Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-6834
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6842
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The Verb-second (V2) phenomenon is one of the central issues of modern linguistic theory. This volume examines V2 from a micro-perspective, comparing various languages and periods. At the heart of the work presented here lies the clear assumption that Verb-second is by no means a unitary phenomenon, but rather a heterogenous and rich system that affects languages in various ways.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. clari Robert de Clari: La Conquête de Constantinople
    clari Robert de Clari: La Conquête de Constantinople 1924, Philippe Lauer (ed). Paris: Champion. catalog.bfm-corpus.org/clari
  2. eneas1 Anonymous: Eneas
    eneas1 Anonymous: Eneas 1925, Jean-Jacques Salverda de Grave (ed). Paris: Champion. catalog.bfm-corpus.org/eneas1
  3. graal_cm Anonymous: Queste del saint Graal
    graal_cm Anonymous: Queste del saint Graal 2013, Christiane Marchello-Nizia et Alexei Lavrentiev (eds). Lyon: EquipeBFM. catalog.bfmcorpus.org/qgraal_cm
  4. MortArtu La Mort du roi Arthur
    MortArtuLa Mort du roi Arthur 2009, David F. Hult (ed), Paris: Livre de Poche. 10.4074/S0336150009001057
  5. Adams, Marianne
    1989 Verb second effects in Medieval French. InC. Kirschner and J. DeCesaris, editors, Studies in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Seventeenth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (XVII. LSRL), Rutgers University, 27–29 March 1987, Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4 Current Issues in Linguistic Theory; 60, pages1–33. J. Benjamins, Amsterdam. 10.1075/cilt.60.02ada
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.60.02ada [Google Scholar]
  6. Axel, Katrin
    2007Studies on Old High German Syntax. Number 112 in Linguistik Aktuell. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam. 10.1075/la.112
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.112 [Google Scholar]
  7. Benincà, Paola
    2006 A Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance. InRaffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger, and Paul H. Portner, editors, Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: negation, tense, and clausal architecture, pages53–86. Georgetown University Press, Washington D.C..
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Benincà, Paola and Cecilia Poletto
    2004 Topic, Focus, and V2. InLuigi Rizzi, editor, The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, volume 2 of Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, pages52–75. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cinque, Guglielmo and Luigi Rizzi
    2008 The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Besten, Hans den
    1983 On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. InWerner Abraham, editor, On the formal syntax of the Westgermania: papers from the “3rd Groningen Grammar Talks” Groningen, January 1981, Linguistik aktuell, pages47–132. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. 10.1075/la.3.03bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.3.03bes [Google Scholar]
  11. Eide, Kristin Melum
    2011 Norwegian (non-V2) declaratives, resumptive elements, and the Wackernagel position. Nordic Journal ofLinguistics, 34 (2):179–213. 10.1017/S0332586511000163
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586511000163 [Google Scholar]
  12. Eide, Kristin Melum and Hilde Sollid
    2011 Norwegian main clause declaratives: variation within and across grammars. InPeter Siemund, editor, Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, pages317–350. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin. 10.1515/9783110238068.327
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238068.327 [Google Scholar]
  13. Eide, Kristine Gunn
    2006 Word order structures and unaccusative verbs in classical and modern Portuguese: the reorganisation of information structure. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
  14. 2016 ENS de Lyon, Laboratoire IHRIM. Bfm – base de français médiéval en ligne. Digital corpus: txm.bfm-corpus.org 2016.
  15. Foulet, Lucien
    1930Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Champion, Paris, 3e edition.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Frascarelli, Mara and Roland Hinterhölzl
    2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. InKerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, editors, On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam. 10.1075/la.100.07fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.07fra [Google Scholar]
  17. Greco, Ciro and Liliane Haegeman
    . in press. Frame setters and the microvariation of subject-initial v2. InRebecca Woods, Sam Wolfe, and Theresa Biberauer editors Rethinking V2. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haegeman, Liliane
    1996 Verb second, the split CP, and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP, 4:135–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haegeman, Liliane and Ciro Greco
    2018a West flemish v3 and the interaction of syntax and discourse. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 21(1):1–56. 10.1007/s10828‑018‑9093‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-018-9093-9 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2018b Main clause external constituents and the derivation of subject-initial verb second. Nederlandse taalkunde, 23 (1):23–55. 10.5117/NEDTAA2018.1.HAEG
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2018.1.HAEG [Google Scholar]
  21. Holmberg, Anders
    2015 Verb Second. InT. Kiss and A. Alexiadou, editors, Syntax – an International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research, HSK Series. Walter de Gruyter Verlag, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hooper, Joan and Sandra Thompson
    1973 On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 4:465–497.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Julien, Marit
    2009 Embedded clauses with main clause word order in mainland scandinavian. LingBuzz.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2015 The force of V2 revisited. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 18:139–181. 10.1007/s10828‑015‑9073‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-015-9073-2 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaiser, Georg A.
