Volume 39, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0731-3500
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5907
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article provides a detailed survey of complement clauses and complementation strategies in Japhug. It shows the bewildering diversity of constructions attested in these languages, which are largely unpredictable and need to be specified for each complement-taking verb. Special focus is given to typologically unusual constructions, in particular Hybrid Indirect Speech.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2008 Semi-direct speech: Manambu and beyond. Language Sciences30: 383–422. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bickel, Balthasar
    2001 Deictic Transposition and Referential Practice in Belhare. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology10 (2): 224–247. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2000.10.2.224
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2000.10.2.224 [Google Scholar]
  3. Comrie, Bernard
    1998 Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design1: 59–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Creissels, Denis
    2006aSyntaxe générale, une introduction typologique, tome 1, Catégories et constructions. Paris: Hermes Science Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2006bSyntaxe générale, une introduction typologique, tome 2, la phrase. Paris: Hermes Science Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2014 Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective. Studies in Language38 (3): 605–647. doi: 10.1075/sl.38.3.07cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.3.07cre [Google Scholar]
  7. DeLancey, Scott
    1981 The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area6 (1): 83–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2011 “Optional” “ergativity” in Tibeto-Burman languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area34 (2): 9–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2015 The historical dynamics of morphological complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery13 (2): 37–56. doi: 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.463
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.463 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dixon, Robert M.W
    2006 Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Genetti, Carol
    2007A grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110198812
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198812 [Google Scholar]
  12. Genetti, Carol , Ellen Bartee , Alec Coupe , Kristine Hildebrandt & Youjing Lin
    2008 Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area31 (2): 97–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gong, Xun
    2014 Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society112 (1): 44–60. doi: 10.1111/1467‑968X.12007
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hagège, Claude
    1974 Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris69: 287–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jacques, Guillaume
    2008嘉絨語研究 Jiāróngyǔ yánjiū (Study on the Rgyalrong language). Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2010 The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics11 (1): 127–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2012a Argument demotion in Japhug Rgyalrong. In Katharina Haude & Gilles Authier (eds.), Ergativity, valency and voice, 199–226. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2012b From denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua122 (11): 1207–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2013a Applicative and tropative derivations in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area36 (2): 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2013b Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology17 (2): 187–217. doi: 10.1515/lity‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2013c Ideophones in Japhug Rgyalrong. Anthropological Linguistics55 (3): 256–287. doi: 10.1353/anl.2013.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2013.0014 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2014a Clause linking in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37 (2): 263–327. doi: 10.1075/ltba.37.2.05jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.05jac [Google Scholar]
  23. 2014b Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua138: 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.011 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2014cEsquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2015 The origin of the causative prefix in Rgyalrong languages and its implication for proto-Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Folia Linguistica Historica36 (1): 165–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2016a From ergative to comparee marker: Multiple reanalyses and polyfunctionality. Diachronica33 (1): 1–30. doi: 10.1075/dia.33.1.01jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.1.01jac [Google Scholar]
  27. 2016b Subjects, objects and relativization in Japhug. Journal of Chinese Linguistics44 (1): 1–28. doi: 10.1353/jcl.2016.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2016.0005 [Google Scholar]
  28. . to appear. Generic person marking in Japhug and other Rgyalrong languages. In Joana Jansen & Spike Gildea (eds.) Diachrony of hierarchical systems, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jacques, Guillaume , Anton Antonov , Yunfan Lai & Lobsang Nima
    . to appear. Stau. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.) The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jacques, Guillaume & Alexis Michaud
    2011 Approaching the historical phonology of three highly eroded Sino-Tibetan languages: Naxi, Na and Laze. Diachronica28 (4): 468–498. doi: 10.1075/dia.28.4.02jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.28.4.02jac [Google Scholar]
  31. Lai, Yunfan
