oa Engagement in oral production

References

1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C.
   (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson Education.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Webster, R.
   (2015) The challenges of implementing group work in primary school classrooms and including pupils with special educational needs. Education 3–13, 43(1), 15–29. 10.1080/03004279.2015.961689
   https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.961689 [Google Scholar]
3. Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y.
   (2016) Engagement with the language: How examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. InM. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp.209–240). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/lllt.45.09bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.09bar [Google Scholar]
4. Behr, H.
   (2005) Comparing rural and urban primary education in the Mekong Delta. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, 4141. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/414
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bock, A. K., & Erickson, K. A.
   (2015) The influence of teacher epistemology and practice on student engagement in literacy learning. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(2), 138–153. 10.1177/1540796915591987
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915591987 [Google Scholar]
6. Borg, S.
   (2006) Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brophy, J.
   (2008) Developing students’ appreciation for what is taught in school. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 132–141. 10.1080/00461520701756511
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701756511 [Google Scholar]
8. Bundick, M. J., Quaglia, R. J., Corso, M. J., & Haywood, D. E.
   (2014) Promoting student engagement in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1–34. 10.1177/016146811411600411
   https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600411 [Google Scholar]
9. Bygate, M., & Samuda, V.
   (2009) Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose, and engagement within the interaction approach. InA. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp.96–122). Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cameron, L.
    (2001) Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511733109
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733109 [Google Scholar]
11. Cazden, C. B.
    (1988) Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dornyei, Z., & Kormos, J.
    (2000) The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275–300. 10.1177/136216880000400305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400305 [Google Scholar]
13. Ellis, G.
    (1995) Storytelling and storybooks: A broader version of the communicative approach. The Journal of TESOL France- British Council, 2(1), 89–100.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Finn, J. D., Folger, J., & Cox, D.
    (1991, 1991/06/01). Measuring participation among elementary grade students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 393–402. 10.1177/0013164491512013
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164491512013 [Google Scholar]
15. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H.
    (2004) School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. 10.3102/00346543074001059
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 [Google Scholar]
16. Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W.
    (2012) The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. InS. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.763–782). Springer US. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑2018‑7_37
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37 [Google Scholar]
17. Frey, N., Fisher, D., & Everlove, S.
    (2009) Productive group work: How to engage students, build teamwork, and promote understanding. ASCD.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gibbs, R., & Poskitt, J.
    (2010) Student engagement in the middle years of schooling (Years 7–10): A literature review report to the Ministry of Education. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/74935/940_Student-Engagement-19052010.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
19. Grassick, L. J.
    (2016) Complexity, connections and sense-making: Stakeholder experiences of primary English language curriculum change in one province in Vietnam [PhD], University of Leeds.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Guthrie, G.
    (2010) Basic research methods: An entry to social science research. SAGE. 10.4135/9788132105961
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132105961 [Google Scholar]
21. Guvenc, H.
    (2015) The relationship between teachers’ motivational support and engagement versus disaffection. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 647–657.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L.
    (2010) Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. 10.1037/a0019682
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682 [Google Scholar]
23. Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D.
    (1995) The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Prentice Hall Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kutnick, P., & Blatchford, P.
    (2014) Effective group work in primary school classrooms: The SPRinG approach. Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑6991‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6991-5 [Google Scholar]
25. Ladd, G. W.
    (2013) Peer influences in elementary school. InJ. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp.205–208). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Macalister, J.
    (2010) Investigating teacher attitudes to extensive reading practices in higher education: Why isn’t everyone doing it?RELC Journal, 41(1), 59–75. 10.1177/0033688210362609
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210362609 [Google Scholar]
27. Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V.
    (2003) Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. InR. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. J. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, J. Nakamura, & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp.60–90). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195149005.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195149005.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
28. Morgan, J., & Rinvolucri, M.
    (1983) Once upon a time: Using stories in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Newton, J., & Nguyen, B. T. T.
    (2019) Task repetition and the public performance of speaking tasks in EFL classes at a Vietnamese high school. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 1(1), 34–56. 10.1075/ltyl.00004.new
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00004.new [Google Scholar]
30. O’Donnell, A. M.
    (2006) The role of peers and group learning. InP. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp.781–802). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip064/2005035459.html
    https://doi.org/http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip064/2005035459.html [Google Scholar]
31. Phillips, S.
    (1993) Young learners. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Philp, J., & Duchesne, S.
    (2016, 03/2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 50–72. 10.1017/S0267190515000094
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094 [Google Scholar]
33. Philp, J., & Tognini, R.
    (2009) Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3–4), 245–266. 10.1515/iral.2009.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.011 [Google Scholar]
34. Pintrich, P. R.
    (2003) Motivation and classroom learning. InW. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp.103–122). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10.1002/0471264385.wei0706
    https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0706 [Google Scholar]
35. Resnick, L. B.
    (1987) Education and learning to think. National Academies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P.
    (2012) Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700–712. 10.1037/a0027268
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027268 [Google Scholar]
37. Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T.
    (2015) To what extent do teacher–student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning?Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 170–185. 10.1037/a0037252
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037252 [Google Scholar]
38. Rogers, E. M.
    (2003) Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Schlechty, P. C.
    (1994) Increasing student engagement. Missouri Leadership Academy.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schlechty, P. C.
    (2011) Engaging students: The next level of working on the work. Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Shawer, S. F.
    (2010, 2/2010) Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 173–184. 10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.015 [Google Scholar]
42. Shintani, N.
    (2016) Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.9 [Google Scholar]
43. Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R.
    (2012) Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. InS. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.21–44). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑2018‑7_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2 [Google Scholar]
44. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T.
    (2005) Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–101. 10.1002/j.2168‑9830.2005.tb00831.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x [Google Scholar]
45. Storch, N.
    (2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00179
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179 [Google Scholar]
46. Storch, N.
    (2007) Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language teaching research : LTR, 11(2), 143–159. 10.1177/1362168807074600
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807074600 [Google Scholar]
47. Swain, M.
    (2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. InJ. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp.97–114). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
    (1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01209.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x [Google Scholar]
49. Wang, Z., Bergin, D. A., & Bergin, C. A.
    (2014) Measuring engagement in fourth to twelfth grade classrooms: The Classroom Engagement Inventory. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 517–535. 10.1037/spq0000050
    https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000050 [Google Scholar]
50. Willms, J. D.
    (2003) Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation, results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
    [Google Scholar]