, Hanny
    1996 The contemporary use of honorifics in Lhasa Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area19(2).45–54.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gallica
    Gallica = https://gallica.bnf.fr
36. GLR = Bsod-nams Rgyal-mchan
    GLR = Bsod-nams Rgyal-mchan 1750–60 [1368] Rgyal rabs gsal baɣi me loṅ. edited byBla-ma čhen-po Kun-dgaɣ Ɣphrin-las Rgya-mcho. Sde-dge.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gong, Hwang-cherng
    1977 古藏文的ｙ及其相關問題Gu Zangwen de y ji qi xiangguan wenti [The classical Tibetan y and its related problems]. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica48(2).205–228.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hahn, Michael
    1996 Lehrbuch der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache. Swisstal-Odendorf: Indica et Tibetica.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hahn, Michael
    2003 Grundfragen der tibetischen Morphologie. InMichael Hahn (ed.), Schlüssel zum Lehrbuch der klassischen tibetischen Schirftsprache und Beiträge zur tibetischen Wortkunde (Miscellanea etymologica tibetica I-VI), 75–94. Marburg: Indica et Tibetica Verlag. Original edition, 1973: Zentralasiatische Studien71, 425–442.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hill, Nathan W.
    2013 The emergence of the Pluralis majestatis and the relative chronology of Old Tibetan texts. InFranz-Karl Ehrhard & Petra Maurer (eds.), Nepalica-Tibetica. Festgabe for Christoph Cüppers, 249–261. Andiast: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Hill, Nathan W.
    2019 The historical phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316550939
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316550939 [Google Scholar]
42. Hyslop, Gwendolyn
    2017 A grammar of Kurtöp. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004328747
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004328747 [Google Scholar]
43. IDP = International Dunhuang Project
    IDP = International Dunhuang Project; idp.bl.uk/
44. J = Jäschke, Heinrich August
    1881 A Tibetan-English dictionary. Reprint, New York: Dover Publications 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Jacques, Guillaume
    2013 On pre-Tibetan semi-vowels. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies76(2).289–300. 10.1017/S0041977X12001450
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X12001450 [Google Scholar]
46. Jacques, Guillaume
    2019 Fossil nominalization prefixes in Tibetan and Chinese. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics121.13–28. 10.1163/2405478X‑01201002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2405478X-01201002 [Google Scholar]
47. Jacques, Guillaume
    2021 A grammar of Japhug. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Jørgensen, Hans
    1941 A grammar of the Classical Newārī. København: Ejnar Munksgaard.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Kitamura, Hajime
    1975 The honorifics in Tibetan. Acta Asiatica291.56–74.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Koshal, Sanyukta
    1987 Honorific systems of the Ladakhi language. Multilingua6(2).149–168. 10.1515/mult.1987.6.2.149
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1987.6.2.149 [Google Scholar]
51. Kværne, Per & Dan Martin
    2023 Drenpa’s Proclamation. The rise and decline of the Bön religion in Tibet. Kathmandu: Vajra Books.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Lalou, Marcelle
    1955 Revendications des fonctionnaires du Grand Tibet au VIIIe siècle. Journal Asiatique, 171–212.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Li, Fang-Kuei
    1933 Certain phonetic influences of the Tibetan prefixes upon the root initials. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊41.135–157.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Li, Fang-Kuei & W. South Coblin
    1987 A study of the Old Tibetan inscriptions. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
55. LS = Bialek, Joanna
    (forthcoming). Lexicological studies. Zenodo.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Lyovin, Anatole V.
    1992 Nominal honorific compounds in Tibetan. Mon-Khmer Studies201.45–56.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Matisoff, James A.
    1991 The Mother of All Morphemes: Augmentatives and diminutives in areal and universal perspective. InMartha Ratliff & Eric Schiller (eds.), Papers from the first annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistic society, 293–349. Tempe: Arizona State University.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Mélac, Eric & Nicolas Tournadre
    2021 The semantics of the verb give in Tibetan: The development of the transfer construction and the honorific domain. InMyriam Bouveret (ed.), Give constructions across languages, 175–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Mimaki, Katsumi
    1992 Index to two brDa gsar rñiṅ treatises. The works of dBus pa blo gsal and lCaṅ skya Rol pa’i rdo rje. 成田山仏教研究所紀要 (Bulletin of the Naritasan Institute for Buddhist studies) 15(2).479–503.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Mvy = Mahāvyutpatti; apud Ishihama, Yumiko & Yoichi Fukuda
    (eds.) 1989 A new critical edition of the Mahāvyutpatti: Sanskrit–Tibetan–Mongolian dictionary of Buddhist terminology. Tokyo: The Toyo Bunko.
    [Google Scholar]
61. OED = Oxford English Dictionary
    OED = Oxford English Dictionary; https://www.oed.com/
62. OTD = Old Tibetan Dictionary
    OTD = Old Tibetan Dictionary; otdict.com/
63. OTDO = Old Tibetan Documents Online
    OTDO = Old Tibetan Documents Online; https://otdo.aa-ken.jp/
64. OTI = Iwao, Kazushi, Nathan W. Hill & Tsuguhito Takeuchi
    (eds.) 2009 Old Tibetan inscriptions. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Panglung, Jampa L.
    1994 New fragments of the sGra-sbyor bam-po gñis-pa. East and West44(1).161–72.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Richardson, Hugh
    2004 [1985] A corpus of early Tibetan inscriptions. London: Royal Asiatic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
67. rKTs = Resources for Kanjur and Tanjur Studies
    rKTs = Resources for Kanjur and Tanjur Studies; www.rkts.org/
68. Samdrup, Tsering & Hiroyuki Suzuki
    2019 Humilifics in Mabzhi pastoralist speech of Amdo Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area42(2).222–259. 10.1075/ltba.17008.sam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.17008.sam [Google Scholar]
69. Schwieger, Peter
    2006 Handbuch zur Grammatik der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache. Halle: IITBS, International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    1985 Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language61(4).821–848. 10.2307/414491
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414491 [Google Scholar]
71. Simon, Camille
    2022 The sociative/benefactive applicative construction and the introduction of attitude holders in Tibetan. InSara Pacchiarotti & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Applicative morphology. Neglected syntactic and non-syntactic functions, 373–404. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110777949‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110777949-013 [Google Scholar]
72. Simon, Walter
    1980 Some Tibetan etymologies of semantic interest. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies431.132–136. 10.1017/S0041977X00110596
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00110596 [Google Scholar]
73. Thomas, Frederick William
    1957 Ancient folk-literature from North-Eastern Tibet. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje
    1998 Manuel de Tibétain Standard, langue et civilisation: Bodkyi spyiskad slobdeb. Paris: Mondes et Langue.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Tshering, Karma & George van Driem
    2019 The grammar of Dzongkha [HL Archive 7]. Santa Barbara: Himalayan Linguistics, University of California. 10.5070/H918144245
    https://doi.org/10.5070/H918144245 [Google Scholar]
76. Widmer, Manuel
    2017 A grammar of Bunan. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
77. WtS = Franke, Herbert, Jens-Uwe Hartmann & Thomas O. Höllmann
    (eds.) 2005 Wörterbuch der tibetischen Schriftsprache. München: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]