    2013 La morphologie affixale du lavrung wobzi. Université Paris III MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2014 Causative constructions in Wobzi. In 14th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics , 319–336. Taipei: Academia Sinica. iscll-14.ling.sinica.edu.tw/files-pdf/Papers/Session7/Lai.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2015 The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society113 (3): 271–285. doi: 10.1111/1467‑968X.12051
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12051 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lehmann, Christian
    1984Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen - Theorie seiner Funktionen - Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: G. Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lin, Xiangrong
    1993Jiarongyu yanjiu 嘉戎語研究 (A study on the Rgyalrong language). Chengdu: Sichuan minzu chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lin, Youjing
    2002 A dimension missed: East and west in situ rGyalrong orientation marking. Language and Linguistics3 (1): 27–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2011 Perfective and imperfective from the same source: Directional “down” in rGyalrong. Diachronica28 (1): 54–81. doi: 10.1075/dia.28.1.03lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.28.1.03lin [Google Scholar]
  38. Lín, Yòujīng
    2003 Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique - Asie Orientale32 (2): 245–286. doi: 10.3406/clao.2003.1633
    https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.2003.1633 [Google Scholar]
  39. Matsumoto, Yoshiko
    1988Grammar and semantics of adnominal clauses in Japanese: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Michailovsky, Boyd , Martine Mazaudon , Alexis Michaud , Séverine Guillaume , Alexandre François & Evangelia Adamou
    2014 Documenting and researching endangered languages: the Pangloss collection. Language Documentation and Conservation8: 119–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Nikitina, Tatiana
    2012 Logophoric discourse and first person reporting in Wan (West Africa). Anthropological Linguistics54 (3): 280–301. doi: 10.1353/anl.2012.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2012.0013 [Google Scholar]
  42. Post, Mark W
    2015 Sino-Tibetan negation and the case of Galo: Explaining a distributional oddity in diachronic terms. Language and Linguistics16 (3): 431–464. doi: 10.1177/1606822X15569168
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X15569168 [Google Scholar]
  43. Prins, Marielle
    2011A web of relations: A grammar of rGyalrong Jiaomuzu (Kyom-kyo) dialects: Leiden University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Shirai, Satoko
    2009 Directional prefixes in nDrapa and neighboring languages: An areal feature of western Sichuan. In Yasuhiko Nagano (ed.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics ( Senri Ethnological Studies 75 ), 7–20. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sun, Hongkai
    1983 Liujiangliuyu de minzu yuyan jiqi xishu fenlei 六江流 域的民族语言及其系属分类 (Minority languages of the Six River Valley and their genetic classification). Minzu xuebao3: 99–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sun, Jackson T.-S
    2000a Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics1 (1): 161–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2000b Stem alternations in Puxi verb inflection: Toward validating the rGyalrongic subgroup in Qiangic. Language and Linguistics1 (2): 211–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2003 Caodeng rGyalrong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 490–502. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2004 Verb-Stem variations in Showu rGyalrong. In Ying-chin Lin , Fang-min Hsu Hsu , Chun-chih Lee , Jackson T.-S. Sun , Hsiu-fang Yang Yang , & Daan Ho (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan Languages: Papers in Honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on His Seventieth Birthday ( Language and Linguistics Monograph Series W4 ), 269–296.Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2006 草登嘉戎語的關係句 Caodeng Jiarongyu de guanxiju (Relative clauses in the Tshobdun language). Language and Linguistics7 (4): 905–933.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2007 Morphological causative formation in Shangzhai Horpa. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics1(2). 207–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2012 Complementation in Caodeng rGyalrong. Language and Linguistics13(3). 471–498.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 2014 Sino-Tibetan: Rgyalrong. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 630–650. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Youjing Lin
    2007 Constructional variation in rGyalrong relativization: How to make a choice? In Pre-Conference Proceedings of the International Workshop on Relative Clauses , 205–226. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Shidanluo
    2002 Caodeng Jiarongyu yu rentong dengdi xiangguan de yufa xianxiang 草登嘉戎語與「認同等第」相關的語 法現象 (Empathy Hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar). Language and Linguistics3 (1): 79–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2004 草登嘉戎語的狀貌詞 Cǎodēng Jiāróngyǔ de zhuàngmàocí (The ideophones in Tshobdun Rgyalrong). Minzu yuwen 民族語文5: 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Thurgood, Graham
    . to appear. Sino-Tibetan: Genetic and areal subgroups. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.) The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tournadre, Nicolas
    2008 Arguments against the concept of ‘Conjunct’ / ‘Disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber , Marianne Volkart & Paul Widmer (eds.), Festscrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281–308. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Van Valin, Robert & Randy LaPolla
    1997Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  60. Wei, Jie-Wu
    2001Verbal prefixation in Zhuokeji Rgyalrong: the problem of kə-/ka- alternation. National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error