1887
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lv.00009.gar
2019-02-01
2021-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arsenijević, Boban
    (2009) ‘Clausal complementation as relativization’. Lingua119, 39–50. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Benincà, Paola
    (2006) ‘A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance’, in R. Zanuttini , H. Campos , E. Herburger , and P. Portner (eds) Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture: Cross-linguistic Investigations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 53–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto
    (2004) ‘Topic, Focus and V2 – Defining the CP sublayers’, in L. Rizzi (ed.) The Structure of IP and CP: Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 2. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 52–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomsky, Noam
    (2000) ‘Minimalist inquiries: the framework’, in R. Martin , D. Michaels , and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2001) ‘Derivation by phase’, in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2004) ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy’, in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 3. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 104–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cinque, Guglielmo
    (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2013) Typological Studies. Word Order and Relative Clause. New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi
    (2010) ‘The Cartography of syntactic structures’, in B. Heine and H. Narrog (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Featherston, Sam & Yannick Versley
    (2016) (eds.) Quantitative Approaches to Grammar and Grammatical Change. Perspectives from Germanic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110401929
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110401929 [Google Scholar]
  11. Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl
    (2007) ‘Types of Topics in German and Italian’, in S. Winkler and K. Schwabe (eds.) On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87–116. 10.1075/la.100.07fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.07fra [Google Scholar]
  12. Garzonio, Jacopo & Cecilia Poletto
    (2018) ‘Exploiting microvariation: How to make your best with incomplete data’. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 112. 10.5334/gjgl.556.
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.556 [Google Scholar]
  13. Giorgi, Alessandra
    (2010) About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill
    (2013) ‘The syntacticization of discourse’, in R. Folli , C. Sevdali & R. Truswell (eds.) Syntax and its Limits. NewYork/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 370–390. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hill, Virginia
    (2007) ‘Romanian adverbs and the pragmatic field’. The Linguistic Review24. 61–86. 10.1515/TLR.2007.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2007.003 [Google Scholar]
  16. Himmelmann, Nikolaus
    (2012) ‘Linguistic Data types and the interface between language documentation and description’. Language Documentation and Conservation6, 187–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kayne, Richard S.
    (1975) French Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2005) ‘Some notes on comparative syntax with special reference to English and French’, in G. Cinque & R. S. Kayne (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2010) ‘Why isn’t This a complementizer?’, in: R. S. Kayne (ed.). Comparison and Contrasts. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 190–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Manzini, M. Rita
    (2009) ‘Pro, pro and NP-trace (raising) are interpretations’, in: K. Grohmann (ed.) Phase Theory: Features, Arguments, Interpretations. Amsterdam/Oxford: Elsevier, 131–180. 10.1515/9783110213966.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213966.131 [Google Scholar]
  21. Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia
    (2005) I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Ed. dell’Orso.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2011) Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511974489
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974489 [Google Scholar]
  23. Munaro, Nicola
    (2010) ‘Towards a hierarchy of clause types, in P. Benincà & N. Munaro (eds.) Mapping the Left Periphery, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 125–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Panagiotidis, Phoevos
    (2010) ‘Introduction: Complementizers and their Phase’, in P. Panagiotidis (ed.) The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1–13. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584352.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584352.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rizzi, Luigi
    (1997) ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in L. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2001) ‘On the position “int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause’, in G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.) Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 267–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2004) ‘Locality and left periphery’, in A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 3. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 223–251.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2014) ‘Some consequences of Criterial Freezing: Asymmetries, anti-adjacency and extraction from cleft sentences’, in P. Svenonius (ed.) Functional Structure from Top to Toe. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 9. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–54. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740390.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740390.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci
    (2017) ‘Left Periphery of the clause: primarily illustrated for Italian’, in M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd Edition. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom104
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom104 [Google Scholar]
  30. Schütze, Carson
    (2016) The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603356
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603356 [Google Scholar]
  31. Shlonsky, Ur & Gabriela Soare
    (2011) ‘Where’s ‘Why’?’. Linguistic Inquiry42, 651–669. 10.1162/LING_a_00064
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00064 [Google Scholar]
  32. Speas, Peggy & Carol L. Tenny
    (2003) ‘Configurational properties of point of view roles’, in A. M. Di Sciullo (ed.) Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 315–344. 10.1075/la.57.15spe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe [Google Scholar]
  33. Stowell, Timothy
    (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Koppen, Marjo
    (2017) ‘Complementizer Agreement’, in M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd Edition. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom061
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom061 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.00009.gar
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error