A preliminary study of the evidential-epistemic system of Dolpo, a Tibetic language of Nepal

References

1. endangeredlanguages.com
   endangeredlanguages.comendangeredlanguages.com/lang/4105#sources_popup_wrapper)
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2014 The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2021 The web of knowledge. Evidentiality at the crossroads. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004466425
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004466425 [Google Scholar]
5. Bauer, Kenneth
   2004 High frontiers: Dolpo and the changing world of Himalayan pastoralists. New York: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/baue12390
   https://doi.org/10.7312/baue12390 [Google Scholar]
6. Beyer, Stephan V.
   1992 The Classical Tibetan language. New York: State University of New York. Reprint 1993 (Bibliotheca Indo-Buddhica series, 116.) Delhi: Sri Satguru.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bielmeier, Roland
   2003 On the languages of the Himalayas and their links (nearly) around the world (Review article ofLanguages of the Himalayas: An ethnolinguistic handbook of the Greater Himalayas, containing an introduction to the symbiotic theory of language, byGeorge van Driem. Brill: 2001) European Bulletin of Himalayan Research241, 94–117.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Boye, Kasper
   2006 Epistemic meaning: A cross-linguistic study. PhD dissertation, University of Copenhagen.
9. Bybee, Joan L. & Suzanne Fleischman
   (eds) 1995 Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32 [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Caplow, Nancy J.
    2017 Inference and deferred evidence in Tibetan. InGawne & Hill (eds.), 225–253. 10.1515/9783110473742‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-008 [Google Scholar]
12. van Driem, George
    2001 Languages of the Himalayas: An ethnolinguistic handbook of the Greater Himalayan region. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
13. van Driem, George
    2007 South Asia and the Middle East. InChristopher Moseley (ed.), Encyclopedia of the world’s endangered languages, 283–347. London, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. DeLancey, Scott
    2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 331, 369–82. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)80001‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80001-1 [Google Scholar]
15. DeLancey, Scott
    2012 Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 529–564. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0020 [Google Scholar]
16. DeLancey, Scott
    2018 Evidentiality in Tibetic. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 580–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.27
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.27 [Google Scholar]
17. Garrett, Edward John
    2001 Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
18. Gawne, Lauren
    2016 A sketch grammar of Lamjung Yolmo (Pacific Linguistics A-PL 30). Canberra: College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University. (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/Gawne2016-YolmoGrammar.pdf)
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gawne, Lauren & Nathan W. Hill
    (eds.) 2017 Evidential systems of Tibetan languages. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110473742
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742 [Google Scholar]
20. Gawne, Lauren
    2017 Egophoric evidentiality in Bodish languages. InGawne & Hill (eds.), 61–94. 10.1515/9783110473742‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-003 [Google Scholar]
21. Gawne, Lauren
    2021 Reported evidentiality in Tibeto-Burman languages. Himalayan Linguistics20(3), 80–115. 10.5070/H920152301
    https://doi.org/10.5070/H920152301 [Google Scholar]
22. Gurung, Phurwa Dhondup
    2020 Mountains are Commons, Grasses are Divided: Indigenous environmental governance between conservation and democracy. MA dissertation, University of Colorado. (https://www.proquest.com/openview/df40c784138433b51573372b372a784d/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y)
23. de Haan, Ferdinand
    1999 Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics181, 83–101.
    [Google Scholar]
24. de Haan, Ferdinand
    2005 Typological approaches to modality. InWilliam Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality, 27–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hargreaves, David
    2005 Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics51, 1–48.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Heller, Amy
    2009 Hidden treasures of the Himalayas: Tibetan manuscripts, paintings and sculptures of Dolpo. Chicago: Serindia Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hill, Nathan W.
    2012 ‘Mirativity’ does not exist: ḥdug in ‘Lhasa’ Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 389–433. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016 [Google Scholar]
28. Jest, Corneille
    1975 Communautés de langue tibétaine du Népal. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Käsang Gyurme
    Käsang Gyurme 1992 Le clair miroir. Paris: Prajna.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mélac, Eric, Nicolas Tournadre & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2025 Speaking of oneself in multi-term evidential systems: From the Himalayas to Amazonia. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Anne Storch & Viveka Velupillai (eds.), Language in strange and familiar places. Berlin, Boston: de Gryuter.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Moseley, Christopher
    (ed.) 2010 Atlas of the world’s languages in danger, 3rd ed. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nima Hojer Lama (Nyima Choekhortshang
    ) 2017 The genealogy of Ya-ngal family of Dolpo (Critical edition of the text, translation into English, analyses of abbreviations and introduction to the Dolpo dialect). PhD dissertation, Univerzita Karlova, Prague.
