1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2589-2053
  • E-ISSN: 2589-207x

Abstract

Abstract

This article reports a small classroom-based study that has explored task-based peer interactions among grade 9 secondary school students ( = 14) of middle and low relative proficiency. Drawing primarily on audio recordings of peer interactions, oral presentations, and post-task interviews, and conducted by the teacher-researcher, it investigated how students interacted on an output task that was embedded in regular EFL lessons and designed to wrap up the unit work centered around the topic Down Under. A particular focus was on exploring to what extent and how students used the language that the task was meant to trigger, namely future tense and unit-related vocabulary. The aim was to inquire whether the task worked in the way it was designed for. The findings have shown that although students were involved with the task and with each other’s contributions, the use of the targeted structure elicited by the task remained limited. Pedagogical implications are discussed.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ltyl.00039.kos
2023-11-17
2025-06-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ltyl.00039.kos.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ltyl.00039.kos&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adams, R., & Oliver, R.
    (2019) Teaching through peer interaction. Routledge: New York, New York. 10.4324/9781315115696
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315115696 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L.
    (2008) Does writing influence learner attention to form?InD. Belcher, Hirvela, A. (Eds.), The oral/literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking/writing connections (pp.243–267). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Breen, M.
    (1987) Learner contributions to task design. InC. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp.23–46). London: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2020a) L2 grammar learning through a collaborative writing task. InW. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching (pp.20–39). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.55.01cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.01cal [Google Scholar]
  5. Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. del P.
    (2020b) Child EFL learners’ attitudes towards a collaborative writing task. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2(1), 52–72. 10.1075/ltyl.19008.cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19008.cal [Google Scholar]
  6. Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2021) Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: when form is not at odds with communication, Language Awareness, 30(1), 1–16. 10.1080/09658416.2020.1751178
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1751178 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, W.
    (2020) Disagreement in peer interaction: Its effect on learner task performance. System, 881, 102–179. 10.1016/j.system.2019.102179
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102179 [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins, L. & J. White
    (2014) The quantity and quality of language practice in typical interactive pair/group tasks. TESL Canada Journal, 31(8), 47–67. 10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1186
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1186 [Google Scholar]
  9. DeKeyser, R.
    (2015) Skill acquisition theory. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (pp.94–112). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Marco, H., & Rutledge, E.
    (2009) Orange Line 5. Grundkurs. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Duchesne, S., McMaugh, A., Bochner, S., & Krause, K.
    (2013) Educational psychology for learning and teaching (4th ed.). Melbourne: Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R.
    (2019) Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 454–475. 10.1177/1362168818765315
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818765315 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2003) Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2016) Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428. 10.1177/1362168816628627
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816628627 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2017a) Task-based language teaching. InLoewen, S., and M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (pp.108–125) New York, USA; Oxon, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2017b) Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507–526. 10.1017/S0261444817000179
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000179 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellis, R., Li, S., & Zhu, Y.
    (2019) The effects of pre-task explicit instruction on the performance of a focused task. System, 801, 38–47. 10.1016/j.system.2018.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Martínez-Adrián, M.
    (2022) Task-modality effects on young learners’ language-related episodes in collaborative dialogue. Revista Española de Lingüistica Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 480–512. 10.1075/resla.20020.gal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.20020.gal [Google Scholar]
  20. García Mayo, M. P. & Imaz Agirre, A.
    (2019) Task modality and pair formation method:their impact on patterns of interaction and attention to form among EFL primary school children. System, 801, 175-185. 10.1016/j.system.2018.11.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.011 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L.
    (2005) Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language learning, 55(4), 575–611. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00318.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Hidalgo, M. A. & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2021) The influence of task repetition type on young learners’ attention to form. Language Teaching Research, 25(4), 565-586. 10.1177/1362168819865559
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819865559 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kos, T.
    (2019) Peer assistance among mixed-age pairs in mixed-age EFL secondary school classrooms in Germany. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 61-112. 10.1515/eujal‑2017‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0013 [Google Scholar]
  24. Loewen, S., & Sato, M.
    (2018) Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language teaching, 51(3), 285–329. 10.1017/S0261444818000125
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125 [Google Scholar]
  25. Long, M. H.
    (1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. InK. Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp.39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon [Google Scholar]
  26. (2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R.
    (1993) Grammar and task-based methodology. Multilingual Matters, 123–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Martínez Adrián, M. & Gallardo del Puerto, F.
    (2021) Task modality and language-related episodes in young learners: An attempt to manage accuracy and editing. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). 10.1177/13621688211052808
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211052808 [Google Scholar]
  29. Philp, J., Adams, A., & Iwashita, N.
    (2014) Peer interaction and second language learning. New York: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sample, E. & Michel, M.
    (2014) An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, Accuracy and fluency in young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 311, 23–46. 10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1185
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1185 [Google Scholar]
  31. Samuda, V.
    (2013) Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. InBygate, M., Skehan, P., Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks (pp.119–140). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.
    (2008) Tasks in Second Language Learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230596429
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596429 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sato, M.
    (2016) Collaborative mindset, collaborative interaction, and L2 development: An affective-social-cognitive model. Language Learning, 67(2). 10.1111/lang.12214
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12214 [Google Scholar]
  34. Shak, J., & Gardner, S.
    (2008) Young learner perspectives on four focus-on-form tasks. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 387–408. 10.1177/1362168808089923
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089923 [Google Scholar]
  35. Skehan, P.
    (1996) A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 171, 38–62. 10.1093/applin/17.1.38
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38 [Google Scholar]
  36. (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M.
    (2008) Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated?. TESOL quarterly, 42(2), 181–207. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Storch, N.
    (1999) Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy. System, 27(3), 363–374. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(99)00031‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00031-7 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2002) Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00179
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2008) Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language awareness, 17(2), 95–114. 10.1080/09658410802146644
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802146644 [Google Scholar]
  41. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
    (1998) Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together. The Modern Language Journal, 821, 320–337. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01209.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x [Google Scholar]
  42. (2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. M. Bygate, P. Skehan, M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.99–118). Longman: Harlow, England.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. VanPatten, B.
    (1990) Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 287–301. 10.1017/S0272263100009177
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009177 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2017) Processing instruction. InS. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp.166–180). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-10 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wajnryb, R.
    (1990) Grammar dictation (Vol.31). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Williams, J.
    (2012) The potential role (s) of writing in second language development. Journal of second language writing, 21(4), 321–331. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  47. Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N.
    (2016) Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty: An EFL classroom-based study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 239–263. 10.1017/S0272263115000509
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000509 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ltyl.00039.kos
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ltyl.00039.kos
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error