Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in

Complementizers and variation in the CP, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/lv.00009.gar-1.gif


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Arsenijević, Boban
    (2009) ‘Clausal complementation as relativization’. Lingua119, 39–50. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Benincà, Paola
    (2006) ‘A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance’, inR. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger, and P. Portner (eds) Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture: Cross-linguistic Investigations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 53–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto
    (2004) ‘Topic, Focus and V2 – Defining the CP sublayers’, inL. Rizzi (ed.) The Structure of IP and CP: Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 2. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 52–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomsky, Noam
    (2000) ‘Minimalist inquiries: the framework’, inR. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2001) ‘Derivation by phase’, inM. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2004) ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy’, inA. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 3. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 104–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cinque, Guglielmo
    (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2013) Typological Studies. Word Order and Relative Clause. New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi
    (2010) ‘The Cartography of syntactic structures’, inB. Heine and H. Narrog (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Featherston, Sam & Yannick Versley
    (2016) (eds.) Quantitative Approaches to Grammar and Grammatical Change. Perspectives from Germanic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110401929
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110401929 [Google Scholar]
  11. Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl
    (2007) ‘Types of Topics in German and Italian’, inS. Winkler and K. Schwabe (eds.) On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87–116. 10.1075/la.100.07fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.07fra [Google Scholar]
  12. Garzonio, Jacopo & Cecilia Poletto
    (2018) ‘Exploiting microvariation: How to make your best with incomplete data’. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 112. 10.5334/gjgl.556.
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.556 [Google Scholar]
  13. Giorgi, Alessandra
    (2010) About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill
    (2013) ‘The syntacticization of discourse’, inR. Folli, C. Sevdali & R. Truswell (eds.) Syntax and its Limits. NewYork/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 370–390. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hill, Virginia
    (2007) ‘Romanian adverbs and the pragmatic field’. The Linguistic Review24. 61–86. 10.1515/TLR.2007.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2007.003 [Google Scholar]
  16. Himmelmann, Nikolaus
    (2012) ‘Linguistic Data types and the interface between language documentation and description’. Language Documentation and Conservation6, 187–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kayne, Richard S.
    (1975) French Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2005) ‘Some notes on comparative syntax with special reference to English and French’, inG. Cinque & R. S. Kayne (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2010) ‘Why isn’t This a complementizer?’, in: R. S. Kayne (ed.). Comparison and Contrasts. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 190–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Manzini, M. Rita
    (2009) ‘Pro, pro and NP-trace (raising) are interpretations’, in: K. Grohmann (ed.) Phase Theory: Features, Arguments, Interpretations. Amsterdam/Oxford: Elsevier, 131–180. 10.1515/9783110213966.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213966.131 [Google Scholar]
  21. Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia
    (2005) I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Ed. dell’Orso.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2011) Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511974489
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974489 [Google Scholar]
  23. Munaro, Nicola
    (2010) ‘Towards a hierarchy of clause types, inP. Benincà & N. Munaro (eds.) Mapping the Left Periphery, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 125–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Panagiotidis, Phoevos
    (2010) ‘Introduction: Complementizers and their Phase’, inP. Panagiotidis (ed.) The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1–13. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584352.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584352.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rizzi, Luigi
    (1997) ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, inL. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2001) ‘On the position “int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause’, inG. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.) Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 267–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2004) ‘Locality and left periphery’, inA. Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 3. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 223–251.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2014) ‘Some consequences of Criterial Freezing: Asymmetries, anti-adjacency and extraction from cleft sentences’, inP. Svenonius (ed.) Functional Structure from Top to Toe. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 9. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–54. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740390.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740390.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci
    (2017) ‘Left Periphery of the clause: primarily illustrated for Italian’, inM. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd Edition. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom104
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom104 [Google Scholar]
  30. Schütze, Carson
    (2016) The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603356
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603356 [Google Scholar]
  31. Shlonsky, Ur & Gabriela Soare
    (2011) ‘Where’s ‘Why’?’. Linguistic Inquiry42, 651–669. 10.1162/LING_a_00064
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00064 [Google Scholar]
  32. Speas, Peggy & Carol L. Tenny
    (2003) ‘Configurational properties of point of view roles’, inA. M. Di Sciullo (ed.) Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 315–344. 10.1075/la.57.15spe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe [Google Scholar]
  33. Stowell, Timothy
    (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
  34. Van Koppen, Marjo
    (2017) ‘Complementizer Agreement’, inM. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd Edition. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom061
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom061 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error