33. Nuyts, Jan
    2001 Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
34. Oisel, Guillaume
    2017 Re-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions. Himalayan Linguistics16(2), 90–128.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Palmer, Frank
    1986 Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Tournadre, Nicolas
    2008 Arguments against the Concept of ‘Conjunct’ / ‘Disjunct’ in Tibetan. InMarianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Brigitte Huber (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek. Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, V.11. 281–308. Halle: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tournadre, Nicolas
    2017 A typological sketch of evidential/epistemic categories in the Tibetic languages. InGawne & Hill (eds.), 95–130. 10.1515/9783110473742‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110473742-004 [Google Scholar]
38. Tournadre, Nicolas
    2023 Evidential strategies and hierarchies in Ladakhi: the case of sensory perceptions. InJuana I. Marin-Arese, Marta Carretero, Elena Dominguez Romero (eds.), Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Conceptual and descriptive issues, 113–136. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje
    2003 Manual of standard Tibetan. Language and civilization. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Tournadre, Nicolas & Jiatso
    2001 Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the Dialects. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area24(1), 49–111. 10.32655/LTBA.24.1.03
    https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.24.1.03 [Google Scholar]
41. Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy LaPolla
    2014 Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37(2), 240–262. 10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou [Google Scholar]
42. Tournadre, Nicolas, Lhakpa Norbu Sherpa, Gyurme Chodrak & Guillaume Oisel
    2009 Sherpa-English and English Sherpa dictionary with literary Tibetan and Nepali equivalents. Kathmandu, Nepal: Vajra. (https://hal.science/hal-03768783v1/file/Sherpa%20dictionary%20First%20Edition%202009.pdf)
    [Google Scholar]
43. Tournadre, Nicolas & Hiroyuki Suzuki
    2023 The Tibetic languages, an introduction to the family of languages derived from Old Tibetan. (Linguistic Diversity Series). Paris: CNRS LACITO. (https://lacito.cnrs.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/TibeticAll-12-9-2023-1.pdf)
    [Google Scholar]
44. Tsering, Karma & George van Driem
    2019 The grammar of Dzongkha revised and expanded, with a guide to Roman Dzongkha and to phonological Dzongkha. Himalayan Linguistics Supplemental Material. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f873/56317​b705​edf9​bea​2b27​32b3​1581​28d3​bf30​.pdf​?​_gl​=1*vyw​akl*​_ga*​MTk2N​Dg3N​zM4L​jE3MT​c1OTQ​0ODM​.*​_ga​_H7P4Z​T52H5​*MTcx​NzU5N​DQ4Mi​4xLj​AuMT​cxNz​U5NDQ​4NC41​OC4wLjA.)
    [Google Scholar]
45. Vokurková, Zuzana
    2017 Epistemic modality in standard spoken Tibetan: Epistemic verbal endings and copulas. Prague: Karolinum Press. 10.2307/jj.362405
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.362405 [Google Scholar]
46. Vokurková, Zuzana
    2025 Preliminary study of the verb morphology of Dolpo, a Tibetic language of Nepal. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area48(1), 60–98. 10.1075/ltba.24005.vok
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.24005.vok [Google Scholar]
47. Yliniemi, Juha
    2021 A descriptive grammar of Denjongke (Sikkimese Bhutia). Himalayan Linguistics Archive101. (https://escholarship.org/content/qt6xs3r33s/qt6xs3r33s_noSplash_14f0b1539b746c8bce869234772597ae.pdf)
    [Google Scholar]
48. Zeisler, Bettina
    2004 Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages. A comparative study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110908183
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110908183 [Google Scholar]
49. Zemp, Marius
    2018 A grammar of Purik Tibetan. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004366312
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004366312 [Google Scholar]