    2002Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Number 465 in Linguistische Arbeiten. Max Niemayer Verlag, Tübingen. 10.1515/9783110911640
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911640 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kiparsky, Paul
    1995 Indo-european Origins of Germanic Syntax. InAdrian Battye and Ian Roberts, editors, Clause Structure and Language Change, Oxford studies in comparative syntax. Oxford University Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Klævik-Pettersen, Espen Johan
    2018 Inversion, V-to-C, and verb-seond: An investigation into the syntax and word order of Old French and Late Latin. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
  28. Labelle, Marie
    2007 Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua, 117:289–316. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ledgeway, Adam
    2012From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2017 Late latin verb second: The sentential word order of the itinerarium egeriae. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 16:163–216. 10.5565/rev/catjl.212
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.212 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mathieu, Éric
    2007a À propos des propri’et’es germaniques de l’ancien français. Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa/Ottawa Papers in Linguistics, 35:107–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mathieu, ’Eric
    2007b À propos des propri’et’es germaniques de l’ancien français. Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa/Ottawa Papers in Linguistics, 35:107–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Østbø, Christine Bjerkan
    2007 The function word ‘så’ and Norwegian CP syntax. Handout.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Poletto, Cecilia
    2002 The left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance dialects: a new view on V2 and V3. InSusanne van der Kleij Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips, editor, Syntactic Microvariation. The Meertens Institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2014Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660247.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660247.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rinke, Esther and Jürgen M. Meisel
    2009 Subject inversion in Old French: Syntax and Information Structure. InG. A. Kaiser and E.-M. Remberger, editors, Proceedings of the Workshop “Null-subjects, expletives, and locatives in Romance”, number Arbeitspapier 123 inKonstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, pages93–130. Universität Konstanz, Constance.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine Structure of the Left Periphery. InLiliane Haegeman, editor, Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Kluwer international handbooks of linguistics; vol.1, pages281–337. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2001 On the Position “Int(errogative)” in the Left Periphery of the Clause. InGuglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, editors, Current Studies in Italian Syntax, pages287–296. Elsevier, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2002 Locality and Left Periphery. InA. Belletti, editor, Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, volume3. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Roberts, Ian
    2004 The C-system in Brythonic Celtic Languages, V2 and the EPP. InLuigi Rizzi, editor, The Structure ofCP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, volume 2 of Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, pages297–328. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Roberts, Ian G.
    1993Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: a Comparative History of English and French. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory; vol.28. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rögnvaldsson, Eirikur and Hoskuldur Thrainsson
    1990 On icelandic word order once more. Syntax and Semantics, 24:3–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg
    . in press. Resumptive Particles and Verb Second. InRebecca Woods, Sam Wolfe, and Theresa Biberauer editors Rethinking V2. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg and George Walkden
    2017 Diagnosing embedded V2 in Old French and Old English. InEric Mathieu and Robert Truswell, editors, From Micro-change to Macro-change. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 10.1093/oso/9780198747840.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198747840.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  45. Salvi, Giampaolo
    2004La formazione della struttura di frase romanza: ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fur romanische Philologie; Bd.323. Max Niemeyer, Tübingen. 10.1515/9783110945508
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110945508 [Google Scholar]
  46. Schwartz, Bonnie D. and Sten Vikner
    1996 The Verb always leaves IP in V2 clauses. InLuigi Rizzi and Adriana Belletti, editors, Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, pages244–302. Oxford University Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sitaridou, Ioanna
    2012 A comparative study of word order in old romance. Folia Linguistica, 46(2):23–34. 10.1515/flin.2012.019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.019 [Google Scholar]
  48. Skårup, Povl
    1975Les premieres zones de la proposition en ancien franais : essai de syntaxe de position. Revue Romane, Copenhagen.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Thurneysen, R.
    1892 Zur Stellung des Verbums im Altfranzösischen. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, XVI:289–307.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vance, Barbara S.
    1997Syntactic Change in Medieval French: Verb-Second and Null Subjects. Studies in natural language and linguistic theory; vol.41. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8843‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8843-0 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vanelli, Laura, Lorenzo Renzi, and Paola Benincà
    1985 Typologie des Pronoms Sujets dans les Langues Romanes. InLinguistique descriptive: Phon’etique, morphologie et lexique. Actes du XVIIe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes, Aix-en-Provence: Universit’e de Provence.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Walkden, George
    2015 Verb-third in early West Germanic: a comparative perspective. InTheresa Biberauer and George Walkden, editors, Syntax over time, pages236–248. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0014 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Kristine Bentzen, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson, and þorbjörg Hróarsdóttir
    2009 On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua, 119:1914–1938. 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wolfe, Sam
    2015a Medieval Sardinian: New Evidence for Syntactic Change from Latin to Romance. InDag T. T. Haug, editor, Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected Papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo 5–9 August 2013, pages303–324. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. 10.1075/cilt.334.16wol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.334.16wol [Google Scholar]
  55. 2015b Microvariation in Medieval Romance Syntax, A Comparative Study. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  56. 2018Verb Second in Medieval Romance. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198804673.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198804673.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  57. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
    1991 Clitics in dutch: evidence for the position of infl. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik, 33(71–92).
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error