1887
Volume 48, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates clausal complementation in Mising, an Eastern Tani (TB) language spoken in Assam, India. It examines finite and non-finite complement clauses, analyzing their grammatical structures and underlying conceptualizations. Mising employs at least four complementizers (one finite, three non-finite), while some complement clauses appear without overt complementizers. Each of these constructions exhibits distinct semantic properties.

While primarily descriptive in nature, this study incorporates insights from Cognitive Linguistics. Our analysis suggests that finite complementation aligns with an objective perspective, where the speaker views the complement event as external and distinct. Conversely, non-finite complementation aligns with a subjective perspective, reflecting a closer involvement of the speaker in the complement event. These two perspectives are associated with different conceptual viewing arrangements.

The data for this paper comes from the Pagro dialect of Mising, primarily spoken in the Jonai sub-division of Assam’s Dhemaji district.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.24009.saw
2025-10-13
2025-11-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Achard, Michel
    1998Representation of cognitive structures: Syntax and semantics in French sentential complements. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110805956
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805956 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbora, Madhumita
    2002 Non-finite markers –la and –pc in Mising. InStephen Morey & Mark Post (eds.), North East Indian linguisticsV.21, 198–218. Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolinger, Dwight
    1980Language — The Loaded Weapon: The use and abuse of language today. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
    2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dirven, Rene
    1989 A Cognitive Perspective on Complementation. InDany Jaspers, Wim Klooster, Yvan Putseys & Pieter Seuren (eds.), Sentential complementation and the lexicon: Studies in honour of Wim de Geest, 113–140. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110878479‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110878479-009 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamawand, Zeki
    2003 The construal of atemporalisation in complement clauses in English. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics1(1), 59–85. 10.1075/arcl.1.04ham
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.1.04ham [Google Scholar]
  7. 2007 The construal of objectivity in atemporal complement clauses in English. Word58(1–3), 159–193. 10.1080/00437956.2007.11432577
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2007.11432577 [Google Scholar]
  8. Konwar, Arpana
    2017A pronouncing multilingual dictionary Assamese-English-Boro-Mising. Guwahati: ABILAC.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1991Foundations of cognitive grammar, V.21: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2009Investigations in cognitive grammar. New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214369 [Google Scholar]
  13. Needham, Jack F.
    1886Outline grammar of the Shaiyâng Miri language. Shillong: Assam Secretariat Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Padun, Nahendra
    1981Mising Asomiya path (Mising-Assamese text). Jorhat: Asom Sahitya Sabha.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1989Mising gomlam (Mising grammar) Dhemaji: Mising Agom Kebang.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pangyang, Sonaram
    1915Miri-duwan (Miri tongue). Self-published.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Prasad, Bal Ram
    1991Mising grammar. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Radden, Günter & Rene Dirven
    2007Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam, Phiadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clip.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.2 [Google Scholar]
  19. Robinson, William
    1849 Notes on the languages spoken by various tribes inhabiting the valley of Assam and its mountain confines. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal18(1), 183–237, 310–349.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sawarni, Bisalakshi & Gautam K. Borah
    (2025) Bol Buli: Layers of Meaning. In review.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Taid, Tabu Ram
    1987 A short note on Mising phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area10(1), 130–133. 10.32655/LTBA.10.1.07
    https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.10.1.07 [Google Scholar]
  22. 1995a Verbal suffixes in Mising. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area18(1), 117–128. 10.32655/LTBA.18.1.08
    https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.18.1.08 [Google Scholar]
  23. 1995bA dictionary of the Mising language. Guwahati: ABILAC.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2010Mising gompir kumsung: A dictionary of the Mising language. Guwahati: ABILAC.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2016An introduction to Mising phonology and grammar. Guwahati: ABILAC.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Taylor, John R.
    2002Cognitive grammar. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198700333.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198700333.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1988The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.18 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ltba.24009.saw
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error